Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
82
52 employees · 30 contractors · 26 on an average day Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Springfield, MA
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Springfield, MA
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing offers independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing in Springfield, MA. Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living provides help with daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication while a resident keeps their own apartment. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Because the community offers multiple care levels, it may be a good fit for a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move to a different community. Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 86 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 29m
This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 86 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 29mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +26% above Massachusetts average
2 of 6 metrics below Massachusetts average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 3 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
3 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
46m
↑ 16% · MA 40mThis facility: 46m per resident per day, 16% above the Massachusetts average of 40m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 3 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
3 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 14 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
14 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
1h 14m
↑ 26% · MA 59mThis facility: 1h 14m per resident per day, 26% above the Massachusetts average of 59m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 14 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
14 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 37 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
37 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
2h 29m
↑ 6% · MA 2h 21mThis facility: 2h 29m per resident per day, 6% above the Massachusetts average of 2h 21m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 37 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 11 agency contractors.
37 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 81% · MA 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 81% below the Massachusetts average of 5m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 3m
↑ 13% · MA 3h 34mThis facility: 4h 3m per resident per day, 13% above the Massachusetts average of 3h 34m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
21m
↓ 25% · MA 28mThis facility: 21m per resident per day, 25% below the Massachusetts average of 28m (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
82
52 employees · 30 contractors · 26 on an average day
82 total staff / 38 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.16 : 1
↑ 34% · MA 1.61This facility: 2.16 staff per resident, 34% above the Massachusetts average of 1.61 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
82 staff ÷ 38 residents
See full Massachusetts ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 6% · MA 7.9 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 6% below the Massachusetts average of 7.9 h (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
17,492 staff hours this quarter
See full Massachusetts ranking →91.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Massachusetts average: 92% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (11), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Licensed Practical Nurse (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Registered Nurse (1), Qualified Social Worker (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
42
Rank #89 / 96Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 96 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Massachusetts facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
42
Rank #89 / 96Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 96 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Massachusetts facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #81 / 111Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 81st out of 111 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Massachusetts facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #81 / 111Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 81st out of 111 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Massachusetts facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
25
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #31 / 81Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 81 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Massachusetts average, with its Statewide rank out of 81. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #31 / 81Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 81 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Massachusetts average, with its Statewide rank out of 81. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
88.8%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 42 beds.
Higher than the Massachusetts average: 80.5%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
37
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
177
days
About This Community
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Assisted Living
Continuum of Care Access Across Loomis Communities
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Garden
Walking Paths
Lake Views
Deck (Cottages)
Garage (Cottages)
24-Acre Grounds
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: The Magnolia · The Maple · The Oak · The Willow
Floor plans: Magnolia, Maple, Oak, Willow
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: The Birch · The Chestnut · The Sycamore · The Evergreen
Floor plans: Birch, Chestnut, Sycamore, Evergreen
Cottage / Villa Floor plans as listed by the community: The Hickory · The Walnut · The Poplar
Floor plans: Hickory, Walnut, Poplar
In-Room Features
Private Balconies
Bathrooms With Grab Bars And Adjustable Shower Heads (In-Unit)
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
2
↓ 53% · MA 4.3This facility: 2, 53% below the Massachusetts average of 4.3 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #7 / 83Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 83 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Massachusetts State average, with a ranking across all 83 MA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 72% · MA 28.5This facility: 8, 72% below the Massachusetts average of 28.5 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4
Rank #19 / 83Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 83 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Massachusetts mean across 83 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 39% · MA 6.58This facility: 4, 39% below the Massachusetts average of 6.58 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Massachusetts average of 0.3 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MA 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Massachusetts average of 1.1 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
8
↓ 69% · MA 26This facility: 8, 69% below the Massachusetts average of 26 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MA 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Massachusetts average of 1.2 (among Massachusetts facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 18, 2024 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 3 of 8 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 18, 2024
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 03, 2023
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (38%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (25%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (25%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 8 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MA avg $73KMassachusetts average: $72,665. Average among the 155 Massachusetts facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MA avg 1.55Massachusetts average: 1.55. Average among the 155 Massachusetts facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MA avg 0.04Massachusetts average: 0.04. Average among the 155 Massachusetts facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Massachusetts average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 15% · MA 8.4This facility: 7.2, 15% below the MA average of 8.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 16% · MA 16.6This facility: 19.4, 16% above the MA average of 16.6 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse, 1 near MA average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.2%
↓ 16% · MA 15.8This facility: 13.2, 16% below the MA average of 15.8 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.2%
↓ 16% · MA 15.8This facility: 13.2, 16% below the MA average of 15.8 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.6%
↓ 9% · MA 13.9This facility: 12.6, 9% below the MA average of 13.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.6%
↓ 9% · MA 13.9This facility: 12.6, 9% below the MA average of 13.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.2%
↑ 58% · MA 20.4This facility: 32.2, 58% above the MA average of 20.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.2%
↑ 58% · MA 20.4This facility: 32.2, 58% above the MA average of 20.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
↓ 6% · MA 1.7This facility: 1.6, 6% below the MA average of 1.7 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
↓ 6% · MA 1.7This facility: 1.6, 6% below the MA average of 1.7 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
↓ 77% · MA 3.4This facility: 0.8, 77% below the MA average of 3.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
↓ 77% · MA 3.4This facility: 0.8, 77% below the MA average of 3.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2%
↑ 73% · MA 4.2This facility: 7.2, 73% above the MA average of 4.2 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2%
↑ 73% · MA 4.2This facility: 7.2, 73% above the MA average of 4.2 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 60% · MA 5.0This facility: 2.0, 60% below the MA average of 5.0 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 60% · MA 5.0This facility: 2.0, 60% below the MA average of 5.0 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
↓ 81% · MA 17.4This facility: 3.3, 81% below the MA average of 17.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
↓ 81% · MA 17.4This facility: 3.3, 81% below the MA average of 17.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
↓ 95% · MA 21.5This facility: 1.1, 95% below the MA average of 21.5 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
↓ 95% · MA 21.5This facility: 1.1, 95% below the MA average of 21.5 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 2% · MA 92.9This facility: 94.6, 2% above the MA average of 92.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 2% · MA 92.9This facility: 94.6, 2% above the MA average of 92.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · MA 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the MA average of 93.5 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · MA 93.5This facility: 100.0, 7% above the MA average of 93.5 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MA average of 1.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MA average of 1.4 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.5%
↑ 5% · MA 78.9This facility: 82.5, 5% above the MA average of 78.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.5%
↑ 5% · MA 78.9This facility: 82.5, 5% above the MA average of 78.9 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 5% · MA 78.1This facility: 81.8, 5% above the MA average of 78.1 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 5% · MA 78.1This facility: 81.8, 5% above the MA average of 78.1 (among MA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 82 Massachusetts nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−26.4% operating margin
+8.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($3.9M) turns it into a net profit to $1.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Massachusetts homes
59.8% payroll share of revenue
MA average 67.4%Rank #47 / 82Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Massachusetts average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $0.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Massachusetts homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MA median | Compared with MA homesRank in MA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.7M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | MA median $15.5M | Rank in MA Rank #61 / 82Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Massachusetts average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Below MA median Higher net patient revenue than 26% of MA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $13.5M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | MA median $16.5M | Rank in MA Rank #55 / 82Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Massachusetts homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$2.8M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | MA median −$0.5M | Rank in MA Rank #72 / 82Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Massachusetts homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −26.4% | +8.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | MA median −3.3% | Rank in MA Rank #73 / 82Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 73rd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Massachusetts homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 11% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $3.9M | — | Trend — | MA median $0.1M | Rank in MA Rank #8 / 81Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Massachusetts homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.0M | +$1.2M | Trend — | MA median $0.0M | Rank in MA Rank #17 / 82Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Massachusetts homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Massachusetts homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MA median | Compared with MA homesRank in MA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.4M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | MA median $9.7M | Rank in MA Rank #64 / 82Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Massachusetts average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Below MA median Higher payroll than 22% of MA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 59.8% | −1.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | MA median 61.9% | Rank in MA Rank #47 / 82Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 82 nursing homes we track in Massachusetts for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Massachusetts average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Massachusetts that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | 7.6 pts under MA average The MA average is 67.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Massachusetts payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.1M | $8.6M | $8.5M | $8.6M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $9.8M | $10.7M |
| Operating expenses | $11.2M | $12.0M | $12.1M | $12.9M | $12.8M | $13.4M | $13.2M | $13.5M |
| Net patient income | −$3.1M | −$3.4M | −$3.5M | −$4.3M | −$3.7M | −$3.6M | −$3.4M | −$2.8M |
| Operating margin | −37.9% | −39.1% | −41.6% | −50.7% | −40.1% | −37.3% | −35.3% | −26.4% |
| Net income | −$0.1M | −$0.9M | −$0.1M | −$1.3M | $0.3M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | $1.0M |
| Payroll costs | $4.6M | $4.9M | $5.2M | $5.6M | $5.3M | $6.0M | $6.0M | $6.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 57.4% | 56.7% | 61.0% | 65.9% | 57.6% | 61.3% | 61.4% | 59.8% |
| Beds | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 |
| Gross revenue | $9.1M | $9.4M | $9.5M | $9.1M | $9.6M | $10.2M | $10.3M | $12.0M |
| Salaries | $3.9M | $4.2M | $4.5M | $4.8M | $4.6M | $5.2M | $5.2M | $5.5M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.4M |
| Other operating costs | $6.5M | $7.1M | $6.9M | $7.3M | $7.6M | $7.4M | $7.2M | $7.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $573 | $597 | $577 | $646 | $702 | $678 | $706 | $728 |
| Cost per day | $790 | $831 | $817 | $974 | $983 | $930 | $955 | $920 |
| Average length of stay | 114.9 days | 102.6 days | 160.9 days | 127.5 days | 70.9 days | 145.4 days | 87.5 days | 176.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
85 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
48 · 56%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
37 · 44%
Resident snapshot
38 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 21%
Medicaid
9 · 24%
Private pay & other
21 · 55%
Leaving
83 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
30 · 36%
Medicaid
6 · 7%
Private pay & other
47 · 57%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Over 20 years of experience
Lori Todd is the Executive Director of Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing, bringing over 20 years of experience in nursing across hospitals, private industry, home care, and long-term care. A Registered Nurse and Eden Associate, Lori is dedicated to improving elder care and pioneering cultural change within The Loomis Communities. She also serves as western Massachusetts representative to the MA Culture Change Coalition.
Places of interest near Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
2.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Springfield's city center to Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Springfield
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MA Executive Office of Elder Affairs, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Massachusetts average is: 67.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicopee Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH PC RC SNF | Chicopee | 68
Facility
68
MA AVG
119
Rank
#79 / 96 |
91.9%
Facility
91.9%
MA AVG
80.5%
Rank
#18 / 81 | +14% | 3.58
Facility
3.58
MA AVG
4.00
Rank
#61 / 86 | -10% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
MA AVG
$73.6k
Rank
#45 / 86 | 24
Facility
24
MA AVG
28.5
Rank
#43 / 83 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MA AVG
6.6
Rank
#53 / 83 | - | 63 | - |
23
Facility
23
MA AVG
48
Rank
#85 / 111 | Thomas Rackliffe | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#73 / 82 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$10.3M
Rank
#73 / 82 | 55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
67.4%
Rank
#61 / 82 | 225539 | ||||
| East Longmeadow Memory Care Assisted Living | NH AL MC SNF | East Longmeadow | 20
Facility
20
MA AVG
119
Rank
#96 / 96 | - | - | 4.38
Facility
4.38
MA AVG
4.00
Rank
#21 / 86 | -25% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
MA AVG
$73.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 30
Facility
30
MA AVG
28.5
Rank
#50 / 83 | 10.0
Facility
10.0
MA AVG
6.6
Rank
#70 / 83 | - | 126 | - |
20
Facility
20
MA AVG
48
Rank
#91 / 111 | Michael Marcus | $19.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#21 / 82 | $9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$10.3M
Rank
#39 / 82 | 50.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
67.4%
Rank
#70 / 82 | 225331 | ||||
| Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing | NH AL IL SNF | Springfield | 42
Facility
42
MA AVG
119
Rank
#89 / 96 |
88.8%
Facility
88.8%
MA AVG
80.5%
Rank
#31 / 81 | +10% | 4.49
Facility
4.49
MA AVG
4.00
Rank
#18 / 86 | -70% | +12% | $0
Facility
$0
MA AVG
$73.6k
Rank
#1 / 86 | 8
Facility
8
MA AVG
28.5
Rank
#7 / 83 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
MA AVG
6.6
Rank
#19 / 83 | - | 37 | - |
25
Facility
25
MA AVG
48
Rank
#81 / 111 | Lori Todd | $10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#61 / 82 | $6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
$10.3M
Rank
#64 / 82 | 59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MA AVG
67.4%
Rank
#47 / 82 | 225691 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Massachusetts
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing is located in Springfield, Massachusetts.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Massachusetts.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing in a walkable area?
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing has a walk score of 25. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing?
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing's occupancy is 88.8%.
03 Are pets allowed at Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing?
No, Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing is registered as a non-profit.
05 What is the overall rating for Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing?
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing have?
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing has 42 beds.
07 Are there photos of Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing?
Yes — there are 6 photos of Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
