Baptist Village of Oklahoma City
Baptist Village of Oklahoma City provides a continuum of senior housing in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, covering independent living, assisted living, memory care, home care, and 24-hour skilled nursing. Residents in independent living manage their own routines while accessing community perks, whereas assisted living adds daily personal assistance with bathing, dressing, and medications. Memory care residents live in a secure neighborhood designed to prevent wandering, and skilled nursing supplies round-the-clock medical supervision.
Administrator Pamela Brooks manages the 50-bed campus, which features on-site rehabilitation therapies and regular religious services. Financial options accommodate private pay, Medicaid for extended stays, and Medicare for short-term post-hospital rehabilitation. Positioned in an area with a 71 walk score, the location allows residents who do not drive to accomplish everyday errands on foot.
Families exploring multi-level senior care can contact Baptist Village of Oklahoma City to learn more about care transitions, inquire about current bed availability, or arrange a private walk-through of the area.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Standout metric: Physical therapist is +182% above Oklahoma average
1 of 6 metrics below Oklahoma average
Daily care time per resident, by role
US average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
US average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
US average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
93.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oklahoma average: 93.9% · Contractors this quarter: Qualified Social Worker (7), Physical Therapy Aide (6), Respiratory Therapy Technician (6), Speech Language Pathologist (6), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Community insights.
Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
About This Community
Baptist Village of Oklahoma City is administered by Pamela Brooks.
Two inspection records, one home. Oklahoma inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Oklahoma, the State Department of Health, Protective Health Services is the regulatory body responsible for conducting unannounced inspections and reporting on facility compliance.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 3 deficiencies 8 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Oklahoma state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2020 vs. Oklahoma state average• Total deficiencies (57% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (43% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 3 | 7.0 | This facility has 57% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (3 vs. OK avg 7).↓ 57% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 0.4 | 0.7 | This facility has 43% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (0.4 vs. OK avg 0.7).↓ 43% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 8 | 11.0 | This facility has had 27% fewer total inspections than the Oklahoma average (8 vs. OK avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 27% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Citation severity
Latest inspection: Oct 01, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 7 of 25 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent firstTop deficiency categories
Share of 25 citationsHow citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 25 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 25 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 25 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 1, 2025 · $10,358 civil money penalty
Penalty history · past 3 years
Fine amount comparison
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Oklahoma and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oklahoma average.
11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse, 1 near OK average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Baptist Village of Oklahoma City’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 41 Oklahoma nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
8.0% operating margin
+6.0 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.9M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Oklahoma homes
47.9% payroll share of revenue
OK average 56.7%Rank #24 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.0M while revenue rose $1.6M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oklahoma homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $18.7M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $10.4M | Rank in OK Rank #4 / 41Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Top 7% in OK Higher net patient revenue than 93% of OK homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $17.2M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $11.3M | Rank in OK Rank #8 / 41Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.5M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #1 / 41Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 8.0% | +6.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | OK median 0.5% | Rank in OK Rank #4 / 41Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #9 / 29Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.9M | +$1.2M | Trend — | OK median $0.2M | Rank in OK Rank #3 / 41Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 95% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Oklahoma homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.0M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $5.3M | Rank in OK Rank #7 / 41Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above OK median Higher payroll than 85% of OK homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 47.9% | +1.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | OK median 50.1% | Rank in OK Rank #24 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | 8.8 pts under OK average The OK average is 56.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · OK benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oklahoma payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OK payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.4M | $17.4M | $11.8M | $13.3M | $12.6M | $13.9M | $17.1M | $18.7M |
| Operating expenses | $14.3M | $15.5M | $11.8M | $14.5M | $13.0M | $14.7M | $16.7M | $17.2M |
| Net patient income | −$5.9M | $1.9M | $0.0M | −$1.3M | −$0.4M | −$0.8M | $0.3M | $1.5M |
| Operating margin | −71.2% | 11.1% | 0.4% | −9.5% | −3.5% | −5.8% | 2.0% | 8.0% |
| Net income | −$5.9M | $1.9M | $0.0M | $1.2M | $0.0M | −$0.1M | $0.7M | $1.9M |
| Payroll costs | $6.6M | $6.4M | $5.6M | $7.9M | $6.8M | $6.6M | $7.9M | $9.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 78.7% | 36.5% | 47.0% | 59.3% | 53.7% | 47.9% | 46.5% | 47.9% |
| Beds | — | — | — | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Gross revenue | $8.4M | $17.4M | $11.8M | $16.5M | $14.7M | $16.2M | $20.7M | $23.3M |
| Salaries | $6.1M | $6.2M | $5.2M | $6.9M | $6.0M | $5.9M | $7.1M | $8.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $1.0M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | $1.3M | $2.2M | $1.2M |
| Other operating costs | $7.7M | $9.1M | $6.2M | $6.7M | $6.3M | $8.0M | $8.8M | $8.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $237 | $456 | $323 | $448 | $471 | $459 | $499 | $500 |
| Cost per day | $405 | $405 | $321 | $491 | $487 | $486 | $490 | $460 |
| Average length of stay | 27.7 days | 26.9 days | 24.4 days | 78.3 days | 81.9 days | 79.0 days | 55.6 days | 48.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Baptist Village of Oklahoma City
9700 Mashburn Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK 73162
Calculate Travel Distance to Baptist Village of Oklahoma City
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Oklahoma City
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OK State Dept. of Health (OSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oklahoma average is: 56.7% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellevue Health & Rehab Center | NH HOS PC SNF | Oklahoma City (Central Oklahoma City) | 142
Facility
142
OK AVG
97
Rank
#6 / 44 |
87.3%
Facility
87.3%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#12 / 39 | +20% | 4.83
Facility
4.83
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#14 / 40 | -38% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 19
Facility
19
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#21 / 42 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#28 / 42 | - | 124 | - |
44
Facility
44
OK AVG
40
Rank
#22 / 46 | Bellevue Northwest Nursing Center LLC | $18.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#5 / 41 | $8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#10 / 41 | 43.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#34 / 41 | 375349 | ||||
| St. Ann‘s Skilled Nursing & Therapy | NH SNF | Oklahoma City (Eagle Hill) | 120
Facility
120
OK AVG
97
Rank
#12 / 44 |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#5 / 39 | +28% | 4.69
Facility
4.69
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#19 / 40 | +106% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 23
Facility
23
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#28 / 42 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#19 / 42 | - | 111 | - |
28
Facility
28
OK AVG
40
Rank
#33 / 46 | - | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#16 / 41 | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#19 / 41 | 50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#19 / 41 | 375561 | ||||
| Wilshire Nursing Skilled and Therapy | NH SNF | Oklahoma City (Northeast Oklahoma City) | 56
Facility
56
OK AVG
97
Rank
#37 / 44 |
71.4%
Facility
71.4%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#22 / 39 | -2% | 4.70
Facility
4.70
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#19 / 40 | +65% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 16
Facility
16
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#18 / 42 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#21 / 42 | - | 40 | - |
12
Facility
12
OK AVG
40
Rank
#39 / 46 | - | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#41 / 41 | $1.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#41 / 41 | 55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#12 / 41 | 375189 | ||||
| Ignite Medical Resort Oklahoma City | NH PC SNF | Oklahoma City (Central Oklahoma City) | 75
Facility
75
OK AVG
97
Rank
#30 / 44 |
93.1%
Facility
93.1%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#3 / 39 | +28% | 3.58
Facility
3.58
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#38 / 40 | +19% | -22% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 16
Facility
16
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#18 / 42 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#13 / 42 | - | 70 | - |
52
Facility
52
OK AVG
40
Rank
#14 / 46 | Ignite Oklahoma Jv, LLC | $15.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#8 / 41 | $6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#15 / 41 | 40.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
40.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#37 / 41 | 375412 | ||||
| Baptist Village of Oklahoma City | NH AL HC IL MC SNF | Oklahoma City | 50
Facility
50
OK AVG
97
Rank
#40 / 44 | - | - | 7.33
Facility
7.33
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#1 / 40 | -23% | +59% | $28.7k
Facility
$28.7k
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#35 / 42 | 25
Facility
25
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#29 / 42 | 8.3
Facility
8.3
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#41 / 42 | 4 | 99 | - |
71
Facility
71
OK AVG
40
Rank
#1 / 46 | Ryan Ade | $18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#4 / 41 | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#7 / 41 | 47.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#24 / 41 | 375381 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OK nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Programs that may help with care and living costs in Oklahoma
Baptist Village of Oklahoma City is in OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- OK specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
ADvantage Waiver
ADvantage Waiver
Eligibility
- General
- Meet SoonerCare financial rules and nursing-facility level of care; be age 65+ or a qualifying disabled adult; needs must be safely met at home with waiver and community supports. Additional exclusions apply.
What it provides
- Assessed supports may include personal care; adult day health; respite; case management; home-delivered meals; environmental modifications; equipment and therapies.
DDS Respite Voucher Program
DDS Respite Voucher Program
Eligibility
- General
- The linked DDS Respite Voucher Program requires a care recipient with a developmental disability and other program criteria; it is not a general age-60+ caregiver benefit.
- OK specifics
- Care recipient must not receive services under a DDS home/community waiver. Provider eligibility and voucher rules apply.
What it provides
- Vouchers let approved caregivers pay another person to provide respite care; the caregiver selects the provider and agrees the rate.
State Plan Personal Care (SPPC)
State Plan Personal Care (SPPC)
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid State Plan Personal Care serves individuals of any age, including children and older adults, who meet financial and medical level-of-care criteria.
- OK specifics
- A nursing assessment establishes care needs and a care plan.
What it provides
- Authorized assistance with bathing; grooming; transfers; toileting; meals; laundry; shopping and light housekeeping; nursing assessment and care-plan oversight.
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
- Who it is for
- Adults 60+ looking for meals, in-home help or other local aging services
Eligibility
- General
- Services are offered through Area Agencies on Aging to adults age 60+ and other specified eligible groups; individual service criteria and availability vary.
What it provides
- Local programs may provide congregate or home-delivered meals; in-home assistance; transportation; health promotion; legal assistance and caregiver support.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- OK specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households responsible for home heating or energy costs
Eligibility
- General
- Income-eligible households with qualifying home-energy costs; the administering agency applies household-size and program eligibility rules.
- OK specifics
- Life-threatening energy-crisis assistance is available year-round. Winter-heating enrollment is anticipated to open December 15, 2026, subject to federal funding; later FY2027 application periods are separately scheduled.
What it provides
- Winter-heating; summer-cooling and energy-crisis assistance during designated application periods.
State Supplemental Payment (SSP)
State Supplemental Payment (SSP)
Eligibility
- General
- Oklahoma residents who are aged 65+, blind or disabled and meet SSI-related eligibility plus state income and resource requirements.
What it provides
- A state cash supplement for qualifying low-income people; the payment is determined through an individual eligibility review.




