ALM's inspection grade is 93 / 100, an A — 10 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
ALM's inspection grade is 93 / 100, an A — 10 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Aviva at Fitzsimons is more than just a care facility. It’s a community where seniors can enjoy life to the fullest. With top-notch skilled nursing services Aviva provides comprehensive care to ensure residents receive the best care possible. They also offer post-acute kidney care and ventilator & tracheostomy care.
Residents may spend their day in a golf putting green, an onsite café, the fitness center, the onsite chapel, or the salon and barbershop. These amenities are designed to enhance residents’ quality of life and provide them with delightful experiences. Aviva at Fitzsimons’ featured private suites allow residents to enjoy their own space and privacy as well. They come equipped with cable, phone, and WiFi, so residents can stay connected with their loved ones. Housekeeping and laundry services are also available to make life easier and more convenient for seniors.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 173rd out of 198 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 0mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +106% above Colorado average
3 of 6 metrics below Colorado average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 51 total: 28 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 50 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 33 agency contractors.
50 staff · 9-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 69 total: 65 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
69 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
240
158 employees · 82 contractors · 65 on an average day
240 total staff / 44 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
5.45 : 1
↑ 208% · CO 1.77This facility: 5.45 staff per resident, 208% above the Colorado average of 1.77 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
240 staff ÷ 44 residents
See full Colorado ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↓ 5% · CO 8.4 hThis facility: 8 h, 5% below the Colorado average of 8.4 h (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,635 staff hours this quarter
See full Colorado ranking →94% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Colorado average: 92.3% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (33), Registered Nurse (23), Speech Language Pathologist (5), Qualified Social Worker (5), Certified Nursing Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Respiratory Therapist (3), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Other Physician (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
100
Rank #95 / 219Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 95th out of 219 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #209 / 242Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 209th out of 242 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #93 / 139Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 93rd out of 139 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 139. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 72.7 residents and 100 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Similar to the Colorado average: 76%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Aviva at Fitzsimons is administered by Lindsey Kristine Doiel.
10 points above the Colorado average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
78 severity-weighted points (22 deficiencies) · 9% lower than the typical CMS-certified CO facility of similar size (median: 86)
$7,008 in fines · 1 enforcement action
16 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified CO facility of similar size (median: 27)
Colorado avg 25.2 (13% better than Colorado average)Colorado avg 5.1 (28% better than Colorado average)
95% corrected
21 of 22 citations corrected · 1 still open Colorado avg 0.4 (100% better than Colorado average)Colorado avg 2 (50% better than Colorado average)Colorado avg 22.6 (7% better than Colorado average)Colorado avg 0.2 (100% better than Colorado average)
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
18 of 22 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 22 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 22 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsFederal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
81% lower than Colorado averageColorado average: $37K
47% fewer fines than Colorado averageColorado average: 1.9
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Colorado averageColorado average: 0.2
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Aug 26, 2025 · $7K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Aug 26, 2025Last updated: Aug 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
9.5
25% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 7.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
14.7
9% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 16.0
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.1%
39% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 13.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
48% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 13.3%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.1%
24% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 21.2%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
10% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 3.4%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3%
174% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 3.4%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
77% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
51% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 4.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
100% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 8.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.7%
47% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 20.0%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.8%
23% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 93.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
14% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 94.7%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.7%
10% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 76.4%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
23% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 1.6%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.8%
33% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 75.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.0%
13% worse than Colorado averageColorado average: 20.3%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.4%
66% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 12.8%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.5%
9% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
68.0%
35% better than Colorado averageColorado average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
25% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
69% of new residents, often for short stays.
6% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
44Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Aviva at Fitzsimons from 2019–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #9 / 176Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 176 nursing homes we track in Colorado. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #83 / 176Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 176 nursing homes we track in Colorado. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (69% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 22 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Aurora's city center to Aviva at Fitzsimons's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Colorado average is: 63.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center of Aurora | NH SNF | Aurora (Southeast Crossing) | 166
Facility
166
CO AVG
94
Rank
#17 / 219 | A |
73.2%
Facility
73.2%
CO AVG
76%
Rank
#92 / 139 | -4% | 4.18
Facility
4.18
CO AVG
3.89
Rank
#45 / 198 | +17% | +8% | $33.2k
Facility
$33.2k
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#159 / 205 | 23
Facility
23
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#104 / 204 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#133 / 204 | 2 | 122 | A+ |
41
Facility
41
CO AVG
60
Rank
#181 / 242 | Arapahoe Medical Investors, LLC | $14.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$14.6MFiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#22 / 176 | $11.0MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#14 / 176 | 75.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
75.3%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
CO AVG
63.4%
Rank
#17 / 176 | 65332 | ||||
| Summit Rehabilitation and Care Community | NH MC SNF | Aurora (Sunny Vale) | 110
Facility
110
CO AVG
94
Rank
#60 / 219 | A+ |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
CO AVG
76%
Rank
#4 / 139 | +29% | 3.34
Facility
3.34
CO AVG
3.89
Rank
#144 / 198 | +4% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 205 | 22
Facility
22
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#97 / 204 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#61 / 204 | 1 | 108 | - |
70
Facility
70
CO AVG
60
Rank
#91 / 242 | - | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#37 / 176 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#61 / 176 | 75.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
75.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.4%
Rank
#121 / 176 | 65176 | ||||
| Cadence Aurora | NH SNF | Aurora (Utah Park) | 54
Facility
54
CO AVG
94
Rank
#179 / 219 | A+ |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
CO AVG
76%
Rank
#14 / 139 | +24% | 3.65
Facility
3.65
CO AVG
3.89
Rank
#96 / 198 | +84% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 205 | 7
Facility
7
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#10 / 204 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#5 / 204 | 1 | 51 | - |
44
Facility
44
CO AVG
60
Rank
#176 / 242 | Daniel Cortez | $11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#57 / 176 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#78 / 176 | 45.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.4%
Rank
#117 / 176 | 65393 | ||||
| Garden Terrace at Aurora | NH MC SNF | Aurora | 120
Facility
120
CO AVG
94
Rank
#42 / 219 | A- |
80.5%
Facility
80.5%
CO AVG
76%
Rank
#69 / 139 | +6% | 4.14
Facility
4.14
CO AVG
3.89
Rank
#50 / 198 | -10% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#1 / 205 | 12
Facility
12
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#33 / 204 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#23 / 204 | - | 97 | - |
46
Facility
46
CO AVG
60
Rank
#169 / 242 | Jerry Weeter | $11.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.8MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#63 / 176 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#35 / 176 | 71.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
71.1%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
CO AVG
63.4%
Rank
#16 / 176 | 65266 | ||||
| Aviva at Fitzsimons | NH SNF | Aurora (Morris Heights) | 100
Facility
100
CO AVG
94
Rank
#95 / 219 | A |
72.7%
Facility
72.7%
CO AVG
76%
Rank
#93 / 139 | -4% | 3.01
Facility
3.01
CO AVG
3.89
Rank
#173 / 198 | +51% | -23% | $7.0k
Facility
$7.0k
CO AVG
$38.1k
Rank
#90 / 205 | 22
Facility
22
CO AVG
25.2
Rank
#97 / 204 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
CO AVG
5.1
Rank
#61 / 204 | 1 | 73 | - |
31
Facility
31
CO AVG
60
Rank
#209 / 242 | Msv Fitzsimons, LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#9 / 176 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
$6.1M
Rank
#9 / 176 | 83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CO AVG
63.4%
Rank
#83 / 176 | 65430 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Aviva at Fitzsimons is located in Aurora, Colorado.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Colorado.
Aviva at Fitzsimons is in the Morris Heights neighborhood of Aurora.
Aviva at Fitzsimons is legally operated by Msv Fitzsimons, LLC, and administered by Lindsey Kristine Doiel.
Aviva at Fitzsimons has a walk score of 31. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Aviva at Fitzsimons's occupancy is 72.7%.
No, Aviva at Fitzsimons has a no-pet policy.
Aviva at Fitzsimons is registered as a for-profit in CO.
Lindsey Kristine Doiel is the administrator of Aviva at Fitzsimons.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
