Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
173
130 employees · 43 contractors · 41 on an average day Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Prescott, AZ
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 7 points below the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 7 points below the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Prescott, AZ
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 7 points below the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — 7 points below the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation is a nursing home and skilled nursing community in Prescott, Arizona. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock for residents who need ongoing clinical support, and the 128 bed community may be a good fit for someone whose needs require a nursing home setting rather than assistance with daily tasks alone.
Private rooms and rooms shared with another resident are available, giving each person a choice between having a room to themselves and sharing one. Medicare, Medicaid and private pay are accepted, so families can use the payment source that matches the resident’s coverage or finances.
Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 3 minutes per resident each day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Dallin Hammond administers Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation, and Ensign Services operates it; landscaped grounds provide outdoor areas on the property, while the diverse activities program offers organized options for residents’ daily routines.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q3 2025 (July 1 – September 30, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m6 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
24m
↓ 44% · AZ 43mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 44% below the Arizona average of 43m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
12 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 52 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
52 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
56m
↓ 10% · AZ 1h 3mThis facility: 56m per resident per day, 10% below the Arizona average of 1h 3m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 52 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
52 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 51 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
69 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
1h 43m
↓ 28% · AZ 2h 22mThis facility: 1h 43m per resident per day, 28% below the Arizona average of 2h 22m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 51 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
69 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 47% · AZ 6mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 47% below the Arizona average of 6m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 58m
↓ 18% · AZ 3h 38mThis facility: 2h 58m per resident per day, 18% below the Arizona average of 3h 38m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
23m
↓ 26% · AZ 31mThis facility: 23m per resident per day, 26% below the Arizona average of 31m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
173
130 employees · 43 contractors · 41 on an average day
173 total staff / 98 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q3 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.77 : 1
↑ 10% · AZ 1.61This facility: 1.77 staff per resident, 10% above the Arizona average of 1.61 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
173 staff ÷ 98 residents
See full Arizona ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.6 h
↑ 1% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 8.6 h, 1% above the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
32,545 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →95.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (23), Certified Nursing Assistant (18), Registered Nurse (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
128
Rank #20 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
128
Rank #20 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #42 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #42 / 53Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 53 nursing homes we track in Arizona for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Arizona facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
5
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #53 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #53 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
32
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #25 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #25 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
79.1%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 128 beds.
Higher than the Arizona average: 73.3%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
101
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
37
days
About This Community
Facility TypeOutpatient Treatment Center
StatusActive
IssuanceNovember 5, 2020
ExpirationOctober 31, 2026 Expires today
License NumberOTC10483
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation is administered by Dallin Hammond.
OwnerWatson Woods Healthcare, Inc.
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
78 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
7 points below the Arizona average for CMS-certified facilities (85/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
58 severity-weighted points (32 deficiencies) · 53% higher than the typical CMS-certified AZ facility (median: 38)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
45 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified AZ facility (median: 41)
Total health inspections
9
↑ 36% · AZ 6.6This facility: 9, 36% above the Arizona average of 6.6 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
32
Rank #52 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arizona State average, with a ranking across all 61 AZ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 47% · AZ 21.7This facility: 32, 47% above the Arizona average of 21.7 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.56
Rank #41 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arizona mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 2% · AZ 3.49This facility: 3.56, 2% above the Arizona average of 3.49 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
32 of 32 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.5 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
32
↑ 52% · AZ 21This facility: 32, 52% above the Arizona average of 21 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 26, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 8 of 32 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 26, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 07, 2026
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 02, 2024
10 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 06, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 24, 2024
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 25, 2024
2 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 11, 2023
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 13, 2023
8 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 32 citations
Quality of Life & Care
8 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (22%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (13%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (6%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
18 of 32 citations resulted from standard inspections; 10 of 32 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 32 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
AZ avg $31KArizona average: $31,098. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AZ avg 1.72Arizona average: 1.72. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AZ avg 0.13Arizona average: 0.13. Average among the 39 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arizona average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 12% · AZ 6.8This facility: 7.7, 12% above the AZ average of 6.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 1% · AZ 14.9This facility: 14.7, 1% below the AZ average of 14.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 2 near AZ average
8 short-stay measures: 5 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9%
↓ 45% · AZ 10.7This facility: 5.9, 45% below the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9%
↓ 45% · AZ 10.7This facility: 5.9, 45% below the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
↓ 1% · AZ 12.8This facility: 12.7, 1% below the AZ average of 12.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
↓ 1% · AZ 12.8This facility: 12.7, 1% below the AZ average of 12.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
↑ 24% · AZ 20.6This facility: 25.5, 24% above the AZ average of 20.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
↑ 24% · AZ 20.6This facility: 25.5, 24% above the AZ average of 20.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 63% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.4, 63% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 63% · AZ 1.2This facility: 0.4, 63% below the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
↑ 128% · AZ 2.1This facility: 4.9, 128% above the AZ average of 2.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
↑ 128% · AZ 2.1This facility: 4.9, 128% above the AZ average of 2.1 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5%
↓ 19% · AZ 4.4This facility: 3.5, 19% below the AZ average of 4.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5%
↓ 19% · AZ 4.4This facility: 3.5, 19% below the AZ average of 4.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3%
↑ 114% · AZ 5.3This facility: 11.3, 114% above the AZ average of 5.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3%
↑ 114% · AZ 5.3This facility: 11.3, 114% above the AZ average of 5.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↑ 119% · AZ 3.9This facility: 8.6, 119% above the AZ average of 3.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↑ 119% · AZ 3.9This facility: 8.6, 119% above the AZ average of 3.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↓ 67% · AZ 10.6This facility: 3.5, 67% below the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↓ 67% · AZ 10.6This facility: 3.5, 67% below the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.1%
↓ 9% · AZ 96.9This facility: 88.1, 9% below the AZ average of 96.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.1%
↓ 9% · AZ 96.9This facility: 88.1, 9% below the AZ average of 96.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
≈ 0% · AZ 94.6This facility: 95.0, level with the AZ average of 94.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
≈ 0% · AZ 94.6This facility: 95.0, level with the AZ average of 94.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.4%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.4, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.4%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.4, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.3%
↑ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 54.3, 7% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.3%
↑ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 54.3, 7% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
↑ 7% · AZ 1.2This facility: 1.3, 7% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
↑ 7% · AZ 1.2This facility: 1.3, 7% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.3%
↓ 8% · AZ 91.8This facility: 84.3, 8% below the AZ average of 91.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.3%
↓ 8% · AZ 91.8This facility: 84.3, 8% below the AZ average of 91.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.5%
↓ 16% · AZ 87.3This facility: 73.5, 16% below the AZ average of 87.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.5%
↓ 16% · AZ 87.3This facility: 73.5, 16% below the AZ average of 87.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.6%
↑ 37% · AZ 24.6This facility: 33.6, 37% above the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.6%
↑ 37% · AZ 24.6This facility: 33.6, 37% above the AZ average of 24.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.0%
↑ 21% · AZ 10.7This facility: 13.0, 21% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.0%
↑ 21% · AZ 10.7This facility: 13.0, 21% above the AZ average of 10.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 61 Arizona nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
8.2% operating margin
+3.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Arizona homes
49.9% payroll share of revenue
AZ average 63.3%Rank #41 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.3M while revenue rose $2.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arizona homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.5M | +$2.3M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $13.7M | Rank in AZ Rank #25 / 61Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | Above AZ median Higher net patient revenue than 60% of AZ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.2M | +$1.7M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.3M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 8.2% | +3.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.3M | +$0.6M | Trend — | AZ median — | Rank in AZ Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Arizona homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.7M | +$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | AZ median $7.5M | Rank in AZ Rank #29 / 61Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 53% of homes | Above AZ median Higher payroll than 53% of AZ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 49.9% | +0.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | AZ median 55.2% | Rank in AZ Rank #41 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | 13.4 pts under AZ average The AZ average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · AZ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arizona payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AZ payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.4M | $9.2M | $10.0M | $9.1M | $9.2M | $11.2M | $13.1M | $15.5M |
| Operating expenses | $9.1M | $9.2M | $9.6M | $9.3M | $9.3M | $11.2M | $12.5M | $14.2M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$0.0M | $0.7M | $1.3M |
| Operating margin | 3.0% | 0.7% | 3.6% | −2.7% | −0.7% | −0.4% | 5.1% | 8.2% |
| Net income | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$0.0M | $0.7M | $1.3M |
| Payroll costs | $5.5M | $5.4M | $5.7M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.3M | $6.5M | $7.7M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.2% | 58.1% | 56.9% | 55.0% | 54.4% | 47.7% | 49.2% | 49.9% |
| Beds | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Gross revenue | $10.0M | $9.8M | $10.3M | $8.7M | $8.5M | $10.0M | $11.0M | $12.3M |
| Salaries | $4.7M | $4.6M | $4.9M | $4.3M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $5.6M | $6.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.7M | $1.9M | $1.3M | $1.2M |
| Other operating costs | $3.6M | $3.8M | $3.9M | $4.3M | $4.3M | $5.9M | $6.0M | $6.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $294 | $293 | $306 | $343 | $379 | $362 | $401 | $426 |
| Cost per day | $285 | $291 | $295 | $352 | $382 | $363 | $381 | $391 |
| Average length of stay | 35.3 days | 45.6 days | 44.7 days | 41.9 days | 40.2 days | 40.4 days | 36.7 days | 37.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
990 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
304 · 31%
Medicaid
165 · 17%
Private pay & other
521 · 53%
Resident snapshot
98 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
16 · 16%
Medicaid
58 · 59%
Private pay & other
24 · 24%
Leaving
981 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
274 · 28%
Medicaid
150 · 15%
Private pay & other
557 · 57%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Prescott's city center to Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Prescott
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Prescott | 128
Facility
128
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#20 / 80 | C+ |
79.1%
Facility
79.1%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#25 / 56 | +8% | 3.05
Facility
3.05
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#56 / 59 | -31% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 32
Facility
32
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#52 / 61 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#41 / 61 | - | 101 | - |
32
Facility
32
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#53 / 82 | Watson Woods Healthcare, Inc | $15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#25 / 61 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#29 / 61 | 49.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#41 / 61 | 035131 | ||||
| Mountain View Manor | NH RC SNF | Prescott | 116
Facility
116
AZ AVG
100
Rank
#33 / 80 | C |
43.6%
Facility
43.6%
AZ AVG
73.3%
Rank
#52 / 56 | -41% | 4.75
Facility
4.75
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#11 / 59 | -51% | +17% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.1k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 46
Facility
46
AZ AVG
21.7
Rank
#58 / 61 | 7.7
Facility
7.7
AZ AVG
3.5
Rank
#60 / 61 | - | 51 | - |
52
Facility
52
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#29 / 82 | Sandretto Hills Nursing Center 2 | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#54 / 61 | $3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#58 / 61 | 60.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
60.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#20 / 61 | 035114 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arizona
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation is located in Prescott, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Frequently Asked Questions about Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation
Who is the owner of Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation?
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Watson Woods Healthcare, Inc., and administered by Dallin Hammond.
Is Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 32. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation?
According to AZ state health department records, Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation's license number is OTC10483.
When does Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation's license expires on October 31, 2026.
What is the occupancy rate at Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation?
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 79.1%.
How long has Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation been in business?
Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation has been operating for approximately 5 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation?
No, Granite Creek Health and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
