Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
55
38 employees · 17 contractors · 18 on an average day Diversicare of Copper Basin
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Copperhill, TN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Diversicare of Copper Basin
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Copperhill, TN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Diversicare of Copper Basin accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Diversicare of Copper Basin
Opened in 1992, Diversicare of Copper Basin provides assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, rehabilitation services, and hospice care in Copperhill, TN. With 24-hour staffing, residents receive care around the clock. The community also supports those with life-limiting conditions through hospice care.
With several care levels, the community can accommodate residents’ growing needs since transitions can happen without leaving. The home has 50 beds, making it a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know each other. It is operated by DAC of Copperhill, with Brent Fair as the administrator.
Short-stay rehabilitation and rehabilitation services let residents receive therapy on-site. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are also accepted. This allows Medicare to cover short-term skilled care after a hospital stay and Medicaid to help when savings may not cover a long stay. The Walk Score is 46 out of 100, placing the area in a car-dependent setting where most errands require a car.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 174 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 20m
This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 174 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 20mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +32% above Tennessee average
4 of 6 metrics below Tennessee average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
45m
↑ 32% · TN 34mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 32% above the Tennessee average of 34m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
51m
↓ 18% · TN 1h 2mThis facility: 51m per resident per day, 18% below the Tennessee average of 1h 2m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
1h 44m
↓ 16% · TN 2h 4mThis facility: 1h 44m per resident per day, 16% below the Tennessee average of 2h 4m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 51% · TN 5mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 51% below the Tennessee average of 5m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 4m
↓ 5% · TN 3h 13mThis facility: 3h 4m per resident per day, 5% below the Tennessee average of 3h 13m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
28m
↑ 18% · TN 23mThis facility: 28m per resident per day, 18% above the Tennessee average of 23m (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
55
38 employees · 17 contractors · 18 on an average day
55 total staff / 29 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.90 : 1
↑ 13% · TN 1.68This facility: 1.90 staff per resident, 13% above the Tennessee average of 1.68 (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
55 staff ÷ 29 residents
See full Tennessee ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
≈ 0% · TN 8.3 hThis facility: 8.3 h, level with the Tennessee average of 8.3 h (among Tennessee facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13,803 staff hours this quarter
See full Tennessee ranking →87% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Tennessee average: 93.5% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Administrator (1), Nurse Practitioner (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #153 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Tennessee facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #153 / 180Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Tennessee facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #20 / 156Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 156 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Tennessee facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #20 / 156Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 156 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Tennessee facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
34
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #72 / 189Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 189 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Tennessee facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #72 / 189Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 189 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Tennessee facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
46
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
36
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
86
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
IssuanceJuly 1, 1992
ExpirationFebruary 16, 2027
License Number00000203
Diversicare of Copper Basin is administered by Brent Fair.
Owner NameDAC of Copperhill, LLC
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Pets not allowed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Tennessee, the Department of Health, Division of Health Care Facilities performs unannounced inspections and investigations to ensure facilities provide high-quality resident care.
Since 2022 · 4 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 citations
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 citations
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
2
↓ 39% · TN 3.3This facility: 2, 39% below the TN average of 3.3 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #79 / 175Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 175 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Tennessee State average, with a ranking across all 175 TN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 10% · TN 14.5This facility: 13, 10% below the TN average of 14.5 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.5
Rank #150 / 175Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 150th out of 175 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Tennessee mean across 175 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 51% · TN 4.31This facility: 6.5, 51% above the TN average of 4.31 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · TN 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the TN average of 0.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TN 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the TN average of 0.5 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
13
↓ 1% · TN 13.1This facility: 13, 1% below the TN average of 13.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TN 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the TN average of 0.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 26, 2025 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 13 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 26, 2025
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 30, 2019
7 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (38%)
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (31%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (15%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (15%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 13 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
TN avg $69KTennessee average: $68,994. Average among the 107 Tennessee facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
TN avg 1.52Tennessee average: 1.52. Average among the 107 Tennessee facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
TN avg 0.3Tennessee average: 0.3. Average among the 107 Tennessee facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Tennessee average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 3% · TN 9.1This facility: 9.4, 3% above the TN average of 9.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · TN 17.1This facility: 16.8, 2% below the TN average of 17.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse, 1 near TN average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.5%
↑ 17% · TN 14.0This facility: 16.5, 17% above the TN average of 14.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.5%
↑ 17% · TN 14.0This facility: 16.5, 17% above the TN average of 14.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.9%
↑ 10% · TN 17.2This facility: 18.9, 10% above the TN average of 17.2 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.9%
↑ 10% · TN 17.2This facility: 18.9, 10% above the TN average of 17.2 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
↓ 25% · TN 20.0This facility: 15.0, 25% below the TN average of 20.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
↓ 25% · TN 20.0This facility: 15.0, 25% below the TN average of 20.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
↑ 52% · TN 1.8This facility: 2.7, 52% above the TN average of 1.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
↑ 52% · TN 1.8This facility: 2.7, 52% above the TN average of 1.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 4% · TN 3.4This facility: 3.5, 4% above the TN average of 3.4 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
↑ 4% · TN 3.4This facility: 3.5, 4% above the TN average of 3.4 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.7%
↓ 26% · TN 5.0This facility: 3.7, 26% below the TN average of 5.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.7%
↓ 26% · TN 5.0This facility: 3.7, 26% below the TN average of 5.0 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
↓ 31% · TN 6.1This facility: 4.2, 31% below the TN average of 6.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
↓ 31% · TN 6.1This facility: 4.2, 31% below the TN average of 6.1 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · TN 13.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TN average of 13.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · TN 13.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TN average of 13.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.9%
↓ 41% · TN 16.8This facility: 9.9, 41% below the TN average of 16.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.9%
↓ 41% · TN 16.8This facility: 9.9, 41% below the TN average of 16.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 11% · TN 89.4This facility: 99.1, 11% above the TN average of 89.4 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
↑ 11% · TN 89.4This facility: 99.1, 11% above the TN average of 89.4 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · TN 94.5This facility: 100.0, 6% above the TN average of 94.5 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · TN 94.5This facility: 100.0, 6% above the TN average of 94.5 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 43% · TN 1.7This facility: 0.9, 43% below the TN average of 1.7 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 43% · TN 1.7This facility: 0.9, 43% below the TN average of 1.7 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.0%
↑ 11% · TN 79.3This facility: 88.0, 11% above the TN average of 79.3 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.0%
↑ 11% · TN 79.3This facility: 88.0, 11% above the TN average of 79.3 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.4%
↑ 15% · TN 79.8This facility: 91.4, 15% above the TN average of 79.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.4%
↑ 15% · TN 79.8This facility: 91.4, 15% above the TN average of 79.8 (among TN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Diversicare of Copper Basin’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 169 Tennessee nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−12.2% operating margin
+19.5 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.4M) trims the net loss to −$0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Tennessee homes
66.1% payroll share of revenue
TN average 53.2%Rank #11 / 169Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Tennessee average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.6M while revenue fell $0.5M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Tennessee homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TN median | Compared with TN homesRank in TN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.1M | −$0.5M | Trend 20162024 | TN median $10.6M | Rank in TN Rank #165 / 169Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 165th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Tennessee average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Below TN median Higher net patient revenue than 2% of TN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $4.6M | −$1.4M | Trend 20162024 | TN median — | Rank in TN Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.5M | +$0.9M | Trend 20162024 | TN median — | Rank in TN Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −12.2% | +19.5 pts | Trend 20162024 | TN median — | Rank in TN Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | TN median — | Rank in TN Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.1M | +$0.8M | Trend — | TN median — | Rank in TN Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Tennessee homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TN median | Compared with TN homesRank in TN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.7M | −$0.6M | Trend 20162024 | TN median $5.2M | Rank in TN Rank #157 / 169Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 157th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Tennessee average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 7% of homes | Below TN median Higher payroll than 7% of TN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 66.1% | −6.7 pts | Trend 20162024 | TN median 50.4% | Rank in TN Rank #11 / 169Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Tennessee for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Tennessee average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Tennessee that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | 12.9 pts over TN average The TN average is 53.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · TN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Tennessee payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TN payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.0M | $7.1M | $6.8M | $6.8M | $7.0M | $4.9M | $4.6M | $4.1M | |
| Operating expenses | $6.9M | $7.1M | $7.0M | $7.0M | $7.3M | $7.0M | $6.0M | $4.6M | |
| Net patient income | $0.1M | −$0.0M | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | −$2.1M | −$1.4M | −$0.5M | |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | −0.1% | −2.3% | −3.7% | −3.8% | −43.2% | −31.7% | −12.2% | |
| Net income | $0.1M | $0.0M | −$0.1M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$1.2M | −$0.9M | −$0.1M | |
| Payroll costs | $3.9M | $4.0M | $4.2M | $4.3M | $4.1M | $3.5M | $3.3M | $2.7M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 56.6% | 57.2% | 61.3% | 62.8% | 58.1% | 70.3% | 72.8% | 66.1% | |
| Beds | 135 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 50 | |
| Gross revenue | $8.2M | $8.6M | $8.1M | $7.9M | $7.8M | $5.1M | $5.6M | $5.0M | |
| Salaries | $3.3M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $3.4M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $2.3M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.4M | |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.3M | |
| Other operating costs | $2.9M | $3.0M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $3.2M | $3.6M | $2.7M | $1.9M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $257 | $263 | $267 | $267 | $272 | $278 | $273 | $324 | |
| Cost per day | $254 | $264 | $273 | $276 | $282 | $399 | $360 | $363 | |
| Average length of stay | 73.1 days | 63.0 days | 59.3 days | 48.7 days | 64.9 days | 93.0 days | 88.5 days | 85.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
136 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
61 · 45%
Medicaid
2 · 1%
Private pay & other
73 · 54%
Resident snapshot
29 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 14%
Medicaid
17 · 59%
Private pay & other
8 · 28%
Leaving
147 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
47 · 32%
Medicaid
8 · 5%
Private pay & other
92 · 63%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Diversicare of Copper Basin
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Copperhill's city center to Diversicare of Copper Basin's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Diversicare of Copper Basin
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TN Dept. of Health (TDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Tennessee average is: 53.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHC Place Cool Springs | NH AL HOS MC SNF | Franklin | 108
Facility
108
TN AVG
105
Rank
#82 / 180 |
67.6%
Facility
67.6%
TN AVG
73.9%
Rank
#89 / 134 | -8% | 4.99
Facility
4.99
TN AVG
3.70
Rank
#18 / 174 | +30% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
TN AVG
$69.0k
Rank
#1 / 175 | 8
Facility
8
TN AVG
14.5
Rank
#34 / 175 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
TN AVG
4.3
Rank
#32 / 175 | 2 | 73 | - |
34
Facility
34
TN AVG
38
Rank
#108 / 189 | Nhc Healthcare/Cool Springs, LLC | $18.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$18.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$12.0M
Rank
#25 / 169 | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#13 / 169 | 64.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
64.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
53.2%
Rank
#15 / 169 | 445475 | ||||
| Smith County Health and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Carthage | 34
Facility
34
TN AVG
105
Rank
#168 / 180 | - | - | 3.47
Facility
3.47
TN AVG
3.70
Rank
#80 / 174 | -1% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
TN AVG
$69.0k
Rank
#1 / 175 | 6
Facility
6
TN AVG
14.5
Rank
#15 / 175 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
TN AVG
4.3
Rank
#9 / 175 | 2 | 85 | - |
45
Facility
45
TN AVG
38
Rank
#75 / 189 | Carthage Opco LLC | $10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$12.0M
Rank
#81 / 169 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#129 / 169 | 36.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
36.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
53.2%
Rank
#167 / 169 | 445172 | ||||
| Harbert Hills Academy Nursing Home | NH SNF | Savannah | 24
Facility
24
TN AVG
105
Rank
#177 / 180 | - | - | 4.99
Facility
4.99
TN AVG
3.70
Rank
#8 / 174 | -55% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
TN AVG
$69.0k
Rank
#1 / 175 | 13
Facility
13
TN AVG
14.5
Rank
#79 / 175 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
TN AVG
4.3
Rank
#91 / 175 | - | 46 | - |
60
Facility
60
TN AVG
38
Rank
#34 / 189 | Rural Life Foundation Inc. Dba | - | - | - | 445527 | ||||
| Rainbow Rehab & Healthcare | NH SNF | Bartlett (West Tennessee) | 99
Facility
99
TN AVG
105
Rank
#99 / 180 | - | - | 3.54
Facility
3.54
TN AVG
3.70
Rank
#80 / 174 | -15% | -4% | $0
Facility
$0
TN AVG
$69.0k
Rank
#1 / 175 | 10
Facility
10
TN AVG
14.5
Rank
#56 / 175 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
TN AVG
4.3
Rank
#116 / 175 | - | 103 | - |
52
Facility
52
TN AVG
38
Rank
#54 / 189 | Bartlett Operator LLC | $12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$12.0M
Rank
#54 / 169 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#88 / 169 | 40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
40.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
53.2%
Rank
#153 / 169 | 445283 | ||||
| Diversicare of Copper Basin | NH AL HOS MC SNF | Copperhill | 50
Facility
50
TN AVG
105
Rank
#153 / 180 | - | - | 3.33
Facility
3.33
TN AVG
3.70
Rank
#97 / 174 | +44% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
TN AVG
$69.0k
Rank
#1 / 175 | 13
Facility
13
TN AVG
14.5
Rank
#79 / 175 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
TN AVG
4.3
Rank
#150 / 175 | - | 36 | - |
46
Facility
46
TN AVG
38
Rank
#72 / 189 | Dac Of Copperhill, LLC | $4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$12.0M
Rank
#165 / 169 | $2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
$6.3M
Rank
#157 / 169 | 66.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
66.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TN AVG
53.2%
Rank
#11 / 169 | 445310 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Diversicare of Copper Basin
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Diversicare of Copper Basin?
Diversicare of Copper Basin is legally operated by DAC of Copperhill, LLC, and administered by Brent Fair.
02 Is Diversicare of Copper Basin in a walkable area?
Diversicare of Copper Basin has a walk score of 46. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the license number of Diversicare of Copper Basin?
According to TN state health department records, Diversicare of Copper Basin's license number is 00000203.
04 When does Diversicare of Copper Basin's license expire?
According to TN state health department records, Diversicare of Copper Basin's license expires on February 16, 2027.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Diversicare of Copper Basin?
Diversicare of Copper Basin's occupancy is 48.5%.
06 How long has Diversicare of Copper Basin been in business?
Diversicare of Copper Basin has been operating for approximately 34 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
07 Are pets allowed at Diversicare of Copper Basin?
No, Diversicare of Copper Basin has a no-pet policy.
Updated on
