Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
80 employees · 33 contractors · 41 on an average day Foxdale Village
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · State College, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Foxdale Village
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · State College, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Foxdale Village accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Foxdale Village
Foxdale Village is a nursing home and skilled nursing community in State College, Pennsylvania. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock for residents who need ongoing clinical oversight. The community has 64 beds and an 86% occupancy rate, meaning most beds are currently in use.
Foxdale Village opened in 1990 and accepts Medicare and private pay. Eligible residents can use Medicare for short term skilled care after a qualifying hospital stay, while private pay covers care directly. Total nurse staffing is 6 hours and 37 minutes per resident each day, representing the daily hands on nursing time assigned to each resident. Foxdale Village may be a good fit for someone whose care needs call for around the clock nursing oversight.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 37m
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 37mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +91% above Pennsylvania average
1 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
12 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 11m
↑ 51% · PA 47mThis facility: 1h 11m per resident per day, 51% above the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 12 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
12 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
18 staff · 9-hour shifts
1h 45m
↑ 91% · PA 55mThis facility: 1h 45m per resident per day, 91% above the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
18 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 41 total: 35 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
41 staff · 8.7-hour shifts
3h 41m
↑ 68% · PA 2h 12mThis facility: 3h 41m per resident per day, 68% above the Pennsylvania average of 2h 12m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 41 total: 35 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
41 staff · 8.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 41% · PA 6mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 41% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
6h 4m
↑ 72% · PA 3h 31mThis facility: 6h 4m per resident per day, 72% above the Pennsylvania average of 3h 31m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
40m
↑ 20% · PA 33mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 20% above the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
80 employees · 33 contractors · 41 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 1% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 1% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
28,922 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →76.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (6), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Licensed Practical Nurse (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Diagnostic X-ray Services Staff (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Registered Nurse (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
110
Rank #140 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 140th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
110
Rank #140 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 140th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
46 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 64 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #2 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #2 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #56 / 163Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 163 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 163. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #56 / 163Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 163 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 163. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
85.9%
This home usually has limited availability
Higher than the Pennsylvania average: 75.3%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
250
days
About This Community
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceJune 14, 2026
ExpirationJune 14, 2027
CountyCentre
License LevelFULL
License Number245650
CMS Certification Number395838
Foxdale Village is legally operated by Foxdale Village Corporation.
Owner NameFoxdale Village Corporation
Profit StatusNonprofit
Physical TherapyListed as: Physical therapy and rehabilitation programs
Housekeeping
MaintenanceListed as: Interior and exterior home maintenance
TransportationListed as: Transportation to shopping · City bus service access · Transportation to medical appointments
55
Total Daily Staff
41
Waking Staff
0
Resident Support Staff
55
Residents Served
0
Hospice Residents
Pets not allowed
Workshop
Auditorium
Art Gallery
Game Room
Beauty Salon
Gift Shop
Community Center
Garden
Courtyard
Sewing Room
Model Train Room
Fitness Equipment
23-Acre Campus
Activities
Sewing Activities
Bridge
Lectures
Concerts
Resident-Led Interest Groups
Volunteering
Biannual Garage Sale
Arts & Crafts
Highlights
- Library – over 8,000 volumes and computers available
Religious AffiliationQuaker
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Foxdale Village.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Foxdale Village.- Vegetarian options.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Elm (1,050 sq ft) · Maple (1,050 sq ft) · Pine (900 sq ft)
Floor plans: Elm, Maple, Pine
900–1,050 sq ft
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Oak (1,450 sq ft) · Hemlock (1,350 sq ft) · Birch (1,200 sq ft) · Walnut (1,200 sq ft)
Floor plans: Oak, Hemlock, Birch, Walnut
1,200–1,450 sq ft
Cottage / Villa Floor plans as listed by the community: Sycamore (1,181 sq ft) · Dogwood (1,041 sq ft) · Hickory (with Extra 1/2 Bath) (1,037 sq ft) · Hickory (1,037 sq ft) · Chestnut (845 sq ft)
Floor plans: Sycamore, Dogwood, Hickory, Chestnut
845–1,181 sq ft
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
ALM Inspection Grade
92 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Pennsylvania inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 42% of the grade
B · 85/100
4 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100).
46 certified beds, 42% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
31 severity-weighted points (8 citations) · 16% lower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 37)
Enforcement
Concern
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 0) · $8,018 in fines
Persistence
Typical
41 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Pennsylvania state-licensed beds · 58% of the grade
A+ · 97/100
14 points above the Pennsylvania average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
64 licensed beds, 58% of the grade. Graded with Pennsylvania state-licensed facilities on the Pennsylvania scale.
Citations
Typical
2.5 citations per inspection (27 in 11 inspections) · 25% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 3.3)
Finding Frequency
Strong
45% of inspections found a citation · 24% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 59%)
Complaints
Strong
0 complaints · better than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 5)
How the final grade is calculated
A- · 92/100
85 × 42% + 97 × 58% = 92 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 46 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (42%) and 64 Pennsylvania state-licensed beds (58%). The result, 92 out of 100, is an A- on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
1vs 1.3 avg↓ 23% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
5 Better
Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (70% below)
• Citations per inspection (42% below)
• Inspections with citations (58% below)
• Inspection citation rate (24% below)
• Total complaints (100% below)
• Total citations (70% below)
• Citations per inspection (42% below)
• Inspections with citations (58% below)
• Inspection citation rate (24% below)
• Total complaints (100% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 27 | 89.0 | This facility has 70% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (27 vs. PA avg 89).↓ 70% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 2.5 | 4.3 | This facility has 42% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (2.5 vs. PA avg 4.3).↓ 42% better Rank #65 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 11 | 21.0 | This facility has had 48% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (11 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 48% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 12.0 | This facility has 58% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (5 vs. PA avg 12).↓ 58% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 45% | 59% | This facility has 14 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (45% vs. PA avg 59%).↓ 14% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 0 | 5.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (0 vs. PA avg 5).↓ 100% better |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 58% · PA 7.2This facility: 3, 58% below the PA average of 7.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #47 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 75% · PA 32This facility: 8, 75% below the PA average of 32 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.67
Rank #65 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 36% · PA 4.16This facility: 2.67, 36% below the PA average of 4.16 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the PA average of 0.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 25% · PA 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the PA average of 0.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
7
↓ 77% · PA 29.9This facility: 7, 77% below the PA average of 29.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the PA average of 0.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 01, 2024 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 8 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 01, 2024
6 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 23, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 02, 2022
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (50%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (13%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (13%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
7 of 8 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 8 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Jan 23, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
Jan 23, 2024 · $8,018 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,018
↓ 86% · PA $58KThis facility: $8,018, 86% below the Pennsylvania average of $58,140. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #121 / 183Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 183 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Pennsylvania average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 183 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 44% · PA 1.78This facility: 1, 44% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.78. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.17Pennsylvania average: 0.17. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jan 23, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,018Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,018
Pennsylvania average
$58,140
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Pennsylvania and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 7% · PA 3.7This facility: 4.0, 7% above the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 54% · PA 3.2This facility: 5.0, 54% above the PA average of 3.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 53% · PA 9.5This facility: 14.6, 53% above the PA average of 9.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
29.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 47% · PA 19.8This facility: 29.0, 47% above the PA average of 19.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 6 worse, 1 near PA average
4 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
30.2%
↑ 80% · PA 16.8This facility: 30.2, 80% above the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
30.2%
↑ 80% · PA 16.8This facility: 30.2, 80% above the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.5%
↑ 26% · PA 17.0This facility: 21.5, 26% above the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.5%
↑ 26% · PA 17.0This facility: 21.5, 26% above the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.4%
↑ 38% · PA 25.5This facility: 35.4, 38% above the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.4%
↑ 38% · PA 25.5This facility: 35.4, 38% above the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
↑ 224% · PA 1.5This facility: 4.7, 224% above the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
↑ 224% · PA 1.5This facility: 4.7, 224% above the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.6%
↑ 237% · PA 3.1This facility: 10.6, 237% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.6%
↑ 237% · PA 3.1This facility: 10.6, 237% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.9%
↓ 82% · PA 4.8This facility: 0.9, 82% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.9%
↓ 82% · PA 4.8This facility: 0.9, 82% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6%
↑ 56% · PA 6.2This facility: 9.6, 56% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6%
↑ 56% · PA 6.2This facility: 9.6, 56% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.5%
↓ 49% · PA 10.8This facility: 5.5, 49% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.5%
↓ 49% · PA 10.8This facility: 5.5, 49% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.8%
↓ 5% · PA 17.7This facility: 16.8, 5% below the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.8%
↓ 5% · PA 17.7This facility: 16.8, 5% below the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 13% · PA 87.5This facility: 99.3, 13% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 13% · PA 87.5This facility: 99.3, 13% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
↓ 1% · PA 93.5This facility: 92.9, 1% below the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
↓ 1% · PA 93.5This facility: 92.9, 1% below the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
34.7%
↓ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 34.7, 31% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
34.7%
↓ 31% · US 50.6This facility: 34.7, 31% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.4%
↑ 39% · PA 70.0This facility: 97.4, 39% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.4%
↑ 39% · PA 70.0This facility: 97.4, 39% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.3%
↑ 30% · PA 68.7This facility: 89.3, 30% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.3%
↑ 30% · PA 68.7This facility: 89.3, 30% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Foxdale Village’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−346.8% operating margin
+12.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($24.5M) turns it into a net profit to $4.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
212.8% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #8 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $0.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.8M | +$0.3M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #171 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 171st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Below PA median Higher net patient revenue than 3% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $25.9M | +$0.9M | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$20.1M | −$0.5M | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −346.8% | +12.0 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $24.5M | — | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $4.4M | +$0.3M | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $12.4M | +$0.7M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #64 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 64% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 212.8% | +0.3 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #8 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | 142.7 pts over PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.1M | $3.9M | $4.2M | $4.9M | $5.5M | $5.8M |
| Operating expenses | $20.3M | $20.5M | $21.4M | $21.8M | $21.8M | $23.1M | $25.1M | $25.9M |
| Net patient income | −$16.1M | −$16.4M | −$17.3M | −$17.9M | −$17.6M | −$18.2M | −$19.6M | −$20.1M |
| Operating margin | −383.2% | −395.7% | −419.9% | −454.9% | −415.0% | −372.7% | −358.8% | −346.8% |
| Net income | $2.6M | $2.2M | $1.4M | $9.0M | −$5.7M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.4M |
| Payroll costs | $9.5M | $9.6M | $9.9M | $10.3M | $10.1M | $10.5M | $11.6M | $12.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 225.1% | 232.5% | 241.3% | 261.5% | 237.8% | 215.0% | 212.5% | 212.8% |
| Beds | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 |
| Gross revenue | $5.3M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $4.8M | $5.0M | $6.0M | $6.6M | $7.1M |
| Salaries | $7.3M | $7.4M | $7.8M | $8.1M | $8.0M | $8.4M | $9.2M | $9.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $2.1M | $2.2M | $2.2M | $2.2M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.4M | $2.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M |
| Other operating costs | $10.9M | $10.9M | $11.5M | $11.5M | $11.7M | $12.6M | $13.5M | $13.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $275 | $260 | $261 | $274 | $274 | $312 | $343 | $381 |
| Cost per day | $1,328 | $1,288 | $1,355 | $1,523 | $1,413 | $1,477 | $1,576 | $1,702 |
| Average length of stay | 191.2 days | 274.5 days | 438.1 days | 231.2 days | 376.8 days | 265.2 days | 244.9 days | 249.9 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Arriving
63 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
16 · 25%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
47 · 75%
Leaving
61 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
3 · 5%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
58 · 95%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Foxdale Village
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from State College's city center to Foxdale Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Foxdale Village
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Inne at Riddle Village | NH AL IL RC SNF | Media | 162
Facility
162
PA AVG
109
Rank
#124 / 200 | A |
63.2%
Facility
63.2%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#120 / 163 | -16% | 5.39
Facility
5.39
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#29 / 182 | -23% | +37% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 2
Facility
2
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#11 / 179 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#1 / 179 | - | 48 | - |
93
Facility
93
PA AVG
50
Rank
#8 / 208 | Riddle Village Inc | $8.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#158 / 177 | $19.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$19.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#21 / 177 | 222.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
222.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#6 / 177 | 395974 | ||||
| Cedarbrook Senior Care and Rehab | NH HOS IL MC PC RC SNF | Allentown | 670
Facility
670
PA AVG
109
Rank
#1 / 200 | B+ |
76.3%
Facility
76.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#87 / 163 | +1% | 4.58
Facility
4.58
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#58 / 182 | -5% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 16
Facility
16
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#85 / 179 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#153 / 179 | - | 511 | - |
22
Facility
22
PA AVG
50
Rank
#163 / 208 | County Of Lehigh Pennsylvania | $21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#56 / 177 | $38.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$38.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#3 / 177 | 179.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
179.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#9 / 177 | 395465 | ||||
| Kendal-Crosslands Communities | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Kennett Square | 111
Facility
111
PA AVG
109
Rank
#163 / 200 | A |
68.6%
Facility
68.6%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#115 / 163 | -9% | 6.46
Facility
6.46
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#6 / 182 | +49% | +64% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#138 / 183 | 8
Facility
8
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#47 / 179 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#28 / 179 | 1 | 35 | - |
9
Facility
9
PA AVG
50
Rank
#188 / 208 | Kendal-Crosslands Communities, Inc | $26.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$26.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#37 / 177 | $16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#33 / 177 | 64.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
64.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#52 / 177 | 395388 | ||||
| Dresher Hill Health & Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Fort Washington (Dresher) | 118
Facility
118
PA AVG
109
Rank
#69 / 200 | A- |
93.5%
Facility
93.5%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#34 / 163 | +24% | 3.12
Facility
3.12
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#146 / 182 | -63% | -21% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 5
Facility
5
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#26 / 179 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#53 / 179 | - | 110 | - |
31
Facility
31
PA AVG
50
Rank
#146 / 208 | Stephen Quindlen | $13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#118 / 177 | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#129 / 177 | 58%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#76 / 177 | 395509 | ||||
| Foxdale Village | NH SNF | State College | 110
Facility
110
PA AVG
109
Rank
#140 / 200 | A- |
85.9%
Facility
85.9%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#56 / 163 | +14% | 6.62
Facility
6.62
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#7 / 182 | -12% | +68% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#121 / 183 | 8
Facility
8
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#47 / 179 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#65 / 179 | 1 | 55 | - |
95
Facility
95
PA AVG
50
Rank
#2 / 208 | Foxdale Village Corporation | $5.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#171 / 177 | $12.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#64 / 177 | 212.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
212.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#8 / 177 | 395838 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Foxdale Village
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Foxdale Village in a walkable area?
Foxdale Village has a walk score of 95. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
02 What is the license number of Foxdale Village?
According to PA state health department records, Foxdale Village's license number is 245650.
03 When does Foxdale Village's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Foxdale Village's license expires on June 14, 2027.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Foxdale Village?
Foxdale Village's occupancy is 85.9%.
05 Are pets allowed at Foxdale Village?
No, Foxdale Village has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Foxdale Village operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Foxdale Village is registered as a non-profit in PA.
07 What is the overall rating for Foxdale Village?
Foxdale Village received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
