ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association, in Green Bay, WI, brings together nursing home care, skilled nursing, and assisted living. Licensed nurses handle skilled nursing, with 24-hour staffing behind them through the night. Assisted living covers medication management, dressing, and bathing. When needs rise, residents move up a level of care here rather than move out.
The building holds 88 beds, and per resident, daily nursing time comes out at 4 hours and 7 minutes. Medicare can pay for qualifying skilled care that is short-term and follows hospitalization. Medicaid may help once eligibility requirements are met, and private pay draws on personal funds.
The neighborhood scores 66, somewhat walkable, keeping some nearby errands on foot, including for residents who’ve stopped driving. A salon keeps grooming on site, so it doesn’t mean a trip out. Therapy and rehabilitation support recovery or maintaining function, and restorative nursing helps residents practice and hold on to daily abilities.
The home fits someone needing nursing care or assisted living, with other levels close at hand. The private rooms each come with a private full bathroom, giving a resident personal space and a bathroom that isn’t shared.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 106th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 7mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +14% above Wisconsin average
4 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
15 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 30 total: 9 of the facility's own employees and 21 agency contractors.
30 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 53 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
53 staff · 7-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
132
90 employees · 42 contractors · 41 on an average day
132 total staff / 59 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.24 : 1
↓ 8% · WI 2.42This facility: 2.24 staff per resident, 8% below the Wisconsin average of 2.42 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
132 staff ÷ 59 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.1 h
↓ 3% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.1 h, 3% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
26,709 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →83.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.1% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (21), Registered Nurse (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
88
Rank #73 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 73rd out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #52 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #102 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 102nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on residents per day and 88 beds.
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 71.7%
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
108 severity-weighted points (42 deficiencies) · 42% higher than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
18 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 0) · $93,034 in fines
30 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
100% corrected
42 of 42 citations corrected Latest inspection: Feb 02, 2026 · 1 citation (Pharmacy, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 10 of 42 citations · 9 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 42 citations resulted from standard inspections; 19 of 42 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 42 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
18 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 20, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,545
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,235
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,882
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,529
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$3,176
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$2,797
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$2,447
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$2,098Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 15% · WI 9.4This facility: 8.0, 15% below the WI average of 9.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 5% · WI 19.8This facility: 20.8, 5% above the WI average of 19.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse, 1 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.2%
↑ 13% · WI 16.1This facility: 18.2, 13% above the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.2%
↓ 29% · WI 18.4This facility: 13.2, 29% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.0%
↑ 26% · WI 24.6This facility: 31.0, 26% above the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
↑ 31% · WI 2.7This facility: 3.5, 31% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 47% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.7, 47% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5%
↓ 31% · WI 5.0This facility: 3.5, 31% below the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
↓ 35% · WI 5.1This facility: 3.3, 35% below the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
↓ 43% · WI 5.7This facility: 3.3, 43% below the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.0%
↓ 30% · WI 15.8This facility: 11.0, 30% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 3% · WI 95.7This facility: 98.8, 3% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
↓ 7% · US 53.7This facility: 50.0, 7% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.6%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.6, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
↑ 33% · WI 1.2This facility: 1.6, 33% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.0%
↑ 11% · WI 86.5This facility: 96.0, 11% above the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.6%
↑ 7% · WI 82.2This facility: 87.6, 7% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.0%
↓ 34% · WI 22.7This facility: 15.0, 34% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.6%
↑ 11% · WI 15.0This facility: 16.6, 11% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
25% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
73% of new residents, often for short stays.
2% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
59Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−19.6% operating margin
−7.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.7M) trims the net loss to −$0.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
45.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #137 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.9M while revenue fell $0.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.4M | −$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #79 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 52% of homes | Above WI median Higher net patient revenue than 52% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.0M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.6M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −19.6% | −7.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.7M | — | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.9M | −$0.5M | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.8M | −$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #109 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 34% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.0% | −7.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #137 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | 13.7 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.0M | $8.3M | $9.2M | $8.1M | $7.5M | $7.8M | $9.1M | $8.4M |
| Operating expenses | $8.4M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $10.1M | $10.4M | $9.7M | $10.1M | $10.0M |
| Net patient income | −$1.4M | −$1.0M | −$0.7M | −$2.0M | −$2.8M | −$1.9M | −$1.1M | −$1.6M |
| Operating margin | −19.9% | −11.8% | −7.6% | −25.3% | −37.7% | −24.6% | −11.7% | −19.6% |
| Net income | −$1.1M | −$0.4M | $1.0M | $1.4M | −$0.6M | −$1.9M | −$0.5M | −$0.9M |
| Payroll costs | $4.5M | $4.4M | $4.8M | $5.2M | $5.6M | $4.8M | $4.7M | $3.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 63.5% | 53.8% | 52.9% | 64.3% | 74.7% | 61.8% | 52.0% | 45.0% |
| Beds | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 |
| Gross revenue | $10.2M | $12.2M | $12.8M | $11.1M | $10.2M | $9.7M | $9.2M | $8.8M |
| Salaries | $3.9M | $3.9M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $5.0M | $4.3M | $4.1M | $3.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $2.2M |
| Other operating costs | $4.0M | $4.8M | $5.0M | $4.9M | $4.7M | $4.9M | $5.4M | $6.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $274 | $302 | $325 | $322 | $322 | $351 | $463 | $421 |
| Cost per day | $328 | $338 | $350 | $404 | $444 | $438 | $517 | $503 |
| Average length of stay | 54.0 days | 53.7 days | 56.1 days | 44.8 days | 49.2 days | 81.7 days | 83.1 days | 98.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (73% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Green Bay's city center to Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.42 miles to nearest hospital (HSHS St. Vincent Hospital)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Lutheran Home | NH AL MC RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 118
Facility
118
WI AVG
78
Rank
#29 / 197 | - |
67
Facility
67
WI AVG
48
Rank
#47 / 191 | - |
| Grancare Nursing Center | NH AL SNF | Green Bay | - | 64
Facility
64
WI AVG
78
Rank
#107 / 197 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Edenbrook of Green Bay | NH RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 90
Facility
90
WI AVG
78
Rank
#68 / 197 | - | - | - |
| Green Bay Health Services | NH SNF | Green Bay | - | 125
Facility
125
WI AVG
78
Rank
#16 / 197 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association | NH AL SNF | Green Bay (Astor) | - | 88
Facility
88
WI AVG
78
Rank
#73 / 197 | - |
66
Facility
66
WI AVG
48
Rank
#52 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is located in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is in the Astor neighborhood of Green Bay.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has a walk score of 66. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association's occupancy is 64.2%.
No, Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has a no-pet policy.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is registered as a non-profit.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has 88 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
