Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
132
80 employees · 52 contractors · 37 on an average day Grancare Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Green Bay, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Grancare Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Green Bay, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Grancare Nursing Center accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Grancare Nursing Center in Green Bay, Wisconsin, provides general nursing home care, assisted living support, and skilled nursing services. Daily assistance covers tasks like bathing, dressing, and managing medications. Short-term respite stays accommodate individuals when primary caregivers require temporary relief, while physical, occupational, and speech therapies assist with mobility, functional tasks, and communication.
Established in 1964 and currently operated by Zunker Health Care under administrator Brittany Cobb, the 64-bed center features an on-staff physician alongside a restorative nursing program. Daily recorded nursing care averages 4 hours and 45 minutes per resident. Conveniences include a salon and regular religious services. Payment options cover Medicare, Medicaid, and direct private pay.
Prospective individuals exploring long-term care or therapy services can connect with Grancare Nursing Center to evaluate admission details, verify insurance coverage, or arrange a personal tour.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 45m
This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 45mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +31% above Wisconsin average
3 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
48m
↓ 18% · WI 58mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 18% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
19 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
50m
↑ 31% · WI 38mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 31% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
19 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 76 total: 47 of the facility's own employees and 29 agency contractors.
76 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
3h 8m
↑ 21% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 3h 8m per resident per day, 21% above the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 76 total: 47 of the facility's own employees and 29 agency contractors.
76 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 30% · WI 4mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 30% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 6m
↑ 11% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 4h 6m per resident per day, 11% above the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↓ 36% · WI 39mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 36% below the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
132
80 employees · 52 contractors · 37 on an average day
132 total staff / 48 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.75 : 1
↑ 14% · WI 2.40This facility: 2.75 staff per resident, 14% above the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
132 staff ÷ 48 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.9 h
↓ 5% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 6.9 h, 5% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
23,169 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →88.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (29), Licensed Practical Nurse (8), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
64
Rank #107 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
64
Rank #107 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #160 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #160 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
22
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #54 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #54 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
80.6%
This home usually has availability
Based on 51.6 residents and 64 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
155
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyBrown
CMS Certification Number525486
Certification TypeTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF
Grancare Nursing Center is administered by Brittany Cobb.
Owner NameZunker Health Care Inc
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Accept Medicaid
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
Speech Therapy
Doctor on Staff
End-Of-Life Program
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Fax(920) 494-2816
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
16 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
33 severity-weighted points (9 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
14 days to fix issues · much faster than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 35% · WI 6.2This facility: 4, 35% below the Wisconsin average of 6.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
9
Rank #21 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 68% · WI 28.3This facility: 9, 68% below the Wisconsin average of 28.3 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.25
Rank #18 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 47% · WI 4.24This facility: 2.25, 47% below the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
9 of 9 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 1.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
9
↓ 65% · WI 25.8This facility: 9, 65% below the Wisconsin average of 25.8 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 07, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 3 of 9 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 07, 2026
4 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 27, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 05, 2024
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 23, 2023
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 9 citations
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (33%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (33%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (11%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (11%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
8 of 9 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 9 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
WI avg $107KWisconsin average: $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
WI avg 2.03Wisconsin average: 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.71Wisconsin average: 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 32% · WI 3.0This facility: 4.0, 32% above the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 74% · WI 2.9This facility: 5.0, 74% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 22% · WI 9.0This facility: 7.0, 22% below the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 42% · WI 18.9This facility: 11.0, 42% below the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse, 1 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.9%
↓ 25% · WI 15.8This facility: 11.9, 25% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.9%
↓ 25% · WI 15.8This facility: 11.9, 25% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
↓ 33% · WI 17.0This facility: 11.5, 33% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
↓ 33% · WI 17.0This facility: 11.5, 33% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.7%
↓ 59% · WI 23.6This facility: 9.7, 59% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.7%
↓ 59% · WI 23.6This facility: 9.7, 59% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
↓ 33% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.8, 33% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
↓ 33% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.8, 33% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.2%
↑ 85% · WI 3.3This facility: 6.2, 85% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.2%
↑ 85% · WI 3.3This facility: 6.2, 85% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
↓ 20% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.9, 20% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
↓ 20% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.9, 20% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6%
↓ 68% · WI 4.9This facility: 1.6, 68% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6%
↓ 68% · WI 4.9This facility: 1.6, 68% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
↑ 175% · WI 6.0This facility: 16.5, 175% above the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
↑ 175% · WI 6.0This facility: 16.5, 175% above the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.7%
↓ 58% · WI 15.9This facility: 6.7, 58% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.7%
↓ 58% · WI 15.9This facility: 6.7, 58% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
38.5%
↓ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 38.5, 28% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
38.5%
↓ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 38.5, 28% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.7%
↑ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 65.7, 30% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.7%
↑ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 65.7, 30% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
3.3%
↑ 332% · US 0.8This facility: 3.3, 332% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
3.3%
↑ 332% · US 0.8This facility: 3.3, 332% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 42% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.7, 42% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 42% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.7, 42% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
↑ 8% · WI 86.9This facility: 94.0, 8% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.0%
↑ 8% · WI 86.9This facility: 94.0, 8% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.2%
↑ 11% · WI 82.2This facility: 91.2, 11% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.2%
↑ 11% · WI 82.2This facility: 91.2, 11% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.0%
↑ 1% · WI 22.7This facility: 23.0, 1% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.0%
↑ 1% · WI 22.7This facility: 23.0, 1% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.9%
↓ 67% · WI 15.0This facility: 4.9, 67% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.9%
↓ 67% · WI 15.0This facility: 4.9, 67% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Grancare Nursing Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
13.2% operating margin
+5.2 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.0M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Wisconsin homes
58.2% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #67 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $0.6M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.5M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #111 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | Below WI median Higher net patient revenue than 33% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #134 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 18% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.9M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #12 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 13.2% | +5.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #5 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #72 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 56% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.0M | +$0.4M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #18 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.8M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #105 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 36% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 36% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.2% | −4.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #67 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | Near WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.0M | $5.6M | $5.3M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.8M | $6.0M | $6.5M |
| Operating expenses | $5.6M | $5.5M | $5.2M | $5.1M | $5.2M | $5.3M | $5.5M | $5.7M |
| Net patient income | $0.4M | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.1M | −$0.2M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.9M |
| Operating margin | 6.5% | 1.4% | 1.9% | −2.0% | −4.8% | 9.6% | 8.0% | 13.2% |
| Net income | $0.4M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $1.2M | $0.1M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $1.0M |
| Payroll costs | $3.7M | $3.8M | $3.4M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $3.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 62.2% | 68.6% | 63.9% | 67.6% | 69.9% | 61.5% | 62.3% | 58.2% |
| Beds | 75 | 75 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| Gross revenue | $7.6M | $7.2M | $6.8M | $6.3M | $6.0M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $7.4M |
| Salaries | $3.1M | $3.1M | $2.8M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $3.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $1.9M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $257 | $258 | $273 | $287 | $262 | $316 | $334 | $352 |
| Cost per day | $241 | $255 | $268 | $293 | $275 | $286 | $308 | $306 |
| Average length of stay | 122.3 days | 108.0 days | 91.6 days | 112.5 days | 155.2 days | 140.2 days | 133.3 days | 154.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
120 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
27 · 23%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
93 · 78%
Resident snapshot
48 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 15%
Medicaid
32 · 67%
Private pay & other
9 · 19%
Leaving
120 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
19 · 16%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
101 · 84%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Grancare Nursing Center
3.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Green Bay's city center to Grancare Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Grancare Nursing Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Green Bay
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Lutheran Home | NH AL MC RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 118
Facility
118
WI AVG
78
Rank
#29 / 197 | - |
67
Facility
67
WI AVG
48
Rank
#47 / 191 | - |
| Grancare Nursing Center | NH AL SNF | Green Bay | - | 64
Facility
64
WI AVG
78
Rank
#107 / 197 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Edenbrook of Green Bay | NH RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 90
Facility
90
WI AVG
78
Rank
#68 / 197 | - | - | - |
| Green Bay Health Services | NH SNF | Green Bay | - | 125
Facility
125
WI AVG
78
Rank
#16 / 197 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association | NH AL SNF | Green Bay (Astor) | - | 88
Facility
88
WI AVG
78
Rank
#73 / 197 | - |
66
Facility
66
WI AVG
48
Rank
#52 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Grancare Nursing Center is located in GREEN BAY, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Grancare Nursing Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Grancare Nursing Center?
Grancare Nursing Center is legally operated by Zunker Health Care Inc, and administered by Brittany Cobb.
02 Is Grancare Nursing Center in a walkable area?
Grancare Nursing Center has a walk score of 22. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Grancare Nursing Center?
Grancare Nursing Center's occupancy is 80.6%.
04 Are pets allowed at Grancare Nursing Center?
No, Grancare Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Grancare Nursing Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Grancare Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in WI.
06 Who is the administrator of Grancare Nursing Center?
Brittany Cobb is the administrator of Grancare Nursing Center.
07 What is the overall rating for Grancare Nursing Center?
Grancare Nursing Center received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
