Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
73 employees · 11 contractors · 36 on an average day Amara Health Care & Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Augusta, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Amara Health Care & Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Augusta, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Amara Health Care & Rehab accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Amara Health Care & Rehab provides nursing home care, hospice care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Augusta, GA. Nursing home care offers residential support for people who need ongoing nursing and personal care, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Hospice care focuses on comfort and support for someone at the end of life. Respite care provides a short stay for a resident whose usual caregiver needs temporary relief. Amara Health Care & Rehab may be a good fit for a family seeking ongoing nursing support, end of life hospice care, or a short term respite stay.
The home has 193 beds and an occupancy rate of 28%, a snapshot of how many beds were in use when the figure was recorded. Total nurse staffing is 3h 49m per resident per day, representing the recorded amount of nurse staffing time available per resident across a day. Jessie Love serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 49m
This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 49mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +23% above Georgia average
4 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
16m
↓ 47% · GA 30mThis facility: 16m per resident per day, 47% below the Georgia average of 30m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 10.1-hour shifts
1h 9m
↑ 23% · GA 56mThis facility: 1h 9m per resident per day, 23% above the Georgia average of 56m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 10.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 39 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
39 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
2h 24m
↑ 12% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 2h 24m per resident per day, 12% above the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 39 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
39 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 44% · GA 3mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 44% below the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 2m
↓ 2% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 3h 2m per resident per day, 2% below the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
13m
↓ 35% · GA 20mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 35% below the Georgia average of 20m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
73 employees · 11 contractors · 36 on an average day
84 total staff / 54 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.56 : 1
↑ 12% · GA 1.39This facility: 1.56 staff per resident, 12% above the Georgia average of 1.39 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
84 staff ÷ 54 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.6 h
↑ 4% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 8.6 h, 4% above the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
28,466 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →95.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.2% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
193
Rank #18 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
193
Rank #18 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #110 / 190Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 110th out of 190 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #110 / 190Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 110th out of 190 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
10
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #135 / 211Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 211 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #135 / 211Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 211 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
35
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #156 / 159Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 156th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 159. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #156 / 159Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 156th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 159. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
38.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 74 residents and 193 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jan 2021)
Lower than the Georgia average: 81%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
55
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusSnf/Nf Dual Cert
IssuanceMay 12, 2016
CountyRichmond
Amara Health Care & Rehab is administered by Jessie Love.
Resident Council
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
27 severity-weighted points (3 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 51)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
29 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 44)
Total health inspections
1
↓ 71% · GA 3.5This facility: 1, 71% below the Georgia average of 3.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
3
Rank #5 / 171Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 171 nursing homes we track in Georgia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Georgia State average, with a ranking across all 171 GA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 82% · GA 17This facility: 3, 82% below the Georgia average of 17 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #30 / 171Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 171 nursing homes we track in Georgia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Georgia mean across 171 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 37% · GA 4.76This facility: 3, 37% below the Georgia average of 4.76 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
3 of 3 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Georgia average of 0.6 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Georgia average of 0.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
3
↓ 81% · GA 15.8This facility: 3, 81% below the Georgia average of 15.8 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Georgia average of 0.1 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 04, 2025 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 2 of 3 citations · 2 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 04, 2025
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 3 citations
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (67%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (33%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
3 of 3 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
GA avg $37KGeorgia average: $37,053. Average among the 128 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
GA avg 1.7Georgia average: 1.7. Average among the 128 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
GA avg 0.32Georgia average: 0.32. Average among the 128 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 45% · GA 8.9This facility: 4.9, 45% below the GA average of 8.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 64% · GA 15.4This facility: 5.6, 64% below the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 7 better, 2 worse, 2 near GA average
7 short-stay measures: 1 better, 3 worse, 1 near GA average, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9%
↓ 75% · GA 15.3This facility: 3.9, 75% below the GA average of 15.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9%
↓ 75% · GA 15.3This facility: 3.9, 75% below the GA average of 15.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.5%
↓ 50% · GA 15.2This facility: 7.5, 50% below the GA average of 15.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.5%
↓ 50% · GA 15.2This facility: 7.5, 50% below the GA average of 15.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.4%
↓ 66% · GA 15.8This facility: 5.4, 66% below the GA average of 15.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.4%
↓ 66% · GA 15.8This facility: 5.4, 66% below the GA average of 15.8 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 81% · GA 2.5This facility: 0.5, 81% below the GA average of 2.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
↓ 81% · GA 2.5This facility: 0.5, 81% below the GA average of 2.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↑ 17% · GA 3.2This facility: 3.7, 17% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↑ 17% · GA 3.2This facility: 3.7, 17% above the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
↑ 8% · GA 5.6This facility: 6.1, 8% above the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
↑ 8% · GA 5.6This facility: 6.1, 8% above the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
↓ 43% · GA 5.6This facility: 3.2, 43% below the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
↓ 43% · GA 5.6This facility: 3.2, 43% below the GA average of 5.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 11.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 11.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · GA 11.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the GA average of 11.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.9%
↓ 40% · GA 19.9This facility: 11.9, 40% below the GA average of 19.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.9%
↓ 40% · GA 19.9This facility: 11.9, 40% below the GA average of 19.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.2%
↓ 1% · GA 91.4This facility: 90.2, 1% below the GA average of 91.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.2%
↓ 1% · GA 91.4This facility: 90.2, 1% below the GA average of 91.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 2% · GA 95.0This facility: 96.9, 2% above the GA average of 95.0 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 2% · GA 95.0This facility: 96.9, 2% above the GA average of 95.0 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
43.1%
↓ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 43.1, 20% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
43.1%
↓ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 43.1, 20% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.2%
↑ 188% · US 0.8This facility: 2.2, 188% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.2%
↑ 188% · US 0.8This facility: 2.2, 188% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8%
↑ 7% · GA 2.6This facility: 2.8, 7% above the GA average of 2.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8%
↑ 7% · GA 2.6This facility: 2.8, 7% above the GA average of 2.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.7%
↓ 3% · GA 80.3This facility: 77.7, 3% below the GA average of 80.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.7%
↓ 3% · GA 80.3This facility: 77.7, 3% below the GA average of 80.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3%
↑ 11% · GA 78.4This facility: 87.3, 11% above the GA average of 78.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3%
↑ 11% · GA 78.4This facility: 87.3, 11% above the GA average of 78.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
39.6%
↑ 64% · GA 24.2This facility: 39.6, 64% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
39.6%
↑ 64% · GA 24.2This facility: 39.6, 64% above the GA average of 24.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.6%
↑ 28% · GA 12.2This facility: 15.6, 28% above the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.6%
↑ 28% · GA 12.2This facility: 15.6, 28% above the GA average of 12.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Amara Health Care & Rehab’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 165 Georgia nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−58.3% operating margin
— vs prior year
An operating loss in 1 of the last 1 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$2.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Georgia homes
94.3% payroll share of revenue
GA average 56.1%Rank #6 / 165Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Georgia homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2025 → 2025Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.6M | — | Trend — | GA median $10.4M | Rank in GA Rank #159 / 165Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 159th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | Below GA median Higher net patient revenue than 4% of GA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.3M | — | Trend — | GA median — | Rank in GA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$2.7M | — | Trend — | GA median — | Rank in GA Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −58.3% | — | Trend — | GA median — | Rank in GA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | GA median — | Rank in GA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$2.7M | — | Trend — | GA median — | Rank in GA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Georgia homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2025 → 2025Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.4M | — | Trend — | GA median $5.5M | Rank in GA Rank #114 / 165Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | Below GA median Higher payroll than 31% of GA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 94.3% | — | Trend — | GA median 51.6% | Rank in GA Rank #6 / 165Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 97% of homes | 38.2 pts over GA average The GA average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2025 2 charts · GA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Georgia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin GA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.6M |
| Operating expenses | $7.3M |
| Net patient income | −$2.7M |
| Operating margin | −58.3% |
| Net income | −$2.7M |
| Payroll costs | $4.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 94.3% |
| Beds | 193 |
| Gross revenue | $4.6M |
| Salaries | $3.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M |
| Contract labor | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $362 |
| Cost per day | $572 |
| Average length of stay | 55.3 days |
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
184 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
55 · 30%
Medicaid
9 · 5%
Private pay & other
120 · 65%
Resident snapshot
54 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 7%
Medicaid
47 · 87%
Private pay & other
3 · 6%
Leaving
231 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
75 · 32%
Medicaid
40 · 17%
Private pay & other
116 · 50%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Amara Health Care & Rehab
2.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Augusta's city center to Amara Health Care & Rehab's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.65 miles to nearest hospital (University Health - South Richmond County Campus)
Calculate Travel Distance to Amara Health Care & Rehab
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Augusta
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stevens Park Health & Rehabilitation | NH | Augusta (Bonair) | 42
Facility
42
GA AVG
110
Rank
#193 / 206 | A+ |
97.6%
Facility
97.6%
GA AVG
81%
Rank
#20 / 159 | +21% | 4.00
Facility
4.00
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#18 / 168 | +69% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 173 | 3
Facility
3
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#5 / 171 | 1.5
Facility
1.5
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#9 / 171 | - | 41 | - |
26
Facility
26
GA AVG
44
Rank
#155 / 211 | Tina Lane | $4.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#158 / 165 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#148 / 165 | 65%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
65%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#16 / 165 | 115294 | ||||
| PruittHealth Augusta Hills | NH HOS SNF | Augusta (Summerville) | 126
Facility
126
GA AVG
110
Rank
#59 / 206 | A- |
66.7%
Facility
66.7%
GA AVG
81%
Rank
#138 / 159 | -18% | 3.57
Facility
3.57
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#106 / 168 | +2% | 0% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 173 | 9
Facility
9
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#29 / 171 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#30 / 171 | - | 84 | - |
66
Facility
66
GA AVG
44
Rank
#41 / 211 | Regina Bell | $9.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#100 / 165 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#98 / 165 | 52.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
52.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#81 / 165 | 115672 | ||||
| Harrington Park | NH HOS | Augusta (Foxhall) | 58
Facility
58
GA AVG
110
Rank
#182 / 206 | A |
95.7%
Facility
95.7%
GA AVG
81%
Rank
#10 / 159 | +18% | 4.05
Facility
4.05
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#27 / 168 | -62% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 173 | 8
Facility
8
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#23 / 171 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#22 / 171 | - | 56 | - |
37
Facility
37
GA AVG
44
Rank
#133 / 211 | Andrea Howard | $6.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#133 / 165 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#124 / 165 | 60.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
60.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#37 / 165 | 115725 | ||||
| Azalea Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | Augusta | 99
Facility
99
GA AVG
110
Rank
#119 / 206 | B+ |
72.7%
Facility
72.7%
GA AVG
81%
Rank
#62 / 159 | -10% | 3.23
Facility
3.23
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#80 / 168 | +104% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 173 | 18
Facility
18
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#92 / 171 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#79 / 171 | - | 72 | - |
58
Facility
58
GA AVG
44
Rank
#73 / 211 | Jessica Love | $10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#83 / 165 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#92 / 165 | 49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#101 / 165 | 115044 | ||||
| Amara Health Care & Rehab | NH HOS RC SNF | Augusta (Southlands) | 193
Facility
193
GA AVG
110
Rank
#18 / 206 | A+ |
38.3%
Facility
38.3%
GA AVG
81%
Rank
#156 / 159 | -53% | 3.82
Facility
3.82
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#80 / 168 | +9% | +7% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.6k
Rank
#1 / 173 | 3
Facility
3
GA AVG
17.0
Rank
#5 / 171 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
GA AVG
4.8
Rank
#30 / 171 | - | 74 | - |
35
Facility
35
GA AVG
44
Rank
#135 / 211 | - | $4.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#159 / 165 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#114 / 165 | 94.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
94.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#6 / 165 | 115777 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Georgia
Amara Health Care & Rehab is located in New York City, Georgia.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York City.
Frequently Asked Questions about Amara Health Care & Rehab
What neighborhood is Amara Health Care & Rehab in?
Amara Health Care & Rehab is in the Southlands neighborhood of Augusta.
Is Amara Health Care & Rehab in a walkable area?
Amara Health Care & Rehab has a walk score of 35. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Amara Health Care & Rehab?
Amara Health Care & Rehab's occupancy is 38.3%.
How long has Amara Health Care & Rehab been in business?
Amara Health Care & Rehab has been operating for approximately 10 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Amara Health Care & Rehab?
No, Amara Health Care & Rehab has a no-pet policy.
Does Amara Health Care & Rehab operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Amara Health Care & Rehab is registered as a for-profit in GA.
Who is the administrator of Amara Health Care & Rehab?
Jessie Love is the administrator of Amara Health Care & Rehab.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
