Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
71
61 employees · 10 contractors · 23 on an average day Pelican Valley Senior Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pelican Rapids, MN
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pelican Valley Senior Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pelican Rapids, MN
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 16 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pelican Valley Senior Living accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Pelican Valley Senior Living provides nursing home, assisted living, hospice care, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Pelican Rapids, MN. Nursing home and skilled nursing services provide ongoing residential support and nursing care, while assisted living helps residents with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medications. Memory care offers supervised support in a secured setting for someone living with dementia; hospice care supports a resident at the end of life, and respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs time away.
With 28 beds, Pelican Valley Senior Living is a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know one another. Private rooms give each resident a single private living space, while wheelchair accessibility supports residents who use wheelchairs in moving through the community. The rehabilitation and post-acute care program supports recovery after illness or injury, and 24-hour staffing means assistance is available at any hour.
Total nurse staffing is 6h 40m per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated per resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families public coverage options or the ability to pay directly. A Walk Score of 58 means the area is somewhat walkable, with some errands possible on foot, so a resident who no longer drives may be able to complete certain errands independently. The range of care options may suit a resident whose needs grow over time because multiple care levels are available within Pelican Valley Senior Living.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 40m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 40mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +48% above Minnesota average
2 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
1h 21m
↑ 11% · MN 1h 13mThis facility: 1h 21m per resident per day, 11% above the Minnesota average of 1h 13m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.7-hour shifts
58m
↑ 37% · MN 42mThis facility: 58m per resident per day, 37% above the Minnesota average of 42m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
4h 20m
↑ 48% · MN 2h 55mThis facility: 4h 20m per resident per day, 48% above the Minnesota average of 2h 55m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 71% · MN 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 71% below the Minnesota average of 5m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 42m
↑ 35% · MN 4h 13mThis facility: 5h 42m per resident per day, 35% above the Minnesota average of 4h 13m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
34m
↓ 19% · MN 42mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 19% below the Minnesota average of 42m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
71
61 employees · 10 contractors · 23 on an average day
71 total staff / 25 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.84 : 1
↑ 30% · MN 2.18This facility: 2.84 staff per resident, 30% above the Minnesota average of 2.18 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
71 staff ÷ 25 residents
See full Minnesota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.6 h
↓ 12% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 6.6 h, 12% below the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13,915 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →94.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Clinical Nurse Specialist (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Administrator (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
28
Rank #85 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
28
Rank #85 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #44 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #44 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
58
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #19 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #19 / 61Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 61. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
90%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 28 beds.
Higher than the Minnesota average: 78.4%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
25
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
218
days
About This Community
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Wheelchair Accessible
CNA Training Program
Rehab / Post-Acute Care
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Dietitian
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Three Meals per Day with Snacks
Pre-Planned Admission Scheduling
Housekeeping
Transportation
Beauty Services
Pets not allowed
Activities
Exercise Classes
Arts and Crafts
Games
Outings
Special Events
Building Type2-story
Room Types
Private Rooms
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
16 points above the Minnesota average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
19 severity-weighted points (7 deficiencies) · 4× lower than the typical CMS-certified MN facility (median: 79)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
28 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified MN facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 49% · MN 5.9This facility: 3, 49% below the MN average of 5.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
7
Rank #8 / 66Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Minnesota State average, with a ranking across all 66 MN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 70% · MN 23.4This facility: 7, 70% below the MN average of 23.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.33
Rank #10 / 66Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Minnesota mean across 66 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 41% · MN 3.92This facility: 2.33, 41% below the MN average of 3.92 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
7 of 7 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
7
↓ 67% · MN 21.3This facility: 7, 67% below the MN average of 21.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 25, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 5 of 7 citations · 3 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 25, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 08, 2025
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 08, 2023
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 7 citations
Infection Control
5 deficiencies (71%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (14%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (14%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 7 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MN avg $50KMinnesota average: $49,948. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MN avg 1.84Minnesota average: 1.84. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MN avg 0.4Minnesota average: 0.4. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Minnesota average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · MN 10.3This facility: 10.7, 4% above the MN average of 10.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 11% · MN 21.0This facility: 23.3, 11% above the MN average of 21.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 4 worse, 2 near MN average
2 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
↓ 19% · MN 18.2This facility: 14.8, 19% below the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
↓ 19% · MN 18.2This facility: 14.8, 19% below the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.7%
↑ 35% · MN 20.5This facility: 27.7, 35% above the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.7%
↑ 35% · MN 20.5This facility: 27.7, 35% above the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.4%
↑ 12% · MN 24.5This facility: 27.4, 12% above the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.4%
↑ 12% · MN 24.5This facility: 27.4, 12% above the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8%
↑ 124% · MN 2.6This facility: 5.8, 124% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8%
↑ 124% · MN 2.6This facility: 5.8, 124% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7%
↑ 69% · MN 4.0This facility: 6.7, 69% above the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7%
↑ 69% · MN 4.0This facility: 6.7, 69% above the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.7%
↓ 86% · MN 5.2This facility: 0.7, 86% below the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.7%
↓ 86% · MN 5.2This facility: 0.7, 86% below the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 13% · MN 4.1This facility: 3.5, 13% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 13% · MN 4.1This facility: 3.5, 13% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
↓ 72% · MN 4.1This facility: 1.1, 72% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
↓ 72% · MN 4.1This facility: 1.1, 72% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.8%
↓ 84% · MN 17.1This facility: 2.8, 84% below the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.8%
↓ 84% · MN 17.1This facility: 2.8, 84% below the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 2% · MN 97.4This facility: 99.0, 2% above the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 2% · MN 97.4This facility: 99.0, 2% above the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MN 96.1This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MN 96.1This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 2 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.4%
↓ 31% · MN 88.1This facility: 60.4, 31% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.4%
↓ 31% · MN 88.1This facility: 60.4, 31% below the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Pelican Valley Senior Living’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 62 Minnesota nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−89.6% operating margin
−9.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($6.1M) turns it into a net profit to $2.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Minnesota homes
117.9% payroll share of revenue
MN average 72.0%Rank #5 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $0.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Minnesota homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.5M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $11.1M | Rank in MN Rank #58 / 62Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 7% of homes | Below MN median Higher net patient revenue than 7% of MN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.5M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.0M | −$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −89.6% | −9.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $6.1M | — | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $2.1M | +$1.6M | Trend — | MN median — | Rank in MN Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Minnesota homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.3M | +$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $7.5M | Rank in MN Rank #45 / 62Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Below MN median Higher payroll than 28% of MN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 117.9% | +7.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median 58.1% | Rank in MN Rank #5 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | 45.9 pts over MN average The MN average is 72.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Minnesota payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MN payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.8M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $2.9M | $4.0M | $4.2M | $4.5M |
| Operating expenses | $5.0M | $5.5M | $5.8M | $6.4M | $5.9M | $6.8M | $7.5M | $8.5M |
| Net patient income | −$2.2M | −$2.3M | −$2.5M | −$2.9M | −$3.1M | −$2.8M | −$3.3M | −$4.0M |
| Operating margin | −79.0% | −73.8% | −77.0% | −84.6% | −107.9% | −71.7% | −80.2% | −89.6% |
| Net income | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | −$0.0M | $0.0M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $2.1M |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $3.1M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $3.6M | $4.2M | $4.6M | $5.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 105.4% | 98.7% | 108.0% | 112.0% | 126.8% | 105.6% | 110.5% | 117.9% |
| Beds | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Gross revenue | $3.0M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $3.7M | $3.0M | $4.2M | $4.4M | $4.8M |
| Salaries | $2.6M | $2.7M | $3.1M | $3.4M | $3.2M | $3.7M | $4.1M | $4.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M |
| Other operating costs | $2.1M | $2.4M | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.3M | $2.6M | $2.9M | $3.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $268 | $287 | $306 | $339 | $363 | $372 | $413 | $421 |
| Cost per day | $479 | $499 | $542 | $626 | $754 | $639 | $744 | $798 |
| Average length of stay | 239.1 days | 153.2 days | 308.0 days | 162.6 days | 108.1 days | 183.1 days | 214.8 days | 217.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
54 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
16 · 30%
Medicaid
5 · 9%
Private pay & other
33 · 61%
Resident snapshot
25 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 4%
Medicaid
14 · 56%
Private pay & other
10 · 40%
Leaving
49 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
16 · 33%
Medicaid
5 · 10%
Private pay & other
28 · 57%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Pelican Valley Senior Living
0.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pelican Rapids's city center to Pelican Valley Senior Living's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Pelican Valley Senior Living
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 72.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelican Valley Senior Living | NH AL HOS MC RC SNF | Pelican Rapids | 28
Facility
28
MN AVG
88
Rank
#85 / 94 | A+ |
90.0%
Facility
90.0%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#19 / 61 | +15% | 6.67
Facility
6.67
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#4 / 63 | -10% | +38% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 7
Facility
7
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#8 / 66 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#10 / 66 | - | 25 | - |
58
Facility
58
MN AVG
49
Rank
#44 / 104 | Pelican Valley Health Center | $4.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#58 / 62 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#45 / 62 | 117.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
117.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#5 / 62 | 245373 | ||||
| Trillium Woods | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Plymouth (Glacier Vista) | 44
Facility
44
MN AVG
88
Rank
#75 / 94 | ? |
88.6%
Facility
88.6%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#45 / 61 | +13% | 6.52
Facility
6.52
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#7 / 63 | +8% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 6
Facility
6
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#5 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | - | 39 | A+ |
4
Facility
4
MN AVG
49
Rank
#103 / 104 | Lcs Trillium Woods Jv LLC | $3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#61 / 62 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#20 / 62 | 280.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
280.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#1 / 62 | 245627 | ||||
| Folkestone | NH AL IL MC SNF | Wayzata | 90
Facility
90
MN AVG
88
Rank
#34 / 94 | ? | - | - | 5.44
Facility
5.44
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#13 / 63 | -24% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 9
Facility
9
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#10 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | - | 27 | - |
53
Facility
53
MN AVG
49
Rank
#52 / 104 | Mark Specht | $4.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#59 / 62 | $8.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$8.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#25 / 62 | 187.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
187.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#3 / 62 | 245621 | ||||
| Annandale Care Center | NH AL IL MC SNF | East Annandale | 120
Facility
120
MN AVG
88
Rank
#20 / 94 | ? | - | - | 4.67
Facility
4.67
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#37 / 63 | -41% | -4% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 5
Facility
5
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#4 / 66 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#1 / 66 | 1 | 40 | - |
62
Facility
62
MN AVG
49
Rank
#33 / 104 | Richard Feeney | $6.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#48 / 62 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#28 / 62 | 121.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
121.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#4 / 62 | 245364 | ||||
| Mission Nursing Home | NH SNF | Plymouth (Mission Farms) | 70
Facility
70
MN AVG
88
Rank
#49 / 94 | B+ |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#22 / 61 | +16% | 4.94
Facility
4.94
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#63 / 63 | +52% | +2% | $14.0k
Facility
$14.0k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#36 / 66 | 33
Facility
33
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#43 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | 2 | 64 | - |
6
Facility
6
MN AVG
49
Rank
#100 / 104 | Missions, Inc Programs | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#41 / 62 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#40 / 62 | 73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#16 / 62 | 245546 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Pelican Valley Senior Living
Is Pelican Valley Senior Living in a walkable area?
Pelican Valley Senior Living has a walk score of 58. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Pelican Valley Senior Living?
Pelican Valley Senior Living's occupancy is 90%.
Are pets allowed at Pelican Valley Senior Living?
No, Pelican Valley Senior Living has a no-pet policy.
Does Pelican Valley Senior Living operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Pelican Valley Senior Living is registered as a non-profit.
What is the overall rating for Pelican Valley Senior Living?
Pelican Valley Senior Living received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Pelican Valley Senior Living have?
Pelican Valley Senior Living has 28 beds.
Are there photos of Pelican Valley Senior Living?
Yes — there are 9 photos of Pelican Valley Senior Living in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
