Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
145
145 employees · 0 contractors · 59 on an average day Elderwood at Wheatfield
Nursing Home, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Niagara Falls, NY
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Elderwood at Wheatfield
Nursing Home, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Niagara Falls, NY
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Elderwood at Wheatfield accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Elderwood at Wheatfield
Elderwood at Wheatfield is a nursing home in Niagara Falls, NY, offering skilled nursing, memory care, palliative care, and respite care. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while memory care offers a secured setting with supervision. Palliative care focuses on comfort and symptom support. Respite care provides a short stay for a family caregiver who needs to travel or recover.
The combination of memory care and nursing services may be a good fit for someone who needs both cognitive supervision and ongoing medical care. The home has 123 beds, with 93% occupancy, meaning nearly all beds are in use at the stated occupancy level and availability can change as residents move in or out. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 8 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nurse time allocated to each resident.
Private and semi private rooms are available for residents who want a room alone or with a roommate. Subacute rehabilitation and oncology are among the community’s named programs, giving residents access to those service areas within the facility. A spacious rehabilitation gym supports therapy services, while enclosed patios and gardens provide outdoor space. Pets are allowed.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Medicare covers short term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long term residence, Medicaid can help cover a longer stay when savings do not, and private pay uses personal funds. Michelle Hardy serves as director, and the community is operated by 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company.
A Walk Score of 34 places the area in a car dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride for a resident who does not drive.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 372nd out of 526 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 8m
This nursing home is ranked 372nd out of 526 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 8mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +146% above New York average
3 of 6 metrics below New York average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 7-hour shifts
45m
↑ 7% · NY 42mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 7% above the New York average of 42m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 24 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
24 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
50m
↑ 8% · NY 46mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 8% above the New York average of 46m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 24 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
24 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
1h 34m
↓ 28% · NY 2h 11mThis facility: 1h 34m per resident per day, 28% below the New York average of 2h 11m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
17m
↑ 146% · NY 7mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 146% above the New York average of 7m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 34m
↓ 19% · NY 3h 10mThis facility: 2h 34m per resident per day, 19% below the New York average of 3h 10m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
22m
↓ 21% · NY 28mThis facility: 22m per resident per day, 21% below the New York average of 28m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
145
145 employees · 0 contractors · 59 on an average day
145 total staff / 106 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.37 : 1
↑ 5% · NY 1.30This facility: 1.37 staff per resident, 5% above the New York average of 1.30 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
145 staff ÷ 106 residents
See full New York ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↓ 1% · NY 7.7 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 1% below the New York average of 7.7 h (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
40,833 staff hours this quarter
See full New York ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New York average: 88% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
93% of staff were vaccinated against the flu
Why it matters: staff move from resident to resident all day. When most of them are vaccinated, the flu is less likely to reach the people it is most dangerous for. Source: state health department data.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
123
Rank #344 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 344th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
123
Rank #344 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 344th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #361 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 361st out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #361 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 361st out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
34
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #278 / 519Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 278th out of 519 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 519. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #278 / 519Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 278th out of 519 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 519. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92.7%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 114 residents and 123 beds. Source: state licensing agency resident count
Higher than the New York average: 86.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
93
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusActive
CountyNiagara
License Number3121304N
CMS Certification Number335790
Elderwood at Wheatfield is legally operated by 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company, LLC (For Profit).
Owner Name2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company, LLC (For Profit)
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Oncology
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
HousekeepingListed as: Daily housekeeping and laundry
Laundry & Linen
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Wi-Fi
In-Room Features
Comfortable Private And Semi-Private Rooms
Two inspection records, one home. New York inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
Enforcement Actions
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
1
enforcement action
This facility has 1 enforcement action. 33% of New York nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
- March 15, 2021 Quality of Care #NH-21-119
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. NY average
5 Worse
Metrics worse than New York average:
• Total citations (41% above)
• Health citations (35% above)
• Inspections with citations (25% above)
• Total complaints (75% above)
• Complaints per bed (123% above) 3 Better Metrics better than New York average:
• Life safety citations (50% below)
• Citations per inspection (44% below)
• Inspection citation rate (56% below)
• Total citations (41% above)
• Health citations (35% above)
• Inspections with citations (25% above)
• Total complaints (75% above)
• Complaints per bed (123% above) 3 Better Metrics better than New York average:
• Life safety citations (50% below)
• Citations per inspection (44% below)
• Inspection citation rate (56% below)
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 31 | 22.0 | This facility has 41% more total citations than a typical New York nursing home (31 vs. NY avg 22).↑ 41% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 27 | 20.0 | This facility has 35% more health citations than a typical New York nursing home (27 vs. NY avg 20).↑ 35% worse |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 4 | 8.0 | This facility has 50% fewer life safety citations than a typical New York nursing home (4 vs. NY avg 8).↓ 50% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 1.5 | 2.7 | This facility has 44% fewer citations per inspection than a typical New York nursing home (1.5 vs. NY avg 2.7).↓ 44% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 21 | 9.0 | This facility has had 133% more total inspections than the New York average (21 vs. NY avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 133% more |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 4.0 | This facility has 25% more inspections with citations than a typical New York nursing home (5 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 24% | 54% | This facility has 30 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical New York nursing home (24% vs. NY avg 54%).↓ 30% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 156 | 89.0 | This facility has 75% more total complaints than a typical New York nursing home (156 vs. NY avg 89).↑ 75% worse |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 1.45 | 0.65 | This facility has 123% more complaints per bed than a typical New York nursing home (1.45 vs. NY avg 0.65).↑ 123% worse |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York regulators.
| 22 | 15.0 | This facility has had 47% more complaint investigations than the New York average (22 vs. NY avg 15). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 47% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
2
↓ 52% · NY 4.2This facility: 2, 52% below the New York average of 4.2 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
13
Rank #145 / 530Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 145th out of 530 nursing homes we track in New York for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the New York State average, with a ranking across all 530 NY facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 37% · NY 20.5This facility: 13, 37% below the New York average of 20.5 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.5
Rank #426 / 530Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 426th out of 530 nursing homes we track in New York for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the New York mean across 530 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 35% · NY 4.83This facility: 6.5, 35% above the New York average of 4.83 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
13 of 13 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 42% · NY 19This facility: 11, 42% below the New York average of 19 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 150% · NY 0.8This facility: 2, 150% above the New York average of 0.8 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 14, 2024 · 12 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 3 of 13 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 14, 2024
12 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 06, 2019
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 13 citations
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (23%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (15%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (15%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (8%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (8%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (8%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (8%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 13 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 13 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Lawsuit overview for Elderwood at Wheatfield
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Total Cases
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
7
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
7
Active Cases
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
2
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
2
Closed
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
5
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
5
Since
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2017
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2017
Most Recent
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Last Scheduled Court Date
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 15, 2026
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 15, 2026
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
NY avg $73KNew York average: $72,735. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
NY avg 1.59New York average: 1.59. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NY avg 0.1New York average: 0.1. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New York average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 25% · NY 4.0This facility: 3.0, 25% below the NY average of 4.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 13% · NY 3.5This facility: 4.0, 13% above the NY average of 3.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 95% · NY 8.0This facility: 15.6, 95% above the NY average of 8.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
27.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 87% · NY 14.5This facility: 27.1, 87% above the NY average of 14.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 5 better, 5 worse, 3 near NY average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near NY average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
↑ 70% · NY 13.6This facility: 23.2, 70% above the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
↑ 70% · NY 13.6This facility: 23.2, 70% above the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.8%
↑ 115% · NY 11.1This facility: 23.8, 115% above the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.8%
↑ 115% · NY 11.1This facility: 23.8, 115% above the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.2%
↑ 83% · NY 18.6This facility: 34.2, 83% above the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.2%
↑ 83% · NY 18.6This facility: 34.2, 83% above the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NY 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · NY 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.4%
↑ 265% · NY 3.1This facility: 11.4, 265% above the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.4%
↑ 265% · NY 3.1This facility: 11.4, 265% above the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.6%
↑ 125% · NY 6.5This facility: 14.6, 125% above the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.6%
↑ 125% · NY 6.5This facility: 14.6, 125% above the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 13% · NY 5.7This facility: 5.0, 13% below the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.0%
↓ 13% · NY 5.7This facility: 5.0, 13% below the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.5%
↓ 58% · NY 20.1This facility: 8.5, 58% below the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.5%
↓ 58% · NY 20.1This facility: 8.5, 58% below the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.8%
↓ 7% · NY 13.7This facility: 12.8, 7% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.8%
↓ 7% · NY 13.7This facility: 12.8, 7% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.9%
↓ 3% · NY 91.8This facility: 88.9, 3% below the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.9%
↓ 3% · NY 91.8This facility: 88.9, 3% below the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7%
↓ 3% · NY 95.2This facility: 92.7, 3% below the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7%
↓ 3% · NY 95.2This facility: 92.7, 3% below the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.46
↓ 15% · NY 1.71This facility: 1.46, 15% below the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.46
↓ 15% · NY 1.71This facility: 1.46, 15% below the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.29
↓ 4% · NY 1.35This facility: 1.29, 4% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.29
↓ 4% · NY 1.35This facility: 1.29, 4% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.3%
↑ 12% · US 53.7This facility: 60.3, 12% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.3%
↑ 12% · US 53.7This facility: 60.3, 12% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.3%
↑ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 53.3, 5% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.3%
↑ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 53.3, 5% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 17% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.9, 17% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 17% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.9, 17% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.0%
↑ 7% · NY 77.6This facility: 83.0, 7% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.0%
↑ 7% · NY 77.6This facility: 83.0, 7% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.0%
↑ 14% · NY 78.9This facility: 90.0, 14% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.0%
↑ 14% · NY 78.9This facility: 90.0, 14% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.8%
↑ 1% · NY 20.6This facility: 20.8, 1% above the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.8%
↑ 1% · NY 20.6This facility: 20.8, 1% above the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.0%
↑ 34% · NY 9.7This facility: 13.0, 34% above the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
13.0%
↑ 34% · NY 9.7This facility: 13.0, 34% above the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Elderwood at Wheatfield’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 479 New York nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−4.9% operating margin
+3.3 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with New York homes
58.9% payroll share of revenue
NY average 56.4%Rank #160 / 477Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 477 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.2M while revenue fell $0.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New York homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.1M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.1M | Rank in NY Rank #340 / 479Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 340th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 29% of homes | Below NY median Higher net patient revenue than 29% of NY homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.8M | −$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.9M | Rank in NY Rank #350 / 479Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 350th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 27% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.7M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | NY median −$0.4M | Rank in NY Rank #273 / 479Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 273rd out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −4.9% | +3.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median −2.0% | Rank in NY Rank #281 / 479Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 281st out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | NY median $0.2M | Rank in NY Rank #391 / 464Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 391st out of 464 nursing homes we track in New York for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 16% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | −$0.0M | Trend — | NY median $0.0M | Rank in NY Rank #314 / 479Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 314th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 35% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with New York homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.9M | −$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $12.2M | Rank in NY Rank #321 / 479Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 321st out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | Below NY median Higher payroll than 33% of NY homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.9% | −1.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median 52.7% | Rank in NY Rank #160 / 477Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 477 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Near NY average The NY average is 56.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NY benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New York payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NY payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.3M | $12.1M | $12.9M | $12.4M | $12.2M | $12.6M | $15.1M | $15.1M |
| Operating expenses | $13.9M | $14.0M | $14.2M | $13.6M | $14.1M | $14.6M | $16.3M | $15.8M |
| Net patient income | −$0.6M | −$2.0M | −$1.3M | −$1.2M | −$1.9M | −$2.0M | −$1.2M | −$0.7M |
| Operating margin | −4.7% | −16.5% | −10.4% | −9.9% | −15.2% | −15.7% | −8.1% | −4.9% |
| Net income | −$0.0M | −$1.0M | −$0.8M | −$0.3M | −$1.5M | −$0.3M | −$0.7M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $7.8M | $7.9M | $8.1M | $8.4M | $8.3M | $7.3M | $9.1M | $8.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 59.1% | 65.6% | 62.6% | 67.9% | 68.0% | 57.8% | 60.4% | 58.9% |
| Beds | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 125 |
| Gross revenue | $15.9M | $15.5M | $17.1M | $16.7M | $16.9M | $18.3M | $21.2M | $21.7M |
| Salaries | $6.4M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $6.9M | $6.7M | $6.1M | $7.8M | $7.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.5M | $1.6M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.4M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.7M | $0.5M | $0.5M |
| Other operating costs | $6.1M | $6.1M | $6.2M | $5.2M | $5.8M | $7.3M | $7.2M | $6.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $329 | $324 | $334 | $333 | $321 | $337 | $374 | $382 |
| Cost per day | $344 | $377 | $368 | $367 | $369 | $390 | $404 | $401 |
| Average length of stay | 67.4 days | 84.0 days | 87.3 days | 89.3 days | 119.7 days | 128.5 days | 108.3 days | 92.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
428 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
106 · 25%
Medicaid
8 · 2%
Private pay & other
314 · 73%
Resident snapshot
106 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 7%
Medicaid
83 · 78%
Private pay & other
16 · 15%
Leaving
425 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
91 · 21%
Medicaid
38 · 9%
Private pay & other
296 · 70%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Elderwood at Wheatfield
3.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Niagara Falls's city center to Elderwood at Wheatfield's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Elderwood at Wheatfield
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Niagara Falls
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 56.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center – Schoellkopf Health Center | NH | Niagara Falls | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
185
Rank
#351 / 567 |
78.3%
Facility
78.3%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#412 / 519 | -9% | 3.98
Facility
3.98
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#141 / 526 | -6% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 19
Facility
19
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#283 / 530 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#126 / 530 | - | 94 | - | - | Niagara Falls Memorial Home Co, Inc (Not For Profit) | $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#379 / 479 | $6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#406 / 479 | 46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#334 / 477 | 335376 | ||||
| Elderwood at Wheatfield | NH MC PC RC SNF | Niagara Falls | 123
Facility
123
NY AVG
185
Rank
#344 / 567 |
92.7%
Facility
92.7%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#278 / 519 | +7% | 3.14
Facility
3.14
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#372 / 526 | +31% | -14% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 13
Facility
13
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#145 / 530 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#426 / 530 | - | 114 | - |
34
Facility
34
NY AVG
64
Rank
#361 / 442 | 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company, LLC (For Profit) | $15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#340 / 479 | $8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#321 / 479 | 58.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#160 / 477 | 335790 | ||||
| Niagara Rehabilitation-Nursing | NH | Niagara Falls | 160
Facility
160
NY AVG
185
Rank
#272 / 567 |
56.3%
Facility
56.3%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#472 / 519 | -35% | 3.14
Facility
3.14
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#372 / 526 | +12% | -15% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 21
Facility
21
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#312 / 530 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#95 / 530 | - | 90 | - | - | Amerifalls, LLC (For Profit) | $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#355 / 479 | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#329 / 479 | 59.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#144 / 477 | 335742 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in New York State
Elderwood at Wheatfield is in Niagara Falls, New York State. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Community First Choice Option
Community First Choice Option
- Who it is for
- New York Medicaid members who need attendant services and supports at home
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid Community First Choice Option supplies home/community attendant services and supports to eligible individuals needing an institutional level of care.
What it provides
- Home and community-based assistance with daily activities and health-related tasks that can be performed by an aide or direct-care worker.
Expanded In-Home Services for the Elderly Program (EISEP)
Expanded In-Home Services for the Elderly Program (EISEP)
- Who it is for
- New Yorkers 60+ who need help with personal care or chores and are not eligible for Medicaid
- Income limit
- EISEP uses income-based sliding cost sharing.
Eligibility
- General
- Age 60+ with need for help with personal care or household chores, not eligible for Medicaid; locally assessed for nonmedical in-home support.
What it provides
- Case management and; when assessed and available; in-home assistance; noninstitutional respite and ancillary support.
Nursing Home Transition and Diversion (NHTD) Medicaid Waiver
Nursing Home Transition and Diversion (NHTD) Medicaid Waiver
- Who it is for
- New York Medicaid recipients with nursing-facility level of care who can live safely in the community
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid recipients with community-based long-term-care coverage, nursing-facility level of care, and a safe community plan; age 65+, or age 18–64 with a physical disability. Conflicting case-management or managed long-term-care enrollment must be resolved.
What it provides
- Assessed waiver supports that allow eligible people to leave a nursing facility or avoid admission and live in the community.
Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC)
Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC)
- Who it is for
- New Yorkers 65+ with qualifying income who have, or can get, Medicare Part D
- Income limit
- Annual income up to $75,000 single or $100,000 married.
Eligibility
- General
- New York residents 65+ with qualifying income who are enrolled or eligible to enroll in Medicare Part D and are not receiving full Medicaid benefits. Enrollment is available throughout the year.
What it provides
- Supplements eligible Medicare Part D prescription costs through income-based fee or deductible plans; premium assistance depends on program rules.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Elderwood at Wheatfield
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Elderwood at Wheatfield?
Elderwood at Wheatfield is legally operated by 2600 Niagara Falls Boulevard Operating Company, LLC (For Profit).
02 Is Elderwood at Wheatfield in a walkable area?
Elderwood at Wheatfield has a walk score of 34. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the license number of Elderwood at Wheatfield?
According to NY state health department records, Elderwood at Wheatfield's license number is 3121304N.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Elderwood at Wheatfield?
Elderwood at Wheatfield's occupancy is 92.7%.
05 Are pets allowed at Elderwood at Wheatfield?
Yes, Elderwood at Wheatfield allows residents to bring their pets.
06 What is the best email address for Elderwood at Wheatfield?
The team at Elderwood at Wheatfield can be reached at mhardy@elderwood.com.
07 Does Elderwood at Wheatfield operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Elderwood at Wheatfield is registered as a for-profit in NY.
Updated on
