Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
240
158 employees · 82 contractors · 65 on an average day Aviva at Fitzsimons
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Aurora, CO
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Aviva at Fitzsimons
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Aurora, CO
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Aviva at Fitzsimons accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Aviva at Fitzsimons
Aviva at Fitzsimons is a nursing home in Aurora, Colorado, offering skilled nursing. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while rehabilitation services support residents recovering after illness, injury, or hospitalization. The community’s ventilator and tracheostomy care, specialty services and complex care, and post-acute kidney care may suit someone with medically complex needs or a post-acute recovery plan.
There are 100 beds and private accommodations, so each resident has an individual room rather than shared sleeping space. Residents can spend time at the putting green or stop at the on-site café for refreshment. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 11 minutes per resident per day, representing the nursing time allocated to each resident across a day.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, allowing eligible residents to use public benefits or pay directly. Lindsey Kristine Doiel serves as the administrator. Vivage Senior Living owns Aviva at Fitzsimons.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 167th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 11m
This nursing home is ranked 167th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 11mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +124% above Colorado average
3 of 6 metrics below Colorado average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 51 total: 28 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
1h 3m
↑ 26% · CO 50mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 26% above the Colorado average of 50m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 51 total: 28 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 50 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 33 agency contractors.
50 staff · 9-hour shifts
19m
↓ 53% · CO 41mThis facility: 19m per resident per day, 53% below the Colorado average of 41m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 50 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 33 agency contractors.
50 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 65 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
69 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
1h 49m
↓ 18% · CO 2h 13mThis facility: 1h 49m per resident per day, 18% below the Colorado average of 2h 13m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 65 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
69 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
8m
↑ 56% · CO 5mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 56% above the Colorado average of 5m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 57m
↓ 10% · CO 3h 17mThis facility: 2h 57m per resident per day, 10% below the Colorado average of 3h 17m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 21m
↑ 124% · CO 36mThis facility: 1h 21m per resident per day, 124% above the Colorado average of 36m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
240
158 employees · 82 contractors · 65 on an average day
240 total staff / 44 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
5.45 : 1
↑ 208% · CO 1.77This facility: 5.45 staff per resident, 208% above the Colorado average of 1.77 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
240 staff ÷ 44 residents
See full Colorado ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↓ 5% · CO 8.4 hThis facility: 8 h, 5% below the Colorado average of 8.4 h (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,635 staff hours this quarter
See full Colorado ranking →94% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Colorado average: 92.3% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (33), Registered Nurse (23), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Qualified Social Worker (5), Certified Nursing Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Respiratory Therapist (3), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Other Physician (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
100
Rank #91 / 212Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 212 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
100
Rank #91 / 212Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 212 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #201 / 233Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 201st out of 233 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #201 / 233Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 201st out of 233 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
31
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #95 / 140Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 140 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 140. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #95 / 140Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 140 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 140. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
74.1%
This home usually has availability
Based on 74.1 residents and 100 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Similar to the Colorado average: 76.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
55
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Nursing Facility (Medicare Only)
StatusActive
Aviva at Fitzsimons is administered by Lindsey Kristine Doiel.
OwnerMsv Fitzsimons, LLC
Resident Council
Family Council
Accept Medicare
Ventilator and Tracheostomy Care
Post-Acute Kidney Care
Pets not allowed
Admission CriteriaAccepts Medicare and most insurance and payment plans.
Putting Green
Café
Room Types
Private Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
94 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
78 severity-weighted points (22 deficiencies) · 11% lower than the typical CMS-certified CO facility of similar size (median: 88)
Enforcement
Typical
$7,008 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Strong
16 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified CO facility of similar size (median: 26)
Total health inspections
6
↑ 22% · CO 4.9This facility: 6, 22% above the Colorado average of 4.9 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
22
Rank #90 / 196Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 196 nursing homes we track in Colorado for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Colorado State average, with a ranking across all 196 CO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 13% · CO 25.2This facility: 22, 13% below the Colorado average of 25.2 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.67
Rank #58 / 196Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 196 nursing homes we track in Colorado for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Colorado mean across 196 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 28% · CO 5.1This facility: 3.67, 28% below the Colorado average of 5.1 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
95% corrected
21 of 22 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CO 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Colorado average of 0.4 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 50% · CO 2This facility: 1, 50% below the Colorado average of 2 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
21
↓ 7% · CO 22.6This facility: 21, 7% below the Colorado average of 22.6 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · CO 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Colorado average of 0.2 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 26, 2025 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, serious), not yet corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 4 of 22 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 26, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Jan 02, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 08, 2024
7 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 11, 2023
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 31, 2023
7 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 10, 2019
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 22 citations
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (14%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (9%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (9%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (5%)
Administration
1 deficiency (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
18 of 22 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 22 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 22 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 26, 2025 · $7,008 civil money penalty
Aug 26, 2025 · $7,008 civil money penalty
Total fines
$7,008
↓ 81% · CO $37KThis facility: $7,008, 81% below the Colorado average of $37,278. Average among the 133 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #86 / 197Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 86th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Colorado for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Colorado average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 197 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 47% · CO 1.89This facility: 1, 47% below the Colorado average of 1.89. Average among the 133 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CO avg 0.24Colorado average: 0.24. Average among the 133 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 26, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,008
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,008Fine amount comparison
This facility
$7,008
Colorado average
$37,278
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Colorado and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Colorado average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 28% · CO 3.9This facility: 5.0, 28% above the CO average of 3.9 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 87% · CO 2.7This facility: 5.0, 87% above the CO average of 2.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 25% · CO 7.6This facility: 9.5, 25% above the CO average of 7.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 9% · CO 16.0This facility: 14.7, 9% below the CO average of 16.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 6 worse
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.1%
↓ 39% · CO 13.4This facility: 8.1, 39% below the CO average of 13.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.1%
↓ 39% · CO 13.4This facility: 8.1, 39% below the CO average of 13.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↑ 48% · CO 13.3This facility: 19.7, 48% above the CO average of 13.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↑ 48% · CO 13.3This facility: 19.7, 48% above the CO average of 13.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.1%
↓ 24% · CO 21.2This facility: 16.1, 24% below the CO average of 21.2 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.1%
↓ 24% · CO 21.2This facility: 16.1, 24% below the CO average of 21.2 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↑ 77% · CO 1.4This facility: 2.6, 77% above the CO average of 1.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↑ 77% · CO 1.4This facility: 2.6, 77% above the CO average of 1.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
↓ 10% · CO 3.4This facility: 3.1, 10% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
↓ 10% · CO 3.4This facility: 3.1, 10% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3%
↑ 174% · CO 3.4This facility: 9.3, 174% above the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3%
↑ 174% · CO 3.4This facility: 9.3, 174% above the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
↑ 51% · CO 4.7This facility: 7.2, 51% above the CO average of 4.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
↑ 51% · CO 4.7This facility: 7.2, 51% above the CO average of 4.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CO 8.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CO average of 8.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CO 8.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CO average of 8.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.7%
↓ 47% · CO 20.0This facility: 10.7, 47% below the CO average of 20.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.7%
↓ 47% · CO 20.0This facility: 10.7, 47% below the CO average of 20.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.8%
↓ 23% · CO 93.5This facility: 71.8, 23% below the CO average of 93.5 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.8%
↓ 23% · CO 93.5This facility: 71.8, 23% below the CO average of 93.5 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↓ 14% · CO 94.7This facility: 81.8, 14% below the CO average of 94.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↓ 14% · CO 94.7This facility: 81.8, 14% below the CO average of 94.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.5%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.5, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.5%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.5, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
68.0%
↑ 35% · US 50.6This facility: 68.0, 35% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
68.0%
↑ 35% · US 50.6This facility: 68.0, 35% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 23% · CO 1.6This facility: 1.2, 23% below the CO average of 1.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 23% · CO 1.6This facility: 1.2, 23% below the CO average of 1.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.7%
↓ 10% · CO 76.4This facility: 68.7, 10% below the CO average of 76.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.7%
↓ 10% · CO 76.4This facility: 68.7, 10% below the CO average of 76.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.8%
↓ 33% · CO 75.6This facility: 50.8, 33% below the CO average of 75.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.8%
↓ 33% · CO 75.6This facility: 50.8, 33% below the CO average of 75.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.0%
↑ 13% · CO 20.3This facility: 23.0, 13% above the CO average of 20.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.0%
↑ 13% · CO 20.3This facility: 23.0, 13% above the CO average of 20.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.4%
↓ 66% · CO 12.8This facility: 4.4, 66% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.4%
↓ 66% · CO 12.8This facility: 4.4, 66% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Aviva at Fitzsimons’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 192 Colorado nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−42.7% operating margin
−30.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 6 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$4.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Colorado homes
83.8% payroll share of revenue
CO average 63.3%Rank #9 / 192Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $2.8M while revenue fell $8.7M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Colorado homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2024Trend | CO median | Compared with CO homesRank in CO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.0M | −$8.7M | Trend 20192024 | CO median $10.0M | Rank in CO Rank #95 / 192Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Colorado for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above CO median Higher net patient revenue than 51% of CO homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.2M | −$6.8M | Trend 20192024 | CO median — | Rank in CO Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.3M | −$1.9M | Trend 20192024 | CO median — | Rank in CO Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −42.7% | −30.2 pts | Trend 20192024 | CO median — | Rank in CO Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | CO median — | Rank in CO Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$4.2M | −$1.9M | Trend — | CO median — | Rank in CO Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Colorado homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2024Trend | CO median | Compared with CO homesRank in CO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.4M | −$2.8M | Trend 20192024 | CO median $6.0M | Rank in CO Rank #46 / 192Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Above CO median Higher payroll than 76% of CO homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 83.8% | +23.9 pts | Trend 20192024 | CO median 59.7% | Rank in CO Rank #9 / 192Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 192 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | 20.5 pts over CO average The CO average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2019–2024 2 charts · CO benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Colorado payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CO payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2019–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.4M | $7.9M | $8.8M | $13.2M | $18.7M | $10.0M |
| Operating expenses | $9.6M | $8.1M | $10.0M | $14.9M | $21.1M | $14.2M |
| Net patient income | −$3.2M | −$0.2M | −$1.3M | −$1.7M | −$2.3M | −$4.3M |
| Operating margin | −50.5% | −2.4% | −14.6% | −13.1% | −12.5% | −42.7% |
| Net income | −$3.2M | $1.2M | −$1.3M | −$1.6M | −$2.2M | −$4.2M |
| Payroll costs | $3.9M | $4.7M | $5.4M | $6.7M | $11.2M | $8.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 61.7% | 59.7% | 62.2% | 50.6% | 59.9% | 83.8% |
| Beds | 92 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Gross revenue | $8.8M | $8.1M | $9.5M | $13.5M | $34.8M | $12.7M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $4.1M | $4.7M | $5.8M | $9.9M | $7.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $1.3M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $0.4M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $2.5M | $2.7M | $0.6M |
| Other operating costs | $5.7M | $3.4M | $4.6M | $8.2M | $9.8M | $5.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $539 | $509 | $510 | $574 | $640 | $704 |
| Cost per day | $811 | $521 | $584 | $649 | $719 | $1,004 |
| Average length of stay | 21.7 days | 24.4 days | 18.7 days | 30.2 days | 81.1 days | 55.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 3 earlier years
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
261 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
65 · 25%
Medicaid
16 · 6%
Private pay & other
180 · 69%
Resident snapshot
44 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
14 · 32%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
30 · 68%
Leaving
258 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
63 · 24%
Medicaid
16 · 6%
Private pay & other
179 · 69%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Aviva at Fitzsimons
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Aurora's city center to Aviva at Fitzsimons's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Aviva at Fitzsimons
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Aurora
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Colorado average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center of Aurora | NH SNF | Aurora (Southeast Crossing) | 166
Facility
166
CO AVG
94
Rank
#16 / 212 | A |
74.3%
Facility
74.3%
CO AVG
76.4%
Rank
#94 / 140 | -3% | 4.03
Facility
4.03
CO AVG
3.87
Rank
#41 / 191 | +17% | +4% | $33.2k
Facility
$33.2k
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#153 / 197 | 23
Facility
23
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#98 / 196 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#127 / 196 | 2 | 123 | A+ |
41
Facility
41
CO AVG
60
Rank
#175 / 233 | Arapahoe Medical Investors, LLC | $14.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$14.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
$10.8M
Rank
#32 / 192 | $11.0MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#17 / 192 | 75.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
75.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
63.3%
Rank
#16 / 192 | 065332 | ||||
| Summit Rehabilitation and Care Community | NH MC SNF | Aurora (Sunny Vale) | 110
Facility
110
CO AVG
94
Rank
#58 / 212 | ? |
96.2%
Facility
96.2%
CO AVG
76.4%
Rank
#4 / 140 | +26% | 3.45
Facility
3.45
CO AVG
3.87
Rank
#137 / 191 | +4% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 197 | 22
Facility
22
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#90 / 196 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#58 / 196 | 1 | 106 | - |
70
Facility
70
CO AVG
60
Rank
#87 / 233 | - | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$10.8M
Rank
#96 / 192 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#61 / 192 | 75.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
75.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.3%
Rank
#14 / 192 | 065176 | ||||
| Cadence Aurora | NH SNF | Aurora (Utah Park) | 54
Facility
54
CO AVG
94
Rank
#175 / 212 | A+ |
86.9%
Facility
86.9%
CO AVG
76.4%
Rank
#14 / 140 | +14% | 3.93
Facility
3.93
CO AVG
3.87
Rank
#91 / 191 | +84% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 197 | 7
Facility
7
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#9 / 196 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#4 / 196 | 1 | 47 | - |
44
Facility
44
CO AVG
60
Rank
#170 / 233 | Daniel Cortez | $11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$10.8M
Rank
#63 / 192 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#120 / 192 | 45.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.3%
Rank
#177 / 192 | 065393 | ||||
| Garden Terrace at Aurora | NH MC SNF | Aurora | 120
Facility
120
CO AVG
94
Rank
#40 / 212 | A- |
81.4%
Facility
81.4%
CO AVG
76.4%
Rank
#70 / 140 | +7% | 3.82
Facility
3.82
CO AVG
3.87
Rank
#46 / 191 | -10% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 197 | 12
Facility
12
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#29 / 196 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#21 / 196 | - | 98 | - |
46
Facility
46
CO AVG
60
Rank
#163 / 233 | Jerry Weeter | $11.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
$10.8M
Rank
#61 / 192 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#45 / 192 | 71.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
71.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
63.3%
Rank
#26 / 192 | 065266 | ||||
| Aviva at Fitzsimons | NH SNF | Aurora (Morris Heights) | 100
Facility
100
CO AVG
94
Rank
#91 / 212 | A |
74.1%
Facility
74.1%
CO AVG
76.4%
Rank
#95 / 140 | -3% | 3.18
Facility
3.18
CO AVG
3.87
Rank
#167 / 191 | +51% | -18% | $7.0k
Facility
$7.0k
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#86 / 197 | 22
Facility
22
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#90 / 196 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#58 / 196 | 1 | 74 | - |
31
Facility
31
CO AVG
60
Rank
#201 / 233 | Msv Fitzsimons, LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$10.8M
Rank
#95 / 192 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.7M
Rank
#46 / 192 | 83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.3%
Rank
#9 / 192 | 065430 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Colorado
Aviva at Fitzsimons is located in Aurora, Colorado.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Colorado.
Frequently Asked Questions about Aviva at Fitzsimons
What neighborhood is Aviva at Fitzsimons in?
Aviva at Fitzsimons is in the Morris Heights neighborhood of Aurora.
Who is the owner of Aviva at Fitzsimons?
Aviva at Fitzsimons is legally operated by Msv Fitzsimons, LLC, and administered by Lindsey Kristine Doiel.
Is Aviva at Fitzsimons in a walkable area?
Aviva at Fitzsimons has a walk score of 31. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Aviva at Fitzsimons?
Aviva at Fitzsimons's occupancy is 74.1%.
Are pets allowed at Aviva at Fitzsimons?
No, Aviva at Fitzsimons has a no-pet policy.
Does Aviva at Fitzsimons operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Aviva at Fitzsimons is registered as a for-profit in CO.
Who is the administrator of Aviva at Fitzsimons?
Lindsey Kristine Doiel is the administrator of Aviva at Fitzsimons.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
