We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Set in the neighborhood of North Manchester, IN, Peabody Retirement Community is a well-established senior living community, offering a wide range of services for independent living, assisted living, memory care, and long-term care. The community features an array of beautifully designed accommodations that cater to residents’ unique lifestyle. Residents here are provided with all the care they need to continue aging gracefully, from assistance with daily living activities to specialized rehabilitation and therapy services.
The community ensures residents are at complete ease with the convenience of having most of their chores done for them. A wellness center is available to provide residents various programs for their well-being and a vibrant range of activities to keep them active and entertained. Restaurant-style dining with savory dishes and flexible dining options are offered to complete residents’ fulfilling living experience, ensuring they are always energized and healthy to take on a vibrant day.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 86th out of 287 homes in Indiana. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 22m per day | ▼ 45% State avg: 40m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 52m per day | ▲ 13% State avg: 46m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 55m per day | ▲ 29% State avg: 2h 16m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Total Nursing (Weekend)
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 48m per day | ▲ 18% State avg: 3h 14m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 1m per day | ▼ 75% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
RN (Weekend)
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 19m per day | ▼ 30% State avg: 27m per day · National avg: 28m per day |
Lower than the Indiana average: 68.1%Peabody Retirement Community is legally operated by Woodlawn Hospital, and administrated by Katie Robinson.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Indiana, the Department of Health, Division of Long Term Care is the primary regulatory body that performs onsite inspections and quality of care reviews for all licensed facilities.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Indiana state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 55 | 36 | This facility has 53% more total deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (55 vs. IN avg 36).↑ 53% worse |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2022.
| 13.8 | 9 | This facility has 53% more deficiencies per year than a typical Indiana nursing home (13.8 vs. IN avg 9).↑ 53% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.6 | 1.9 | This facility has 16% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Indiana nursing home (1.6 vs. IN avg 1.9).↓ 16% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
Combined count of all on-site visits — routine inspections, complaint visits, follow-ups, and other focused visits.
| 35 | 19 | This facility has 84% more total visits than a typical Indiana nursing home (35 vs. IN avg 19).↑ 84% worse |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory deficiency.
| 13 | 7 | This facility has 86% more inspections with deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (13 vs. IN avg 7).↑ 86% worse |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency.
| 37% | 37% | This facility has inspection deficiency rate in line with the Indiana average (37 vs. IN avg 37).— At avg |
|
Inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators.
| 24 | 13 | This facility has 85% more inspections than a typical Indiana nursing home (24 vs. IN avg 13).↑ 85% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 7 | 5 | This facility has 40% more total complaints than a typical Indiana nursing home (7 vs. IN avg 5).↑ 40% worse |
|
Complaints per year
Average complaints per year since 2022.
| 1.8 | 1.3 | This facility has 38% more complaints per year than a typical Indiana nursing home (1.8 vs. IN avg 1.3).↑ 38% worse |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints. Formal complaints can result in multiple visits.
| 24 | 8 | This facility has 200% more complaint visits than a typical Indiana nursing home (24 vs. IN avg 8).↑ 200% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
The most recent inspection on June 12, 2025, found Peabody Retirement Community in compliance with Emergency Preparedness and Life Safety Code requirements, with no deficiencies cited. Prior inspections showed a pattern of deficiencies primarily related to emergency preparedness, life safety code compliance, and quality of care issues including medication management, infection control, and resident supervision. Complaint investigations were mostly unsubstantiated, though some substantiated complaints involved staff-to-resident verbal abuse, medication diversion, and inadequate supervision of cognitively impaired residents, with corrective actions implemented each time. Enforcement actions included an immediate jeopardy finding in June 2024 related to elopement and failure to provide adequate supervision, which was resolved after corrective measures; fines or license suspensions were not listed in the available reports. The facility’s recent inspections indicate improvement, with the latest survey showing compliance following earlier citations and complaint-related deficiencies.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsIndiana average 6
Last Health inspection on Apr 2025
Indiana average 25
Indiana average 4.12
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 8 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations.
400% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.2
233% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
1982855% better than Indiana average
10% better than Indiana average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.2 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.5 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.6 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
8,791 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 99 | 65 | 164 | 33,705 | 92 | 100% | 8.6 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 30 | 24 | 54 | 12,857 | 92 | 100% | 9.5 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 33 | 9 | 42 | 11,526 | 92 | 100% | 10 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 32 | 0 | 32 | 6,005 | 92 | 100% | 6.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 12 | 8 | 20 | 4,894 | 92 | 100% | 9.2 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,148 | 64 | 70% | 7.5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1,180 | 70 | 76% | 6.5 |
| Dietitian | 2 | 0 | 2 | 878 | 64 | 70% | 7.5 |
| Dental Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 793 | 63 | 68% | 7.2 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 613 | 64 | 70% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 489 | 54 | 59% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 473 | 63 | 68% | 7.5 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 468 | 66 | 72% | 7.1 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 450 | 60 | 65% | 7.5 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 435 | 58 | 63% | 7.5 |
| Feeding Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 386 | 63 | 68% | 5.5 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 382 | 51 | 55% | 7.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 2 | 2 | 325 | 58 | 63% | 5.5 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 280 | 49 | 53% | 5.7 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 3 | 3 | 115 | 21 | 23% | 5 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 12 | 13% | 4.1 |
Includes penalties issued in 2024
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
23% higher than Indiana averageIndiana average: $27K
188% more fines than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.4
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jun 7, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Apr 18, 2024Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
5.9
26% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 8.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
16.7
In line with Indiana averageIndiana average: 17.1
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
41% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 12.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
23% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 14.4%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.9%
30% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 24.6%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
In line with Indiana averageIndiana average: 3.9%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
7% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 4.4%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.2%
86% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.4%
40% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 5.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1%
66% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 24.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.6%
33% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 12.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
5% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 93.7%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
5% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 95.4%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.14
29% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.60
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.23
17% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.48
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.3%
6% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 81.7%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.9%
11% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 79.0%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.0%
24% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 22.4%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.0%
33% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 10.5%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
37.2%
31% worse than Indiana averageIndiana average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.5%
16% better than Indiana averageIndiana average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
22% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
67% of new residents, often for short stays.
11% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
176Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Peabody Retirement Community based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #6 / 290Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 6th out of 290 homes in Indiana. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Indiana average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Pets Allowed
Building Type: 3-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Three Meals Per Day
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
0.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from North Manchester's city center to Peabody Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Peabody Retirement Community is located in North Manchester, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.
Peabody Retirement Community is in the North Manchester neighborhood of North Manchester.
Sharon Scott-Bellinger is the Director of Nursing at Peabody Retirement Community.
The legal owner and operator of Peabody Retirement Community is Woodlawn Hospital.
Peabody Retirement Community has a walk score of 22. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
According to IN state health department records, Peabody Retirement Community's license number is 24-000485-1.
According to IN state health department records, Peabody Retirement Community's license expires on September 30, 2025.
Peabody Retirement Community's occupancy is 52%.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
