|
| | Hyattsville (Queens Chapel Manor) | 130 | Yes | | Suite / 1 Bed | 36 |
44%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
44% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. A relatively balanced gender mix for assisted living, where facilities typically skew heavily female. |
56%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
56% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. Closer to an even gender split than most assisted living facilities, which typically have 65–75% female residents. |
24%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
24% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. A lower White share than the Maryland average — the community may draw a more diverse resident mix relative to other facilities in Maryland. |
68%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
68% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A higher African American share than the typical Maryland average — useful context when comparing cultural fit and community composition. |
8%
Other Ethnicity Residents — State Benchmarked
8% of residents fall into categories other than White or African American (combined), compared to the Maryland average of 6%. This column aggregates Hispanic, Asian, multiracial, and any other labeled groups that are not classified as White or African American. Reported subgroups in this total: Other (6%), Asian (2%). |
18%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
18% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A higher share of younger seniors often signals a more independent, active resident community with lower acuity care needs. |
42%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
42% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. A high concentration in this mid-range bracket, where residents typically need moderate support with daily activities. |
22%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
22% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. The population here skews younger than the statewide norm, which may indicate a more active, lower-acuity community. |
14%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
14% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. In line with the statewide profile for the oldest resident bracket. |
|
| | Lanham | 125 | Yes | | - | 27 |
29%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
29% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. This facility caters to a majority female resident pool (71% female), consistent with the broader assisted living trend where women significantly outnumber men. |
71%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
71% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. Women comprise the large majority, consistent with national assisted living demographics where women live longer and enter care facilities at higher rates. |
4%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
4% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. A lower White share than the Maryland average — the community may draw a more diverse resident mix relative to other facilities in Maryland. |
96%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
96% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A higher African American share than the typical Maryland average — useful context when comparing cultural fit and community composition. |
0%
Other Ethnicity Residents — State Benchmarked
0% of residents fall into categories other than White or African American (combined), compared to the Maryland average of 6%. This column aggregates Hispanic, Asian, multiracial, and any other labeled groups that are not classified as White or African American. |
15%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
15% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. In line with the statewide profile for this youngest senior bracket in assisted living. |
29%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
29% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. This is the second most common age bracket in assisted living, representing residents with moderate care needs. |
37%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
37% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. The population here skews younger than the statewide norm, which may indicate a more active, lower-acuity community. |
15%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
15% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. In line with the statewide profile for the oldest resident bracket. |
|
| | North Bethesda | 101 | Yes | | studio / suite / 1 bed | 28 |
45%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
45% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. A relatively balanced gender mix for assisted living, where facilities typically skew heavily female. |
55%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
55% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. Closer to an even gender split than most assisted living facilities, which typically have 65–75% female residents. |
75%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
75% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. Close to the average for this category among assisted living facilities in Maryland with reported race/ethnicity data. |
15%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
15% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. In line with the Maryland average for African American residents among facilities reporting this breakdown. |
9%
Other Ethnicity Residents — State Benchmarked
9% of residents fall into categories other than White or African American (combined), compared to the Maryland average of 6%. This column aggregates Hispanic, Asian, multiracial, and any other labeled groups that are not classified as White or African American. Reported subgroups in this total: Asian (5%), Hispanic (3%), American Indian (2%). |
11%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
11% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. In line with the statewide profile for this youngest senior bracket in assisted living. |
26%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
26% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. Below the state norm — the resident mix may skew either younger or older than this typical middle bracket. |
48%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
48% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. This is typically the most common age bracket in assisted living — this facility is in line with the statewide norm. |
14%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
14% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. In line with the statewide profile for the oldest resident bracket. |
|
| | Chillum | 16 | Yes | | Private Studio | 31 |
25%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
25% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. This facility caters to a majority female resident pool (75% female), consistent with the broader assisted living trend where women significantly outnumber men. |
75%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
75% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. Women comprise the large majority, consistent with national assisted living demographics where women live longer and enter care facilities at higher rates. |
58%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
58% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. A lower White share than the Maryland average — the community may draw a more diverse resident mix relative to other facilities in Maryland. |
42%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
42% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A higher African American share than the typical Maryland average — useful context when comparing cultural fit and community composition. |
0%
Other Ethnicity Residents — State Benchmarked
0% of residents fall into categories other than White or African American (combined), compared to the Maryland average of 6%. This column aggregates Hispanic, Asian, multiracial, and any other labeled groups that are not classified as White or African American. |
17%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
17% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A higher share of younger seniors often signals a more independent, active resident community with lower acuity care needs. |
33%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
33% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. This is the second most common age bracket in assisted living, representing residents with moderate care needs. |
42%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
42% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. This is typically the most common age bracket in assisted living — this facility is in line with the statewide norm. |
8%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
8% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. Most residents here have not yet reached the oldest-old bracket, suggesting a younger overall community. |
|
| | Hyattsville (Radiant Valley) | 7 | No | | Private / Semi-Private Rooms | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
7
Rank #282 / 579Bed count — State benchmarkedThis assisted living community is ranked 282nd out of 579 assisted living communities we track in Maryland for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maryland facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every assisted living community we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Assisted living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
