Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
54
53 employees · 1 contractor · 20 on an average day Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Nursing Home · Conrad, MT
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Nursing Home · Conrad, MT
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Logan Health, Conrad, Ltc is a nursing home in Conrad, Montana, with staffing throughout the day and night for residents who need ongoing nursing care. The community has 59 beds, which may suit someone who prefers a smaller setting where staff and residents can get to know each other.
Nurse staffing totals five hours per resident each day. That figure represents the daily hands on nursing time available to each resident. Rehabilitation services support people who need therapy as part of their care, while emergency room, laboratory, imaging, and TeleStroke services provide access to urgent evaluation, testing, and specialized stroke consultation through the broader hospital and care center.
Vicki Newmiller serves as the administrator. Logan Health, Conrad, Ltc may be a good fit for a resident who needs nursing home care and prefers a smaller community with rehabilitation and hospital based services available.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 8m
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 8mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +120% above Montana average
3 of 6 metrics below Montana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 11-hour shifts
38m
↓ 33% · MT 56mThis facility: 38m per resident per day, 33% below the Montana average of 56m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 11-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 6m
↑ 120% · MT 30mThis facility: 1h 6m per resident per day, 120% above the Montana average of 30m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
3h 25m
↑ 35% · MT 2h 32mThis facility: 3h 25m per resident per day, 35% above the Montana average of 2h 32m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 100% · MT 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Montana average of 4m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 14m
↑ 22% · MT 3h 29mThis facility: 4h 14m per resident per day, 22% above the Montana average of 3h 29m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
26m
↓ 37% · MT 41mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 37% below the Montana average of 41m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
54
53 employees · 1 contractor · 20 on an average day
54 total staff / 41 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.32 : 1
↓ 24% · MT 1.74This facility: 1.32 staff per resident, 24% below the Montana average of 1.74 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
54 staff ÷ 41 residents
See full Montana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.2 h
↑ 7% · MT 8.6 hThis facility: 9.2 h, 7% above the Montana average of 8.6 h (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
16,843 staff hours this quarter
See full Montana ranking →99.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Montana average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #29 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
59
Rank #29 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #13 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #13 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
57
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #16 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #16 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
69.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 41.1 residents and 59 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Similar to the Montana average: 71.9%About This Community
Facility TypeLong Term Care
StatusCurrent
IssuanceDecember 2, 2025
ExpirationDecember 1, 2028
License Number42028
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC is administered by Vicki Newmiller.
Imaging Services
Laboratory Services
Imaging/Radiology Services
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
5
↓ 9% · MT 5.5This facility: 5, 9% below the MT average of 5.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
34
Rank #17 / 30Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Montana State average, with a ranking across all 30 MT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 10% · MT 31This facility: 34, 10% above the MT average of 31 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.8
Rank #25 / 30Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Montana mean across 30 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 20% · MT 5.66This facility: 6.8, 20% above the MT average of 5.66 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
34 of 34 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the MT average of 0.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 47% · MT 1.9This facility: 1, 47% below the MT average of 1.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
31
↑ 10% · MT 28.1This facility: 31, 10% above the MT average of 28.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 186% · MT 0.7This facility: 2, 186% above the MT average of 0.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 07, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 6 of 34 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 07, 2026
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 24, 2025
12 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 25, 2024
14 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 07, 2024
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 12, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 34 citations
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
6 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
6 deficiencies (18%)
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (12%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 34 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 34 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 34 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Mar 7, 2024 · $23,868 civil money penalty
Mar 7, 2024 · $23,868 civil money penalty
Aug 28, 2023 · $3,145 civil money penalty
Mar 7, 2024 · 2-day payment denial
Total fines
$27,013
↓ 67% · MT $81KThis facility: $27,013, 67% below the Montana average of $80,691. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #14 / 30Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Montana average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 30 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 8% · MT 2.16This facility: 2, 8% below the Montana average of 2.16. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
2 days
↑ 207% · MT 0.33This facility: 1, 207% above the Montana average of 0.33. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Mar 7, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$23,868
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$23,868
Mar 7, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
2 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
2 days
Aug 28, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,145
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,145Fine amount comparison
This facility
$27,013
Montana average
$80,691
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Montana and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Montana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 20% · MT 10.6This facility: 12.7, 20% above the MT average of 10.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
22.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 13% · MT 20.1This facility: 22.7, 13% above the MT average of 20.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 4 worse, 2 near MT average
1 short-stay measure: 1 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.4%
↑ 25% · MT 18.7This facility: 23.4, 25% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.4%
↑ 25% · MT 18.7This facility: 23.4, 25% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↑ 14% · MT 17.2This facility: 19.7, 14% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↑ 14% · MT 17.2This facility: 19.7, 14% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.9%
↑ 3% · MT 24.1This facility: 24.9, 3% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.9%
↑ 3% · MT 24.1This facility: 24.9, 3% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↓ 9% · MT 2.9This facility: 2.6, 9% below the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↓ 9% · MT 2.9This facility: 2.6, 9% below the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3%
↑ 19% · MT 4.4This facility: 5.3, 19% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3%
↑ 19% · MT 4.4This facility: 5.3, 19% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
↓ 16% · MT 6.3This facility: 5.3, 16% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
↓ 16% · MT 6.3This facility: 5.3, 16% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.9%
↑ 60% · MT 6.2This facility: 9.9, 60% above the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.9%
↑ 60% · MT 6.2This facility: 9.9, 60% above the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↓ 15% · MT 5.6This facility: 4.8, 15% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↓ 15% · MT 5.6This facility: 4.8, 15% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.1%
↓ 31% · MT 20.4This facility: 14.1, 31% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.1%
↓ 31% · MT 20.4This facility: 14.1, 31% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MT 96.5This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MT 96.5This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · MT 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · MT 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.53
↓ 58% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.53, 58% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.53
↓ 58% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.53, 58% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 29% · MT 2.17This facility: 1.53, 29% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 29% · MT 2.17This facility: 1.53, 29% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 23% · MT 81.2This facility: 100.0, 23% above the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 23% · MT 81.2This facility: 100.0, 23% above the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
41
Medicaid
24
58.5% of residents
Private pay or other
17
41.5% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Places of interest near Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Conrad's city center to Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 49.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Living Centre | NH AL CCRC IL SNF | Stevensville | 50
Facility
50
MT AVG
97
Rank
#30 / 37 |
75.6%
Facility
75.6%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#13 / 25 | +5% | 5.35
Facility
5.35
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#3 / 29 | -41% | +12% | $37.5k
Facility
$37.5k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#16 / 30 | 10
Facility
10
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#1 / 30 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#1 / 30 | 2 | 38 | A+ |
38
Facility
38
MT AVG
47
Rank
#29 / 40 | Living Centre Limited | $6.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#17 / 26 | $3.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$3.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#15 / 26 | 56.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
56.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#3 / 26 | 275125 | ||||
| Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home | NH SNF | Butte | 60
Facility
60
MT AVG
97
Rank
#28 / 37 |
96.3%
Facility
96.3%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#3 / 25 | +34% | 6.40
Facility
6.40
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#5 / 29 | +62% | +34% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#5 / 30 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#20 / 30 | 1 | 58 | - |
14
Facility
14
MT AVG
47
Rank
#37 / 40 | - | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#16 / 26 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#5 / 26 | 71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#1 / 26 | 275156 | ||||
| Crest Nursing Home | NH SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 103
Facility
103
MT AVG
97
Rank
#13 / 37 |
44.0%
Facility
44.0%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#23 / 25 | -39% | 3.55
Facility
3.55
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#20 / 29 | -20% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 11
Facility
11
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#2 / 30 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#2 / 30 | - | 45 | - | - | Christina Jayne Penn Management Trust | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#20 / 26 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#19 / 26 | 50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#11 / 26 | 275122 | ||||
| Libby of Cascadia, LLC dba Libby Care Center | NH SNF | Libby | 101
Facility
101
MT AVG
97
Rank
#14 / 37 |
76.7%
Facility
76.7%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#12 / 25 | +7% | 3.44
Facility
3.44
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#25 / 29 | -7% | -28% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 19
Facility
19
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#6 / 30 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#4 / 30 | 2 | 78 | - |
76
Facility
76
MT AVG
47
Rank
#5 / 40 | Cascadia Montana Operations LLC | $10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#6 / 26 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#6 / 26 | 46.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#21 / 26 | 275040 | ||||
| Logan Health – Conrad – LTC | NH | Conrad | 59
Facility
59
MT AVG
97
Rank
#29 / 37 |
69.7%
Facility
69.7%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#16 / 25 | -3% | 5.14
Facility
5.14
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#6 / 29 | +8% | +7% | $27.0k
Facility
$27.0k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#14 / 30 | 34
Facility
34
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#17 / 30 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#25 / 30 | 1 | 41 | - |
57
Facility
57
MT AVG
47
Rank
#13 / 40 | - | - | - | - | 275119 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Is Logan Health – Conrad – LTC in a walkable area?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC has a walk score of 57. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the license number of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
According to MT state health department records, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license number is 42028.
When does Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license expire?
According to MT state health department records, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license expires on December 1, 2028.
What is the occupancy rate at Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's occupancy is 69.7%.
Are pets allowed at Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
No, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC has a no-pet policy.
Does Logan Health – Conrad – LTC operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC is registered as a non-profit in MT.
Who is the administrator of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
Vicki Newmiller is the administrator of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
