Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
146
118 employees · 28 contractors · 57 on an average day College Park Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · North Las Vegas, NV
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
College Park Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · North Las Vegas, NV
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
College Park Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Julie Liebo serves as the administrator of College Park Rehabilitation Center, a 98-bed skilled nursing facility based in North Las Vegas, Nevada. The community delivers short-term recovery, extended long-term care, and dedicated hospice support. Room arrangements feature both private suites and shared layouts, accommodating patients focused on physical rehabilitation alongside those requiring ongoing clinical attention.
Hands-on clinical staffing averages 3 hours and 14 minutes of direct nursing time per resident daily. Onsite treatment encompasses restorative programs, IV therapy, and speech and language rehabilitation to support recovery benchmarks. Residents gather in restaurant-style dining areas, visit the community library, attend events in the social hall, or spend afternoons outside at the shaded picnic tables.
Interested individuals evaluating skilled nursing or recovery care in North Las Vegas can reach out to College Park Rehabilitation Center to discuss therapy plans and schedule an onsite visit.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 14m
This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 14mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +9% above Nevada average
4 of 6 metrics below Nevada average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 28 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
28 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
1h 4m
↑ 1% · NV 1h 4mThis facility: 1h 4m per resident per day, 1% above the Nevada average of 1h 4m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 28 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
28 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
19 staff · 10.1-hour shifts
33m
↓ 39% · NV 54mThis facility: 33m per resident per day, 39% below the Nevada average of 54m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 19 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
19 staff · 10.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 51 total: 48 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
1h 37m
↓ 32% · NV 2h 23mThis facility: 1h 37m per resident per day, 32% below the Nevada average of 2h 23m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 51 total: 48 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
51 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 13% · NV 5mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 13% below the Nevada average of 5m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 52m
↓ 26% · NV 3h 51mThis facility: 2h 52m per resident per day, 26% below the Nevada average of 3h 51m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
56m
↑ 9% · NV 51mThis facility: 56m per resident per day, 9% above the Nevada average of 51m (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
146
118 employees · 28 contractors · 57 on an average day
146 total staff / 93 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.57 : 1
↑ 6% · NV 1.48This facility: 1.57 staff per resident, 6% above the Nevada average of 1.48 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
146 staff ÷ 93 residents
See full Nevada ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.2 h
↑ 6% · NV 8.7 hThis facility: 9.2 h, 6% above the Nevada average of 8.7 h (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,625 staff hours this quarter
See full Nevada ranking →91.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Nevada average: 95% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Certified Nursing Assistant (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Registered Nurse (2), Medical Director (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
98
Rank #30 / 48Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 48 nursing homes we track in Nevada for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nevada facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
98
Rank #30 / 48Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 48 nursing homes we track in Nevada for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nevada facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 34Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 34 nursing homes we track in Nevada for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Nevada facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #6 / 34Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 34 nursing homes we track in Nevada for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Nevada facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
29
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #28 / 54Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 54 nursing homes we track in Nevada for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nevada facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #28 / 54Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 54 nursing homes we track in Nevada for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nevada facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
46
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #30 / 43Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 43 nursing homes we track in Nevada for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nevada average, with its Statewide rank out of 43. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #30 / 43Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 43 nursing homes we track in Nevada for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nevada average, with its Statewide rank out of 43. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 82 residents and 98 beds. Source: state inspection report (Sep 2023)
Similar to the Nevada average: 83.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
213
days
About This Community
Facility TypeFacility For Skilled Nursing
StatusActive
IssuanceJune 1, 1997
ExpirationDecember 31, 2026
CMS Certification Number295055
College Park Rehabilitation Center is administered by Julie Liebo.
Independent Living
0 units
Assisted Living Beds (Low Income)
Units designated for residents who qualify for low-income assistance programs.
0 units
SNF (Skilled Nursing)
98 units
Total beds
98 units
Resident Council
Speech TherapyListed as: Speech/Language Therapy
IV Therapy
Infectious Disease Specialty Facility
Ventilator and Trach Care
Psycho-Social and Psychiatry Program
Social Work & Case ManagementListed as: Social Work/Discharge Planning
Pets not allowed
Cable Tv
Wi-Fi
Library
Picnic Area
Social Halls
Operating HoursPlanned admissions are accepted 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays. Recommended visiting hours are 8:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m.
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Private
Semi-Private Rooms
In-Room Features
Individual Room Temperature Controls
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Nevada, the Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance performs unannounced onsite surveys to evaluate resident safety and care quality.
Since 2008 · 18 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 400 deficiencies 74 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 400 deficiencies 74 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Nevada state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2008 vs. Nevada state average
Overall vs. NV average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Nevada average:
• Total deficiencies (669% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (69% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (669% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (69% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | NV Average | vs. NV Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 400 | 52.0 | This facility has 669% more total deficiencies than a typical Nevada nursing home (400 vs. NV avg 52).↑ 669% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 5.4 | 3.2 | This facility has 69% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Nevada nursing home (5.4 vs. NV avg 3.2).↑ 69% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NV Average | vs. NV Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 74 | 21.0 | This facility has had 252% more total inspections than the Nevada average (74 vs. NV avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 252% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 18% · NV 4.9This facility: 4, 18% below the Nevada average of 4.9 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
20
Rank #4 / 39Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Nevada State average, with a ranking across all 39 NV facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 38% · NV 32.5This facility: 20, 38% below the Nevada average of 32.5 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5
Rank #10 / 39Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Nevada for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Nevada mean across 39 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 24% · NV 6.62This facility: 5, 24% below the Nevada average of 6.62 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
20 of 20 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · NV 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Nevada average of 0.2 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · NV 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Nevada average of 0.3 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
20
↓ 36% · NV 31.4This facility: 20, 36% below the Nevada average of 31.4 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NV 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Nevada average of 0.6 (among Nevada facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 24, 2025 · 9 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 20 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 24, 2025
9 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 27, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 13, 2023
7 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 20 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (35%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (20%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (15%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (5%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 20 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 20 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
NV avg $36KNevada average: $35,551. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
NV avg 1.31Nevada average: 1.31. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NV avg 0.04Nevada average: 0.04. Average among the 26 Nevada facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Nevada average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 29% · NV 3.1This facility: 4.0, 29% above the NV average of 3.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 63% · NV 3.1This facility: 5.0, 63% above the NV average of 3.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 37% · NV 7.3This facility: 10.0, 37% above the NV average of 7.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · NV 13.3This facility: 13.8, 4% above the NV average of 13.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 4 worse, 2 near NV average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near NV average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↑ 18% · NV 12.5This facility: 14.7, 18% above the NV average of 12.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↑ 18% · NV 12.5This facility: 14.7, 18% above the NV average of 12.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.2%
↑ 55% · NV 12.4This facility: 19.2, 55% above the NV average of 12.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.2%
↑ 55% · NV 12.4This facility: 19.2, 55% above the NV average of 12.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.4%
↓ 52% · NV 15.5This facility: 7.4, 52% below the NV average of 15.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.4%
↓ 52% · NV 15.5This facility: 7.4, 52% below the NV average of 15.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 1.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 1.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 1.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 1.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
↑ 6% · NV 1.9This facility: 2.0, 6% above the NV average of 1.9 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
↑ 6% · NV 1.9This facility: 2.0, 6% above the NV average of 1.9 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.2%
↑ 123% · NV 5.5This facility: 12.2, 123% above the NV average of 5.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.2%
↑ 123% · NV 5.5This facility: 12.2, 123% above the NV average of 5.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
↓ 61% · NV 5.3This facility: 2.1, 61% below the NV average of 5.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
↓ 61% · NV 5.3This facility: 2.1, 61% below the NV average of 5.3 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 5.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 5.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · NV 5.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NV average of 5.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.2%
↓ 58% · NV 17.1This facility: 7.2, 58% below the NV average of 17.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.2%
↓ 58% · NV 17.1This facility: 7.2, 58% below the NV average of 17.1 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 6% · NV 93.7This facility: 99.7, 6% above the NV average of 93.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 6% · NV 93.7This facility: 99.7, 6% above the NV average of 93.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.3%
↑ 3% · NV 92.8This facility: 95.3, 3% above the NV average of 92.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.3%
↑ 3% · NV 92.8This facility: 95.3, 3% above the NV average of 92.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.83
↑ 1% · NV 1.82This facility: 1.83, 1% above the NV average of 1.82 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.83
↑ 1% · NV 1.82This facility: 1.83, 1% above the NV average of 1.82 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.41
↓ 73% · NV 1.50This facility: 0.41, 73% below the NV average of 1.50 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.41
↓ 73% · NV 1.50This facility: 0.41, 73% below the NV average of 1.50 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
31.8%
↓ 41% · US 53.7This facility: 31.8, 41% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
31.8%
↓ 41% · US 53.7This facility: 31.8, 41% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
47.0%
↓ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 47.0, 7% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
47.0%
↓ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 47.0, 7% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 13% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 13% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 13% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 13% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 57% · NV 1.7This facility: 0.7, 57% below the NV average of 1.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 57% · NV 1.7This facility: 0.7, 57% below the NV average of 1.7 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
↑ 11% · NV 85.0This facility: 94.1, 11% above the NV average of 85.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
↑ 11% · NV 85.0This facility: 94.1, 11% above the NV average of 85.0 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.8%
↑ 2% · NV 82.5This facility: 83.8, 2% above the NV average of 82.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.8%
↑ 2% · NV 82.5This facility: 83.8, 2% above the NV average of 82.5 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.2%
↓ 9% · NV 23.4This facility: 21.2, 9% below the NV average of 23.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
21.2%
↓ 9% · NV 23.4This facility: 21.2, 9% below the NV average of 23.4 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.6%
↓ 33% · NV 9.8This facility: 6.6, 33% below the NV average of 9.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.6%
↓ 33% · NV 9.8This facility: 6.6, 33% below the NV average of 9.8 (among NV facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
College Park Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 38 Nevada nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
13.7% operating margin
+16.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $2.6M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Nevada homes
46.2% payroll share of revenue
NV average 50.1%Rank #24 / 38Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $3.8M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Nevada homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NV median | Compared with NV homesRank in NV | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $17.6M | +$3.8M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $19.3M | Rank in NV Rank #25 / 38Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Below NV median Higher net patient revenue than 35% of NV homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.2M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $18.3M | Rank in NV Rank #26 / 38Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 32% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $2.4M | +$2.7M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $1.2M | Rank in NV Rank #10 / 38Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 13.7% | +16.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | NV median 7.1% | Rank in NV Rank #6 / 38Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 86% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | NV median $0.0M | Rank in NV Rank #8 / 38Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 81% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $2.6M | +$1.9M | Trend — | NV median $1.1M | Rank in NV Rank #11 / 38Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Nevada homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 73% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Nevada homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NV median | Compared with NV homesRank in NV | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.1M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | NV median $9.4M | Rank in NV Rank #28 / 38Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 27% of homes | Below NV median Higher payroll than 27% of NV homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 46.2% | −7.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | NV median 51.0% | Rank in NV Rank #24 / 38Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 38 nursing homes we track in Nevada for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nevada average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nevada that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | 3.9 pts under NV average The NV average is 50.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NV benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Nevada payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NV payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.0M | $13.5M | $14.3M | $13.7M | $13.1M | $13.0M | $13.8M | $17.6M |
| Operating expenses | $12.5M | $12.1M | $12.6M | $12.4M | $12.7M | $13.0M | $14.1M | $15.2M |
| Net patient income | $0.5M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.3M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | −$0.3M | $2.4M |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 10.0% | 12.0% | 9.6% | 3.3% | −0.3% | −2.4% | 13.7% |
| Net income | $0.5M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.9M | $1.8M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $2.6M |
| Payroll costs | $5.9M | $5.6M | $5.9M | $6.1M | $6.1M | $6.5M | $7.5M | $8.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.5% | 41.9% | 41.1% | 44.3% | 46.7% | 50.2% | 54.1% | 46.2% |
| Beds | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
| Gross revenue | $18.5M | $16.7M | $17.2M | $17.0M | $16.6M | $16.1M | $16.4M | $22.1M |
| Salaries | $5.1M | $5.0M | $5.2M | $5.4M | $5.4M | $5.8M | $6.4M | $7.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.1M |
| Other operating costs | $6.6M | $6.5M | $6.7M | $6.3M | $6.5M | $6.5M | $6.7M | $7.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $395 | $414 | $436 | $457 | $438 | $434 | $446 | $534 |
| Cost per day | $381 | $373 | $384 | $413 | $424 | $436 | $457 | $461 |
| Average length of stay | 63.5 days | 73.2 days | 88.7 days | 110.1 days | 120.1 days | 124.1 days | 93.3 days | 212.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
161 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
99 · 61%
Medicaid
51 · 32%
Private pay & other
11 · 7%
Resident snapshot
93 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
12 · 13%
Medicaid
81 · 87%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
155 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
78 · 50%
Medicaid
59 · 38%
Private pay & other
18 · 12%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near College Park Rehabilitation Center
2.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from North Las Vegas's city center to College Park Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to College Park Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around North Las Vegas
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NV Dept. of Health & Human Services, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Nevada average is: 50.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Health Care Of Paradise | NH SNF | Las Vegas | 38
Facility
38
NV AVG
117
Rank
#40 / 48 |
98.7%
Facility
98.7%
NV AVG
83.7%
Rank
#2 / 43 | +18% | 4.73
Facility
4.73
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#4 / 38 | -3% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 39 | 21
Facility
21
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#8 / 39 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#15 / 39 | - | 38 | A+ |
76
Facility
76
NV AVG
48
Rank
#2 / 54 | Jason Gubler | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#33 / 38 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.6M
Rank
#34 / 38 | 38.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
38.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.1%
Rank
#37 / 38 | 295107 | ||||
| College Park Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS SNF | North Las Vegas | 98
Facility
98
NV AVG
117
Rank
#30 / 48 |
83.7%
Facility
83.7%
NV AVG
83.7%
Rank
#30 / 43 | 0% | 3.23
Facility
3.23
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#33 / 38 | +27% | -20% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 39 | 20
Facility
20
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#4 / 39 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#10 / 39 | - | 82 | - |
46
Facility
46
NV AVG
48
Rank
#28 / 54 | Lauren Aufiero | $17.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#25 / 38 | $8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.6M
Rank
#28 / 38 | 46.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.1%
Rank
#24 / 38 | 295055 | ||||
| North Las Vegas Care Center | NH HOS SNF | North Las Vegas | 182
Facility
182
NV AVG
117
Rank
#9 / 48 |
84.8%
Facility
84.8%
NV AVG
83.7%
Rank
#28 / 43 | +1% | 3.66
Facility
3.66
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#14 / 38 | -56% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#27 / 39 | 35
Facility
35
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#20 / 39 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#17 / 39 | 1 | 154 | C+ |
62
Facility
62
NV AVG
48
Rank
#14 / 54 | Mistie Montes | $23.6MFiscal year ending 05/2025
Facility
$23.6MFiscal year ending 05/2025
NV AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#12 / 38 | $9.5MFiscal year ending 05/2025
Facility
$9.5MFiscal year ending 05/2025
NV AVG
$9.6M
Rank
#19 / 38 | 40.4%Fiscal year ending 05/2025
Facility
40.4%Fiscal year ending 05/2025
NV AVG
50.1%
Rank
#36 / 38 | 295036 | ||||
| The Heights of Summerlin, Llc | NH HOS RC SNF | Las Vegas (Summerlin North) | 190
Facility
190
NV AVG
117
Rank
#6 / 48 |
86.7%
Facility
86.7%
NV AVG
83.7%
Rank
#23 / 43 | +4% | 3.89
Facility
3.89
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#11 / 38 | +21% | -4% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 39 | 40
Facility
40
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#25 / 39 | 8.0
Facility
8.0
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#29 / 39 | - | 165 | B- |
67
Facility
67
NV AVG
48
Rank
#10 / 54 | - | $24.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$24.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#10 / 38 | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.6M
Rank
#12 / 38 | 42.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
42.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.1%
Rank
#33 / 38 | 295083 | ||||
| Transitional Care Of Las Vegas | NH AL | Las Vegas (Rancho Manor) | 160
Facility
160
NV AVG
117
Rank
#13 / 48 |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
NV AVG
83.7%
Rank
#29 / 43 | +1% | 3.01
Facility
3.01
NV AVG
4.06
Rank
#37 / 38 | +65% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
NV AVG
$35.6k
Rank
#1 / 39 | 49
Facility
49
NV AVG
32.5
Rank
#30 / 39 | 6.1
Facility
6.1
NV AVG
6.6
Rank
#23 / 39 | - | 135 | - |
58
Facility
58
NV AVG
48
Rank
#19 / 54 | - | $32.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$32.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$19.8M
Rank
#4 / 38 | $13.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
$9.6M
Rank
#5 / 38 | 41.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NV AVG
50.1%
Rank
#35 / 38 | 295095 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NV nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Nevada
College Park Rehabilitation Center is located in North Las Vegas, Nevada.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Nevada.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about College Park Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is College Park Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
College Park Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 46. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 When does College Park Rehabilitation Center's license expire?
According to NV state health department records, College Park Rehabilitation Center's license expires on December 31, 2026.
03 What is the occupancy rate at College Park Rehabilitation Center?
College Park Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 83.7%.
04 How long has College Park Rehabilitation Center been in business?
College Park Rehabilitation Center has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at College Park Rehabilitation Center?
No, College Park Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
06 What is the best email address for College Park Rehabilitation Center?
The team at College Park Rehabilitation Center can be reached at collegeparkrehab@fundltc.com.
07 Does College Park Rehabilitation Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
College Park Rehabilitation Center is registered as a for-profit in NV.
Updated on
