Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
152
76 employees · 76 contractors · 35 on an average day Tudor Oaks
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Muskego, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Tudor Oaks
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Muskego, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Tudor Oaks accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Tudor Oaks
Tudor Oaks offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing care in Muskego, Wisconsin. Independent living gives residents private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living includes help with dressing, bathing, medication, and other daily tasks. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision, and skilled nursing offers licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
With several care levels available, Tudor Oaks may be a good fit for a resident whose needs grow over time and who may be able to move from one level of care to another without leaving the community. The home has 33 beds. That makes it a smaller community where staff and residents get to know each other.
Rehabilitation services let a resident receive therapy within the community without arranging transportation elsewhere, while home care services provide support where a resident lives. Senior wellness programs offer wellness activities, and volunteering opportunities give residents a way to take part in volunteer work. A wellness center and warm water pool provide spaces for exercise and warm water activity; a theater, bistro, greenhouse, and man cave add places for entertainment, dining, gardening, and hobbies. Tudor Oaks is operated by American Baptist Homes Of The Midwest, with Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay among the payment options.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 75th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 16m
This nursing home is ranked 75th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 16mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +6% above Wisconsin average
2 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 27 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
27 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
47m
↓ 24% · WI 1h 1mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 24% below the Wisconsin average of 1h 1m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 27 total: 3 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
27 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 31 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
31 staff · 8-hour shifts
40m
↑ 3% · WI 39mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 3% above the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 31 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 24 agency contractors.
31 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 50 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
64 staff · 7.1-hour shifts
2h 49m
↑ 4% · WI 2h 42mThis facility: 2h 49m per resident per day, 4% above the Wisconsin average of 2h 42m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 50 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
64 staff · 7.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↑ 6% · WI 4mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 6% above the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 58m
↑ 3% · WI 3h 51mThis facility: 3h 58m per resident per day, 3% above the Wisconsin average of 3h 51m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
34m
↓ 16% · WI 40mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 16% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
152
76 employees · 76 contractors · 35 on an average day
152 total staff / 42 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.62 : 1
↑ 51% · WI 2.40This facility: 3.62 staff per resident, 51% above the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
152 staff ÷ 42 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7 h
↓ 4% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7 h, 4% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
22,184 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →80.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (24), Registered Nurse (24), Certified Nursing Assistant (14), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Medical Director (2), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Medication Aide/Technician (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
33
Rank #177 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 177th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
33
Rank #177 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 177th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #190 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 190th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #190 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 190th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
3
/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
112
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeRegistered
IssuanceJuly 15, 2004
CountyWaukesha
CMS Certification Number525279
Tudor Oaks is legally operated by American Baptist Homes Of The Midwest.
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Massage Therapy
Podiatry Services
Dental Services
Optometry Services
Catering Services
Newspaper Delivery
Real Estate Property Taxes Included
HousekeepingListed as: Housekeeping (twice monthly) · Additional housekeeping service
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation · Private transportation
Laundry & LinenListed as: Additional laundry services
Utilities IncludedListed as: Utilities included (heat, AC, electric, water, sewer)
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Swimming Pool
Fitness Center
Library
Art Gallery
Dog Park
Bistro
Cable Tv
Whirlpool
Greenhouse and Outdoor Garden Space
Lifestyle Activity Room with Full Kitchen
Theater with 8X14 Screen
Man Cave with Car Bay, Workshop, and Lounge
Walking and Biking Trails
Pond
Golf Carts On 110 Acres
Guest Room Rentals
Bluebird Trails
Park-Like Sitting Areas with Sculptures
Private Dining Room
Emergency Call System
Beauty Salon
Volunteer Program
Activities
Aquatic Water Classes
Endurance and Strengthening Classes
Seated Strength Class
Circuit Training
Zumba
Yoga Classes
Senior Olympic Games
Volleyball
Wii Bowling and Tennis
Exercise Classes
Outdoor Yard Games
Movie Screenings
Musical and Dance Group Entertainment
Educational Presentations
Card and Game Groups
Day Trips
Destination Vacations
Sewing and Painting Classes
Art Gallery Exhibitions
Book Discussions
Bocce Ball
Travelogue Programs
Volunteering
Gardening
Highlights
- Sports complex with bocce ball, putting greens, and croquet
Chaplain and Spiritual Care Program
Chapel
Church Services and Bible Studies
Worship Services, Prayer Groups, and Devotional Opportunities
Religious AffiliationAmerican Baptist
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Tudor Oaks.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Tudor Oaks.- Private dining room for family events.
- Bistro / café on site.
Studio
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Classic 1 · Classic 2 · Signature · Windsor
Floor plans: Classic, Signature, Windsor
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Luxury · Exclusive · Ultra
Floor plans: Luxury, Exclusive, Ultra
Private Room
Floor plans: Enhanced Floor Plan
In-Room Features
Ample Storage
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
7
↑ 13% · WI 6.2This facility: 7, 13% above the Wisconsin average of 6.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
34
Rank #114 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 20% · WI 28.3This facility: 34, 20% above the Wisconsin average of 28.3 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.86
Rank #103 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 15% · WI 4.24This facility: 4.86, 15% above the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
34 of 34 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 150% · WI 1.2This facility: 3, 150% above the Wisconsin average of 1.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
30
↑ 16% · WI 25.8This facility: 30, 16% above the Wisconsin average of 25.8 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 05, 2025 · 1 citation (Abuse/Neglect, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 34 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 05, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 06, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 16, 2025
14 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 23, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 05, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 05, 2023
13 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 34 citations
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (32%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
7 deficiencies (21%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (12%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (9%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (6%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
24 of 34 citations resulted from standard inspections; 7 of 34 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 34 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 16, 2025 · $117,527 civil money penalty
Jun 16, 2025 · $117,527 civil money penalty
Jun 16, 2025 · 62-day payment denial
Total fines
$117,527
↑ 10% · WI $107KThis facility: $117,527, 10% above the Wisconsin average of $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #155 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 155th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 51% · WI 2.03This facility: 1, 51% below the Wisconsin average of 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
62 days
↑ 42% · WI 0.71This facility: 1, 42% above the Wisconsin average of 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 16, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$117,527
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$117,527
Jun 16, 2025
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
62 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
62 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$117,527
Wisconsin average
$106,807
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 63% · WI 9.0This facility: 14.6, 63% above the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
30.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 63% · WI 18.9This facility: 30.8, 63% above the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 7 worse, 1 near WI average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 1 near WI average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
33.8%
↑ 114% · WI 15.8This facility: 33.8, 114% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
33.8%
↑ 114% · WI 15.8This facility: 33.8, 114% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
24.1%
↑ 42% · WI 17.0This facility: 24.1, 42% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
24.1%
↑ 42% · WI 17.0This facility: 24.1, 42% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4%
↑ 46% · WI 23.6This facility: 34.4, 46% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4%
↑ 46% · WI 23.6This facility: 34.4, 46% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
↑ 7% · WI 2.7This facility: 2.9, 7% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
↑ 7% · WI 2.7This facility: 2.9, 7% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1%
↑ 114% · WI 3.3This facility: 7.1, 114% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1%
↑ 114% · WI 3.3This facility: 7.1, 114% above the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2%
↑ 5% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.2, 5% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2%
↑ 5% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.2, 5% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
↓ 39% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.0, 39% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
↓ 39% · WI 4.9This facility: 3.0, 39% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.4%
↑ 54% · WI 15.9This facility: 24.4, 54% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.4%
↑ 54% · WI 15.9This facility: 24.4, 54% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.4%
≈ 0% · WI 96.0This facility: 96.4, level with the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.4%
≈ 0% · WI 96.0This facility: 96.4, level with the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.6This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.6%
↑ 3% · WI 86.9This facility: 89.6, 3% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.6%
↑ 3% · WI 86.9This facility: 89.6, 3% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.4%
↓ 9% · WI 82.2This facility: 74.4, 9% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.4%
↓ 9% · WI 82.2This facility: 74.4, 9% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Tudor Oaks’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending August 2025, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Aug 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−8.6% operating margin
+6.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.6M) trims the net loss to −$0.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
46.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #132 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $1.6M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $17.1M | +$1.6M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #10 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | Top 6% in WI Higher net patient revenue than 94% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $18.6M | +$0.7M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #17 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.5M | +$0.9M | Trend 20182025 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #131 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −8.6% | +6.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #113 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 113th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.6M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #39 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.9M | +$0.7M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #145 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 145th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.9M | +$0.3M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #25 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above WI median Higher payroll than 85% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 46.0% | −2.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #132 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | 12.7 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.4M | $13.5M | $14.1M | $13.3M | $13.4M | $15.2M | $15.6M | $17.1M |
| Operating expenses | $16.5M | $16.9M | $17.1M | $17.0M | $17.6M | $17.6M | $18.0M | $18.6M |
| Net patient income | −$3.1M | −$3.4M | −$2.9M | −$3.7M | −$4.1M | −$2.4M | −$2.4M | −$1.5M |
| Operating margin | −23.2% | −24.8% | −20.8% | −28.0% | −30.7% | −15.5% | −15.5% | −8.6% |
| Net income | −$6.7M | −$1.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.8M | −$4.9M | −$1.5M | −$1.6M | −$0.9M |
| Payroll costs | $6.6M | $6.7M | $7.1M | $6.9M | $6.7M | $7.0M | $7.6M | $7.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 49.1% | 49.8% | 50.3% | 52.0% | 49.8% | 46.0% | 48.9% | 46.0% |
| Beds | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 50 |
| Gross revenue | $15.7M | $15.9M | $16.7M | $15.4M | $15.3M | $16.2M | $16.1M | $18.5M |
| Salaries | $5.7M | $5.8M | $6.0M | $6.0M | $5.9M | $6.2M | $6.6M | $6.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $0.9M |
| Contract labor | $1.1M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.8M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.0M |
| Other operating costs | $9.9M | $10.1M | $10.0M | $10.1M | $10.9M | $10.6M | $10.4M | $10.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $736 | $781 | $691 | $801 | $831 | $963 | $1,010 | $1,067 |
| Cost per day | $906 | $975 | $835 | $1,025 | $1,086 | $1,112 | $1,166 | $1,158 |
| Average length of stay | 86.0 days | 78.0 days | 121.8 days | 81.3 days | 111.6 days | 128.5 days | 111.6 days | 112.4 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
146 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
33 · 23%
Medicaid
7 · 5%
Private pay & other
106 · 73%
Resident snapshot
42 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 17%
Medicaid
12 · 29%
Private pay & other
23 · 55%
Leaving
143 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
26 · 18%
Medicaid
9 · 6%
Private pay & other
108 · 76%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Tudor Oaks
3.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Muskego's city center to Tudor Oaks's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Tudor Oaks
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Muskego
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muskego Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Muskego (Lake Forest) | - | 49
Facility
49
WI AVG
78
Rank
#156 / 197 | - |
53
Facility
53
WI AVG
48
Rank
#78 / 191 | - |
| Tudor Oaks | NH AL IL MC SNF | Muskego | - | 33
Facility
33
WI AVG
78
Rank
#177 / 197 | A+ |
3
Facility
3
WI AVG
48
Rank
#190 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Tudor Oaks is located in MUSKEGO, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Tudor Oaks
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Tudor Oaks?
Tudor Oaks is legally operated by American Baptist Homes Of The Midwest.
02 Is Tudor Oaks in a walkable area?
Tudor Oaks has a walk score of 3. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Tudor Oaks?
Tudor Oaks's occupancy is 88.1%.
04 Are pets allowed at Tudor Oaks?
No, Tudor Oaks has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Tudor Oaks operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Tudor Oaks is registered as a non-profit in WI.
06 What is the overall rating for Tudor Oaks?
Tudor Oaks received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Tudor Oaks have?
Tudor Oaks has 33 beds.
Updated on
