2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Alameda Care Center is a nursing home in Burbank, CA, specializing in memory care, skilled nursing, and rehabilitation. Here, older adults can keep their peace of mind, especially with its compassionate and supportive environment. Exceptional services, including 24-hour care, medication administration, and assistance with daily living activities, are also provided to help residents maintain their independence with ease. The community also follows a resident-focused approach to meet residents’ needs and preferences.
Sensory-stimulating games, light exercises, and recreational programs help enhance residents’ memory and encourage them to live actively. A spacious dining room, top-notch rehabilitation equipment, and cozy common areas are also available, so residents can relax and focus on their recovery. With a variety of restaurants and shops nearby, residents experience a convenient lifestyle. This nursing home has high standards of care, making it one of the best options for senior living in California.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs California averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 63rd out of 289 homes in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 35m
9% above state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
5 of 6 metrics below state avg
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
30% fewer staff per resident than California average
0% compared with California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 6 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
6
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.8 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 15 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
15
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 62 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
62
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.5 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
3,575 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 62 | 0 | 62 | 21,928 | 92 | 100% | 7.5 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 15 | 0 | 15 | 5,320 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,310 | 92 | 100% | 7.8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,779 | 92 | 100% | 7.8 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,438 | 67 | 73% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1,132 | 91 | 99% | 7.5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 4 | 4 | 846 | 81 | 88% | 6.2 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 4 | 4 | 624 | 86 | 93% | 6.8 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 510 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 3 | 3 | 492 | 65 | 71% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 488 | 61 | 66% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 481 | 67 | 73% | 7.2 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 440 | 55 | 60% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 439 | 58 | 63% | 7.6 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
85% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.3
69% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
15.6
38% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.4%
84% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.6%
21% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.0%
6% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4%
107% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
55% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
93% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2%
143% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
74% better than California averageCalifornia average: 10.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.51
12% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 2.25
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.56
65% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.59
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.7%
9% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.9%
19% better than California averageCalifornia average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.7%
247% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
7% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
32.9%
35% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
7% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
14% of new residents, often for short stays.
80% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
87Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Alameda Care Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #220 / 260Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 220th out of 260 homes in California. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #225 / 260Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 225th out of 260 homes in California. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Housing Options: Private / Semi-Private Rooms
Building Type: Single-story
Personal Care Assistance
Rehabilitative Support
On-site Medical Care and Health Services
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Most new residents arrive under Medicaid (80% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 1 - 2 years.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Burbank's city center to Alameda Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Alameda Care Center | NH MC SNF | Burbank | 89
Facility
89
CA AVG
104
Rank
#858 / 1646 |
94.5%
Facility
94.5%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#224 / 1492 | +28% | 4.59
Facility
4.59
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#63 / 289 | -39% | +9% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#184 / 294 | - | 80
Facility
80
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#250 / 291 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#201 / 291 | 1 | 84 | - |
82
Facility
82
CA AVG
59
Rank
#356 / 2058 | Barbara Czarnik | $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#180 / 260 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#220 / 260 | 46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#225 / 260 | 555690 | ||||
| Providence St. Elizabeth Care Center – North Hollywood | NH SNF | North Hollywood (North Hollywood Neighborhood Council District) | 52
Facility
52
CA AVG
104
Rank
#1121 / 1646 |
92.9%
Facility
92.9%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#267 / 1492 | +26% | 3.93
Facility
3.93
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#169 / 289 | +21% | -7% | $54.0k
Facility
$54.0k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#256 / 294 | - | 63
Facility
63
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#228 / 291 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#237 / 291 | 2 | 48 | - |
79
Facility
79
CA AVG
59
Rank
#450 / 2058 | Providence Health System-Southern California | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#248 / 260 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#238 / 260 | 67.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
67.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#38 / 260 | 55192 | ||||
| Burbank Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS SNF | Burbank (South Main Street) | 188
Facility
188
CA AVG
104
Rank
#188 / 1646 |
93.7%
Facility
93.7%
CA AVG
73.9
Rank
#240 / 1492 | +27% | 4.11
Facility
4.11
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#131 / 289 | -36% | -3% | $17.4k
Facility
$17.4k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#215 / 294 | - | 110
Facility
110
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#279 / 291 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#180 / 291 | 3 | 176 | - |
78
Facility
78
CA AVG
59
Rank
#485 / 2058 | Reiner Roeske | $25.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$25.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$15.7M
Rank
#28 / 260 | $12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#39 / 260 | 49.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
49.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
CA AVG
61.1%
Rank
#199 / 260 | 56129 |
Alameda Care Center is located in Burbank, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Alameda Care Center has a walk score of 82. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Alameda Care Center's occupancy is 94.9%.
No, Alameda Care Center has a no-pet policy.
The team at Alameda Care Center can be reached at fac52admin@longwoodmgmt.com.
Alameda Care Center is registered as a for-profit.
Yes — there are 7 photos of Alameda Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Alameda Care Center is located at 925 W Alameda Ave, Burbank, CA 91506.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
