Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
225
60 employees · 165 contractors · 44 on an average day Meadow Park Care
Nursing Home · St Helens, OR
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 19 points below the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 19 points below the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadow Park Care
Nursing Home · St Helens, OR
ALM Inspection Grade
D
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 19 points below the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 65 / 100, a D — 19 points below the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Meadow Park Care accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Meadow Park Care is a 24-hour skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility that provides the support and nursing care needed by residents. The care home offers a range of services, including occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, pet therapy, nutritional support, and wellness-focused activities. Meadow Park Care’s experienced staff deliver quality care while giving residents a serene, safe, and comfortable place to enjoy healing and rest.
Meadow Park Care is proud to offer pet therapy to residents, with studies showing that pet therapy improves the quality of life and emotional well-being of residents in long-term care communities. The care home’s pet therapy teams include Robert Mckenna and Kip, Carrie Morilon and Wyatt, Katie Joes and Maggie, and Averi Morely and Tucker. Meadow Park Care’s passionate team consists of experts in long-term care and short-term rehabilitation, compassionately caring for residents and providing a full range of services to help them heal, regain strength, and live as independently as possible. The care home’s staff, from the leadership team to the direct care staff, work to exceed expectations and provide round-the-clock care to meet every resident’s needs, including assistance with personal care, concierge services, and companionship.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 51m
This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 77 nursing homes we track in Oregon for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 51m4 of 6 metrics below Oregon average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 23 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
23 staff · 10.4-hour shifts
37m
↓ 11% · OR 41mThis facility: 37m per resident per day, 11% below the Oregon average of 41m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 23 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 15 agency contractors.
23 staff · 10.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 38 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 32 agency contractors.
38 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
55m
↑ 3% · OR 54mThis facility: 55m per resident per day, 3% above the Oregon average of 54m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 38 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 32 agency contractors.
38 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 113 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 83 agency contractors.
113 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
3h 19m
↓ 2% · OR 3h 22mThis facility: 3h 19m per resident per day, 2% below the Oregon average of 3h 22m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 113 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 83 agency contractors.
113 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 87% · OR 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 87% below the Oregon average of 5m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 25m
↑ 1% · OR 4h 23mThis facility: 4h 25m per resident per day, 1% above the Oregon average of 4h 23m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
24m
↓ 7% · OR 26mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 7% below the Oregon average of 26m (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
225
60 employees · 165 contractors · 44 on an average day
225 total staff / 74 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.04 : 1
↑ 18% · OR 2.57This facility: 3.04 staff per resident, 18% above the Oregon average of 2.57 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
225 staff ÷ 74 residents
See full Oregon ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.6 h
↑ 10% · OR 7.8 hThis facility: 8.6 h, 10% above the Oregon average of 7.8 h (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
34,480 staff hours this quarter
See full Oregon ranking →57.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oregon average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (83), Licensed Practical Nurse (32), Medication Aide/Technician (17), Registered Nurse (15), Qualified Social Worker (4), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Feeding Assistant (2), Medical Director (1), Physician Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
92
Rank #29 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
92
Rank #29 / 91Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 29th out of 91 nursing homes we track in Oregon for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oregon facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #4 / 81Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Oregon for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Oregon facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #4 / 81Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Oregon for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Oregon facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
42
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #56 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #56 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Oregon for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oregon facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
60
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #21 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #21 / 70Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 70 nursing homes we track in Oregon for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oregon average, with its Statewide rank out of 70. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83.8%
This home usually has availability
Based on 77.1 residents and 92 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Oregon average: 72.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
70
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
IssuanceJune 1, 2023
CountyColumbia
CMS Certification Number385222
Meadow Park Care is legally operated by Meadow Park Health - St Helen, LLC, and administered by John Adlesich.
Owner NameMeadow Park Health - St Helen, LLC
Total
92 units
Total beds
92 units
Resident Council
Fax(253) 200-5644
Pets not allowed
Smoking not allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
65 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
19 points below the Oregon average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
229 severity-weighted points (76 deficiencies) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified OR facility (median: 72)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified OR facility (median: 0) · $43,525 in fines
Persistence
Typical
38 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified OR facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
9
↑ 73% · OR 5.2This facility: 9, 73% above the Oregon average of 5.2 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
74
Rank #77 / 78Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 78 nursing homes we track in Oregon for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oregon State average, with a ranking across all 78 OR facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 120% · OR 33.7This facility: 74, 120% above the Oregon average of 33.7 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.22
Rank #61 / 78Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 78 nursing homes we track in Oregon for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oregon mean across 78 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 27% · OR 6.49This facility: 8.22, 27% above the Oregon average of 6.49 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
74 of 74 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 150% · OR 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the Oregon average of 0.4 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
≈ 0% · OR 1This facility: 1, level with the Oregon average of 1 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
71
↑ 121% · OR 32.1This facility: 71, 121% above the Oregon average of 32.1 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 233% · OR 0.3This facility: 1, 233% above the Oregon average of 0.3 (among Oregon facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 27, 2026 · 19 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 23 of 74 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 27, 2026
19 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 10, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 21, 2025
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 17, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 01, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 21, 2025
21 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 12, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 22, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 74 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 74 citations
Quality of Life & Care
23 deficiencies (31%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
11 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Rights
9 deficiencies (12%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (9%)
Administration
6 deficiencies (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
5 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (5%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (4%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (4%)
Environmental
3 deficiencies (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
53 of 74 citations resulted from standard inspections; 10 of 74 resulted from complaint investigations; and 11 of 74 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 17, 2025 · $14,613 civil money penalty
Oct 17, 2025 · $14,613 civil money penalty
Total fines
$14,613
↓ 72% · OR $51KThis facility: $14,613, 72% below the Oregon average of $51,286. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #63 / 80Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 63rd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Oregon for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Oregon average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 80 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 35% · OR 1.53This facility: 1, 35% below the Oregon average of 1.53. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OR avg 0.09Oregon average: 0.09. Average among the 64 Oregon facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Oct 17, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,613
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,613Fine amount comparison
This facility
$14,613
Oregon average
$51,286
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Oregon and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oregon average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 49% · OR 3.4This facility: 5.0, 49% above the OR average of 3.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 27% · OR 3.2This facility: 4.0, 27% above the OR average of 3.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 26% · OR 8.7This facility: 6.5, 26% below the OR average of 8.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 18% · OR 17.9This facility: 14.6, 18% below the OR average of 17.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 1 worse, 2 near OR average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.8%
↓ 10% · OR 14.2This facility: 12.8, 10% below the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.8%
↓ 10% · OR 14.2This facility: 12.8, 10% below the OR average of 14.2 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.0%
↓ 41% · OR 18.5This facility: 11.0, 41% below the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.0%
↓ 41% · OR 18.5This facility: 11.0, 41% below the OR average of 18.5 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.1%
↓ 4% · OR 20.9This facility: 20.1, 4% below the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.1%
↓ 4% · OR 20.9This facility: 20.1, 4% below the OR average of 20.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · OR 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · OR 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the OR average of 2.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
↓ 59% · OR 2.4This facility: 1.0, 59% below the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
↓ 59% · OR 2.4This facility: 1.0, 59% below the OR average of 2.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5%
↓ 2% · OR 5.6This facility: 5.5, 2% below the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5%
↓ 2% · OR 5.6This facility: 5.5, 2% below the OR average of 5.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
↓ 54% · OR 4.6This facility: 2.1, 54% below the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
↓ 54% · OR 4.6This facility: 2.1, 54% below the OR average of 4.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
↓ 27% · OR 4.9This facility: 3.6, 27% below the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
↓ 27% · OR 4.9This facility: 3.6, 27% below the OR average of 4.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
↓ 8% · OR 14.4This facility: 13.2, 8% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
↓ 8% · OR 14.4This facility: 13.2, 8% below the OR average of 14.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · OR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · OR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the OR average of 95.3 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
↓ 6% · OR 94.0This facility: 88.1, 6% below the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
↓ 6% · OR 94.0This facility: 88.1, 6% below the OR average of 94.0 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.4%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.4, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.4%
↓ 17% · US 53.7This facility: 44.4, 17% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.6%
↑ 24% · US 50.6This facility: 62.6, 24% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.6%
↑ 24% · US 50.6This facility: 62.6, 24% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1%
↑ 48% · OR 1.4This facility: 2.1, 48% above the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1%
↑ 48% · OR 1.4This facility: 2.1, 48% above the OR average of 1.4 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
↑ 16% · OR 85.7This facility: 99.8, 16% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
↑ 16% · OR 85.7This facility: 99.8, 16% above the OR average of 85.7 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.9%
↓ 14% · OR 80.9This facility: 69.9, 14% below the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.9%
↓ 14% · OR 80.9This facility: 69.9, 14% below the OR average of 80.9 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.9%
↓ 45% · OR 21.6This facility: 11.9, 45% below the OR average of 21.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.9%
↓ 45% · OR 21.6This facility: 11.9, 45% below the OR average of 21.6 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.8%
↑ 5% · OR 15.1This facility: 15.8, 5% above the OR average of 15.1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
15.8%
↑ 5% · OR 15.1This facility: 15.8, 5% above the OR average of 15.1 (among OR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Meadow Park Care’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 73 Oregon nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
14.1% operating margin
+5.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.4M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Oregon homes
45.2% payroll share of revenue
OR average 53.4%Rank #54 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.1M while revenue rose $1.8M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oregon homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.7M | +$1.8M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #52 / 73Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 29% of homes | Below OR median Higher net patient revenue than 29% of OR homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.4M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $11.9M | Rank in OR Rank #57 / 73Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.4M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $0.7M | Rank in OR Rank #16 / 73Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 79% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 14.1% | +5.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 7.0% | Rank in OR Rank #7 / 73Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | OR median $0.1M | Rank in OR Rank #49 / 56Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Oregon for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.4M | +$0.7M | Trend — | OR median $1.0M | Rank in OR Rank #22 / 73Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oregon homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Oregon homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OR median | Compared with OR homesRank in OR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.4M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | OR median $6.2M | Rank in OR Rank #56 / 73Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Below OR median Higher payroll than 24% of OR homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.2% | +3.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | OR median 49.1% | Rank in OR Rank #54 / 73Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Oregon for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oregon average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oregon that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | 8.2 pts under OR average The OR average is 53.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · OR benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oregon payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OR payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.0M | $4.7M | $4.4M | $5.3M | $3.7M | $5.6M | $7.9M | $9.7M |
| Operating expenses | $5.9M | $5.1M | $5.0M | $5.8M | $5.5M | $6.1M | $7.2M | $8.4M |
| Net patient income | $0.2M | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.5M | −$1.7M | −$0.4M | $0.7M | $1.4M |
| Operating margin | 2.5% | −7.9% | −12.2% | −9.7% | −46.7% | −7.9% | 8.6% | 14.1% |
| Net income | $0.2M | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.5M | −$1.7M | $0.1M | $0.7M | $1.4M |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $2.3M | $2.4M | $2.8M | $2.2M | $2.8M | $3.3M | $4.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 49.1% | 48.8% | 55.0% | 53.2% | 60.4% | 49.2% | 42.2% | 45.2% |
| Beds | 83 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 |
| Gross revenue | $7.5M | $6.2M | $5.4M | $5.1M | $3.8M | $5.9M | $8.3M | $10.2M |
| Salaries | $2.5M | $1.8M | $1.9M | $2.2M | $1.7M | $2.2M | $2.7M | $3.5M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $2.9M | $2.8M | $2.5M | $3.0M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.9M | $4.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $364 | $380 | $376 | $412 | $392 | $468 | $524 | $564 |
| Cost per day | $355 | $410 | $422 | $452 | $575 | $505 | $479 | $484 |
| Average length of stay | 57.3 days | 82.4 days | 79.4 days | 76.9 days | 114.3 days | 87.0 days | 90.5 days | 69.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
256 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
64 · 25%
Medicaid
40 · 16%
Private pay & other
152 · 59%
Resident snapshot
74 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 9%
Medicaid
46 · 62%
Private pay & other
21 · 28%
Leaving
248 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
54 · 22%
Medicaid
55 · 22%
Private pay & other
139 · 56%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Meadow Park Care
0.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from St Helens's city center to Meadow Park Care's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 19.49 miles to nearest hospital (PeaceHealth St. John Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Meadow Park Care
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Oregon
Meadow Park Care is located in St Helens, Oregon.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Oregon.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Meadow Park Care
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Meadow Park Care in?
Meadow Park Care is in the Graystone Estate neighborhood of St Helens.
02 Who is the owner of Meadow Park Care?
Meadow Park Care is legally operated by Meadow Park Health - St Helen, LLC, and administered by John Adlesich.
03 Is Meadow Park Care in a walkable area?
Meadow Park Care has a walk score of 60. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Meadow Park Care?
Meadow Park Care's occupancy is 83.8%.
05 How long has Meadow Park Care been in business?
Meadow Park Care has been operating for approximately 42 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Meadow Park Care?
No, Meadow Park Care has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Meadow Park Care?
The team at Meadow Park Care can be reached at jadlesich@sainthelenspa.com.
Updated on
