5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Surrounded by breathtaking scenery, Asbury Towers Retirement Community offers an ideal blend of exceptional care and a vibrant community, making it the perfect choice for residents in Greencastle, IN. Residents can benefit from personalized, compassionate support in independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing, all provided by a team of experienced professionals. With a variety of floor plans available, the community accommodates different preferences and budgets, ensuring that each resident can find the ideal living space.
To enhance their quality of life even further, Asbury Towers provides a range of top-tier amenities and services, including a fully equipped fitness room to promote physical well-being, as well as a beauty and barber shop for residents to enjoy regular grooming services without leaving the community. With these thoughtful additions, residents can relax, unwind, and fully embrace their golden years in comfort and style.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 4th out of 291 homes in Indiana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 5m per day | ▲ 67% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 1m per day | ▲ 30% State avg: 47m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 3h 46m per day | ▲ 67% State avg: 2h 15m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 59m per day | ▲ 53% State avg: 3h 16m per day · National avg: 3h 27m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 1m per day | ▼ 79% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 33m per day | ▲ 23% State avg: 27m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Asbury Towers Retirement Community is legally operated by Pulaski Memorial Hospital, and administrated by Eric Ahlbrand.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Indiana, the Department of Health, Division of Long Term Care is the primary regulatory body that performs onsite inspections and quality of care reviews for all licensed facilities.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Indiana state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Indiana nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.
6 points below the Indiana average for nursing homes (83/100)
Rank #228 / 384 in Indiana Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 228th out of 384 homes in Indiana. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Indiana average among 384 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking. Inspection score: 77 out of 100. Letter grade C+. 6 points below the Indiana average for nursing homes (83/100)
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Indiana state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 87 | 36 | This facility has 142% more total deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (87 vs. IN avg 36).↑ 142% worse Rank #318 / 386 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 318th out of 386 homes in Indiana. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Indiana average among 386 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking. |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2022.
| 21.8 | 9 | This facility has 142% more deficiencies per year than a typical Indiana nursing home (21.8 vs. IN avg 9).↑ 142% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 4.4 | 1.9 | This facility has 132% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Indiana nursing home (4.4 vs. IN avg 1.9).↑ 132% worse Rank #289 / 386 Deficiencies per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 289th out of 386 homes in Indiana. Shows this facility's deficiencies per inspection compared to the Indiana average among 386 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking. |
Inspections
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of all on-site visits — routine inspections, complaint visits, follow-ups, and other focused visits.
| 20 | 19 | This facility has 5% more total visits than a typical Indiana nursing home (20 vs. IN avg 19).↑ 5% worse |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory deficiency.
| 10 | 7 | This facility has 43% more inspections with deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (10 vs. IN avg 7).↑ 43% worse |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency.
| 50% | 37% | This facility has 13 percentage points higher inspection deficiency rate than a typical Indiana nursing home (50% vs. IN avg 37%).↑ 13% worse |
|
Inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators.
| 6 | 13 | This facility has 54% fewer inspections than a typical Indiana nursing home (6 vs. IN avg 13).↓ 54% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 2 | 5 | This facility has 60% fewer total complaints than a typical Indiana nursing home (2 vs. IN avg 5).↓ 60% better Rank #50 / 352 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 50th out of 352 homes in Indiana. Shows this facility's total complaints compared to the Indiana average among 352 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking. |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2022.
| 0.5 | 1.3 | This facility has 62% fewer complaints per year than a typical Indiana nursing home (0.5 vs. IN avg 1.3).↓ 62% better |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints. Formal complaints can result in multiple visits.
| 6 | 8 | This facility has 25% fewer complaint visits than a typical Indiana nursing home (6 vs. IN avg 8).↓ 25% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Indiana average 6
Last Health inspection on Mar 2025
Indiana average 25
Indiana average 4.12
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 14 citations resulted from standard inspections.
100% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.2
100% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
1632253% more staff per resident than Indiana average
6% better than Indiana average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
16 total: 7 full-time employees and 9 contractors.
16
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10.3 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
32 total: 6 full-time employees and 26 contractors.
32
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.6 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
33 total: 25 full-time employees and 8 contractors.
33
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.8 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
1,584 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 25 | 8 | 33 | 8,208 | 92 | 100% | 8.8 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 6 | 26 | 32 | 2,361 | 91 | 99% | 8.6 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,295 | 92 | 100% | 8.5 |
| Registered Nurse | 7 | 9 | 16 | 2,057 | 92 | 100% | 10.3 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,665 | 90 | 98% | 6.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 2 | 0 | 2 | 993 | 77 | 84% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 515 | 65 | 71% | 7.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 485 | 66 | 72% | 7.4 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 482 | 60 | 65% | 8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 480 | 55 | 60% | 8.7 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 472 | 58 | 63% | 8.1 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 464 | 58 | 63% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 262 | 36 | 39% | 7.3 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 4 | 4 | 189 | 45 | 49% | 3.9 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 1 | 1 | 97 | 40 | 43% | 2.4 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 25 | 27% | 2.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 4 | 4 | 36 | 20 | 22% | 1.8 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
7.2
10% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 8.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
15.2
11% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 17.1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.3%
11% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 12.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.9%
17% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 14.4%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
17% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 24.6%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
In line with Indiana averageIndiana average: 3.9%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
55% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 4.4%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
209% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2%
9% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 5.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.2%
33% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 24.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6%
130% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 12.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.8%
17% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 93.7%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8%
In line with Indiana averageIndiana average: 95.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.9%
19% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 81.7%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
198% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.9%
22% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 79.0%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
32% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
68% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
68Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Asbury Towers Retirement Community from 2012–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #178 / 294Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 178th out of 294 homes in Indiana. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Indiana average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #4 / 294Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 4th out of 294 homes in Indiana. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Indiana average. Well-run Indiana facilities typically land around 54–68% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: 3-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Three Meals Per Day
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (68% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 4 - 5 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.3 mile from city center
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Indiana Department of Health, Division of Long Term Care.
| Asbury Towers Retirement Community | NH AL IL NC | Greencastle | 123
Facility
123
IN AVG
116
Rank
#163 / 437 | - | - | 7.03
Facility
7.03
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#4 / 291 | +47% | +104% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 77
Facility
77
IN AVG
83
Rank
#228 / 384 | 14
Facility
14
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#66 / 292 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#194 / 292 | - | 24 | A+ |
73
Facility
73
IN AVG
37
Rank
#49 / 587 | Pulaski Memorial Hospital | $5.5M
Facility
$5.5M
IN AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#252 / 294 | $4.3M
Facility
$4.3M
IN AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#178 / 294 | 78.7%
Facility
78.7%
IN AVG
42%
Rank
#4 / 294 | 155758 | ||||
| Mill Pond Health Campus | NH AL MC | Greencastle | 117
Facility
117
IN AVG
116
Rank
#179 / 437 |
27.4%
Facility
27.4%
IN AVG
69.4%
Rank
#419 / 434 | -61% | 3.00
Facility
3.00
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#213 / 291 | +7% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 293 | - | 22
Facility
22
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#140 / 292 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#130 / 292 | 2 | 32 | - |
36
Facility
36
IN AVG
37
Rank
#288 / 587 | Trilogy Healthcare Operations Of Greencastle, LLC | $8.6M
Facility
$8.6M
IN AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#183 / 294 | $4.5M
Facility
$4.5M
IN AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#165 / 294 | 52.5%
Facility
52.5%
IN AVG
42%
Rank
#103 / 294 | 155736 | ||||
| Hickory Creek at Sunset | NH AL IL MC | Greencastle | 68
Facility
68
IN AVG
116
Rank
#354 / 437 |
75.0%
Facility
75.0%
IN AVG
69.4%
Rank
#147 / 434 | +8% | 2.89
Facility
2.89
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#232 / 291 | +13% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 293 | 79
Facility
79
IN AVG
83
Rank
#209 / 384 | 15
Facility
15
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#77 / 292 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#82 / 292 | - | 54 | A+ |
42
Facility
42
IN AVG
37
Rank
#261 / 587 | Yvonne Culpepper | $5.4M
Facility
$5.4M
IN AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#271 / 294 | $2.6M
Facility
$2.6M
IN AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#261 / 294 | 47.8%
Facility
47.8%
IN AVG
42%
Rank
#61 / 294 | 155565 | ||||
| The Waters of Greencastle | NH MC RC | Greencastle | 100
Facility
100
IN AVG
116
Rank
#237 / 437 |
64.0%
Facility
64.0%
IN AVG
69.4%
Rank
#244 / 434 | -8% | 2.83
Facility
2.83
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#245 / 291 | -20% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 293 | - | 21
Facility
21
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#131 / 292 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#170 / 292 | - | 71 | - |
1
Facility
1
IN AVG
37
Rank
#553 / 587 | Jennifer Etienne | $8.2M
Facility
$8.2M
IN AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#197 / 294 | $3.7M
Facility
$3.7M
IN AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#228 / 294 | 44.7%
Facility
44.7%
IN AVG
42%
Rank
#224 / 294 | 155202 |
Asbury Towers Retirement Community is located in Greencastle, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.
Audra Rose is the Director of Nursing at Asbury Towers Retirement Community.
The legal owner and operator of Asbury Towers Retirement Community is Pulaski Memorial Hospital.
Asbury Towers Retirement Community has a walk score of 73. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to IN state health department records, Asbury Towers Retirement Community's license number is 25-001120-1.
According to IN state health department records, Asbury Towers Retirement Community's license expires on June 30, 2026.
Asbury Towers Retirement Community's occupancy is 58.5%.
Asbury Towers Retirement Community is registered as a non-profit in IN.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
