3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Operating in Argyle, Washington County, New York, Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare maintains 122 licensed beds under private ownership by Washington Operations Associates. The facility staffs nursing care at 3 hours 16 minutes per resident daily and maintains 24-hour coverage. Rehabilitation services, respite care, and memory care programming form the clinical core. The facility earned recognition with a CMS Five Star Rating.
The inspection trajectory reveals consistent compliance above the state benchmark. Five years of regulatory activity produced 18 documented deficiencies; a rate of 3.6 annually, placing the facility 29 percent better than New York’s 5.1-per-year baseline.
Complaint investigations, the dominant inspection type, were not substantiated.
The September 2025 investigation identified 12 deficiencies across garbage and refuse handling, abuse and neglect protocols, pharmacy operations, resident autonomy, respiratory care procedures, electrical equipment integrity, emergency contact procedures, fire alarm maintenance, egress lighting, comprehensive hazard assessment, sprinkler testing and maintenance, and utility systems; a broad operational scope consistent with standard compliance auditing.
Earlier inspections from 2021 through 2024 documented isolated, corrected violations: a severe CPR gap in 2023 (systemic but resolved), abuse prevention protocols in 2024, PASARR mental-health screening in 2022, staff COVID-19 immunization requirements in 2022, and care-plan development in 2021.
All deficiencies were corrected within weeks to months. No federal enforcement, fines, or ongoing immediate jeopardy appears in the public record.
The facility faces four lawsuits filed since 2020; two remain active, one was stayed pending regulatory developments, and one industry-related proceeding settled in 2025.
Programs include Health Services, Health Programs, RehabStrong™, and coordinated nutrition planning.
The facility’s rehabilitation and respite capacity suit residents and families seeking post-acute care in a setting with above-average regulatory performance.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 193rd out of 407 homes in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 28m per day | ▼ 32% State avg: 42m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 1m per day | ▲ 32% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 2m per day | ▼ 6% State avg: 2h 11m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 7m per day | ■ Avg State avg: 3h 10m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 5m per day | ▼ 24% State avg: 7m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 20m per day | ▼ 30% State avg: 28m per day · National avg: 28m per day |
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is legally operated by Washington Operations Associates, LLC (For Profit).
In New York State, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the New York State state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical New York State nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.
8 points below the New York State average for nursing homes (83/100)
Rank #436 / 593 in New York State Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 436th out of 593 homes in New York State. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the New York State average among 593 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in New York State that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. Inspection score: 75 out of 100. Letter grade C. 8 points below the New York State average for nursing homes (83/100)
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York State regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
This facility has 5 enforcement actions. 33% of New York State nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York State state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 20 | 13 | This facility has 54% more total citations than a typical New York State nursing home (20 vs. NY avg 13).↑ 54% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 17 | 20 | This facility has 15% fewer health citations than a typical New York State nursing home (17 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 15% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 3 | 4 | This facility has 25% fewer life safety citations than a typical New York State nursing home (3 vs. NY avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2020.
| 3.3 | 2.2 | This facility has 50% more citations per year than a typical New York State nursing home (3.3 vs. NY avg 2.2).↑ 50% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 1.5 | 1.4 | This facility has 7% more citations per inspection than a typical New York State nursing home (1.5 vs. NY avg 1.4).↑ 7% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 13 | 9 | This facility has 44% more total inspections than a typical New York State nursing home (13 vs. NY avg 9).↑ 44% worse |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more inspections with citations than a typical New York State nursing home (5 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 38% | 44% | This facility has 6 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical New York State nursing home (38% vs. NY avg 44%).↓ 6% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 55 | 79 | This facility has 30% fewer total complaints than a typical New York State nursing home (55 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 30% better |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2020.
| 9.2 | 13.2 | This facility has 30% fewer complaints per year than a typical New York State nursing home (9.2 vs. NY avg 13.2).↓ 30% better |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 10.00 | 0.50 | This facility has 1900% more complaints per bed than a typical New York State nursing home (10 vs. NY avg 0.5).↑ 1900% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York State regulators.
| 14 | 15 | This facility has 7% fewer complaint investigations than a typical New York State nursing home (14 vs. NY avg 15).↓ 7% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
New York State average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Sep 2025
New York State average 18.5
New York State average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
10 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 13 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 13 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
400% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.2
400% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
4
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
2
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
1
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2020
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Next scheduled court appearance on record across active cases.
May 01, 2026Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
524% more staff per resident than New York average
12% better than New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 10 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
10
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 31 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
31
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
44 total: 41 full-time employees and 3 contractors.
44
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10.3 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
3,226 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 41 | 3 | 44 | 22,048 | 92 | 100% | 10.3 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 31 | 0 | 31 | 10,928 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 14 | 0 | 14 | 2,795 | 92 | 100% | 7.4 |
| Registered Nurse | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1,861 | 91 | 99% | 7.6 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 6 | 6 | 956 | 66 | 72% | 6.7 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 917 | 65 | 71% | 7.5 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 719 | 67 | 73% | 5.8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 476 | 64 | 70% | 7.4 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 450 | 60 | 65% | 7.5 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 443 | 59 | 64% | 7.5 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 420 | 56 | 61% | 7.5 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 413 | 52 | 57% | 7.9 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 2 | 2 | 341 | 54 | 59% | 5.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 334 | 67 | 73% | 4.9 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 1 | 1 | 263 | 50 | 54% | 5.3 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 218 | 40 | 43% | 5.2 |
| Medical Director | 2 | 0 | 2 | 92 | 15 | 16% | 6.1 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 2 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 14 | 15% | 2.6 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 0 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 9 | 10% | 2.9 |
Includes penalties issued in 2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
56% lower than New York State averageNew York State average: $66K
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 2.0
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.1
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Sep 12, 2025 · $15K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Sep 12, 2025Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
8.2
17% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
18.2
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 18.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.9%
21% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
16% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
30% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
96% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.7%
63% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
16% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
10% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.9%
10% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.6%
71% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
9% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
5% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 95.2%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
24% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
22% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
23% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 78.8%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.9%
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 20.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.8%
30% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 9.7%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.3%
195% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
45.2%
16% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
42.9%
15% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
24% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
58% of new residents, often for short stays.
17% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
118Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #319 / 403Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 319th out of 403 homes in New York. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the New York average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Rankings are based only on facilities in New York that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #136 / 403Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 136th out of 403 homes in New York. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the New York average. Well-run New York facilities typically land around 53–65% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Rankings are based only on facilities in New York that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (58% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Argyle's city center to Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The information below is reported by the New York State Department of Health.
| Edna Tina Wilson Living Center | NH HC MC | Rochester (Island Cottage Road) | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
160
Rank
#412 / 748 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#17 / 436 | +11% | 4.83
Facility
4.83
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#21 / 407 | -56% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 86
Facility
86
NY AVG
83
Rank
#242 / 593 | 5
Facility
5
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#15 / 414 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#10 / 414 | - | 118 | - |
2
Facility
2
NY AVG
63
Rank
#1144 / 1173 | Sandra Loan | $12.9M
Facility
$12.9M
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#312 / 403 | $11.1M
Facility
$11.1M
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#255 / 403 | 85.5%
Facility
85.5%
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#44 / 403 | 335769 | ||||
| Amsterdam Nursing Home | NH | New York City (Manhattan) | 409
Facility
409
NY AVG
160
Rank
#23 / 748 |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#107 / 436 | +11% | 3.25
Facility
3.25
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#212 / 407 | +5% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 78
Facility
78
NY AVG
83
Rank
#382 / 593 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#153 / 414 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#339 / 414 | - | 402 | A+ |
93
Facility
93
NY AVG
63
Rank
#192 / 1173 | Judith Fenster | $81.1M
Facility
$81.1M
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#19 / 403 | $30.1M
Facility
$30.1M
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#25 / 403 | 37.1%
Facility
37.1%
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#245 / 403 | 335570 | ||||
| Massapequa Center Rehabilitation & Nursing | NH ADC PC | Amityville (Louden Avenue) | 320
Facility
320
NY AVG
160
Rank
#45 / 748 |
89.1%
Facility
89.1%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#242 / 436 | +1% | 3.01
Facility
3.01
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#271 / 407 | -14% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 75
Facility
75
NY AVG
83
Rank
#436 / 593 | 11
Facility
11
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#94 / 414 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#266 / 414 | - | 290 | - |
62
Facility
62
NY AVG
63
Rank
#680 / 1173 | Aharon Bleier | $58.5M
Facility
$58.5M
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#34 / 403 | $28.0M
Facility
$28.0M
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#42 / 403 | 47.8%
Facility
47.8%
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#248 / 403 | 335213 | ||||
| Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | NH MC | Argyle | 122
Facility
122
NY AVG
160
Rank
#404 / 748 | - | - | 3.27
Facility
3.27
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#193 / 407 | -38% | -9% | $24.1k
Facility
$24.1k
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#348 / 415 | 75
Facility
75
NY AVG
83
Rank
#436 / 593 | 13
Facility
13
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#129 / 414 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#86 / 414 | 2 | 118 | - |
25
Facility
25
NY AVG
63
Rank
#996 / 1173 | Brooke Daley | $14.3M
Facility
$14.3M
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#335 / 403 | $5.7M
Facility
$5.7M
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#319 / 403 | 39.7%
Facility
39.7%
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#136 / 403 | 335413 | ||||
| Van Duyn Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | NH | Syracuse (West Seneca Turnpike) | 513
Facility
513
NY AVG
160
Rank
#12 / 748 |
69.8%
Facility
69.8%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#390 / 436 | -21% | 4.77
Facility
4.77
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#21 / 407 | - | -49% | +33% | $750.3k
Facility
$750.3k
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#415 / 415 | 62
Facility
62
NY AVG
83
Rank
#580 / 593 | 65
Facility
65
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#411 / 414 | 8.1
Facility
8.1
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#380 / 414 | 7 | 358 | A+ |
8
Facility
8
NY AVG
63
Rank
#1097 / 1173 | Jack Augenstein | $40.8M
Facility
$40.8M
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#36 / 403 | $21.6M
Facility
$21.6M
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#58 / 403 | 52.9%
Facility
52.9%
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#324 / 403 | 335184 |
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is located in Argyle, New York.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York.
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is legally operated by Washington Operations Associates, LLC (For Profit).
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has a walk score of 25. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
According to NY state health department records, Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's license number is 5750301N.
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's occupancy is 4.1%.
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is registered as a for-profit in NY.
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has 122 beds.
Washington Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has had 20 recently reported citations.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
