3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mvhs Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is a 202-bed skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility at 1650 Champlin Avenue in Utica, New York, operated by non-profit Mohawk Valley Health System. Accepted are Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. The facility provides skilled nursing, subacute rehabilitation, memory care, and respite services, with access to the full MVHS clinical network including geriatric medicine, diagnostic imaging, laboratory, eye care, and podiatry services.
CMS scores the facility 3 stars, with staffing and quality measure sub-ratings each roughly 25 percent below New York average. Nurse hours run 3h 9m per resident per day, 10 percent below state average of 3h 29m. Across six inspections since 2021, the facility averaged 5.5 deficiencies per year, essentially aligned with New York’s 5.1 average. An April 2022 inspection cited an abuse and neglect finding with actual harm, corrected by June 2022. A July 2025 inspection identified 15 deficiencies spanning food sanitation, infection control, insufficient nursing staff, and life safety systems, a spike from the one-to-two deficiency findings in prior years. No fines, immediate jeopardy findings, or enforcement actions are on record. Occupancy is at 97 percent, well above New York’s 88.3 percent average, with likely limited current availability.
On-site amenities include a chapel, private dining room, library, and beauty and barber shop.
Mvhs Rehabilitation and Nursing Center suits residents needing skilled nursing or subacute rehabilitation in a health-system-integrated setting in Oneida County, where clinical continuity across the MVHS network is a practical advantage.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 247th out of 407 homes in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 33m per day | ▼ 22% State avg: 42m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 48m per day | ▲ 4% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 0m per day | ▼ 9% State avg: 2h 11m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 2h 48m per day | ▼ 11% State avg: 3h 10m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 6m per day | ▼ 19% State avg: 7m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 14m per day | ▼ 48% State avg: 28m per day · National avg: 28m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is legally operated by St Lukes Home Residential Health Care Facility, Inc (Not for Profit).
In New York State, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the New York State state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical New York State nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
1 point above the New York State average for nursing homes (83/100)
Rank #278 / 593 in New York State Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 278th out of 593 homes in New York State. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the New York State average among 593 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Rankings are based only on facilities in New York State that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 84 out of 100. Letter grade B. 1 point above the New York State average for nursing homes (83/100)
Enforcement actions are formal penalties or interventions imposed by New York State regulators when a nursing home fails to meet state or federal care, safety, or regulatory standards. They may include directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
This facility has 1 enforcement action. 33% of New York State nursing homes have zero, and the statewide average is 1.6.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York State state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 18 | 13 | This facility has 38% more total citations than a typical New York State nursing home (18 vs. NY avg 13).↑ 38% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 14 | 20 | This facility has 30% fewer health citations than a typical New York State nursing home (14 vs. NY avg 20).↓ 30% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 4 | 4 | This facility has life safety citations in line with the New York State average (4 vs. NY avg 4).— At avg |
|
Citations per year
Average citations per year since 2021.
| 3.6 | 2.6 | This facility has 38% more citations per year than a typical New York State nursing home (3.6 vs. NY avg 2.6).↑ 38% worse |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 3 | 1.4 | This facility has 114% more citations per inspection than a typical New York State nursing home (3 vs. NY avg 1.4).↑ 114% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 6 | 9 | This facility has 33% fewer total inspections than a typical New York State nursing home (6 vs. NY avg 9).↓ 33% better |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 4 | This facility has 25% more inspections with citations than a typical New York State nursing home (5 vs. NY avg 4).↑ 25% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 83% | 44% | This facility has 39 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical New York State nursing home (83% vs. NY avg 44%).↑ 39% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 64 | 79 | This facility has 19% fewer total complaints than a typical New York State nursing home (64 vs. NY avg 79).↓ 19% better |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2021.
| 12.8 | 15.8 | This facility has 19% fewer complaints per year than a typical New York State nursing home (12.8 vs. NY avg 15.8).↓ 19% better |
|
Complaints per bed
Size-adjusted complaint rate based on occupied beds.
| 0.32 | 0.50 | This facility has 36% fewer complaints per bed than a typical New York State nursing home (0.32 vs. NY avg 0.5).↓ 36% better |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with New York State regulators.
| 10 | 15 | This facility has 33% fewer complaint investigations than a typical New York State nursing home (10 vs. NY avg 15).↓ 33% better |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
New York State average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Jul 2025
New York State average 18.5
New York State average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 12 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 12 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.2
100% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
How this facility protects residents through staff vaccination policies and immunization practices.
Percentage of facility employees vaccinated against influenza.
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
3
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
2
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
1
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2018
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
663% more staff per resident than New York average
10% better than New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
24 total: 20 full-time employees and 4 contractors.
24
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.7 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
57 total: 9 full-time employees and 48 contractors.
57
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
129 total: 60 full-time employees and 69 contractors.
129
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.6 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
27,263 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 60 | 69 | 129 | 33,724 | 92 | 100% | 8.6 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 9 | 48 | 57 | 14,002 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 20 | 4 | 24 | 7,904 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1,669 | 72 | 78% | 7.6 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,540 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,515 | 81 | 88% | 7.1 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1,434 | 63 | 68% | 8.1 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1,370 | 62 | 67% | 6.8 |
| Other Physician | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,305 | 68 | 74% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,276 | 67 | 73% | 8.3 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 464 | 58 | 63% | 8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 432 | 58 | 63% | 7.4 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 430 | 58 | 63% | 7.4 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 392 | 50 | 54% | 7.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 270 | 36 | 39% | 7.5 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 265 | 53 | 58% | 5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 5 | 5% | 5.1 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2% | 1.7 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
11.0
12% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
23.9
32% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 18.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.7%
8% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.6%
12% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.3%
65% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8%
27% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3%
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
37% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5%
23% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9%
73% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.1%
60% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.3%
8% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 95.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.23
28% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.71
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.79
33% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.35
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.6%
6% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
20% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.5%
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 78.8%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
26.3%
28% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 20.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.2%
67% worse than New York State averageNew York State average: 9.7%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
34% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.8%
13% better than New York State averageNew York State average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.0%
In line with New York State averageNew York State average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
45% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
51% of new residents, often for short stays.
4% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
190Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #194 / 403Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 194th out of 403 homes in New York. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the New York average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Rankings are based only on facilities in New York that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #46 / 403Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 46th out of 403 homes in New York. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the New York average. Well-run New York facilities typically land around 53–65% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Rankings are based only on facilities in New York that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (51% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Utica's city center to MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The information below is reported by the New York State Department of Health.
| Ditmas Park Nursing & Rehab | NH PC SNF | Brooklyn (Flatbush) | 240
Facility
240
NY AVG
160
Rank
#113 / 748 |
95.0%
Facility
95.0%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#412 / 436 | +8% | - | +50% | - | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 85
Facility
85
NY AVG
83
Rank
#254 / 593 | 7
Facility
7
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#31 / 414 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#31 / 414 | - | 194 | A- |
93
Facility
93
NY AVG
63
Rank
#192 / 1173 | Bmo Family Holdings LLC | $62.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$62.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#44 / 403 | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#67 / 403 | 14.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
14.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#331 / 403 | 335648 | ||||
| United Hebrew of New Rochelle | NH AL IL MC SNF | New Rochelle | 294
Facility
294
NY AVG
160
Rank
#74 / 748 |
57.1%
Facility
57.1%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#397 / 436 | -35% | 3.72
Facility
3.72
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#123 / 407 | +31% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 96
Facility
96
NY AVG
83
Rank
#42 / 593 | 7
Facility
7
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#31 / 414 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#31 / 414 | - | 165 | - |
80
Facility
80
NY AVG
63
Rank
#457 / 1173 | Rita Mabli | $31.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$31.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#133 / 403 | $27.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$27.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#56 / 403 | 86%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
86%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#8 / 403 | 335621 | ||||
| Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare | NH SNF | Brooklyn (Boerum Hill) | 288
Facility
288
NY AVG
160
Rank
#75 / 748 |
99.0%
Facility
99.0%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#1 / 436 | +12% | 2.88
Facility
2.88
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#296 / 407 | -16% | -20% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 85
Facility
85
NY AVG
83
Rank
#254 / 593 | 14
Facility
14
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#153 / 414 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#199 / 414 | - | 283 | - |
97
Facility
97
NY AVG
63
Rank
#81 / 1173 | Hopkins Ventures LLC | $52.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$52.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#82 / 403 | $20.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#66 / 403 | 39.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
39.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#114 / 403 | 335847 | ||||
| Edna Tina Wilson Living Center | NH HOS MC SNF | Rochester (Island Cottage Road) | 120
Facility
120
NY AVG
160
Rank
#412 / 748 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
NY AVG
88.3%
Rank
#17 / 436 | +11% | 4.83
Facility
4.83
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#21 / 407 | -56% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 86
Facility
86
NY AVG
83
Rank
#242 / 593 | 5
Facility
5
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#15 / 414 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#10 / 414 | - | 118 | - |
2
Facility
2
NY AVG
63
Rank
#1144 / 1173 | Sandra Loan | $12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#312 / 403 | $11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#255 / 403 | 85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
85.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#44 / 403 | 335769 | ||||
| MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH SNF | Utica | 202
Facility
202
NY AVG
160
Rank
#165 / 748 | - | - | 3.14
Facility
3.14
NY AVG
3.58
Rank
#247 / 407 | -26% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$67.6k
Rank
#1 / 415 | 84
Facility
84
NY AVG
83
Rank
#278 / 593 | 12
Facility
12
NY AVG
18.5
Rank
#111 / 414 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
NY AVG
5.1
Rank
#128 / 414 | - | 39 | - |
85
Facility
85
NY AVG
63
Rank
#374 / 1173 | Mohawk Valley Health System | $17.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$17.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$32.0M
Rank
#265 / 403 | $11.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
$10.7M
Rank
#194 / 403 | 64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
NY AVG
37%
Rank
#46 / 403 | 335801 |
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is located in Utica, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is legally operated by St Lukes Home Residential Health Care Facility, Inc (Not for Profit).
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a walk score of 85. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to NY state health department records, MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's license number is 3227305N.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's occupancy is 97%.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is registered as a non-profit in NY.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has 202 beds.
MVHS Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has had 18 recently reported citations.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
