Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, memory care, and respite care in Clinton, SC. Assisted living includes help with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication while a resident keeps an apartment; Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care.
Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision, while nursing home and skilled nursing include licensed nursing care on site around the clock. The community has 43 beds, creating a smaller setting where staff and residents can get to know one another.
Its range of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time without leaving the community, while respite care offers a short stay for someone whose usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. Short-term rehabilitation is also available for a time-limited recovery stay.
Medicare and private pay are accepted. Medicare can cover eligible short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay lets a family cover services directly.
Pets are allowed, so residents can keep a pet with them. Tamieka Hawkins serves as the administrator, and Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina operates the community.
Community insights.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton is legally operated by Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina, and administered by Tamieka Hawkins.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near SC average, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Hospital & emergency visits
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−23.4% operating margin
+0.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.4M) trims the net loss to −$1.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with South Carolina homes
61.7% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #28 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $0.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #96 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 8% of homes | Below SC median Higher net patient revenue than 8% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.6M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.4M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −23.4% | +0.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.1M | +$0.1M | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.8M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #94 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 94th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Below SC median Higher payroll than 10% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 61.7% | +0.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #28 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Near SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.1M | $5.6M | $5.8M | $5.7M | $4.9M | $5.5M | $6.0M | $6.2M |
| Operating expenses | $8.7M | $8.3M | $8.1M | $8.0M | $7.3M | $7.5M | $7.4M | $7.6M |
| Net patient income | −$2.6M | −$2.7M | −$2.4M | −$2.3M | −$2.3M | −$1.9M | −$1.4M | −$1.4M |
| Operating margin | −42.8% | −47.6% | −40.8% | −39.6% | −47.7% | −34.9% | −23.9% | −23.4% |
| Net income | −$2.3M | −$2.4M | −$2.1M | −$1.9M | −$2.0M | −$1.6M | −$1.1M | −$1.1M |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M | $3.8M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $2.8M | $3.4M | $3.7M | $3.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 65.4% | 67.5% | 61.5% | 61.8% | 56.3% | 61.2% | 61.2% | 61.7% |
| Beds | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Gross revenue | $7.4M | $6.5M | $6.7M | $6.6M | $5.5M | $6.2M | $6.7M | $6.7M |
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.0M | $2.9M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $3.1M | $3.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.6M | — | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $4.7M | $4.5M | $4.6M | $4.5M | $4.5M | $4.1M | $3.8M | $3.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $413 | $468 | $454 | $514 | $545 | $581 | $642 | $713 |
| Cost per day | $590 | $691 | $639 | $717 | $804 | $784 | $796 | $880 |
| Average length of stay | 82.7 days | 89.1 days | 106.0 days | 101.5 days | 82.9 days | 76.9 days | 104.9 days | 97.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton
801 Musgrove St, Clinton, SC 29325-1796
Calculate Travel Distance to Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Clinton | 43
Facility
43
SC AVG
108
Rank
#126 / 132 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#96 / 104 | $3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#94 / 104 | 61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#28 / 104 | 425393 | |||
| Resorts at Beaufort | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Beaufort | 170
Facility
170
SC AVG
108
Rank
#14 / 132 |
77.1%
Facility
77.1%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#79 / 84 | -13% | 4.00
Facility
4.00
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#49 / 116 | -2% | -3% | $10.9k
Facility
$10.9k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#73 / 119 | 22
Facility
22
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#103 / 116 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#89 / 116 | 1 | 131 | - |
44
Facility
44
SC AVG
33
Rank
#16 / 46 | Resorts At Beaufort LLC | $11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#52 / 104 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#59 / 104 | 56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
56.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#59 / 104 | 425067 | ||||
| Myrtle Beach Manor | NH AL MC RC SNF | Myrtle Beach | 111
Facility
111
SC AVG
108
Rank
#63 / 132 | - | - | 4.09
Facility
4.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#15 / 116 | +36% | -1% | $27.8k
Facility
$27.8k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#102 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#52 / 116 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#14 / 116 | 3 | 39 | - |
41
Facility
41
SC AVG
33
Rank
#19 / 46 | Snh Sc Tenant LLC | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#86 / 104 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#90 / 104 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#64 / 104 | 425070 | ||||
| Peachtree Centre | NH HOS RC SNF | Gaffney | 151
Facility
151
SC AVG
108
Rank
#19 / 132 |
88.5%
Facility
88.5%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#3 / 84 | 0% | 3.09
Facility
3.09
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#108 / 116 | -46% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 18
Facility
18
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#93 / 116 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#109 / 116 | - | 134 | - |
26
Facility
26
SC AVG
33
Rank
#28 / 46 | Peachtree Operating Group LLC | $13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#39 / 104 | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#76 / 104 | 41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#101 / 104 | 425095 | ||||
| Brookdale Anderson | - | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Anderson | 160
Facility
160
SC AVG
108
Rank
#16 / 132 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
43
Facility
43
SC AVG
33
Rank
#17 / 46 | $5.9M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $3.3M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 56.1%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 425398 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton
Who is the owner of Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton is legally operated by Presbyterian Communities Of South Carolina, and administered by Tamieka Hawkins.
What is the license number of Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
According to SC state health department records, Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton's license number is CRC-0014.
What is the occupancy rate at Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton's occupancy is 67.5%.
Are pets allowed at Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
Yes, Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton allows residents to bring their pets.
What is the best email address for Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
The team at Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton can be reached at TAMIEKA.HAWKINS@PRESCOMM.ORG.
Who is the administrator of Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
Tamieka Hawkins is the administrator of Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton.
What is the overall rating for Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton?
Presbyterian Communities of South Carolina-Clinton received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance




