Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
161
161 employees · 0 contractors · 69 on an average day Charleston Post Acute
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Las Vegas, NV
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the Nevada average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the Nevada average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Charleston Post Acute
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Las Vegas, NV
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the Nevada average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 13 points below the Nevada average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Charleston Post Acute accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Offering skilled nursing and rehabilitation services, Charleston Post Acute is a nursing home in Las Vegas, NV. Licensed nurses provide continuous clinical support, with 24-hour staffing available to ensure round-the-clock availability. Recovery-focused care is also provided to help improve residents’ ability to function.
The home has 148 beds, with 97% occupancy. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 25 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time allocated per resident. Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families routes to cover care through public benefits or personal funds.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 25m
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 25mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +30% above Nevada average
5 of 6 metrics below Nevada average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
34m
↓ 44% · NV 1h 1mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 44% below the Nevada average of 1h 1m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
1h 4m
↑ 30% · NV 49mThis facility: 1h 4m per resident per day, 30% above the Nevada average of 49m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 62 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
62 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
1h 47m
↓ 20% · NV 2h 14mThis facility: 1h 47m per resident per day, 20% below the Nevada average of 2h 14m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 62 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
62 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 55% · NV 7mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 55% below the Nevada average of 7m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 1m
↓ 15% · NV 3h 34mThis facility: 3h 1m per resident per day, 15% below the Nevada average of 3h 34m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
26m
↓ 50% · NV 53mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 50% below the Nevada average of 53m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
161
161 employees · 0 contractors · 69 on an average day
161 total staff / 146 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.10 : 1
↓ 25% · NV 1.48This facility: 1.10 staff per resident, 25% below the Nevada average of 1.48 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
161 staff ÷ 146 residents
See full Nevada ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9 h
↑ 3% · NV 8.7 hThis facility: 9 h, 3% above the Nevada average of 8.7 h (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
56,203 staff hours this quarter
See full Nevada ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Nevada average: 95% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #15 / 49Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 49 nursing homes we track in Nevada for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nevada facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
148
Rank #15 / 49Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 49 nursing homes we track in Nevada for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nevada facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #29 / 34Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 34 nursing homes we track in Nevada for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Nevada facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #29 / 34Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 34 nursing homes we track in Nevada for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Nevada facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
1
year
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #7 / 54Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 54 nursing homes we track in Nevada for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nevada facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #7 / 54Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 54 nursing homes we track in Nevada for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nevada facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
71
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #4 / 44Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 44 nursing homes we track in Nevada for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nevada average, with its Statewide rank out of 44. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #4 / 44Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 44 nursing homes we track in Nevada for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nevada average, with its Statewide rank out of 44. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
97.5%
This home is often near full
Based on 144.3 residents and 148 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Nevada average: 83.9%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
66
days
About This Community
Facility TypeFacility For Skilled Nursing
StatusActive
IssuanceOctober 8, 2025
ExpirationDecember 31, 2026
License Number11907-SNF-1
Resident Council
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
On-Site Medical Director
Director of Nursing Oversight
IV Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Enteral Feeding
Colostomy CareHelp caring for a colostomy, an opening in the abdomen that allows stool to leave the body into an attached pouch. Support can include pouch changes and skin care.
Ostomy CareCare for a stoma and the attached pouch after surgery, such as for a colostomy or ileostomy. Proper care helps prevent skin problems and infection.
Diabetic Management and Education
Pain Management
Psychologist Services
Audiology ServicesHearing-related evaluation and treatment provided by an audiologist or other qualified professional. Services can include hearing tests, hearing aids, and communication support.
Laboratory Testing and X-Rays
Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Dietitian
- Arrangement of dental, vision, podiatry, audiology appointments
Psychosocial and Psychiatric Evaluation
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Individualized Resident Care Plan Treatments
Family Education
Accompaniment To Appointments
TransportationListed as: Transportation arrangement for appointments
Pets not allowed
Activities
Resident and Family Councils
Volunteer Programs
Musical Performances
Current Events Discussion
Newspaper Reading
Singing
Stretching Exercises
Games
Trivia
History Programs
Gardening
Field Trips and Outings
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
13 points below the Nevada average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
70 severity-weighted points (33 deficiencies) · 3% higher than the typical CMS-certified NV facility (median: 68)
Enforcement
Concern
$69,343 in fines · 2 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
29 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified NV facility (median: 33)
Total health inspections
7
↑ 43% · NV 4.9This facility: 7, 43% above the Nevada average of 4.9 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
33
Rank #19 / 40Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Nevada for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Nevada State average, with a ranking across all 40 NV facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 2% · NV 32.5This facility: 33, 2% above the Nevada average of 32.5 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.71
Rank #10 / 40Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Nevada for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Nevada mean across 40 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 29% · NV 6.62This facility: 4.71, 29% below the Nevada average of 6.62 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
96% corrected
32 of 33 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 400% · NV 0.2This facility: 1, 400% above the Nevada average of 0.2 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 233% · NV 0.3This facility: 1, 233% above the Nevada average of 0.3 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
31
↓ 1% · NV 31.4This facility: 31, 1% below the Nevada average of 31.4 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
96% corrected · 1 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NV 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Nevada average of 0.6 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 27, 2026 · 1 citation (Resident Rights, moderate), not yet corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 14 of 33 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 27, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Apr 24, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 11, 2025
7 citations
Nutrition critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 16, 2025
4 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 26, 2024
11 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 07, 2023
6 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 33 citations
Quality of Life & Care
14 deficiencies (42%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
6 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (12%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (6%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (6%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
19 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; 12 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 33 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Apr 11, 2025 · $61,900 civil money penalty
Apr 11, 2025 · $61,900 civil money penalty
Nov 7, 2023 · $7,443 civil money penalty
Total fines
$69,343
↑ 95% · NV $36KThis facility: $69,343, 95% above the Nevada average of $35,551. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #38 / 40Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Nevada for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Nevada average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 40 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 53% · NV 1.31This facility: 2, 53% above the Nevada average of 1.31. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NV avg 0.04Nevada average: 0.04. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Apr 11, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$61,900
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$61,900
Nov 7, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,443
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$7,443Fine amount comparison
This facility
$69,343
Nevada average
$35,551
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Nevada and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Nevada average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
2.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 61% · NV 7.3This facility: 2.9, 61% below the NV average of 7.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 58% · NV 13.3This facility: 5.6, 58% below the NV average of 13.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse, 1 near NV average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4%
↓ 81% · NV 12.5This facility: 2.4, 81% below the NV average of 12.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4%
↓ 81% · NV 12.5This facility: 2.4, 81% below the NV average of 12.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.8%
↓ 86% · NV 12.4This facility: 1.8, 86% below the NV average of 12.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.8%
↓ 86% · NV 12.4This facility: 1.8, 86% below the NV average of 12.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.6%
↓ 18% · NV 15.5This facility: 12.6, 18% below the NV average of 15.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.6%
↓ 18% · NV 15.5This facility: 12.6, 18% below the NV average of 15.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 1.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 1.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 1.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 1.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
↓ 50% · NV 1.9This facility: 0.9, 50% below the NV average of 1.9 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
↓ 50% · NV 1.9This facility: 0.9, 50% below the NV average of 1.9 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
↑ 20% · NV 5.5This facility: 6.5, 20% above the NV average of 5.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
↑ 20% · NV 5.5This facility: 6.5, 20% above the NV average of 5.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
↓ 50% · NV 5.3This facility: 2.7, 50% below the NV average of 5.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
↓ 50% · NV 5.3This facility: 2.7, 50% below the NV average of 5.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1%
↑ 122% · NV 5.0This facility: 11.1, 122% above the NV average of 5.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1%
↑ 122% · NV 5.0This facility: 11.1, 122% above the NV average of 5.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.0%
↓ 36% · NV 17.1This facility: 11.0, 36% below the NV average of 17.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.0%
↓ 36% · NV 17.1This facility: 11.0, 36% below the NV average of 17.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 6% · NV 93.7This facility: 99.1, 6% above the NV average of 93.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 6% · NV 93.7This facility: 99.1, 6% above the NV average of 93.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 3% · NV 92.8This facility: 95.5, 3% above the NV average of 92.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 3% · NV 92.8This facility: 95.5, 3% above the NV average of 92.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 45% · NV 1.7This facility: 0.9, 45% below the NV average of 1.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 45% · NV 1.7This facility: 0.9, 45% below the NV average of 1.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 17% · NV 85.0This facility: 99.4, 17% above the NV average of 85.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 17% · NV 85.0This facility: 99.4, 17% above the NV average of 85.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.1%
↑ 6% · NV 82.5This facility: 87.1, 6% above the NV average of 82.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.1%
↑ 6% · NV 82.5This facility: 87.1, 6% above the NV average of 82.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Charleston Post Acute’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 39 Nevada nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
1.8% operating margin
−0.0 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.4M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Nevada homes
51.6% payroll share of revenue
NV average 50.3%Rank #16 / 39Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.5M while revenue rose $0.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Nevada homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NV median | Compared with NV homesRank in NV | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $19.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $19.1M | Rank in NV Rank #17 / 39Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Above NV median Higher net patient revenue than 58% of NV homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $19.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $18.2M | Rank in NV Rank #16 / 39Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $1.2M | Rank in NV Rank #29 / 39Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 1.8% | −0.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | NV median 7.1% | Rank in NV Rank #29 / 39Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | NV median $0.0M | Rank in NV Rank #18 / 39Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.4M | −$0.2M | Trend — | NV median $1.0M | Rank in NV Rank #30 / 39Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Nevada homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NV median | Compared with NV homesRank in NV | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.1M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $9.3M | Rank in NV Rank #13 / 39Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 68% of homes | Above NV median Higher payroll than 68% of NV homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 51.6% | +1.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | NV median 51.1% | Rank in NV Rank #16 / 39Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Near NV average The NV average is 50.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NV benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Nevada payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NV payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $19.6M | $19.9M | $20.6M | $20.3M | $20.0M | $19.7M | $19.4M | $19.7M |
| Operating expenses | $19.3M | $19.4M | $20.3M | $20.8M | $21.1M | $22.1M | $19.1M | $19.3M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | $0.5M | $0.3M | −$0.5M | −$1.1M | −$2.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 2.7% | 1.7% | −2.6% | −5.7% | −12.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Net income | $0.3M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.6M | −$1.1M | −$2.4M | $0.6M | $0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $8.5M | $8.4M | $8.4M | $8.6M | $8.8M | $9.9M | $9.7M | $10.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 43.6% | 42.3% | 40.7% | 42.6% | 44.1% | 50.3% | 49.8% | 51.6% |
| Beds | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 | 148 |
| Gross revenue | $22.1M | $22.2M | $22.9M | $20.8M | $19.9M | $19.8M | $24.6M | $25.5M |
| Salaries | $7.2M | $7.1M | $7.2M | $7.4M | $7.5M | $8.6M | $8.4M | $8.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.1M |
| Other operating costs | $10.8M | $10.9M | $11.9M | $12.1M | $12.3M | $12.2M | $9.4M | $9.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $408 | $416 | $432 | $450 | $450 | $410 | $387 | $390 |
| Cost per day | $403 | $405 | $424 | $462 | $476 | $460 | $380 | $383 |
| Average length of stay | 54.9 days | 51.9 days | 53.0 days | 63.1 days | 49.4 days | 55.1 days | 64.0 days | 66.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
765 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
162 · 21%
Medicaid
120 · 16%
Private pay & other
483 · 63%
Resident snapshot
146 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
14 · 10%
Medicaid
85 · 58%
Private pay & other
47 · 32%
Leaving
762 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
116 · 15%
Medicaid
176 · 23%
Private pay & other
470 · 62%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Charleston Post Acute
5.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Las Vegas's city center to Charleston Post Acute's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Charleston Post Acute
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Las Vegas
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NV Dept. of Health & Human Services, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Nevada average is: 50.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Health Care of Las Vegas | NH SNF | Las Vegas | 38
Facility
38
NV AVG
116
Rank
#41 / 49 | A+ |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
NV AVG
83.9%
Rank
#3 / 44 | +17% | 4.15
Facility
4.15
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#8 / 39 | -10% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 40 | 10
Facility
10
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#3 / 40 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#3 / 40 | - | 37 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
NV AVG
48
Rank
#48 / 54 | Joseph Walker | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.4M
Rank
#32 / 39 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#35 / 39 | 36.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
36.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.3%
Rank
#39 / 39 | 295090 | ||||
| Sage Creek Post-Acute | NH HOS SNF | Las Vegas | 60
Facility
60
NV AVG
116
Rank
#37 / 49 | A+ |
88.5%
Facility
88.5%
NV AVG
83.9%
Rank
#20 / 44 | +5% | 3.30
Facility
3.30
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#30 / 39 | +1% | -19% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 40 | 21
Facility
21
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#8 / 40 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#5 / 40 | - | 53 | - |
72
Facility
72
NV AVG
48
Rank
#5 / 54 | Travis Jones | $16.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.4M
Rank
#27 / 39 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#27 / 39 | 51.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.3%
Rank
#18 / 39 | 295098 | ||||
| Trellis Centennial | NH HOS SNF | Las Vegas (Paradise) | 72
Facility
72
NV AVG
116
Rank
#36 / 49 | A |
90.8%
Facility
90.8%
NV AVG
83.9%
Rank
#18 / 44 | +8% | 3.25
Facility
3.25
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#30 / 39 | +57% | -20% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#25 / 40 | 17
Facility
17
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#4 / 40 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#7 / 40 | 1 | 65 | - |
53
Facility
53
NV AVG
48
Rank
#23 / 54 | Shivani Chopra | $19.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.4M
Rank
#18 / 39 | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#15 / 39 | 50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.3%
Rank
#21 / 39 | 295106 | ||||
| Marquis Centennial Hills | NH HOS RC SNF | Las Vegas (La Madre Foothills) | 115
Facility
115
NV AVG
116
Rank
#26 / 49 | A |
86.4%
Facility
86.4%
NV AVG
83.9%
Rank
#25 / 44 | +3% | 3.45
Facility
3.45
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#26 / 39 | -34% | -15% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 40 | 23
Facility
23
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#10 / 40 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#9 / 40 | - | 99 | - |
31
Facility
31
NV AVG
48
Rank
#44 / 54 | Jacob Atwood | $16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.4M
Rank
#26 / 39 | $9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#24 / 39 | 54.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
54.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.3%
Rank
#12 / 39 | 295089 | ||||
| Charleston Post Acute | NH SNF | Las Vegas | 148
Facility
148
NV AVG
116
Rank
#15 / 49 | C- |
97.5%
Facility
97.5%
NV AVG
83.9%
Rank
#4 / 44 | +16% | 3.42
Facility
3.42
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#26 / 39 | -34% | -16% | $69.3k
Facility
$69.3k
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#38 / 40 | 33
Facility
33
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#19 / 40 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#10 / 40 | 2 | 144 | - |
71
Facility
71
NV AVG
48
Rank
#7 / 54 | - | $19.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.4M
Rank
#17 / 39 | $10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#13 / 39 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.3%
Rank
#16 / 39 | 295072 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NV nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Nevada
Charleston Post Acute is in LAS VEGAS, Nevada. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- NV specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
Waiver for the Frail Elderly
Waiver for the Frail Elderly
Eligibility
- General
- Adults age 65+ who meet nursing-facility level of care and Medicaid waiver eligibility.
- NV specifics
- CMS lists the Frail Elderly 1915(c) waiver as approved from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030.
What it provides
- Case management; homemaker help; respite; adult companion services; adult day care; augmented personal care; chores; home-delivered meals and personal emergency response systems.
Family Caregiver Support Services (Title III-E)
Family Caregiver Support Services (Title III-E)
Eligibility
- General
- Family and informal caregivers seeking support through the state aging network; individual services are assessed through local providers.
What it provides
- Title III-E caregiver support includes counseling; group support and caregiver training.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- NV specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Energy Assistance Program (EAP)
Energy Assistance Program (EAP)
- Income limit
- FY2027 monthly gross limits: $1,995 for one person and $2,705 for two; larger households have higher limits.
Eligibility
- General
- Nevada households meeting citizenship rules, responsible for some heating or cooling costs, and within the household income limit.
What it provides
- An annual energy-assistance payment; usually paid to the household’s energy provider.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Charleston Post Acute
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Charleston Post Acute in a walkable area?
Charleston Post Acute has a walk score of 71. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
02 What is the license number of Charleston Post Acute?
According to NV state health department records, Charleston Post Acute's license number is 11907-SNF-1.
03 When does Charleston Post Acute's license expire?
According to NV state health department records, Charleston Post Acute's license expires on December 31, 2026.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Charleston Post Acute?
Charleston Post Acute's occupancy is 97.5%.
05 How long has Charleston Post Acute been in business?
Charleston Post Acute has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Charleston Post Acute?
No, Charleston Post Acute has a no-pet policy.
07 Does Charleston Post Acute operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Charleston Post Acute is registered as a for-profit in NV.
Updated on
