Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
115
75 employees · 40 contractors · 31 on an average day Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Butte, MT
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Butte, MT
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home operates as a 60-bed skilled nursing facility under administrator Josh Kelly in Butte, Montana. The center maintains continuous on-site licensed nursing care to assist individuals requiring ongoing clinical monitoring.
Current census figures show a 96% occupancy rate across the facility. Daily hands-on nurse staffing averages 6 hours and 24 minutes per resident. Payment structures include private funds as well as Medicare and Medicaid for eligible applicants.
Prospective representatives researching long-term veteran placement in Butte can call Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home to discuss open bed availability and arrange an on-site visit.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 24m
This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 24mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +151% above Montana average
0 of 6 metrics below Montana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 29 total: 22 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 58m
↑ 110% · MT 56mThis facility: 1h 58m per resident per day, 110% above the Montana average of 56m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 29 total: 22 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
18 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 15m
↑ 151% · MT 30mThis facility: 1h 15m per resident per day, 151% above the Montana average of 30m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 18 total: 10 of the facility's own employees and 8 agency contractors.
18 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 52 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 22 agency contractors.
52 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
3h 11m
↑ 26% · MT 2h 32mThis facility: 3h 11m per resident per day, 26% above the Montana average of 2h 32m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 52 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 22 agency contractors.
52 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 40% · MT 4mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 40% above the Montana average of 4m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 48m
↑ 67% · MT 3h 29mThis facility: 5h 48m per resident per day, 67% above the Montana average of 3h 29m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
50m
↑ 23% · MT 41mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 23% above the Montana average of 41m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
115
75 employees · 40 contractors · 31 on an average day
115 total staff / 55 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.09 : 1
↑ 20% · MT 1.74This facility: 2.09 staff per resident, 20% above the Montana average of 1.74 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
115 staff ÷ 55 residents
See full Montana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.3 h
↑ 8% · MT 8.6 hThis facility: 9.3 h, 8% above the Montana average of 8.6 h (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
26,463 staff hours this quarter
See full Montana ranking →90.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Montana average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (22), Licensed Practical Nurse (8), Registered Nurse (7), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #28 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
60
Rank #28 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #19 / 27Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 27 nursing homes we track in Montana for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Montana facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #19 / 27Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 27 nursing homes we track in Montana for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Montana facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
1
year
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #37 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #37 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
14
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #3 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #3 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
96.3%
This home is often near full
Based on 57.8 residents and 60 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Higher than the Montana average: 71.9%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
283
days
About This Community
Facility TypeLong Term Care
StatusCurrent
IssuanceMay 3, 2025
ExpirationApril 3, 2028
License Number13594
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home is administered by Josh Kelly.
Resident Council
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Pets not allowed
Minimum Age55
Room Types
Private Room
In-Room Features
Private Rooms With Medical Supplies
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
51 severity-weighted points (18 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified MT facility (median: 107)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
28 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified MT facility (median: 34)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 45% · MT 5.5This facility: 3, 45% below the Montana average of 5.5 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18
Rank #5 / 30Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Montana State average, with a ranking across all 30 MT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 42% · MT 31This facility: 18, 42% below the Montana average of 31 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6
Rank #20 / 30Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Montana mean across 30 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 6% · MT 5.66This facility: 6, 6% above the Montana average of 5.66 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 0.3 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 47% · MT 1.9This facility: 1, 47% below the Montana average of 1.9 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
17
↓ 40% · MT 28.1This facility: 17, 40% below the Montana average of 28.1 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 0.7 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 19, 2025 · 9 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 18 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 19, 2025
9 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 06, 2024
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 11, 2023
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (39%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (22%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (6%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (6%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 18 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MT avg $81KMontana average: $80,691. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MT avg 2.16Montana average: 2.16. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MT avg 0.33Montana average: 0.33. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Montana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 69% · MT 3.0This facility: 5.0, 69% above the MT average of 3.0 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 5% · MT 10.6This facility: 10.0, 5% below the MT average of 10.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 6% · MT 20.1This facility: 18.9, 6% below the MT average of 20.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 4 worse, 2 near MT average
4 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 1 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.1%
↓ 9% · MT 18.7This facility: 17.1, 9% below the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.1%
↓ 9% · MT 18.7This facility: 17.1, 9% below the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.7%
↑ 3% · MT 17.2This facility: 17.7, 3% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.7%
↑ 3% · MT 17.2This facility: 17.7, 3% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9%
↓ 9% · MT 24.1This facility: 21.9, 9% below the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9%
↓ 9% · MT 24.1This facility: 21.9, 9% below the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
↑ 85% · MT 2.9This facility: 5.4, 85% above the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
↑ 85% · MT 2.9This facility: 5.4, 85% above the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.4%
↑ 66% · MT 4.4This facility: 7.4, 66% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.4%
↑ 66% · MT 4.4This facility: 7.4, 66% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↓ 22% · MT 6.3This facility: 5.0, 22% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↓ 22% · MT 6.3This facility: 5.0, 22% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
↓ 52% · MT 6.2This facility: 3.0, 52% below the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
↓ 52% · MT 6.2This facility: 3.0, 52% below the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3%
↑ 31% · MT 5.6This facility: 7.3, 31% above the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3%
↑ 31% · MT 5.6This facility: 7.3, 31% above the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.2%
↓ 55% · MT 20.4This facility: 9.2, 55% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.2%
↓ 55% · MT 20.4This facility: 9.2, 55% below the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
↓ 20% · MT 96.5This facility: 76.8, 20% below the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
↓ 20% · MT 96.5This facility: 76.8, 20% below the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.6%
↑ 2% · MT 93.7This facility: 95.6, 2% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.6%
↑ 2% · MT 93.7This facility: 95.6, 2% above the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.64
↓ 50% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.64, 50% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.64
↓ 50% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.64, 50% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.83
↓ 62% · MT 2.17This facility: 0.83, 62% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.83
↓ 62% · MT 2.17This facility: 0.83, 62% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
59.1%
↑ 10% · US 53.7This facility: 59.1, 10% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
59.1%
↑ 10% · US 53.7This facility: 59.1, 10% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
13.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
13.0%
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 1.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 1.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.9%
↓ 24% · MT 81.2This facility: 61.9, 24% below the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.9%
↓ 24% · MT 81.2This facility: 61.9, 24% below the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 26 Montana nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.8% operating margin
+0.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 3 reported years. Net income $0.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Montana homes
71.3% payroll share of revenue
MT average 49.9%Rank #1 / 26Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 26 nursing homes we track in Montana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Montana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Montana homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2022 → 2024Trend | MT median | Compared with MT homesRank in MT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $7.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20222024 | MT median $8.2M | Rank in MT Rank #16 / 26Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Montana for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Montana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Below MT median Higher net patient revenue than 40% of MT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.4M | +$0.0M | Trend 20222024 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.1M | +$0.0M | Trend 20222024 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.8% | +0.4 pts | Trend 20222024 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | +$0.0M | Trend — | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Montana homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2022 → 2024Trend | MT median | Compared with MT homesRank in MT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.3M | +$0.3M | Trend 20222024 | MT median $4.3M | Rank in MT Rank #5 / 26Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Montana for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Montana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | Above MT median Higher payroll than 84% of MT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 71.3% | +2.8 pts | Trend 20222024 | MT median 48.8% | Rank in MT Rank #1 / 26Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 26 nursing homes we track in Montana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Montana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | 21.4 pts over MT average The MT average is 49.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2022–2024 2 charts · MT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Montana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2022–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.0M | $7.4M | $7.5M |
| Operating expenses | $5.9M | $7.4M | $7.4M |
| Net patient income | $0.1M | $0.0M | $0.1M |
| Operating margin | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Net income | $0.1M | $0.0M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $4.4M | $5.1M | $5.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 72.5% | 68.5% | 71.3% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $7.1M | $8.9M | $8.7M |
| Salaries | $3.7M | $4.3M | $4.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $1.6M | $2.3M | $2.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $441 | $479 | $482 |
| Cost per day | $436 | $477 | $478 |
| Average length of stay | 191.8 days | 212.2 days | 282.5 days |
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
65 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
28 · 43%
Medicaid
10 · 15%
Private pay & other
27 · 42%
Resident snapshot
55 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
22 · 40%
Private pay & other
33 · 60%
Leaving
55 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
10 · 18%
Medicaid
18 · 33%
Private pay & other
27 · 49%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
4.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Butte's city center to Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Butte
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 49.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home | NH SNF | Butte | 60
Facility
60
MT AVG
97
Rank
#28 / 37 | A+ |
96.3%
Facility
96.3%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#3 / 25 | +34% | 6.40
Facility
6.40
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#5 / 29 | +62% | +34% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 18
Facility
18
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#5 / 30 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#20 / 30 | 1 | 58 | - |
14
Facility
14
MT AVG
47
Rank
#37 / 40 | - | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#16 / 26 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#5 / 26 | 71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#1 / 26 | 275156 | ||||
| Crest Nursing Home | NH SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 103
Facility
103
MT AVG
97
Rank
#13 / 37 | A+ |
44.0%
Facility
44.0%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#23 / 25 | -39% | 3.55
Facility
3.55
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#20 / 29 | -20% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 11
Facility
11
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#2 / 30 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#2 / 30 | - | 45 | - | - | Christina Jayne Penn Management Trust | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#20 / 26 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#19 / 26 | 50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#11 / 26 | 275122 | ||||
| Copper Ridge Health and Rehab | NH HOS SNF | Butte | 186
Facility
186
MT AVG
97
Rank
#4 / 37 | A+ |
35.1%
Facility
35.1%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#24 / 25 | -51% | 3.63
Facility
3.63
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#17 / 29 | +20% | -24% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#10 / 30 | 28
Facility
28
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#12 / 30 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#5 / 30 | 2 | 65 | - |
34
Facility
34
MT AVG
47
Rank
#31 / 40 | Brian Ramos | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#7 / 26 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#7 / 26 | 51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#10 / 26 | 275060 | ||||
| Continental Care and Rehabilitation | NH MC RC SNF | Butte (Meaderville) | 100
Facility
100
MT AVG
97
Rank
#16 / 37 | A- |
87.1%
Facility
87.1%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#7 / 25 | +21% | 4.75
Facility
4.75
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#8 / 29 | -41% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 32
Facility
32
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#15 / 30 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#10 / 30 | 1 | 87 | - | - | Gary Plasschaert | $10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#5 / 26 | $5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#4 / 26 | 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#7 / 26 | 275103 | ||||
| Community Nursing Home of Anaconda | NH HC HOS SNF | Anaconda | 62
Facility
62
MT AVG
97
Rank
#26 / 37 | ? |
29.8%
Facility
29.8%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#25 / 25 | -59% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#4 / 29 | +18% | +19% | $0
Facility
$0
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#1 / 30 | 26
Facility
26
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#9 / 30 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#23 / 30 | - | 19 | - |
73
Facility
73
MT AVG
47
Rank
#6 / 40 | - | - | - | - | 275065 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Montana
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home is located in Butte, Montana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home
Is Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home in a walkable area?
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home has a walk score of 14. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home?
According to MT state health department records, Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home's license number is 13594.
When does Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home's license expire?
According to MT state health department records, Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home's license expires on April 3, 2028.
What is the occupancy rate at Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home?
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home's occupancy is 96.3%.
How long has Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home been in business?
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home?
No, Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home has a no-pet policy.
Is Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home a government-operated facility?
Southwest Montana Veteran’s Home is a government-operated nursing facility in MT.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
