Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
208
137 employees · 71 contractors · 62 on an average day Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Memory Care · Centralia, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 13 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 13 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Memory Care · Centralia, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 13 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 13 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center, tucked in Centralia, Washington, boasts a team of highly competent and credible healthcare professionals, including physicians, registered nurses, dietitians, certified nursing assistants, and more. Patients find comfort in the ideal recovery environment created by professionals who prioritize their needs and preferences.
At Prestige, nursing home care and skilled nursing facility services are seamlessly integrated into their offerings. Beyond their skilled therapy teams, this center provides a spectrum of services ranging from pain management and pulmonary care to balance programs, cancer recovery, and tracheostomy recovery. Notably, the facility houses a pharmacy, laboratory, and x-ray services, showcasing a comprehensive approach to healthcare. With a dedication to excellence, Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center emerges as a trusted haven for those seeking superior senior living.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 59 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 16m
This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 59 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 16mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +31% above Washington average
4 of 6 metrics below Washington average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
44m
↓ 17% · WA 53mThis facility: 44m per resident per day, 17% below the Washington average of 53m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 31 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
31 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
1h 4m
↑ 31% · WA 49mThis facility: 1h 4m per resident per day, 31% above the Washington average of 49m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 31 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
31 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 126 total: 69 of the facility's own employees and 57 agency contractors.
126 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
2h 28m
↓ 8% · WA 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 28m per resident per day, 8% below the Washington average of 2h 41m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 126 total: 69 of the facility's own employees and 57 agency contractors.
126 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 24% · WA 5mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 24% above the Washington average of 5m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 42m
↓ 2% · WA 3h 47mThis facility: 3h 42m per resident per day, 2% below the Washington average of 3h 47m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
21m
↓ 44% · WA 38mThis facility: 21m per resident per day, 44% below the Washington average of 38m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
208
137 employees · 71 contractors · 62 on an average day
208 total staff / 106 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.96 : 1
↑ 12% · WA 1.75This facility: 1.96 staff per resident, 12% above the Washington average of 1.75 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
208 staff ÷ 106 residents
See full Washington ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
↓ 1% · WA 8 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 1% below the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
44,476 staff hours this quarter
See full Washington ranking →87.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.9% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (57), Licensed Practical Nurse (13), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
128
Rank #15 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
128
Rank #15 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #8 / 17Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 17 nursing homes we track in Washington for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Washington facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #8 / 17Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 17 nursing homes we track in Washington for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Washington facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
29
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #79 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #79 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
9
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #33 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #33 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
74.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 128 beds.
Similar to the Washington average: 77.5%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
95
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
64
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Resident Council
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
95 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
13 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
89 severity-weighted points (42 deficiencies) · 27% lower than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 123)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · about the same as the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 1) · $8,278 in fines
Persistence
Strong
25 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
17
↑ 93% · WA 8.8This facility: 17, 93% above the Washington average of 8.8 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
45
Rank #26 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 10% · WA 49.9This facility: 45, 10% below the Washington average of 49.9 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.65
Rank #1 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 57% · WA 6.18This facility: 2.65, 57% below the Washington average of 6.18 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
45 of 45 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.3 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 41% · WA 1.7This facility: 1, 41% below the Washington average of 1.7 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
42
↓ 11% · WA 47.4This facility: 42, 11% below the Washington average of 47.4 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 300% · WA 0.5This facility: 2, 300% above the Washington average of 0.5 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 26, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 9 of 45 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 26, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 30, 2026
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 20, 2026
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 11, 2026
7 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 29, 2025
1 citation
Administration serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 02, 2025
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 09, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 24, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 01, 2025
1 citation
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 17, 2025
1 citation
Nutrition minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 11, 2025
14 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 11, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 19, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 17, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 07, 2025
2 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 24, 2024
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 02, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 45 citations
Quality of Life & Care
9 deficiencies (20%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
9 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (9%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (7%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
26 of 45 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 19 of 45 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 29, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Dec 29, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,278
↓ 90% · WA $80KThis facility: $8,278, 90% below the Washington average of $80,436. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #25 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 47% · WA 1.89This facility: 1, 47% below the Washington average of 1.89. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WA avg 0.25Washington average: 0.25. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Dec 29, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,278
Washington average
$80,436
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Washington and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 40% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 40% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 38% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 38% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.3
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · WA 8.2This facility: 4.3, 47% below the WA average of 8.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.3
Score · lower is better
↓ 57% · WA 17.0This facility: 7.3, 57% below the WA average of 17.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 1 worse, 4 near WA average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near WA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.8%
↓ 29% · WA 13.8This facility: 9.8, 29% below the WA average of 13.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.8%
↓ 29% · WA 13.8This facility: 9.8, 29% below the WA average of 13.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.8%
↓ 70% · WA 15.6This facility: 4.8, 70% below the WA average of 15.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.8%
↓ 70% · WA 15.6This facility: 4.8, 70% below the WA average of 15.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.4%
↓ 66% · WA 21.6This facility: 7.4, 66% below the WA average of 21.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.4%
↓ 66% · WA 21.6This facility: 7.4, 66% below the WA average of 21.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 15% · WA 1.7This facility: 1.4, 15% below the WA average of 1.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 15% · WA 1.7This facility: 1.4, 15% below the WA average of 1.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
↓ 3% · WA 2.6This facility: 2.5, 3% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
↓ 3% · WA 2.6This facility: 2.5, 3% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3%
↓ 2% · WA 4.4This facility: 4.3, 2% below the WA average of 4.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3%
↓ 2% · WA 4.4This facility: 4.3, 2% below the WA average of 4.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.4%
↓ 93% · WA 5.6This facility: 0.4, 93% below the WA average of 5.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.4%
↓ 93% · WA 5.6This facility: 0.4, 93% below the WA average of 5.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9%
↓ 67% · WA 17.9This facility: 5.9, 67% below the WA average of 17.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9%
↓ 67% · WA 17.9This facility: 5.9, 67% below the WA average of 17.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 18% · WA 15.0This facility: 12.3, 18% below the WA average of 15.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↓ 18% · WA 15.0This facility: 12.3, 18% below the WA average of 15.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.2This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.2This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.7%
↓ 3% · WA 94.3This facility: 91.7, 3% below the WA average of 94.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.7%
↓ 3% · WA 94.3This facility: 91.7, 3% below the WA average of 94.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.50
↓ 64% · WA 1.38This facility: 0.50, 64% below the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.50
↓ 64% · WA 1.38This facility: 0.50, 64% below the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.95
↑ 29% · WA 1.51This facility: 1.95, 29% above the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.95
↑ 29% · WA 1.51This facility: 1.95, 29% above the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.4%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.4, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.4%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.4, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
61.2%
↑ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 61.2, 21% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
61.2%
↑ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 61.2, 21% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 38% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 38% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 38% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 38% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
↓ 62% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.5, 62% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
↓ 62% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.5, 62% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 12% · WA 88.7This facility: 99.6, 12% above the WA average of 88.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 12% · WA 88.7This facility: 99.6, 12% above the WA average of 88.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.0%
↑ 8% · WA 84.4This facility: 91.0, 8% above the WA average of 84.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.0%
↑ 8% · WA 84.4This facility: 91.0, 8% above the WA average of 84.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.4%
↓ 8% · WA 19.9This facility: 18.4, 8% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.4%
↓ 8% · WA 19.9This facility: 18.4, 8% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.7%
↑ 4% · WA 13.2This facility: 13.7, 4% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.7%
↑ 4% · WA 13.2This facility: 13.7, 4% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 60 Washington nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Fiscal 2024 adds up two reports filed back to back, usually after a change of operator.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−3.7% operating margin
+1.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Washington homes
53.5% payroll share of revenue
WA average 64.4%Rank #46 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue rose $0.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Washington homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.8M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $13.7M | Rank in WA Rank #30 / 60Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above WA median Higher net patient revenue than 51% of WA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.3M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $14.1M | Rank in WA Rank #28 / 60Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.5M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | WA median −$0.2M | Rank in WA Rank #39 / 60Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 36% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −3.7% | +1.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median −1.7% | Rank in WA Rank #36 / 60Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | −$0.4M | Trend — | WA median −$0.0M | Rank in WA Rank #25 / 60Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Washington homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.4M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $8.4M | Rank in WA Rank #39 / 60Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 36% of homes | Below WA median Higher payroll than 36% of WA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 53.5% | −2.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median 58.9% | Rank in WA Rank #46 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | 10.9 pts under WA average The WA average is 64.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Washington payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $11.8M | $12.2M | $11.3M | $11.2M | $11.9M | $12.5M | $13.1M | $13.8M |
| Operating expenses | $12.3M | $12.8M | $11.6M | $11.6M | $11.6M | $13.8M | $13.8M | $14.3M |
| Net patient income | −$0.4M | −$0.6M | −$0.3M | −$0.4M | $0.3M | −$1.3M | −$0.7M | −$0.5M |
| Operating margin | −3.6% | −5.2% | −2.4% | −3.9% | 2.2% | −10.8% | −5.5% | −3.7% |
| Net income | −$0.4M | −$0.6M | −$0.1M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $0.6M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $5.0M | $5.6M | $6.0M | $5.8M | $5.7M | $6.5M | $7.3M | $7.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 42.2% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 51.6% | 48.3% | 52.4% | 55.6% | 53.5% |
| Beds | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 102 | 128 | 128 | 128 |
| Gross revenue | $19.6M | $20.9M | $18.8M | $17.6M | $17.9M | $18.9M | $20.3M | $23.5M |
| Salaries | $4.1M | $4.6M | $4.9M | $4.8M | $4.8M | $5.3M | $5.9M | $6.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.4M |
| Other operating costs | $7.3M | $7.3M | $5.7M | $5.8M | $5.9M | $7.3M | $6.5M | $6.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $330 | $331 | $322 | $380 | $383 | $408 | $420 | $454 |
| Cost per day | $342 | $349 | $330 | $395 | $374 | $452 | $443 | $471 |
| Average length of stay | 76.1 days | 73.2 days | 73.3 days | 84.8 days | 92.7 days | 69.8 days | 67.0 days | 53.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
245 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
94 · 38%
Medicaid
9 · 4%
Private pay & other
142 · 58%
Resident snapshot
106 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
33 · 31%
Medicaid
72 · 68%
Private pay & other
1 · 1%
Leaving
204 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
71 · 35%
Medicaid
40 · 20%
Private pay & other
93 · 46%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Centralia's city center to Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.11 miles to nearest hospital (Providence Centralia Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Centralia
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 64.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia | NH AL IL MC | Centralia | 128
Facility
128
WA AVG
103
Rank
#15 / 69 | A |
74.3%
Facility
74.3%
WA AVG
77.5%
Rank
#33 / 56 | -4% | 4.26
Facility
4.26
WA AVG
4.41
Rank
#22 / 59 | -46% | -3% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
WA AVG
$82.6k
Rank
#25 / 61 | 45
Facility
45
WA AVG
49.9
Rank
#26 / 61 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#1 / 61 | 1 | 95 | A+ |
9
Facility
9
WA AVG
51
Rank
#79 / 80 | - | $13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#30 / 60 | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#39 / 60 | 53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#46 / 60 | 505373 | ||||
| Sharon Care Center | NH AL MC SNF | Centralia | 114
Facility
114
WA AVG
103
Rank
#25 / 69 | A |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
WA AVG
77.5%
Rank
#1 / 56 | +29% | - | -33% | - | $0
Facility
$0
WA AVG
$82.6k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 36
Facility
36
WA AVG
49.9
Rank
#23 / 61 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#51 / 61 | - | 35 | - |
49
Facility
49
WA AVG
51
Rank
#40 / 80 | Summit Care LLC | $10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#49 / 60 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#44 / 60 | 67.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
67.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#12 / 60 | 505429 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia is located in Centralia, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia in a walkable area?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia has a walk score of 9. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia's occupancy is 74.3%.
03 How long has Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia been in business?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Are pets allowed at Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia?
No, Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia is registered as a for-profit in WA.
06 What is the overall rating for Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia have?
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia has 128 beds.
Updated on
