Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
143
113 employees · 30 contractors · 54 on an average day EdenHill Communities
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · New Braunfels, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
EdenHill Communities
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · New Braunfels, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
EdenHill Communities accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of EdenHill Communities
There are eight care types at EdenHill Communities in New Braunfels, TX. The first four are independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Nursing home care, hospice care, respite care, and the continuing care retirement community designation account for the rest.
In independent living, a resident has private quarters, and the use of community services and daily care stays off the schedule. Assisted living is where dressing, bathing, and medication get staff attention. Memory care stays secured, and its staff supervises anyone whose dementia now makes wandering a risk. Skilled nursing means licensed nurses on duty at every hour.
Hospice care attends to a resident’s last stage of life. Respite is the booked stay that covers a caregiver’s absence. Because every level is on the one campus, growing needs mean new rooms, not a new community, the draw for anyone planning.
On-site recovery after an illness or injury runs through rehabilitation services, Short-Term Rehab among them. The 64 beds are in the Landa Park Estates neighborhood, and the starting price is $2,928 a month, a figure a family can budget for.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are the accepted routes. Each resident’s daily nursing averages 4 h 8 m. For exercise, there is a swimming pool, plus fitness center access, and personal care has a salon and spa of its own.
A chapel and religious services are on site for worship, and residents may bring their pets. Eden Home, Inc. runs the community, and its business start date goes back to 1910.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 6m
This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 6mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +78% above Texas average
0 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 10.8-hour shifts
39m
↑ 48% · TX 26mThis facility: 39m per resident per day, 48% above the Texas average of 26m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 10.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
20 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
58m
↑ 2% · TX 57mThis facility: 58m per resident per day, 2% above the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
20 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 58 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
64 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
2h 30m
↑ 24% · TX 2h 1mThis facility: 2h 30m per resident per day, 24% above the Texas average of 2h 1m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 64 total: 58 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
64 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 78% · TX 4mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 78% above the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 38m
↑ 22% · TX 2h 59mThis facility: 3h 38m per resident per day, 22% above the Texas average of 2h 59m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
30m
↑ 43% · TX 21mThis facility: 30m per resident per day, 43% above the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
143
113 employees · 30 contractors · 54 on an average day
143 total staff / 97 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.47 : 1
≈ 0% · TX 1.47This facility: 1.47 staff per resident, level with the Texas average of 1.47 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
143 staff ÷ 97 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.7 h
↑ 7% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 8.7 h, 7% above the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
42,880 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →87.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (6), Licensed Practical Nurse (6), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
186
Rank #19 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
186
Rank #19 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
122 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 64 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #273 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 273rd out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #273 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 273rd out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
5
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
99
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
95
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$2928/Month
Facility TypeType B
CountyComal
License Number0529
SNF LicenseSkilled Nursing Facility #004048
State License TypesAL License #0529, Skilled Nursing Facility #004048
EdenHill Communities is legally operated by Eden Home, Inc.
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Grab Bars
Short-Term Rehab
Alzheimer's Certification
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Maintenance
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Minimum Age55+
Linen ServiceYes
27-Acre Campus
Volunteer Program
Activities
Guided Campus Tours
- Educational event series (EdenHill Signature Series)
Signature ProgramsEdenHill Signature Series
Room Types
Studio
1 Bedroom
Private Room
Cottage / Villa
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
ALM Inspection Grade
82 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Texas inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 66% of the grade
C+ · 78/100
4 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100).
122 certified beds, 66% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
92 severity-weighted points (28 citations) · 8% higher than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 85)
Enforcement
Concern
3 enforcement actions · 3× more than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 1) · $45,130 in fines
Persistence
Concern
22 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 16)
Texas state-licensed beds · 34% of the grade
B+ · 89/100
6 points above the Texas average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
64 licensed beds, 34% of the grade. Graded with Texas state-licensed facilities on the Texas scale.
Health citations
Typical
1 health citation · about the same as the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 1)
Life safety citations
Concern
11 life safety citations · 3× more than the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 4)
Enforcement actions
Strong
No enforcement actions on record (median: 0)
How the final grade is calculated
B- · 82/100
78 × 66% + 89 × 34% = 82 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 122 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (66%) and 64 Texas state-licensed beds (34%). The result, 82 out of 100, is a B- on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. TX average
3 Worse
Metrics worse than Texas average:
• Total citations (71% above)
• Life safety citations (83% above)
• Inspections with citations (100% above) 2 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Health citations (75% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Total citations (71% above)
• Life safety citations (83% above)
• Inspections with citations (100% above) 2 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Health citations (75% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 12 | 7.0 | This facility has 71% more total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (12 vs. TX avg 7).↑ 71% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 1 | 4.0 | This facility has 75% fewer health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (1 vs. TX avg 4).↓ 75% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 11 | 6.0 | This facility has 83% more life safety citations than a typical Texas nursing home (11 vs. TX avg 6).↑ 83% worse |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties the state issued against this facility. In Texas these are administrative penalties, recorded by the Health and Human Services Commission.
| 0 | 0.2 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Texas nursing home (0 vs. TX avg 0.2).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 2 | 1.0 | This facility has 100% more inspections with citations than a typical Texas nursing home (2 vs. TX avg 1).↑ 100% worse |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
10
↑ 25% · TX 8This facility: 10, 25% above the Texas average of 8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
28
Rank #147 / 234Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.≈ 0% · TX 28This facility: 28, level with the Texas average of 28 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.8
Rank #69 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 23% · TX 3.65This facility: 2.8, 23% below the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
28 of 28 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
2
↑ 11% · TX 1.8This facility: 2, 11% above the Texas average of 1.8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
25
↓ 2% · TX 25.4This facility: 25, 2% below the Texas average of 25.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 150% · TX 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 01, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 8 of 28 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 01, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2026
13 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 12, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 22, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 13, 2024
5 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 15, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 27, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 17, 2023
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 03, 2023
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 28 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (29%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (18%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (11%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (7%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (7%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 28 citations resulted from standard inspections; 7 of 28 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 28 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: May 22, 2025 · $22,925 civil money penalty
May 22, 2025 · $22,925 civil money penalty
Jun 27, 2024 · $22,205 civil money penalty
Jun 27, 2024 · 19-day payment denial
Total fines
$45,130
↓ 29% · TX $63KThis facility: $45,130, 29% below the Texas average of $63,404. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #168 / 236Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 168th out of 236 nursing homes we track in Texas for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Texas average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 236 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 5% · TX 2.1This facility: 2, 5% below the Texas average of 2.1. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
19 days
TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
May 22, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,925
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,925
Jun 27, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,205
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$22,205
Jun 27, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
19 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
19 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$45,130
Texas average
$63,404
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Texas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↓ 1% · TX 4.1This facility: 4.0, 1% below the TX average of 4.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 30% · TX 3.1This facility: 4.0, 30% above the TX average of 3.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 62% · TX 7.6This facility: 12.3, 62% above the TX average of 7.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 82% · TX 13.8This facility: 25.0, 82% above the TX average of 13.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 6 worse, 3 near TX average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near TX average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.1%
↑ 59% · TX 15.8This facility: 25.1, 59% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.1%
↑ 59% · TX 15.8This facility: 25.1, 59% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.3%
↑ 128% · TX 12.9This facility: 29.3, 128% above the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.3%
↑ 128% · TX 12.9This facility: 29.3, 128% above the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.6%
↑ 65% · TX 12.5This facility: 20.6, 65% above the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.6%
↑ 65% · TX 12.5This facility: 20.6, 65% above the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
↑ 130% · TX 0.8This facility: 1.9, 130% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
↑ 130% · TX 0.8This facility: 1.9, 130% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
↑ 79% · TX 3.2This facility: 5.8, 79% above the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
↑ 79% · TX 3.2This facility: 5.8, 79% above the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.4%
↓ 61% · TX 3.7This facility: 1.4, 61% below the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.4%
↓ 61% · TX 3.7This facility: 1.4, 61% below the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 2.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 2.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
↑ 2% · TX 2.3This facility: 2.4, 2% above the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
↑ 2% · TX 2.3This facility: 2.4, 2% above the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.5%
↑ 17% · TX 9.8This facility: 11.5, 17% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.5%
↑ 17% · TX 9.8This facility: 11.5, 17% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
≈ 0% · TX 97.0This facility: 97.3, level with the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
≈ 0% · TX 97.0This facility: 97.3, level with the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.51
↓ 29% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.51, 29% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.51
↓ 29% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.51, 29% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.46
↓ 29% · TX 2.07This facility: 1.46, 29% below the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.46
↓ 29% · TX 2.07This facility: 1.46, 29% below the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.0%
↑ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 69.0, 28% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.0%
↑ 28% · US 53.7This facility: 69.0, 28% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
41.7%
↓ 18% · US 50.6This facility: 41.7, 18% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
41.7%
↓ 18% · US 50.6This facility: 41.7, 18% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 9% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 9% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · TX 88.7This facility: 100.0, 13% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · TX 88.7This facility: 100.0, 13% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 17% · TX 85.4This facility: 100.0, 17% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 17% · TX 85.4This facility: 100.0, 17% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.7%
↓ 8% · TX 25.9This facility: 23.7, 8% below the TX average of 25.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.7%
↓ 8% · TX 25.9This facility: 23.7, 8% below the TX average of 25.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.1%
↑ 1% · TX 12.0This facility: 12.1, 1% above the TX average of 12.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.1%
↑ 1% · TX 12.0This facility: 12.1, 1% above the TX average of 12.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
EdenHill Communities’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 225 Texas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−196.9% operating margin
−88.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($30.8M) trims the net loss to −$15.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Texas homes
99.7% payroll share of revenue
TX average 68.8%Rank #18 / 202Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 202 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $8.5M while revenue rose $2.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Texas homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $23.6M | +$2.4M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $9.3M | Rank in TX Rank #8 / 225Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 97% of homes | Top 3% in TX Higher net patient revenue than 97% of TX homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $70.2M | +$25.9M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $9.8M | Rank in TX Rank #2 / 225Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$46.6M | −$23.5M | Trend 20162024 | TX median −$0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #224 / 225Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 224th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −196.9% | −88.1 pts | Trend 20162024 | TX median −5.0% | Rank in TX Rank #209 / 225Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 209th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 7% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $30.8M | — | Trend — | TX median $0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #5 / 214Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 214 nursing homes we track in Texas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$15.8M | −$4.5M | Trend — | TX median $0.3M | Rank in TX Rank #206 / 207Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 206th out of 207 nursing homes we track in Texas for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Texas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $23.6M | +$8.5M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $4.9M | Rank in TX Rank #3 / 225Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 99% of homes | Top 2% in TX by size Higher payroll than 99% of TX homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 99.7% | +28.6 pts | Trend 20162024 | TX median 57.6% | Rank in TX Rank #18 / 202Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 202 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | 30.9 pts over TX average The TX average is 68.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · TX benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Texas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TX payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021no report | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.0M | $13.0M | $13.8M | $13.4M | $13.5M | $7.6M | $21.2M | $23.6M | |
| Operating expenses | $16.4M | $16.9M | $19.4M | $22.3M | $17.6M | $19.0M | $44.3M | $70.2M | |
| Net patient income | −$3.4M | −$3.9M | −$5.6M | −$8.9M | −$4.1M | −$11.4M | −$23.1M | −$46.6M | |
| Operating margin | −25.7% | −30.1% | −40.6% | −65.9% | −30.2% | −149.7% | −108.8% | −196.9% | |
| Net income | −$2.9M | −$3.0M | $7.7M | −$8.6M | −$2.9M | −$5.3M | −$11.3M | −$15.8M | |
| Payroll costs | $8.3M | $8.3M | $9.2M | $9.0M | $8.5M | $6.3M | $15.1M | $23.6M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 63.5% | 63.8% | 66.4% | 66.8% | 63.1% | 83.3% | 71.1% | 99.7% | |
| Beds | 184 | 184 | 184 | 184 | 184 | 184 | 184 | 184 | |
| Gross revenue | $16.1M | $16.9M | $17.8M | $14.2M | $13.7M | $8.3M | $22.7M | $25.4M | |
| Salaries | $7.2M | $7.3M | $8.0M | $7.9M | $7.5M | $5.7M | $14.1M | $22.4M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $0.7M | $1.0M | $1.2M | |
| Contract labor | $2.1M | $2.3M | $2.4M | $3.0M | $2.9M | $2.0M | $2.1M | $1.8M | |
| Other operating costs | $8.1M | $8.6M | $10.3M | $13.3M | $9.1M | $12.7M | $29.2M | $46.6M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $250 | $262 | $270 | $287 | $301 | $251 | $747 | $708 | |
| Cost per day | $314 | $341 | $380 | $475 | $391 | $627 | $1,559 | $2,102 | |
| Average length of stay | 115.1 days | 120.0 days | 75.5 days | 74.9 days | 95.1 days | 79.1 days | 105.6 days | 95.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
334 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
160 · 48%
Medicaid
25 · 7%
Private pay & other
149 · 45%
Resident snapshot
97 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
22 · 23%
Medicaid
31 · 32%
Private pay & other
44 · 45%
Leaving
351 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
137 · 39%
Medicaid
29 · 8%
Private pay & other
185 · 53%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Over 30 years of experience
Wendy Carpenter serves as CEO and Executive Director of EdenHill Communities, bringing over 30 years of experience in senior living and health care. She began her career as a Licensed Vocational Nurse and Certified Assisted Living Administrator and holds degrees in Business Administration, Economics, and Health Administration. Wendy has a strong background in operations, quality improvement, regulatory compliance, and strategic planning, and is actively involved in advocacy for seniors.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for EdenHill Communities
Places of interest near EdenHill Communities
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from New Braunfels's city center to EdenHill Communities's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 17.79 miles to nearest hospital (Methodist Hospital Northeast)
Calculate Travel Distance to EdenHill Communities
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Texas
EdenHill Communities is located in New Braunfels, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about EdenHill Communities
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is EdenHill Communities in?
EdenHill Communities is in the Landa Park Estates neighborhood of New Braunfels.
02 Who is the owner of EdenHill Communities?
EdenHill Communities is legally operated by Eden Home, Inc.
03 Is EdenHill Communities in a walkable area?
EdenHill Communities has a walk score of 5. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
04 What is the license number of EdenHill Communities?
EdenHill Communities's license number is 0529.
05 What is the occupancy rate at EdenHill Communities?
EdenHill Communities's occupancy is 49.6%.
06 Does EdenHill Communities have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at EdenHill Communities on this page.
07 Are pets allowed at EdenHill Communities?
Yes, EdenHill Communities allows residents to bring their pets.
Updated on
