Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
110
109 employees · 1 contractor · 53 on an average day MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Augusta, ME
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Augusta, ME
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care, Gray Birch provides nursing home, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing in Augusta, ME. Nursing home and skilled nursing services provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Assisted living helps with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication, while memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering.
Several care levels are available. The community may suit a resident whose needs grow over time and who may be able to move to a different level of care without leaving the community. The home has 77 beds, with total nurse staffing of 5 hours and 6 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Payment options include Medicare for short-term skilled care after a hospital stay, Medicaid for eligible residents whose savings may not cover a long stay, and private pay from personal funds. Pets are allowed, and Melissa Martin serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
110
109 employees · 1 contractor · 53 on an average day
110 total staff / 66 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.67 : 1
↓ 17% · ME 2.01This facility: 1.67 staff per resident, 17% below the Maine average of 2.01 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
110 staff ÷ 66 residents
See full Maine ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.5 h
↑ 5% · ME 8.1 hThis facility: 8.5 h, 5% above the Maine average of 8.1 h (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
41,538 staff hours this quarter
See full Maine ranking →99.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Maine average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
77
Rank #17 / 40Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Maine for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maine facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
77
Rank #17 / 40Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Maine for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maine facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #28 / 43Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 43 nursing homes we track in Maine for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Maine facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #28 / 43Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 43 nursing homes we track in Maine for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Maine facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
28
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #23 / 34Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 34 nursing homes we track in Maine for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Maine average, with its Statewide rank out of 34. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #23 / 34Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 34 nursing homes we track in Maine for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Maine average, with its Statewide rank out of 34. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
90.1%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 77 beds.
Higher than the Maine average: 84.3%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
69
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
126
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyKennebec
CMS Certification Number205054
MaineCare AvailableNo
Multi-level BuildingNo
Handicapped AccessibleNo
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch is administered by Melissa Martin.
Resident Council
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Maine, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Licensing and Certification is responsible for inspecting long-term care facilities to ensure they meet quality of care standards.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Maine state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. ME average
3 Worse
Metrics worse than Maine average:
• Deficiency Count (203% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (13% above)
• Inspections With Deficiencies (135% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Deficiency Count (203% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (13% above)
• Inspections With Deficiencies (135% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | ME Average | vs. ME Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deficiency Count
Total deficiencies cited across all inspections on record for this facility.
| 27 | 8.9 | This facility has 203% more deficiency count than a typical Maine nursing home (27 vs. ME avg 8.9).↑ 203% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.7 | 1.5 | This facility has 13% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Maine nursing home (1.7 vs. ME avg 1.5).↑ 13% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | ME Average | vs. ME Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 16 | 6.1 | This facility has had 162% more total inspections than the Maine average (16 vs. ME avg 6.1). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 162% more |
|
Inspections With Deficiencies
Inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency. Never exceeds the total inspection count.
| 4 | 1.7 | This facility has 135% more inspections with deficiencies than a typical Maine nursing home (4 vs. ME avg 1.7).↑ 135% worse |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
5
≈ 0% · ME 5This facility: 5, level with the Maine average of 5 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
28
Rank #10 / 29Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Maine for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Maine State average, with a ranking across all 29 ME facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 9% · ME 30.7This facility: 28, 9% below the Maine average of 30.7 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.6
Rank #14 / 29Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Maine for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Maine mean across 29 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 10% · ME 6.21This facility: 5.6, 10% below the Maine average of 6.21 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
28 of 28 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · ME 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Maine average of 0.2 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 233% · ME 0.3This facility: 1, 233% above the Maine average of 0.3 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
25
↓ 11% · ME 28.1This facility: 25, 11% below the Maine average of 28.1 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↓ 5% · ME 2.1This facility: 2, 5% below the Maine average of 2.1 (among Maine facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 30, 2026 · 1 citation (Resident Rights, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 6 of 28 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 30, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 14, 2026
7 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 07, 2024
11 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 22, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 24, 2023
7 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 28 citations
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (21%)
Quality of Life & Care
6 deficiencies (21%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (14%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (11%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (7%)
Administration
1 deficiency (4%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 28 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 28 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
ME avg $21KMaine average: $20,702. Average among the 28 Maine facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
ME avg 1.14Maine average: 1.14. Average among the 28 Maine facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
ME avg 0.32Maine average: 0.32. Average among the 28 Maine facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Maine average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · ME 12.6This facility: 12.8, 2% above the ME average of 12.6 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
21.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 18% · ME 26.5This facility: 21.7, 18% below the ME average of 26.5 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 6 worse
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
28.2%
↑ 16% · ME 24.4This facility: 28.2, 16% above the ME average of 24.4 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
28.2%
↑ 16% · ME 24.4This facility: 28.2, 16% above the ME average of 24.4 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.1%
↓ 41% · ME 25.6This facility: 15.1, 41% below the ME average of 25.6 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.1%
↓ 41% · ME 25.6This facility: 15.1, 41% below the ME average of 25.6 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.7%
↓ 26% · ME 29.2This facility: 21.7, 26% below the ME average of 29.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.7%
↓ 26% · ME 29.2This facility: 21.7, 26% below the ME average of 29.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
↑ 149% · ME 2.2This facility: 5.6, 149% above the ME average of 2.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
↑ 149% · ME 2.2This facility: 5.6, 149% above the ME average of 2.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.0%
↑ 71% · ME 4.1This facility: 7.0, 71% above the ME average of 4.1 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.0%
↑ 71% · ME 4.1This facility: 7.0, 71% above the ME average of 4.1 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
↑ 82% · ME 4.3This facility: 7.7, 82% above the ME average of 4.3 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
↑ 82% · ME 4.3This facility: 7.7, 82% above the ME average of 4.3 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↑ 15% · ME 5.2This facility: 6.0, 15% above the ME average of 5.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
↑ 15% · ME 5.2This facility: 6.0, 15% above the ME average of 5.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.6%
↓ 34% · ME 11.6This facility: 7.6, 34% below the ME average of 11.6 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.6%
↓ 34% · ME 11.6This facility: 7.6, 34% below the ME average of 11.6 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3%
↑ 15% · ME 20.2This facility: 23.3, 15% above the ME average of 20.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3%
↑ 15% · ME 20.2This facility: 23.3, 15% above the ME average of 20.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
↑ 7% · ME 92.3This facility: 98.5, 7% above the ME average of 92.3 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
↑ 7% · ME 92.3This facility: 98.5, 7% above the ME average of 92.3 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · ME 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the ME average of 95.5 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · ME 95.5This facility: 100.0, 5% above the ME average of 95.5 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↑ 47% · ME 1.2This facility: 1.7, 47% above the ME average of 1.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7%
↑ 47% · ME 1.2This facility: 1.7, 47% above the ME average of 1.2 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.3%
↑ 30% · ME 72.7This facility: 94.3, 30% above the ME average of 72.7 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.3%
↑ 30% · ME 72.7This facility: 94.3, 30% above the ME average of 72.7 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.7%
↑ 19% · ME 74.5This facility: 88.7, 19% above the ME average of 74.5 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.7%
↑ 19% · ME 74.5This facility: 88.7, 19% above the ME average of 74.5 (among ME facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 27 Maine nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−26.6% operating margin
+23.7 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$3.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Maine homes
88.5% payroll share of revenue
ME average 53.4%Rank #2 / 27Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 27 nursing homes we track in Maine for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Maine average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.8M while revenue rose $1.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Maine homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | ME median | Compared with ME homesRank in ME | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $12.0M | +$1.4M | Trend 20182025 | ME median $12.3M | Rank in ME Rank #16 / 27Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 27 nursing homes we track in Maine for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Maine average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 42% of homes | Below ME median Higher net patient revenue than 42% of ME homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.2M | −$0.8M | Trend 20182025 | ME median — | Rank in ME Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.2M | +$2.2M | Trend 20182025 | ME median — | Rank in ME Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −26.6% | +23.7 pts | Trend 20182025 | ME median — | Rank in ME Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | ME median — | Rank in ME Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$3.2M | +$2.1M | Trend — | ME median — | Rank in ME Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Maine homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | ME median | Compared with ME homesRank in ME | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.6M | +$1.8M | Trend 20182025 | ME median $7.2M | Rank in ME Rank #8 / 27Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 27 nursing homes we track in Maine for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Maine average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 73% of homes | Above ME median Higher payroll than 73% of ME homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 88.5% | +5.4 pts | Trend 20182025 | ME median 53.1% | Rank in ME Rank #2 / 27Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 27 nursing homes we track in Maine for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Maine average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maine that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | 35.1 pts over ME average The ME average is 53.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · ME benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Maine payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin ME payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.1M | $9.0M | $8.7M | $8.3M | $7.2M | $10.2M | $10.6M | $12.0M |
| Operating expenses | $10.5M | $10.5M | $11.2M | $12.6M | $15.0M | $16.3M | $16.0M | $15.2M |
| Net patient income | −$1.4M | −$1.5M | −$2.5M | −$4.3M | −$7.8M | −$6.1M | −$5.3M | −$3.2M |
| Operating margin | −15.0% | −16.7% | −28.6% | −51.3% | −109.2% | −59.5% | −50.3% | −26.6% |
| Net income | −$1.3M | −$1.5M | −$2.5M | −$4.1M | −$7.8M | −$6.0M | −$5.3M | −$3.2M |
| Payroll costs | $5.6M | $5.8M | $7.0M | $7.6M | $6.9M | $7.4M | $8.8M | $10.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 61.5% | 63.7% | 79.9% | 91.4% | 96.3% | 72.8% | 83.1% | 88.5% |
| Beds | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 |
| Gross revenue | $12.1M | $12.3M | $12.6M | $11.2M | $10.3M | $12.9M | $13.5M | $14.3M |
| Salaries | $4.5M | $4.6M | $5.9M | $6.2M | $5.7M | $6.3M | $7.5M | $9.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.4M | $1.6M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.9M | $4.8M | $4.2M | $5.0M | $8.1M | $8.9M | $7.1M | $4.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $234 | $237 | $236 | $256 | $232 | $284 | $289 | $321 |
| Cost per day | $269 | $276 | $304 | $387 | $485 | $453 | $434 | $407 |
| Average length of stay | 84.1 days | 95.6 days | 63.6 days | 78.7 days | 153.9 days | 131.6 days | 122.4 days | 126.3 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
295 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
234 · 79%
Medicaid
42 · 14%
Private pay & other
19 · 6%
Resident snapshot
66 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
14 · 21%
Medicaid
44 · 67%
Private pay & other
8 · 12%
Leaving
202 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
145 · 72%
Medicaid
36 · 18%
Private pay & other
21 · 10%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Augusta's city center to MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Augusta
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the ME Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Maine average is: 53.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maine Veterans‘ Homes Augusta | NH AL MC RESC RC SNF | Augusta | 108
Facility
108
ME AVG
66
Rank
#8 / 40 |
95.6%
Facility
95.6%
ME AVG
84.3%
Rank
#10 / 34 | +13% | 7.65
Facility
7.65
ME AVG
4.67
Rank
#1 / 29 | +2% | +64% | $0
Facility
$0
ME AVG
$20.7k
Rank
#1 / 29 | 12
Facility
12
ME AVG
30.7
Rank
#2 / 29 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
ME AVG
6.2
Rank
#2 / 29 | - | 103 | - |
7
Facility
7
ME AVG
44
Rank
#43 / 43 | Maine Veterans' Home | $100.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$100.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
$19.7M
Rank
#1 / 27 | $16.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$16.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#1 / 27 | 16.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
16.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
53.4%
Rank
#26 / 27 | 205126 | ||||
| MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch | NH AL MC SNF | Augusta | 77
Facility
77
ME AVG
66
Rank
#17 / 40 |
90.1%
Facility
90.1%
ME AVG
84.3%
Rank
#23 / 34 | +7% | - | +34% | - | $0
Facility
$0
ME AVG
$20.7k
Rank
#1 / 29 | 28
Facility
28
ME AVG
30.7
Rank
#10 / 29 | 5.6
Facility
5.6
ME AVG
6.2
Rank
#14 / 29 | 1 | 69 | - |
28
Facility
28
ME AVG
44
Rank
#28 / 43 | Mainegeneral Health | $12.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
$19.7M
Rank
#16 / 27 | $10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#8 / 27 | 88.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
88.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
ME AVG
53.4%
Rank
#2 / 27 | 205054 | ||||
| Augusta Center for Health & Rehabilitation | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Augusta (Mayfair) | 72
Facility
72
ME AVG
66
Rank
#18 / 40 |
94.2%
Facility
94.2%
ME AVG
84.3%
Rank
#12 / 34 | +12% | 3.80
Facility
3.80
ME AVG
4.67
Rank
#21 / 29 | +9% | -19% | $0
Facility
$0
ME AVG
$20.7k
Rank
#1 / 29 | 30
Facility
30
ME AVG
30.7
Rank
#17 / 29 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
ME AVG
6.2
Rank
#16 / 29 | 1 | 68 | - |
23
Facility
23
ME AVG
44
Rank
#29 / 43 | Ryan Francis | $9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
ME AVG
$19.7M
Rank
#22 / 27 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
ME AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#22 / 27 | 52.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
ME AVG
53.4%
Rank
#17 / 27 | 205077 | ||||
| Oak Grove Center | NH | Waterville | 90
Facility
90
ME AVG
66
Rank
#13 / 40 |
93.3%
Facility
93.3%
ME AVG
84.3%
Rank
#14 / 34 | +11% | 3.69
Facility
3.69
ME AVG
4.67
Rank
#28 / 29 | -8% | -21% | $14.1k
Facility
$14.1k
ME AVG
$20.7k
Rank
#25 / 29 | 63
Facility
63
ME AVG
30.7
Rank
#29 / 29 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
ME AVG
6.2
Rank
#28 / 29 | 1 | 84 | - |
41
Facility
41
ME AVG
44
Rank
#21 / 43 | Laura Matones | $11.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
ME AVG
$19.7M
Rank
#19 / 27 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
ME AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#25 / 27 | 39.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
39.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
ME AVG
53.4%
Rank
#24 / 27 | 205091 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other ME nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Maine
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch is located in Augusta, Maine.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Maine.
Frequently Asked Questions about MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch
Is MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch in a walkable area?
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch has a walk score of 28. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch?
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch's occupancy is 90.1%.
Are pets allowed at MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch?
Yes, MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch allows residents to bring their pets.
Does MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch is registered as a non-profit in ME.
Who is the administrator of MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch?
Melissa Martin is the administrator of MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch.
What is the overall rating for MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch?
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch have?
MaineGeneral Rehabilitation & Long Term Care – Gray Birch has 77 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
