Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Logan Health, Conrad, Ltc is a nursing home in Conrad, Montana, with staffing throughout the day and night for residents who need ongoing nursing care. The community has 59 beds, which may suit someone who prefers a smaller setting where staff and residents can get to know each other.
Nurse staffing totals five hours per resident each day. That figure represents the daily hands on nursing time available to each resident. Rehabilitation services support people who need therapy as part of their care, while emergency room, laboratory, imaging, and TeleStroke services provide access to urgent evaluation, testing, and specialized stroke consultation through the broader hospital and care center.
Vicki Newmiller serves as the administrator. Logan Health, Conrad, Ltc may be a good fit for a resident who needs nursing home care and prefers a smaller community with rehabilitation and hospital based services available.
Community insights.
About this community
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC is administered by Vicki Newmiller.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Montana, the Department of Public Health and Human Services, Quality Assurance Division is the state body responsible for inspecting and licensing all senior residential care facilities.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 49 deficiencies 5 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Montana state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Montana state average• Total deficiencies (113% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (149% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MT Average | vs. MT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 49 | 23 | This facility has 113% more total deficiencies than a typical Montana nursing home (49 vs. MT avg 23).↑ 113% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 9.8 | 3.94 | This facility has 149% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Montana nursing home (9.8 vs. MT avg 3.94).↑ 149% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | MT Average | vs. MT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 5 | 5 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Montana average (5 vs. MT avg 5).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Inspections
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
State average 5.4
Last Health inspection on May 2026
State average 31.3
State average 5.8
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 34 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 34 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 34 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Breakdown of citation severity (last 3 years)
State average: 0.3
State average: 2
Citations history (last 3 years)
Staffing Data
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Nursing staff breakdown
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31Registered Nurse
Manages medical care and health needs.
Licensed Practical Nurse
Assists with medical care and medications.
Certified Nursing Assistant
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Contractor staffing
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31Total hours from contractors
125 contractor hours this quarter
Staff by category
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31| Certified Nursing Assistant | 30 | 0 | 30 | 10,641 | 92 | 100% | 9.7 |
| Registered Nurse | 9 | 0 | 9 | 2,171 | 92 | 100% | 11 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,505 | 88 | 96% | 9.9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 534 | 66 | 72% | 8.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 448 | 56 | 61% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 392 | 49 | 53% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 356 | 49 | 53% | 7.3 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 301 | 57 | 62% | 5.3 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 2 | 0 | 2 | 264 | 21 | 23% | 11 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 125 | 23 | 25% | 5.5 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 4 | 4% | 11.6 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 1 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 14 | 15% | 2.6 |
| Medical Director | 1 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 13% | 2 |
30 Certified Nursing Assistant
9 Registered Nurse
4 Licensed Practical Nurse
1 Other Dietary Services Staff
1 Administrator
1 Nurse Practitioner
1 Speech Language Pathologist
1 Mental Health Service Worker
2 Nurse Aide in Training
1 Occupational Therapy Aide
1 Clinical Nurse Specialist
1 Occupational Therapy Assistant
1 Medical Director
Penalties and fines
Includes penalties issued in 2024
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
Penalty History
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Last updated: Jan 2026
Quality of care over time
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
Long-stay resident measures
Short-stay resident measures
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Places of interest near Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Conrad's city center to Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 47.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Living Centre | NH AL CCRC IL SNF | Stevensville | 50
Facility
50
MT AVG
97
Rank
#30 / 37 |
73.2%
Facility
73.2%
MT AVG
66.8%
Rank
#11 / 24 | +10% | 6.03
Facility
6.03
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#3 / 30 | -41% | +33% | $37.5k
Facility
$37.5k
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#16 / 31 | 10
Facility
10
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#1 / 31 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#1 / 31 | 2 | 37 | A+ |
38
Facility
38
MT AVG
48
Rank
#30 / 42 | Living Centre Limited | $6.0MFiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
$6.0MFiscal year ending 08/2024
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#14 / 18 | $3.4MFiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
$3.4MFiscal year ending 08/2024
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#13 / 18 | 56.7%Fiscal year ending 08/2024
Facility
56.7%Fiscal year ending 08/2024
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#3 / 18 | 275125 | ||||
| Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home | NH SNF | Butte | 60
Facility
60
MT AVG
97
Rank
#28 / 37 |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MT AVG
66.8%
Rank
#3 / 24 | +43% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#5 / 30 | +62% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#1 / 31 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#7 / 31 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#20 / 31 | 1 | 57 | - |
14
Facility
14
MT AVG
48
Rank
#39 / 42 | - | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#12 / 18 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#2 / 18 | 68.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
68.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#1 / 18 | 275156 | ||||
| Crest Nursing Home | NH SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 103
Facility
103
MT AVG
97
Rank
#13 / 37 |
44.6%
Facility
44.6%
MT AVG
66.8%
Rank
#19 / 24 | -33% | 3.49
Facility
3.49
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#20 / 30 | -20% | -23% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#1 / 31 | 11
Facility
11
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#2 / 31 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#2 / 31 | - | 46 | - | - | Christina Jayne Penn Management Trust | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#16 / 18 | $2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#15 / 18 | 53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
53.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#4 / 18 | 275122 | ||||
| Libby of Cascadia, LLC dba Libby Care Center | NH SNF | Libby | 101
Facility
101
MT AVG
97
Rank
#14 / 37 |
75.5%
Facility
75.5%
MT AVG
66.8%
Rank
#9 / 24 | +13% | 3.37
Facility
3.37
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#26 / 30 | -7% | -26% | $22.7k
Facility
$22.7k
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#13 / 31 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#7 / 31 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#8 / 31 | 2 | 76 | - |
76
Facility
76
MT AVG
48
Rank
#5 / 42 | Cascadia Montana Operations LLC | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#6 / 18 | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
$3.7M
Rank
#7 / 18 | 46.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MT AVG
47%
Rank
#8 / 18 | 275040 | ||||
| Logan Health – Conrad – LTC | NH | Conrad | 59
Facility
59
MT AVG
97
Rank
#29 / 37 |
68.1%
Facility
68.1%
MT AVG
66.8%
Rank
#14 / 24 | +2% | 5.01
Facility
5.01
MT AVG
4.53
Rank
#6 / 30 | +8% | +11% | $27.0k
Facility
$27.0k
MT AVG
$83.8k
Rank
#14 / 31 | 34
Facility
34
MT AVG
29.7
Rank
#17 / 31 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#24 / 31 | 1 | 40 | - |
57
Facility
57
MT AVG
48
Rank
#14 / 42 | - | - | - | - | 275119 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Logan Health – Conrad – LTC
Is Logan Health – Conrad – LTC in a walkable area?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC has a walk score of 57. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the license number of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
According to MT state health department records, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license number is 42028.
When does Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license expire?
According to MT state health department records, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's license expires on December 1, 2028.
What is the occupancy rate at Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC's occupancy is 68.1%.
Are pets allowed at Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
No, Logan Health – Conrad – LTC has a no-pet policy.
Does Logan Health – Conrad – LTC operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Logan Health – Conrad – LTC is registered as a non-profit in MT.
Who is the administrator of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC?
Vicki Newmiller is the administrator of Logan Health – Conrad – LTC.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance




