Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
166
96 employees · 70 contractors · 71 on an average day Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Warminster, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Warminster, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Peacefully set in the neighborhood of Warminster, PA, Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is a reliable senior care provider that delivers comprehensive short-term care, rehabilitation, long-term care, and skilled nursing care. An expertly skilled and competent team of care professionals are available to cater to residents’ unique needs, emergencies, and concerns any time of the day. Personalized care and treatment plans are offered to make sure residents receive the right amount and type of services they need to maintain their overall well-being or recover from their conditions.
The community utilizes the latest advances in technology to deliver top-notch rehabilitation that fosters better recovery outcomes. An array of specialized services like audiology, dental, dermatology, optometry, and psychological counseling are available to provide residents the services they need for their other needs. At Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, residents can focus on maintaining or improving their strength, mobility, and overall well-being without the hassle of moving into another community for their ever-changing needs.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 148th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 10m
This nursing home is ranked 148th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 10m6 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 18 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
18 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
26m
↓ 46% · PA 47mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 46% below the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 18 total: 17 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
18 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 9-hour shifts
54m
↓ 1% · PA 55mThis facility: 54m per resident per day, 1% below the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 78 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 66 agency contractors.
78 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
1h 50m
↓ 16% · PA 2h 12mThis facility: 1h 50m per resident per day, 16% below the Pennsylvania average of 2h 12m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 78 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 66 agency contractors.
78 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 56% · PA 6mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 56% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 51m
↓ 19% · PA 3h 31mThis facility: 2h 51m per resident per day, 19% below the Pennsylvania average of 3h 31m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
15m
↓ 55% · PA 33mThis facility: 15m per resident per day, 55% below the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
166
96 employees · 70 contractors · 71 on an average day
166 total staff / 154 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.08 : 1
↓ 41% · PA 1.81This facility: 1.08 staff per resident, 41% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.81 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
166 staff ÷ 154 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
↑ 6% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 8.3 h, 6% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
53,708 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →59.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.6% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (66), Registered Nurse (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
180
Rank #60 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
180
Rank #60 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #175 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 175th out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #175 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 175th out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
17
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #55 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #55 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
88.7%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 180 beds.
Higher than the Pennsylvania average: 75.8%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
160
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
133
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Pets Allowed
Building TypeMid-rise
Room Types
Private Rooms
Semi - Private Rooms
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
99 severity-weighted points (50 citations) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 37)
Enforcement
Concern
$35,175 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Concern
45 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Total health inspections
8
↑ 10% · PA 7.3This facility: 8, 10% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.3 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
50
Rank #159 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 159th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 57% · PA 31.8This facility: 50, 57% above the Pennsylvania average of 31.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.25
Rank #164 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 52% · PA 4.11This facility: 6.25, 52% above the Pennsylvania average of 4.11 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
50 of 50 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 150% · PA 0.8This facility: 2, 150% above the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
48
↑ 62% · PA 29.7This facility: 48, 62% above the Pennsylvania average of 29.7 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 05, 2026 · 9 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 11 of 50 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 05, 2026
9 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 24, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2025
21 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 17, 2024
1 citation
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 16, 2024
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 10, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 28, 2024
12 citations
Resident Rights serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 24, 2024
3 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 50 citations
Resident Rights
11 deficiencies (22%)
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (22%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (14%)
Nutrition & Dietary
6 deficiencies (12%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (6%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (6%)
Environmental
3 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
40 of 50 citations resulted from standard inspections; 8 of 50 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 50 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Apr 24, 2024 · $35,175 civil money penalty
Apr 24, 2024 · $35,175 civil money penalty
Total fines
$35,175
↓ 40% · PA $58KThis facility: $35,175, 40% below the Pennsylvania average of $58,340. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #162 / 183Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 162nd out of 183 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Pennsylvania average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 183 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 45% · PA 1.82This facility: 1, 45% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.82. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.15Pennsylvania average: 0.15. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Apr 24, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$35,175
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$35,175Fine amount comparison
This facility
$35,175
Pennsylvania average
$58,340
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Pennsylvania and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 20% · PA 3.7This facility: 3.0, 20% below the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 69% · PA 3.2This facility: 1.0, 69% below the PA average of 3.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · PA 9.1This facility: 8.9, 2% below the PA average of 9.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.9
Score · lower is better
≈ 0% · PA 19.0This facility: 18.9, level with the PA average of 19.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 6 worse, 1 near PA average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 4 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.5%
↑ 31% · PA 16.4This facility: 21.5, 31% above the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.5%
↑ 31% · PA 16.4This facility: 21.5, 31% above the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
↓ 19% · PA 15.4This facility: 12.5, 19% below the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
↓ 19% · PA 15.4This facility: 12.5, 19% below the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9%
↓ 9% · PA 25.0This facility: 22.9, 9% below the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9%
↓ 9% · PA 25.0This facility: 22.9, 9% below the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.2%
↓ 87% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.2, 87% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.2%
↓ 87% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.2, 87% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9%
↑ 25% · PA 3.1This facility: 3.9, 25% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9%
↑ 25% · PA 3.1This facility: 3.9, 25% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 47% · PA 4.7This facility: 2.5, 47% below the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 47% · PA 4.7This facility: 2.5, 47% below the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↓ 32% · PA 6.0This facility: 4.1, 32% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↓ 32% · PA 6.0This facility: 4.1, 32% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
40.4%
↑ 193% · PA 13.8This facility: 40.4, 193% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
40.4%
↑ 193% · PA 13.8This facility: 40.4, 193% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.6%
↑ 56% · PA 17.6This facility: 27.6, 56% above the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.6%
↑ 56% · PA 17.6This facility: 27.6, 56% above the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.7%
↑ 7% · PA 87.8This facility: 93.7, 7% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.7%
↑ 7% · PA 87.8This facility: 93.7, 7% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
↑ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 95.4, 2% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
↑ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 95.4, 2% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.41
↑ 103% · PA 1.68This facility: 3.41, 103% above the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.41
↑ 103% · PA 1.68This facility: 3.41, 103% above the PA average of 1.68 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.34
↑ 12% · PA 1.20This facility: 1.34, 12% above the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.34
↑ 12% · PA 1.20This facility: 1.34, 12% above the PA average of 1.20 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
46.2%
↓ 14% · US 53.7This facility: 46.2, 14% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
46.2%
↓ 14% · US 53.7This facility: 46.2, 14% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
36.9%
↓ 27% · US 50.6This facility: 36.9, 27% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
36.9%
↓ 27% · US 50.6This facility: 36.9, 27% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.2%
↑ 184% · US 0.8This facility: 2.2, 184% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.2%
↑ 184% · US 0.8This facility: 2.2, 184% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
↑ 126% · PA 1.4This facility: 3.1, 126% above the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
↑ 126% · PA 1.4This facility: 3.1, 126% above the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.2%
↓ 43% · PA 70.8This facility: 40.2, 43% below the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.2%
↓ 43% · PA 70.8This facility: 40.2, 43% below the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.3%
↓ 43% · PA 70.9This facility: 40.3, 43% below the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.3%
↓ 43% · PA 70.9This facility: 40.3, 43% below the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.3%
↑ 23% · PA 23.1This facility: 28.3, 23% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.3%
↑ 23% · PA 23.1This facility: 28.3, 23% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.1%
↓ 7% · PA 9.8This facility: 9.1, 7% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.1%
↓ 7% · PA 9.8This facility: 9.1, 7% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−1.5% operating margin
−3.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
45.3% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #147 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.6M while revenue rose $0.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $18.0M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #81 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 81st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 55% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $18.3M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $20.7M | Rank in PA Rank #107 / 177Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | PA median −$1.3M | Rank in PA Rank #61 / 177Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −1.5% | −3.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median −7.4% | Rank in PA Rank #60 / 177Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | PA median $1.1M | Rank in PA Rank #131 / 172Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 172 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.3M | −$0.5M | Trend — | PA median $0.4M | Rank in PA Rank #121 / 177Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 32% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.2M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #118 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below PA median Higher payroll than 34% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.3% | +2.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #147 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | 24.8 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $18.1M | $18.0M | $16.6M | $13.7M | $15.2M | $17.5M | $17.7M | $18.0M |
| Operating expenses | $16.5M | $17.0M | $17.8M | $14.8M | $16.5M | $19.5M | $17.4M | $18.3M |
| Net patient income | $1.6M | $0.9M | −$1.2M | −$1.1M | −$1.2M | −$2.0M | $0.3M | −$0.3M |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | 5.3% | −7.4% | −7.7% | −8.2% | −11.4% | 1.9% | −1.5% |
| Net income | $1.7M | $1.0M | −$0.9M | $0.9M | $2.3M | −$2.1M | $0.2M | −$0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $7.3M | $7.7M | $7.9M | $6.6M | $5.5M | $6.9M | $7.5M | $8.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 40.1% | 42.7% | 47.7% | 48.3% | 36.3% | 39.3% | 42.4% | 45.3% |
| Beds | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Gross revenue | $19.7M | $19.3M | $17.4M | $14.4M | $16.3M | $18.6M | $18.6M | $19.1M |
| Salaries | $6.1M | $6.6M | $6.7M | $5.4M | $4.6M | $5.8M | $6.6M | $7.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $2.0M | $4.1M | $2.5M | $2.6M |
| Other operating costs | $9.2M | $9.3M | $9.9M | $8.1M | $10.9M | $12.6M | $9.9M | $10.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $319 | $309 | $298 | $312 | $318 | $317 | $328 | $323 |
| Cost per day | $291 | $293 | $320 | $336 | $345 | $353 | $322 | $328 |
| Average length of stay | 163.4 days | 187.0 days | 190.4 days | 191.2 days | 115.7 days | 123.1 days | 128.5 days | 133.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
435 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
163 · 37%
Medicaid
174 · 40%
Private pay & other
98 · 23%
Resident snapshot
154 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
18 · 12%
Medicaid
129 · 84%
Private pay & other
7 · 5%
Leaving
418 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
84 · 20%
Medicaid
252 · 60%
Private pay & other
82 · 20%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
2.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Warminster's city center to Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Pennsylvania
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is located in Warminster, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in?
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is in the Johnsville neighborhood of Warminster.
02 Is Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in a walkable area?
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a walk score of 17. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's occupancy is 88.7%.
04 Are pets allowed at Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
Yes, Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center allows residents to bring their pets.
05 What is the best email address for Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
The team at Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center can be reached at info@majesticrehab.com.
06 Does Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit.
07 What is the overall rating for Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
