Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
169
103 employees · 66 contractors · 51 on an average day Brookdale Rosehill
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community & Skilled Nursing · Shawnee, KS
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Brookdale Rosehill
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community & Skilled Nursing · Shawnee, KS
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Brookdale Rosehill accepts Medicare and private pay.
Enjoy a rewarding retirement lifestyle at Brookdale Rosehill, a charming senior living community set in Shawnee, Kansas, offering assisted living and a wide range of medical care, including respite stays, short-term care, long-term skilled care, short-stay transitional care, and hospice care. With several apartment floor plans, including apartments with kitchenettes, residents have a lot of great options to choose from.
At Brookdale Rosehill, residents live a maintenance-free lifestyle with the care that matches their needs even as they change. Whether you need long-term care while recovering from surgery or an extra hand with daily activities like medication management or grooming, Brookdale Rosehill has it all for you. Here, residents also enjoy plenty of activities curated from their interests and passions and a host of amenities dedicated to their wellness and enjoyment. With an excellent dining program, residents also enjoy fresh, made-from-scratch meals with seasonal menu options that change. A theater, chapel, piano, beauty/barber shop, a library, ice cream parlor, and a therapy room are just some of the wonderful amenities within the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 141 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 14m
This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 141 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 14mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +266% above Kansas average
1 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 20 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
20 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
1h 19m
↑ 83% · KS 43mThis facility: 1h 19m per resident per day, 83% above the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 20 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
20 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
20 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
57m
↑ 42% · KS 40mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 42% above the Kansas average of 40m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 20 total: 18 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
20 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 85 total: 55 of the facility's own employees and 30 agency contractors.
85 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
1h 59m
↓ 26% · KS 2h 41mThis facility: 1h 59m per resident per day, 26% below the Kansas average of 2h 41m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 85 total: 55 of the facility's own employees and 30 agency contractors.
85 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 266% · KS 2mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 266% above the Kansas average of 2m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 45m
↑ 5% · KS 3h 35mThis facility: 3h 45m per resident per day, 5% above the Kansas average of 3h 35m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 11m
↑ 138% · KS 30mThis facility: 1h 11m per resident per day, 138% above the Kansas average of 30m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
169
103 employees · 66 contractors · 51 on an average day
169 total staff / 73 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.32 : 1
↑ 3% · KS 2.24This facility: 2.32 staff per resident, 3% above the Kansas average of 2.24 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
169 staff ÷ 73 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.3 h
↓ 5% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 7.3 h, 5% below the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
34,066 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →86.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (30), Physical Therapy Assistant (9), Speech Language Pathologist (8), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Occupational Therapy Assistant (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (2), Registered Nurse (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
92
Rank #37 / 148Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 148 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
92
Rank #37 / 148Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 148 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #7 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #7 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
48
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #69 / 159Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #69 / 159Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
54
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #80 / 127Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 127 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 127. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #80 / 127Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 127 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 127. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83.6%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 92 beds.
Similar to the Kansas average: 84.8%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
77
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
42
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$6,270/Month
CMS Certification Number175478
Resident Council
Family Council
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Concierge
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Library
Beauty Salon
Game Room
Movie Theater
Walking Paths
Wi-Fi
Meeting Room
Ice Cream Parlor
Piano
Private Dining Room
Emergency Call System
Activities
Garden Club
Tai Chi
Book Club
Music Appreciation
Veterans Club
Live Entertainment
Arts & Crafts
Touring HoursMon - Fri: 8am - 9pm CT / Sat: 9am - 5:30pm CT
Chapel
Building Type2-story
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
4
↓ 5% · KS 4.2This facility: 4, 5% below the KS average of 4.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
36
Rank #105 / 144Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 144 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 30% · KS 27.6This facility: 36, 30% above the KS average of 27.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
9
Rank #119 / 144Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 119th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 144 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 38% · KS 6.52This facility: 9, 38% above the KS average of 6.52 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
36 of 36 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
35
↑ 38% · KS 25.3This facility: 35, 38% above the KS average of 25.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 43% · KS 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 10, 2025 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 14 of 36 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 10, 2025
5 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 30, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 19, 2023
23 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 17, 2022
6 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 36 citations
Quality of Life & Care
14 deficiencies (39%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
7 deficiencies (19%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (8%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (6%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (3%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
34 of 36 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 36 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
KS avg $41KKansas average: $41,033. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
KS avg 2.13Kansas average: 2.13. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.26Kansas average: 0.26. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 35% · KS 3.0This facility: 4.0, 35% above the KS average of 3.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 93% · KS 2.6This facility: 5.0, 93% above the KS average of 2.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · KS 9.0This facility: 8.9, 2% below the KS average of 9.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 20% · KS 17.8This facility: 14.2, 20% below the KS average of 17.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 4 worse, 1 near KS average
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
↓ 44% · KS 17.4This facility: 9.7, 44% below the KS average of 17.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
↓ 44% · KS 17.4This facility: 9.7, 44% below the KS average of 17.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.9%
↑ 2% · KS 14.5This facility: 14.9, 2% above the KS average of 14.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.9%
↑ 2% · KS 14.5This facility: 14.9, 2% above the KS average of 14.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
↓ 16% · KS 21.6This facility: 18.0, 16% below the KS average of 21.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
↓ 16% · KS 21.6This facility: 18.0, 16% below the KS average of 21.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 56% · KS 2.8This facility: 1.2, 56% below the KS average of 2.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 56% · KS 2.8This facility: 1.2, 56% below the KS average of 2.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
↑ 28% · KS 4.2This facility: 5.4, 28% above the KS average of 4.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
↑ 28% · KS 4.2This facility: 5.4, 28% above the KS average of 4.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2%
↑ 42% · KS 4.4This facility: 6.2, 42% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2%
↑ 42% · KS 4.4This facility: 6.2, 42% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2%
↑ 73% · KS 4.8This facility: 8.2, 73% above the KS average of 4.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2%
↑ 73% · KS 4.8This facility: 8.2, 73% above the KS average of 4.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
↓ 70% · KS 6.6This facility: 1.9, 70% below the KS average of 6.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
↓ 70% · KS 6.6This facility: 1.9, 70% below the KS average of 6.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.5%
↓ 53% · KS 17.9This facility: 8.5, 53% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.5%
↓ 53% · KS 17.9This facility: 8.5, 53% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
↑ 6% · KS 92.9This facility: 98.2, 6% above the KS average of 92.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
↑ 6% · KS 92.9This facility: 98.2, 6% above the KS average of 92.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 94.9This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 94.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · KS 94.9This facility: 100.0, 5% above the KS average of 94.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.18
↑ 18% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.18, 18% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.18
↑ 18% · KS 1.84This facility: 2.18, 18% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.01
↓ 53% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.01, 53% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.01
↓ 53% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.01, 53% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
72.8%
↑ 36% · US 53.7This facility: 72.8, 36% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
72.8%
↑ 36% · US 53.7This facility: 72.8, 36% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.1%
↑ 29% · US 50.6This facility: 65.1, 29% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.1%
↑ 29% · US 50.6This facility: 65.1, 29% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 36% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 36% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 36% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 36% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 75% · KS 1.6This facility: 0.4, 75% below the KS average of 1.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 75% · KS 1.6This facility: 0.4, 75% below the KS average of 1.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
↑ 27% · KS 77.0This facility: 98.2, 27% above the KS average of 77.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
↑ 27% · KS 77.0This facility: 98.2, 27% above the KS average of 77.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 28% · KS 75.4This facility: 96.7, 28% above the KS average of 75.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 28% · KS 75.4This facility: 96.7, 28% above the KS average of 75.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.5%
↓ 15% · KS 23.0This facility: 19.5, 15% below the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.5%
↓ 15% · KS 23.0This facility: 19.5, 15% below the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.4%
↓ 37% · KS 11.7This facility: 7.4, 37% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.4%
↓ 37% · KS 11.7This facility: 7.4, 37% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Brookdale Rosehill’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 144 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.1% operating margin
−1.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Kansas homes
53.2% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.2%Rank #80 / 144Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.0M while revenue rose $0.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $16.0M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.4M | Rank in KS Rank #14 / 144Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Top 9% in KS Higher net patient revenue than 91% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.0M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.4M | Rank in KS Rank #16 / 144Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.0M | −$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median −$0.1M | Rank in KS Rank #66 / 144Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.1% | −1.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median −0.8% | Rank in KS Rank #66 / 144Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | KS median $0.0M | Rank in KS Rank #61 / 142Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 142 nursing homes we track in Kansas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 57% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | −$0.2M | Trend — | KS median $0.2M | Rank in KS Rank #79 / 144Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.5M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.4M | Rank in KS Rank #15 / 144Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Top 10% in KS by size Higher payroll than 90% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 53.2% | +5.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Rank #80 / 144Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 80th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | 4.0 pts under KS average The KS average is 57.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $11.7M | $12.8M | $14.1M | $11.9M | $13.7M | $14.8M | $15.7M | $16.0M |
| Operating expenses | $13.2M | $13.8M | $14.8M | $14.1M | $15.5M | $16.3M | $15.5M | $16.0M |
| Net patient income | −$1.5M | −$1.1M | −$0.7M | −$2.2M | −$1.8M | −$1.5M | $0.2M | $0.0M |
| Operating margin | −12.8% | −8.3% | −5.1% | −18.1% | −13.0% | −10.1% | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Net income | −$1.4M | −$1.0M | −$0.6M | −$1.4M | −$1.5M | −$1.3M | $0.3M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $8.1M | $8.5M | $9.3M | $8.7M | $8.6M | $8.4M | $7.5M | $8.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 69.1% | 66.4% | 66.1% | 72.7% | 62.4% | 57.0% | 48.0% | 53.2% |
| Beds | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Gross revenue | $14.7M | $13.4M | $14.3M | $11.1M | $12.7M | $14.6M | $14.7M | $14.3M |
| Salaries | $7.1M | $7.2M | $7.9M | $7.4M | $7.5M | $7.4M | $6.6M | $7.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $0.9M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $5.1M | $5.3M | $5.5M | $5.4M | $6.9M | $7.9M | $8.0M | $7.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $298 | $307 | $313 | $293 | $344 | $352 | $381 | $400 |
| Cost per day | $336 | $332 | $329 | $346 | $388 | $387 | $377 | $400 |
| Average length of stay | 31.6 days | 28.3 days | 29.9 days | 38.1 days | 29.4 days | 28.2 days | 30.0 days | 41.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Studio
1
1 / 4
1 Bed
1
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
609 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
147 · 24%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
462 · 76%
Resident snapshot
73 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
38 · 52%
Medicaid
27 · 37%
Private pay & other
8 · 11%
Leaving
615 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
210 · 34%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
405 · 66%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Brookdale Rosehill
Places of interest near Brookdale Rosehill
1.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Shawnee's city center to Brookdale Rosehill's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 2.97 miles to nearest hospital (AdventHealth Shawnee Mission)
Calculate Travel Distance to Brookdale Rosehill
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookdale Rosehill | NH AL CCRC SNF | Shawnee | 92
Facility
92
KS AVG
74
Rank
#37 / 148 |
83.6%
Facility
83.6%
KS AVG
84.8%
Rank
#80 / 127 | -1% | 4.23
Facility
4.23
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#96 / 141 | +11% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 36
Facility
36
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#105 / 144 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#119 / 144 | - | 77 | A+ |
54
Facility
54
KS AVG
49
Rank
#69 / 159 | Mary Patchett | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#14 / 144 | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#15 / 144 | 53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#80 / 144 | 175478 | ||||
| Bethany Home Association of Lindsborg, Kansas | NH AL IL SNF | Chestnut Lindsborg | 85
Facility
85
KS AVG
74
Rank
#41 / 148 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
84.8%
Rank
#1 / 127 | +18% | 6.70
Facility
6.70
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#7 / 141 | -11% | +43% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#57 / 144 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#15 / 144 | - | 73 | - |
61
Facility
61
KS AVG
49
Rank
#47 / 159 | Kansas Bethany Home Association Of Lindsborg | $10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#40 / 144 | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#22 / 144 | 71.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#11 / 144 | 175507 | ||||
| Claridge Court | NH IL SNF | Prairie Village (Prairie Hills) | 45
Facility
45
KS AVG
74
Rank
#106 / 148 |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
KS AVG
84.8%
Rank
#73 / 127 | 0% | 4.95
Facility
4.95
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#48 / 141 | +69% | +6% | $18.0k
Facility
$18.0k
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#96 / 145 | 17
Facility
17
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#30 / 144 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#55 / 144 | 1 | 38 | - |
64
Facility
64
KS AVG
49
Rank
#42 / 159 | Lifespace Communities Inc | $15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#15 / 144 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#24 / 144 | 47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#114 / 144 | 175343 | ||||
| Pleasant View Home | NH ADC AL HC IL MC SNF | Inman | 122
Facility
122
KS AVG
74
Rank
#18 / 148 |
65.8%
Facility
65.8%
KS AVG
84.8%
Rank
#115 / 127 | -22% | 6.34
Facility
6.34
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#12 / 141 | -25% | +36% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#57 / 144 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#50 / 144 | 1 | 80 | - |
31
Facility
31
KS AVG
49
Rank
#116 / 159 | Reno County | $11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#28 / 144 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#37 / 144 | 53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#81 / 144 | 175406 | ||||
| Diversicare of Haysville | NH HOS MC SNF | Haysville | 100
Facility
100
KS AVG
74
Rank
#29 / 148 |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
KS AVG
84.8%
Rank
#1 / 127 | +18% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#138 / 141 | +10% | -37% | $30.6k
Facility
$30.6k
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#112 / 145 | 43
Facility
43
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#118 / 144 | 7.2
Facility
7.2
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#95 / 144 | 3 | 91 | - |
61
Facility
61
KS AVG
49
Rank
#47 / 159 | Diversicare Haysville Property LLC | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#53 / 144 | $3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#71 / 144 | 42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
42.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#132 / 144 | 175133 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Kansas
Brookdale Rosehill is in Shawnee, Kansas. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Pension Aid and Attendance and Housebound Benefits (Federal)
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- No single monthly income cutoff. VA compares countable annual income, after permitted deductions, with the applicable Maximum Annual Pension Rate for the household and benefit category.
- Asset limit
- Net-worth limit is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus annual income; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Veterans or eligible survivors who qualify for VA Pension or Survivors Pension and meet the additional Aid and Attendance or Housebound criteria. Service, discharge, family status and pension eligibility rules also apply.
- KS specifics
- A federal VA pension benefit; Aid and Attendance and Housebound enhancements cannot be received together.
What it provides
- A higher pension ceiling for eligible Aid and Attendance or Housebound recipients. Actual pension equals the applicable annual maximum minus countable income; the two enhancements cannot be paid together.
Frail Elderly Waiver
Kansas Medicaid FE Waiver
Eligibility
- General
- Kansas residents age 65 or older who meet Medicaid financial rules and the long-term-care functional assessment.
- KS specifics
- Begin with the Aging and Disability Resource Center; service types and amounts depend on current waiver rules and assessment.
What it provides
- Authorized home/community services under the Frail Elderly Waiver instead of nursing-facility care.
Senior Care Act
Kansas SCA
- Income limit
- Cost sharing uses a sliding scale based on income and assets.
Eligibility
- General
- Kansas residents age 60 or older with functional limitations who can remain in a community residence with support.
What it provides
- In-home support services under a needs assessment; services vary by county and available program resources.
Family Caregiver Support Program
Family Caregiver Support Program (Kansas)
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
Eligibility
- General
- Adult family or informal caregivers of adults age 60 or older or people of any age with Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder. The federal program also supports specified older-relative caregiver categories.
What it provides
- Caregiver information and access assistance; counseling and training; support groups; respite and limited supplemental services under the federal caregiver-support framework.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Kansas Medicare Savings Program
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiaries meeting the applicable state Medicare Savings Program eligibility rules.
- KS specifics
- Applications are administered by the state Medicaid program.
What it provides
- Assistance with Medicare premiums and; for qualified QMB beneficiaries; Medicare-covered deductibles and coinsurance. The qualifying category determines which costs are paid.
More homes from the same operator
Operated by
Brookdale
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Brookdale Rosehill
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Brookdale Rosehill in a walkable area?
Brookdale Rosehill has a walk score of 54. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Brookdale Rosehill?
Brookdale Rosehill's occupancy is 83.6%.
03 How long has Brookdale Rosehill been in business?
Brookdale Rosehill has been operating for approximately 48 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Does Brookdale Rosehill have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Brookdale Rosehill on this page.
05 Are pets allowed at Brookdale Rosehill?
Yes, Brookdale Rosehill allows residents to bring their pets.
06 Does Brookdale Rosehill operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Brookdale Rosehill is registered as a for-profit in KS.
07 What is the overall rating for Brookdale Rosehill?
Brookdale Rosehill received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
