Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
127
99 employees · 28 contractors · 36 on an average day Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Green Bay, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Green Bay, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — 7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association, in Green Bay, WI, brings together nursing home care, skilled nursing, and assisted living. Licensed nurses handle skilled nursing, with 24-hour staffing behind them through the night. Assisted living covers medication management, dressing, and bathing. When needs rise, residents move up a level of care here rather than move out.
The building holds 88 beds, and per resident, daily nursing time comes out at 4 hours and 7 minutes. Medicare can pay for qualifying skilled care that is short-term and follows hospitalization. Medicaid may help once eligibility requirements are met, and private pay draws on personal funds.
The neighborhood scores 66, somewhat walkable, keeping some nearby errands on foot, including for residents who’ve stopped driving. A salon keeps grooming on site, so it doesn’t mean a trip out. Therapy and rehabilitation support recovery or maintaining function, and restorative nursing helps residents practice and hold on to daily abilities.
The home fits someone needing nursing care or assisted living, with other levels close at hand. The private rooms each come with a private full bathroom, giving a resident personal space and a bathroom that isn’t shared.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 7m
This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 7mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +14% above Wisconsin average
4 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 14 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
14 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
53m
↓ 9% · WI 58mThis facility: 53m per resident per day, 9% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 14 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
14 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 34 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
34 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
44m
↑ 14% · WI 38mThis facility: 44m per resident per day, 14% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 34 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 23 agency contractors.
34 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 6.9-hour shifts
2h 31m
↓ 3% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 31m per resident per day, 3% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 6.9-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 100% · WI 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 48m
↑ 2% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 48m per resident per day, 2% above the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
38m
↓ 3% · WI 39mThis facility: 38m per resident per day, 3% below the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
127
99 employees · 28 contractors · 36 on an average day
127 total staff / 61 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.08 : 1
↓ 13% · WI 2.40This facility: 2.08 staff per resident, 13% below the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
127 staff ÷ 61 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 1% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 1% below the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
23,493 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →91.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (23), Registered Nurse (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
88
Rank #73 / 198Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 73rd out of 198 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
88
Rank #73 / 198Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 73rd out of 198 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #52 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #52 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
66
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #120 / 168Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 168. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #120 / 168Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 168. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
64.2%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 88 beds.
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 72%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
57
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
99
days
About This Community
International Home Association of the Sovereign Grand Lodge Independent Order of the Odd Fellows — Sovereign Grand Lodge Independent Order of the Odd FellowsMembership in a professional or industry association - a sign of engagement with industry standards and education, though not itself a quality rating.
Select Rehabilitation therapy services — Select RehabilitationA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Resident Council
Short Term Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
IV Therapy
Diabetes Management
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
DietitianListed as: Therapeutic diets monitored by registered dietitian
Bladder Control Training
Beauty Salon
Indoor Walkway Connecting Buildings
Activities
Group Fitness Classes
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
74 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
7 points below the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
109 severity-weighted points (41 deficiencies) · 38% higher than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 79)
Enforcement
Concern
12 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 0) · $75,105 in fines
Persistence
Concern
31 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
9
↑ 45% · WI 6.2This facility: 9, 45% above the Wisconsin average of 6.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
41
Rank #121 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 45% · WI 28.3This facility: 41, 45% above the Wisconsin average of 28.3 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.56
Rank #100 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 8% · WI 4.24This facility: 4.56, 8% above the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
41 of 41 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 1.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
40
↑ 55% · WI 25.8This facility: 40, 55% above the Wisconsin average of 25.8 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 22, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 10 of 41 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 22, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 02, 2026
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 18, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 08, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 07, 2025
7 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 09, 2025
5 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 07, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 12, 2024
16 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 08, 2023
6 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 41 citations
Infection Control
10 deficiencies (24%)
Quality of Life & Care
8 deficiencies (20%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (12%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (12%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (10%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (5%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 41 citations resulted from standard inspections; 18 of 41 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 41 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
12 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 20, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Feb 20, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Feb 12, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Jan 22, 2024 · $14,814 civil money penalty
Jan 8, 2024 · $4,938 civil money penalty
Jan 2, 2024 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Dec 11, 2023 · $13,762 civil money penalty
Nov 20, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Nov 13, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Nov 6, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Oct 30, 2023 · $4,587 civil money penalty
Oct 23, 2023 · $4,545 civil money penalty
Oct 17, 2023 · $4,235 civil money penalty
Total fines
$75,105
↓ 30% · WI $107KThis facility: $75,105, 30% below the Wisconsin average of $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #128 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
12
WI avg 2.03Wisconsin average: 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.71Wisconsin average: 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Feb 20, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Feb 12, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Jan 22, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,814
Jan 8, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,938
Jan 2, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Dec 11, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$13,762
Nov 20, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Nov 13, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Nov 6, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Oct 30, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,587
Oct 23, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,545
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,545
Oct 17, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,235
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,235Fine amount comparison
This facility
$75,105
Wisconsin average
$106,807
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 11% · WI 9.0This facility: 8.0, 11% below the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · WI 18.9This facility: 19.7, 4% above the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 3 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.6%
↑ 18% · WI 15.8This facility: 18.6, 18% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.6%
↑ 18% · WI 15.8This facility: 18.6, 18% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
↓ 39% · WI 17.0This facility: 10.4, 39% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
↓ 39% · WI 17.0This facility: 10.4, 39% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.2%
↑ 28% · WI 23.6This facility: 30.2, 28% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.2%
↑ 28% · WI 23.6This facility: 30.2, 28% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
↑ 32% · WI 2.7This facility: 3.6, 32% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
↑ 32% · WI 2.7This facility: 3.6, 32% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 47% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.8, 47% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 47% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.8, 47% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 4% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.1, 4% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 4% · WI 4.9This facility: 5.1, 4% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↓ 16% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.1, 16% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↓ 16% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.1, 16% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7%
↓ 89% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.7, 89% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7%
↓ 89% · WI 6.0This facility: 0.7, 89% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
↓ 19% · WI 15.9This facility: 12.9, 19% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
↓ 19% · WI 15.9This facility: 12.9, 19% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 99.4, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 4% · WI 96.0This facility: 99.4, 4% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · WI 95.6This facility: 97.7, 2% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · WI 95.6This facility: 97.7, 2% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
↓ 7% · US 53.7This facility: 50.0, 7% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
50.0%
↓ 7% · US 53.7This facility: 50.0, 7% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.6%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.6, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.6%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.6, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↑ 69% · WI 1.2This facility: 2.0, 69% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↑ 69% · WI 1.2This facility: 2.0, 69% above the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.2%
↑ 11% · WI 86.9This facility: 96.2, 11% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.2%
↑ 11% · WI 86.9This facility: 96.2, 11% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.9%
↓ 2% · WI 82.2This facility: 80.9, 2% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.9%
↓ 2% · WI 82.2This facility: 80.9, 2% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.0%
↓ 34% · WI 22.7This facility: 15.0, 34% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.0%
↓ 34% · WI 22.7This facility: 15.0, 34% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.6%
↑ 11% · WI 15.0This facility: 16.6, 11% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.6%
↑ 11% · WI 15.0This facility: 16.6, 11% above the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−19.6% operating margin
−7.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.7M) trims the net loss to −$0.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
45.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #137 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.9M while revenue fell $0.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.4M | −$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #79 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 52% of homes | Above WI median Higher net patient revenue than 52% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.0M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #57 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.6M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #136 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 136th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −19.6% | −7.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #131 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 131st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.7M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #35 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 79% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.9M | −$0.5M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #147 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.8M | −$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #109 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 34% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.0% | −7.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #137 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | 13.7 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.0M | $8.3M | $9.2M | $8.1M | $7.5M | $7.8M | $9.1M | $8.4M |
| Operating expenses | $8.4M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $10.1M | $10.4M | $9.7M | $10.1M | $10.0M |
| Net patient income | −$1.4M | −$1.0M | −$0.7M | −$2.0M | −$2.8M | −$1.9M | −$1.1M | −$1.6M |
| Operating margin | −19.9% | −11.8% | −7.6% | −25.3% | −37.7% | −24.6% | −11.7% | −19.6% |
| Net income | −$1.1M | −$0.4M | $1.0M | $1.4M | −$0.6M | −$1.9M | −$0.5M | −$0.9M |
| Payroll costs | $4.5M | $4.4M | $4.8M | $5.2M | $5.6M | $4.8M | $4.7M | $3.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 63.5% | 53.8% | 52.9% | 64.3% | 74.7% | 61.8% | 52.0% | 45.0% |
| Beds | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 |
| Gross revenue | $10.2M | $12.2M | $12.8M | $11.1M | $10.2M | $9.7M | $9.2M | $8.8M |
| Salaries | $3.9M | $3.9M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $5.0M | $4.3M | $4.1M | $3.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $2.2M |
| Other operating costs | $4.0M | $4.8M | $5.0M | $4.9M | $4.7M | $4.9M | $5.4M | $6.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $274 | $302 | $325 | $322 | $322 | $351 | $463 | $421 |
| Cost per day | $328 | $338 | $350 | $404 | $444 | $438 | $517 | $503 |
| Average length of stay | 54.0 days | 53.7 days | 56.1 days | 44.8 days | 49.2 days | 81.7 days | 83.1 days | 98.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
211 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
52 · 25%
Medicaid
5 · 2%
Private pay & other
154 · 73%
Resident snapshot
61 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
14 · 23%
Medicaid
29 · 48%
Private pay & other
18 · 30%
Leaving
201 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
57 · 28%
Medicaid
28 · 14%
Private pay & other
116 · 58%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
1.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Green Bay's city center to Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.42 miles to nearest hospital (HSHS St. Vincent Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Green Bay
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Lutheran Home | NH AL MC RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 118
Facility
118
WI AVG
78
Rank
#29 / 198 | - |
67
Facility
67
WI AVG
48
Rank
#47 / 191 | - |
| Grancare Nursing Center | NH AL SNF | Green Bay | - | 64
Facility
64
WI AVG
78
Rank
#107 / 198 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Edenbrook of Green Bay | NH RC SNF | Green Bay | - | 90
Facility
90
WI AVG
78
Rank
#68 / 198 | - | - | - |
| Green Bay Health Services | NH SNF | Green Bay | - | 125
Facility
125
WI AVG
78
Rank
#16 / 198 | - |
22
Facility
22
WI AVG
48
Rank
#160 / 191 | - |
| Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association | NH AL SNF | Green Bay (Astor) | - | 88
Facility
88
WI AVG
78
Rank
#73 / 198 | - |
66
Facility
66
WI AVG
48
Rank
#52 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Wisconsin
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is in Green Bay, Wisconsin. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Family Care Program
WI Medicaid Family Care
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin adult age 18 or older who is frail elderly or has a qualifying disability; Medicaid financial eligibility and the applicable functional screen are required.
- WI specifics
- Family Care is managed long-term care; member and care team plan supports based on assessed outcomes and needs.
What it provides
- Authorized long-term care and care management under the individual service plan.
IRIS (Include, Respect, I Self-Direct)
Wisconsin IRIS
- Income limit
- IRIS Medicaid financial eligibility must be determined for the applicant.
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin resident age 18 or older with a qualifying disability or frail-elder status; Medicaid financial eligibility and functional screening required; eligible community residence.
- WI specifics
- IRIS participants direct an individual budget and select or manage approved supports and providers within program requirements.
What it provides
- Authorized self-directed long-term supports may include personal assistance transportation home modifications meals and other assessed services.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
Wisconsin VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- Countable income must be below the applicable Maximum Annual Pension Rate (MAPR); the rate depends on dependents and benefit category; Qualifying unreimbursed medical expenses may reduce countable income.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth limit is $163,699 from December 1 2025 through November 30 2026; net worth includes countable assets and annual income under VA rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Additional pension benefits for qualifying Veterans or survivors who satisfy VA pension eligibility and the medical requirements for Aid and Attendance or Housebound status; being an older veteran or spouse alone does not qualify.
- WI specifics
- This is a federal VA benefit rather than a state-specific grant; Aid and Attendance and Housebound benefits cannot be received together.
What it provides
- Increased monthly VA pension based on the applicable MAPR less countable income.
SSI Exceptional Expense Supplement (SSI-E)
Wisconsin SSI Exceptional Expense Supplement (SSI-E)
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin SSI recipients certified by a county agency, either in qualifying residential settings with expenses above the applicable SSI-E payment level or at home with at least 40 hours of primary long-term support services needed each month.
- WI specifics
- Eligible residential settings include licensed or certified adult family homes, qualifying CBRFs of 20 beds or fewer and certified residential care apartment complexes. Home-based recipients must pay their share of household costs. A county assessment and certification are required.
What it provides
- For an eligible individual an additional monthly cash benefit of up to $105.59 may be added to the state SSI payment. Couple amounts differ.
Wisconsin Family Caregiver Support Programs
WI NFCSP Respite
Eligibility
- General
- NFCSP serves eligible caregivers of older adults and specified relative caregivers of children or adults with disabilities; Wisconsin also has a separate Alzheimer Family and Caregiver Support Program.
- WI specifics
- National Family Caregiver Support and Alzheimer Family and Caregiver Support have distinct eligibility rules.
What it provides
- Caregiver counseling training respite and other approved supports.
SeniorCare Prescription Drug Assistance
Wisconsin SeniorCare
- Income limit
- 2026 · Income determines participation level rather than a hard exclusion at 240% FPL; Individual annual thresholds: Level 1 up to $25,536; Level 2A $25,537 to $31,920; Level 2B $31,921 to $38,304; Level 3 $38,305 or more; Couple thresholds differ.
- Asset limit
- Assets are not counted according to the official Kenosha County ADRC program listing; income from assets can count under state income rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin resident age 65 or older who is a U.S; citizen or qualifying immigrant; not enrolled in full Medicaid; Other insurance including Medicare may be coordinated.
- WI specifics
- $30 annual enrollment fee per person and annual renewal; deductible and spenddown depend on income level.
What it provides
- Covered prescription assistance; Level 1 has no deductible; Levels 2A and 2B have $500 and $850 deductibles; Level 3 has spenddown then $850 deductible; Applicable covered-drug copays are $5 generic and $15 brand after requirements are met.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Wisconsin Medicare Savings Program
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
- Income limit
- 2026 · Published monthly countable-income bases: QMB $1,330 single or $1,803.33 couple; SLMB up to $1,596 single or $2,164 couple; SLMB+ up to $1,795.50 single or $2,434.50 couple; Deductions exclusions and tier lower bounds apply.
- Asset limit
- 2026 · QMB SLMB and SLMB+ countable-resource limits $9,950 single or $14,910 couple; QDWI has separate rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin Medicare beneficiary meeting the applicable Medicare Savings Program rules; age 65 is not a universal requirement.
- WI specifics
- Wisconsin calls its QI category SLMB+; full Medicaid affects SLMB+ eligibility; Refer to state fact sheet for distinct benefits and counting rules.
What it provides
- QMB pays qualifying Medicare premiums and cost sharing; SLMB and SLMB+ pay the Part B or B-ID premium; QDWI pays qualifying Part A premiums.
Wisconsin Home Energy Assistance Program (WHEAP)
Wisconsin WHEAP
- Income limit
- 2026-2027 · 60% of Wisconsin state median income; One-person gross income limit $3,322 monthly or $39,864 annually; two-person $4,344.08 monthly or $52,129 annually; larger household limits apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Wisconsin households meeting WHEAP eligibility; benefits depend on household circumstances and available funding rather than senior status alone.
- WI specifics
- Current heating season is October 1 2026 through September 30 2027; benefit funding is not guaranteed.
What it provides
- Eligible heating electric crisis and heating-system assistance under WHEAP rules.
Homestead Credit
Wisconsin Homestead Credit
- Income limit
- For a 2025 claim, household income must be below $24,680.
Eligibility
- General
- For tax year 2025: full-year Wisconsin legal residents age 18 or older who own or rent an eligible homestead and satisfy all credit requirements. The claimant or spouse must have earned income, be disabled or be age 62 or older at year-end.
- WI specifics
- The 2025 claim can generally be filed through April 15 2030. Tax-exempt housing and nursing-home residency while receiving Title XIX medical assistance can disqualify a claimant. This offsets eligible property tax or rent costs rather than paying for care.
What it provides
- A state tax credit based on household income and allowable property taxes or rent; meeting basic eligibility does not guarantee a positive credit.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association in?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is in the Astor neighborhood of Green Bay.
02 Is Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association in a walkable area?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has a walk score of 66. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association's occupancy is 64.2%.
04 Are pets allowed at Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association?
No, Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association is registered as a non-profit.
06 What is the overall rating for Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association have?
Odd Fellow Rebekah Home Association has 88 beds.
Updated on
