1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
New Orange Hills is a well-recognized nursing home in Orange, CA, offering long-term care, rehabilitation, and skilled nursing. Here, older adults can ease their worries in a nurturing, welcoming environment. Residents also experience worry-free living, with 24-hour care, nutritious meals, and recreational activities. Working closely with residents, their families, and physicians, the community provides top-notch care tailored to their unique needs and preferences.
Arts and crafts, lecture series, and ice cream socials provide residents with more opportunities to continue learning and stay active. Well-lit spaces, innovative rehabilitation equipment, and thoughtfully curated amenities also ensure residents can focus on their recovery. Situated in the quiet residential area of Orange, near bus stops, the community guarantees a laid-back lifestyle. This nursing home is a good option for senior living in California, especially with its dedicated services and top-notch amenities.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 336th out of 354 homes in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 30m per day | ▼ 23% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 2h 7m per day | ▲ 74% State avg: 1h 13m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 23m per day | ▼ 10% State avg: 2h 39m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 32m per day | ▲ 11% State avg: 4h 5m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 7m per day | ▲ 40% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 22m per day | ▼ 27% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Reporting period: July 1 – September 30, 2025 (Q3 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
7% more staff per resident than California average
10% better than California average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 23 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
23
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.5 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 70 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
70
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.5 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 107 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
107
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering July 1 – September 30, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 107 | 0 | 107 | 29,685 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 70 | 0 | 70 | 25,247 | 92 | 100% | 9.5 |
| Registered Nurse | 23 | 0 | 23 | 4,999 | 92 | 100% | 9.5 |
| Qualified Activities Professional | 18 | 0 | 18 | 4,817 | 92 | 100% | 9 |
| Dental Services Staff | 8 | 0 | 8 | 2,630 | 67 | 73% | 7.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,530 | 89 | 97% | 7.4 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,242 | 69 | 75% | 7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,178 | 92 | 100% | 6.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,089 | 66 | 72% | 8.7 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1,056 | 74 | 80% | 7.7 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 4 | 0 | 4 | 750 | 68 | 74% | 6.8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 6 | 0 | 6 | 619 | 64 | 70% | 6.7 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 618 | 66 | 72% | 8.4 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 2 | 0 | 2 | 610 | 66 | 72% | 9 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 528 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 2 | 0 | 2 | 425 | 59 | 64% | 7.2 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 372 | 47 | 51% | 7.9 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
72% lower than California averageCalifornia average: $55K
58% fewer fines than California averageCalifornia average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than California averageCalifornia average: 0.5
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.0
25% better than California averageCalifornia average: 6.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
12.7
12% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.7%
39% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.0%
8% better than California averageCalifornia average: 12.0%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3%
80% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 11.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7%
15% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 5.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6%
62% better than California averageCalifornia average: 4.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
29.1%
335% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 6.7%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
In line with California averageCalifornia average: 98.2%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.13
5% better than California averageCalifornia average: 2.25
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.99
38% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.59
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
6% better than California averageCalifornia average: 94.0%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
82% better than California averageCalifornia average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
6% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 93.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.3%
5% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 23.2%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.0%
11% better than California averageCalifornia average: 11.2%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than California averageCalifornia average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
34.0%
37% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
42.8%
15% worse than California averageCalifornia average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
20% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
57% of new residents, often for short stays.
23% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
140Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for New Orange Hills from 2012–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #39 / 355Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 39th out of 355 homes in California. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the California average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #202 / 355Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 202nd out of 355 homes in California. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the California average. Well-run California facilities typically land around 55–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Rankings are based only on facilities in California that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Building Type: Single-story
Beauty Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Rehabilitative Support
On-site Medical Care and Health Services
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (57% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 25 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
3.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Orange's city center to New Orange Hills's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The information below is reported by the California Department of Social Services and Department of Public Health.
| Mission Palms Healthcare Center | NH HC RC | Westminster | 99
Facility
99
CA AVG
103
Rank
#725 / 1657 |
89.6%
Facility
89.6%
CA AVG
84.7%
Rank
#335 / 1537 | +6% | 3.61
Facility
3.61
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#269 / 354 | -48% | -15% | $13.9k
Facility
$13.9k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#258 / 362 | - | 39
Facility
39
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#164 / 361 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#315 / 361 | 1 | 93 | A+ |
63
Facility
63
CA AVG
57
Rank
#951 / 2092 | - | $15.7M
Facility
$15.7M
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#187 / 355 | $8.9M
Facility
$8.9M
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#161 / 355 | 56.4%
Facility
56.4%
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#116 / 355 | 56271 | ||||
| Villa Valencia Healthcare Center | NH | Laguna Hills | 59
Facility
59
CA AVG
103
Rank
#1092 / 1657 |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
CA AVG
84.7%
Rank
#504 / 1537 | -2% | 3.21
Facility
3.21
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#336 / 354 | +19% | -24% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 362 | - | 41
Facility
41
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#176 / 361 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#82 / 361 | - | 53 | - |
62
Facility
62
CA AVG
57
Rank
#982 / 2092 | Alhv LLC | $14.0M
Facility
$14.0M
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#183 / 355 | $6.9M
Facility
$6.9M
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#222 / 355 | 49.5%
Facility
49.5%
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#241 / 355 | 555462 | ||||
| Orange Healthcare & Wellness Center, LLC | NH | Orange | 112
Facility
112
CA AVG
103
Rank
#631 / 1657 |
93.6%
Facility
93.6%
CA AVG
84.7%
Rank
#225 / 1537 | +11% | 3.72
Facility
3.72
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#245 / 354 | -56% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#1 / 362 | - | 83
Facility
83
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#313 / 361 | 4.9
Facility
4.9
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#240 / 361 | 1 | 93 | - |
58
Facility
58
CA AVG
57
Rank
#1128 / 2092 | - | $15.5M
Facility
$15.5M
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#67 / 355 | $9.7M
Facility
$9.7M
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#105 / 355 | 62.2%
Facility
62.2%
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#315 / 355 | 55252 | ||||
| Anaheim Healthcare Center | NH | Anaheim (Southwest Anaheim) | 250
Facility
250
CA AVG
103
Rank
#86 / 1657 |
86.2%
Facility
86.2%
CA AVG
84.7%
Rank
#429 / 1537 | +2% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#122 / 354 | +18% | +2% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#238 / 362 | - | 110
Facility
110
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#348 / 361 | 5.2
Facility
5.2
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#260 / 361 | 1 | 219 | - |
69
Facility
69
CA AVG
57
Rank
#768 / 2092 | Anaheim Healthcare Center LLC | $35.3M
Facility
$35.3M
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#3 / 355 | $21.2M
Facility
$21.2M
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#6 / 355 | 59.9%
Facility
59.9%
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#343 / 355 | 55984 | ||||
| New Orange Hills | NH | Orange | 145
Facility
145
CA AVG
103
Rank
#388 / 1657 |
92.9%
Facility
92.9%
CA AVG
84.7%
Rank
#246 / 1537 | +10% | 3.21
Facility
3.21
CA AVG
4.22
Rank
#336 / 354 | -5% | -24% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
CA AVG
$56.5k
Rank
#253 / 362 | - | 93
Facility
93
CA AVG
50.2
Rank
#330 / 361 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
CA AVG
4.6
Rank
#169 / 361 | 1 | 135 | - |
69
Facility
69
CA AVG
57
Rank
#768 / 2092 | James Villafania | $23.3M
Facility
$23.3M
CA AVG
$17.0M
Rank
#65 / 355 | $12.2M
Facility
$12.2M
CA AVG
$7.0M
Rank
#39 / 355 | 52.2%
Facility
52.2%
CA AVG
45.2%
Rank
#202 / 355 | 555286 |
New Orange Hills is located in Orange, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
New Orange Hills is in the Orange neighborhood.
New Orange Hills has a walk score of 69. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
New Orange Hills's occupancy is 92.9%.
The team at New Orange Hills can be reached at NewOrangeHills@ensignservices.net.
New Orange Hills is registered as a for-profit.
Yes — there are 5 photos of New Orange Hills in the photo gallery on this page.
New Orange Hills is located at 5017 E Chapman Ave, Orange, CA 92869.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
