ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 8 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 8 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Premier Washington Health Center offers nursing home and skilled nursing care, memory care, hospice care, and respite care in Washington, PA. Nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering.
Hospice care focuses on comfort for someone with an advanced illness, and respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs time to travel or recover. Short-term rehabilitation is also available, giving a resident a temporary stay focused on recovery rather than long-term residence.
The community has 288 beds and accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours 35 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated per resident; staffing is available around the clock, including overnight hours. The range of care services and respite option may make Premier Washington Health Center a good fit for a resident whose needs may change over time or for a family caregiver who needs a short-term break.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 35mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +14% above Pennsylvania average
5 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 43 total: 21 of the facility's own employees and 22 agency contractors.
43 staff · 8-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 75 total: 40 of the facility's own employees and 35 agency contractors.
75 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 169 total: 88 of the facility's own employees and 81 agency contractors.
169 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
337
199 employees · 138 contractors · 115 on an average day
337 total staff / 244 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.38 : 1
↓ 23% · PA 1.80This facility: 1.38 staff per resident, 23% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.80 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
337 staff ÷ 244 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.4 h
↑ 8% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 8.4 h, 8% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
88,987 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →85.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (81), Licensed Practical Nurse (35), Registered Nurse (22)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
288
Rank #6 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #199 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 199th out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #42 / 163Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 163 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 163. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on residents per day and 288 beds.
Higher than the Pennsylvania average: 75.3%
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
8 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
122 severity-weighted points (26 citations) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 37)
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
44 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
100% corrected
26 of 26 citations corrected Latest inspection: Apr 24, 2026 · 10 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Nutrition & Dietary, 9 of 26 citations · 7 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; 8 of 26 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 34% · PA 3.7This facility: 5.0, 34% above the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 7% · PA 3.2This facility: 3.0, 7% below the PA average of 3.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 27% · PA 9.5This facility: 7.0, 27% below the PA average of 9.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 41% · PA 19.8This facility: 11.7, 41% below the PA average of 19.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 near PA average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.4%
↓ 32% · PA 16.8This facility: 11.4, 32% below the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.4%
↓ 33% · PA 17.0This facility: 11.4, 33% below the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.3%
↓ 52% · PA 25.5This facility: 12.3, 52% below the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
↓ 39% · PA 1.5This facility: 0.9, 39% below the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 9% · PA 3.1This facility: 2.9, 9% below the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
↑ 4% · PA 4.8This facility: 5.0, 4% above the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
↓ 32% · PA 6.2This facility: 4.2, 32% below the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.2%
↓ 98% · PA 10.8This facility: 0.2, 98% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.9%
↑ 1% · PA 17.7This facility: 17.9, 1% above the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.9%
↑ 11% · PA 87.5This facility: 96.9, 11% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 3% · PA 93.5This facility: 96.4, 3% above the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
45.5%
↓ 15% · US 53.7This facility: 45.5, 15% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.0%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.0, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.9%
↑ 271% · US 0.8This facility: 2.9, 271% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 61% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.6, 61% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.7%
↑ 37% · PA 70.0This facility: 95.7, 37% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.4%
↑ 36% · PA 68.7This facility: 93.4, 36% above the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
30.4%
↑ 32% · PA 23.1This facility: 30.4, 32% above the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.6%
↓ 53% · PA 9.8This facility: 4.6, 53% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
11% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
69% of new residents, often for short stays.
20% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
244Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Premier Washington Health Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−3.8% operating margin
−3.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.3M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
45.5% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #145 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 145th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.5M while revenue rose $0.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $26.6M | +$0.2M | Trend 20162025 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #34 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 81% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 81% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $27.6M | +$1.1M | Trend 20162025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.0M | −$0.9M | Trend 20162025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −3.8% | −3.4 pts | Trend 20162025 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.3M | — | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | −$0.8M | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $12.1M | +$2.5M | Trend 20162025 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #66 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 63% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.5% | +9.1 pts | Trend 20162025 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #145 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 145th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 18% of homes | 24.6 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average No report
| Metric | 2016 | 2017no report | 2018no report | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $27.6M | $23.7M | $23.9M | $21.7M | $21.8M | $23.9M | $26.4M | $26.6M | ||
| Operating expenses | $30.3M | $22.5M | $23.1M | $21.7M | $23.8M | $25.4M | $26.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Net patient income | −$2.7M | $1.2M | $0.8M | $0.1M | −$1.9M | −$1.5M | −$0.1M | −$1.0M | ||
| Operating margin | −9.7% | 5.2% | 3.3% | 0.4% | −8.9% | −6.1% | −0.4% | −3.8% | ||
| Net income | −$2.5M | $1.5M | $0.9M | $1.0M | −$1.6M | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.7M | ||
| Payroll costs | $21.6M | $9.8M | $9.2M | $9.5M | $9.4M | $9.0M | $9.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 78.3% | 41.3% | 38.4% | 43.7% | 43.3% | 37.5% | 36.4% | 45.5% | ||
| Beds | 288 | 288 | 288 | 288 | 288 | 288 | 288 | 288 | ||
| Gross revenue | $34.0M | $27.7M | $26.1M | $23.6M | $25.9M | $30.2M | $34.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Salaries | $15.1M | $8.4M | $7.8M | $8.0M | $8.1M | $7.7M | $8.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $6.6M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.5M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Contract labor | $1.9M | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4.6M | ||
| Other operating costs | $8.7M | $12.7M | $13.9M | $12.2M | $14.3M | $16.4M | $16.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $296 | $274 | $267 | $271 | $272 | $281 | $285 | $285 | ||
| Cost per day | $324 | $260 | $258 | $270 | $297 | $298 | $287 | $295 | ||
| Average length of stay | 164.7 days | 165.1 days | 267.6 days | 276.7 days | 106.0 days | 84.4 days | 183.1 days | 122.4 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (69% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 29 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Washington's city center to Premier Washington Health Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.02 miles to nearest hospital (AHN Canonsburg Hospital - Main Building)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trillium Place | NH IL MC SNF | Lancaster | 85
Facility
85
PA AVG
109
Rank
#106 / 200 | ? |
81.2%
Facility
81.2%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#69 / 163 | +8% | 5.37
Facility
5.37
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#31 / 182 | -28% | +37% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 1
Facility
1
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#1 / 179 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#1 / 179 | - | 69 | - |
52
Facility
52
PA AVG
50
Rank
#99 / 208 | The Mennonite Home | $57.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$57.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#3 / 177 | $28.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$28.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#6 / 177 | 48.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
48.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#125 / 177 | 395559 | ||||
| Garden Spot Village | NH ADC AL CCRC IL MC SNF | New Holland | 110
Facility
110
PA AVG
109
Rank
#75 / 200 | ? |
53.6%
Facility
53.6%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#138 / 163 | -29% | 5.52
Facility
5.52
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#31 / 182 | +15% | +40% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#121 / 183 | 4
Facility
4
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#20 / 179 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#15 / 179 | 2 | 59 | - |
32
Facility
32
PA AVG
50
Rank
#142 / 208 | Garden Spot Village | $10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#138 / 177 | $19.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$19.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#18 / 177 | 179.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
179.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#10 / 177 | 396079 | ||||
| Laurel View Village | NH AL HC IL MC SNF | Davidsville (Conemaugh Township) | 107
Facility
107
PA AVG
109
Rank
#82 / 200 | ? |
52.3%
Facility
52.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#141 / 163 | -31% | 4.91
Facility
4.91
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#38 / 182 | -39% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 18
Facility
18
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#97 / 179 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#130 / 179 | - | 56 | A+ |
28
Facility
28
PA AVG
50
Rank
#152 / 208 | Allegheny Christian Ministries, Inc | $16.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$16.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#98 / 177 | $10.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#86 / 177 | 63.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
63.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#56 / 177 | 395891 | ||||
| Spiritrust Lutheran the Village at Luther Ridge | NH IL SNF | Chambersburg | 36
Facility
36
PA AVG
109
Rank
#189 / 200 | ? |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#63 / 163 | +11% | - | - | +141% | - | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 20
Facility
20
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#106 / 179 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#145 / 179 | 1 | 30 | - |
81
Facility
81
PA AVG
50
Rank
#33 / 208 | Spiritrust Lutheran | $9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#145 / 177 | $5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#151 / 177 | 57.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#77 / 177 | 396146 | |||
| Premier Washington Health Center | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Washington (Chartiers Township) | 288
Facility
288
PA AVG
109
Rank
#6 / 200 | C |
86.7%
Facility
86.7%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#42 / 163 | +15% | 3.58
Facility
3.58
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#132 / 182 | +7% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 26
Facility
26
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#112 / 179 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#90 / 179 | - | 250 | - |
5
Facility
5
PA AVG
50
Rank
#199 / 208 | Washington Operating Holdings | $26.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$26.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#34 / 177 | $12.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#66 / 177 | 45.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
45.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#145 / 177 | 395577 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Premier Washington Health Center is in the Chartiers Township neighborhood of Washington.
Premier Washington Health Center has a walk score of 5. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Premier Washington Health Center's occupancy is 86.7%.
No, Premier Washington Health Center has a no-pet policy.
The team at Premier Washington Health Center can be reached at info@premierwashington.com.
Premier Washington Health Center is registered as a for-profit.
Premier Washington Health Center received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
