Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
155
133 employees · 22 contractors · 47 on an average day Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Wichita, KS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Wichita, KS
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation is a nursing home in Wichita, KS, providing skilled nursing and nursing care. Skilled nursing means licensed nursing care is available on site around the clock, while rehabilitation services support residents who are working to regain or maintain function.
The home may be a good fit for someone who needs nursing support during rehabilitation or for long term care. It has 76 beds, giving families a clear measure of the home’s capacity without suggesting a particular living arrangement.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 38 minutes per resident per day, representing the documented amount of daily nurse staffing time allocated to each resident. The Skilled/Rehabilitation program provides rehabilitation services within the home’s care setting, and Medicare, Medicaid and private pay are accepted, giving families several listed ways to cover care. Stacie Degoey serves as administrator, and Rchr Development operates the home.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 38m
This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 38mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +162% above Kansas average
2 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
15 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
52m
↑ 2% · KS 51mThis facility: 52m per resident per day, 2% above the Kansas average of 51m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
15 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 28 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
28 staff · 10.2-hour shifts
49m
↑ 14% · KS 43mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 14% above the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 28 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 13 agency contractors.
28 staff · 10.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 55 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
55 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
2h 56m
↓ 8% · KS 3h 13mThis facility: 2h 56m per resident per day, 8% below the Kansas average of 3h 13m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 55 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
55 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 162% · KS 3mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 162% above the Kansas average of 3m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 0m
↓ 6% · KS 4h 15mThis facility: 4h 0m per resident per day, 6% below the Kansas average of 4h 15m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
36m
↑ 15% · KS 31mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 15% above the Kansas average of 31m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
155
133 employees · 22 contractors · 47 on an average day
155 total staff / 70 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.21 : 1
≈ 0% · KS 2.22This facility: 2.21 staff per resident, level with the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
155 staff ÷ 70 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
↑ 8% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 8.3 h, 8% above the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
35,818 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →98.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (13), Registered Nurse (4), Certified Nursing Assistant (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
76
Rank #53 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
76
Rank #53 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #27 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #27 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
15
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #23 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #23 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
75
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #24 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #24 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92.1%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 70 residents and 76 beds. Source: state inspection report (May 2026)
Higher than the Kansas average: 80.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
110
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
B-
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility
StatusActive
CountySedgwick
License Number175532
CMS Certification Number175532
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC is administered by Stacie Degoey.
Owner NameRchr Development LLC
Resident Council
Adaptive Equipment Training
Prosthetic Training
Vestibular Therapy
Stroke Recovery
Fall Prevention & Balance Training
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Pulmonary and Cardiac Treatment
Pain Management
Orthopedic CareMedical care for bone, joint, muscle, and connective-tissue problems, including injuries, arthritis, and mobility concerns. It may involve orthopedic specialists or treatment plans.
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowedVisiting pets welcome.
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Warmly Decorated Living Areas
Activities
Pet a Pet Day
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
In-Room Features
Private Bathrooms
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Since 2013 · 13 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 194 deficiencies 54 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 194 deficiencies 54 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2013 vs. Kansas state average
Overall vs. KS average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Kansas average:
• Total deficiencies (92% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (3% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (92% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (3% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 194 | 101.0 | This facility has 92% more total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (194 vs. KS avg 101).↑ 92% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 3.6 | 3.5 | This facility has 3% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (3.6 vs. KS avg 3.5).↑ 3% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 54 | 24.0 | This facility has had 125% more total inspections than the Kansas average (54 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 125% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
5
↑ 16% · KS 4.3This facility: 5, 16% above the Kansas average of 4.3 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
42
Rank #109 / 138Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 138 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 53% · KS 27.5This facility: 42, 53% above the Kansas average of 27.5 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.4
Rank #109 / 138Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 138 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 32% · KS 6.37This facility: 8.4, 32% above the Kansas average of 6.37 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
42 of 42 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 25% · KS 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the Kansas average of 0.8 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 150% · KS 0.8This facility: 2, 150% above the Kansas average of 0.8 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
38
↑ 51% · KS 25.2This facility: 38, 51% above the Kansas average of 25.2 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 43% · KS 0.7This facility: 1, 43% above the Kansas average of 0.7 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 07, 2026 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 13 of 42 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 07, 2026
5 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 24, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 14, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 19, 2024
19 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 30, 2022
16 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 42 citations
Quality of Life & Care
13 deficiencies (31%)
Pharmacy Services
8 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (7%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (5%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
23 of 42 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 42 resulted from complaint investigations; and 17 of 42 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Nov 14, 2024 · $8,827 civil money penalty
Nov 14, 2024 · $8,827 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,827
↓ 78% · KS $40KThis facility: $8,827, 78% below the Kansas average of $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #67 / 139Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Kansas average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 139 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 54% · KS 2.16This facility: 1, 54% below the Kansas average of 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Nov 14, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,827
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,827Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,827
Kansas average
$40,388
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Kansas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 41% · KS 9.5This facility: 13.5, 41% above the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 32% · KS 18.9This facility: 25.0, 32% above the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 6 worse, 2 near KS average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
19.5%
↑ 9% · KS 17.9This facility: 19.5, 9% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
19.5%
↑ 9% · KS 17.9This facility: 19.5, 9% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.5%
↑ 82% · KS 16.2This facility: 29.5, 82% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.5%
↑ 82% · KS 16.2This facility: 29.5, 82% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9%
↑ 15% · KS 22.6This facility: 25.9, 15% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9%
↑ 15% · KS 22.6This facility: 25.9, 15% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8%
↑ 167% · KS 2.9This facility: 7.8, 167% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8%
↑ 167% · KS 2.9This facility: 7.8, 167% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6%
↑ 54% · KS 4.3This facility: 6.6, 54% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6%
↑ 54% · KS 4.3This facility: 6.6, 54% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.1%
↑ 84% · KS 4.4This facility: 8.1, 84% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.1%
↑ 84% · KS 4.4This facility: 8.1, 84% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
↓ 27% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.6, 27% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
↓ 27% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.6, 27% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
↓ 22% · KS 6.5This facility: 5.0, 22% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
↓ 22% · KS 6.5This facility: 5.0, 22% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7%
↓ 30% · KS 18.1This facility: 12.7, 30% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7%
↓ 30% · KS 18.1This facility: 12.7, 30% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.5%
↓ 1% · KS 92.1This facility: 91.5, 1% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.5%
↓ 1% · KS 92.1This facility: 91.5, 1% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · KS 95.5This facility: 97.7, 2% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · KS 95.5This facility: 97.7, 2% above the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↑ 19% · KS 76.1This facility: 90.7, 19% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↑ 19% · KS 76.1This facility: 90.7, 19% above the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.8%
↑ 23% · KS 73.8This facility: 90.8, 23% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.8%
↑ 23% · KS 73.8This facility: 90.8, 23% above the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 139 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−10.3% operating margin
+4.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Kansas homes
58.6% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.3%Rank #49 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $7.4M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.7M | Rank in KS Rank #64 / 139Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 54% of homes | Above KS median Higher net patient revenue than 54% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.1M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.8M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −10.3% | +4.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | −$0.9M | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.6M | Rank in KS Rank #55 / 139Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 55th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Above KS median Higher payroll than 61% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.6% | −3.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Rank #49 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Near KS average The KS average is 57.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.1M | $6.0M | $5.9M | $5.7M | $5.4M | $6.5M | $6.6M | $7.4M |
| Operating expenses | $6.1M | $6.9M | $6.9M | $6.6M | $7.2M | $7.4M | $7.6M | $8.1M |
| Net patient income | −$1.1M | −$0.9M | −$1.0M | −$0.9M | −$1.8M | −$0.9M | −$1.0M | −$0.8M |
| Operating margin | −20.6% | −15.9% | −17.4% | −16.6% | −33.9% | −13.3% | −15.1% | −10.3% |
| Net income | −$0.5M | −$0.2M | −$0.2M | $1.0M | −$0.8M | −$0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $2.6M | $2.9M | $3.0M | $3.0M | $3.3M | $3.9M | $4.1M | $4.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 51.3% | 48.0% | 50.2% | 53.4% | 61.6% | 59.5% | 62.4% | 58.6% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 76 |
| Gross revenue | $5.7M | $6.9M | $7.1M | $7.5M | $7.2M | $8.9M | $8.3M | $8.8M |
| Salaries | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $3.0M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $3.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M |
| Contract labor | $0.5M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.2M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Other operating costs | $3.5M | $4.1M | $4.0M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $3.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $261 | $301 | $301 | $304 | $310 | $342 | $349 | $367 |
| Cost per day | $315 | $348 | $353 | $354 | $415 | $388 | $401 | $405 |
| Average length of stay | 78.7 days | 69.0 days | 66.1 days | 88.9 days | 93.6 days | 82.2 days | 95.0 days | 110.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
184 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
78 · 42%
Medicaid
27 · 15%
Private pay & other
79 · 43%
Resident snapshot
70 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 9%
Medicaid
46 · 66%
Private pay & other
18 · 26%
Leaving
182 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
83 · 46%
Medicaid
18 · 10%
Private pay & other
81 · 45%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Wichita's city center to Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Wichita
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Health & Rehabilitation Center | NH SNF | Wichita | 72
Facility
72
KS AVG
74
Rank
#60 / 151 |
81.9%
Facility
81.9%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#81 / 143 | +2% | 5.94
Facility
5.94
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#28 / 136 | -41% | +22% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 24
Facility
24
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#64 / 138 | 8.0
Facility
8.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#100 / 138 | - | 59 | - |
15
Facility
15
KS AVG
49
Rank
#153 / 162 | Fhrc Property Development LLC | $10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#46 / 139 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#47 / 139 | 51.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#82 / 139 | 175501 | ||||
| Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare | NH AL HC IL MC RC SNF | Wichita | 84
Facility
84
KS AVG
74
Rank
#42 / 151 |
83.7%
Facility
83.7%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#62 / 143 | +4% | 5.55
Facility
5.55
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#44 / 136 | +6% | +14% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 15
Facility
15
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#16 / 138 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#36 / 138 | - | 70 | - |
28
Facility
28
KS AVG
49
Rank
#125 / 162 | Legend Senior Properties | $12.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#28 / 139 | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#29 / 139 | 59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#45 / 139 | 175527 | ||||
| Larksfield Place Independent Living | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Wichita | 80
Facility
80
KS AVG
74
Rank
#46 / 151 | - | - | 5.05
Facility
5.05
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#38 / 136 | -8% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#1 / 139 | 13
Facility
13
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#11 / 138 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#23 / 138 | - | 86 | A+ |
32
Facility
32
KS AVG
49
Rank
#118 / 162 | Larksfield Place Retirement Communities, Inc | $25.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$25.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#3 / 139 | $13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#6 / 139 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#85 / 139 | 175181 | ||||
| Ascension Living Via Christi Village Ridge | NH ADC AL IL MC SNF | Wichita | 80
Facility
80
KS AVG
74
Rank
#46 / 151 |
88.0%
Facility
88.0%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#33 / 143 | +9% | 4.44
Facility
4.44
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#64 / 136 | -6% | -9% | $36.0k
Facility
$36.0k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#112 / 139 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#53 / 138 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#28 / 138 | 2 | 70 | - |
25
Facility
25
KS AVG
49
Rank
#133 / 162 | Trisha Chege | $14.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#19 / 139 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#26 / 139 | 50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
50.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#92 / 139 | 175539 | ||||
| Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC | NH SNF | East Wichita | 76
Facility
76
KS AVG
74
Rank
#53 / 151 |
92.1%
Facility
92.1%
KS AVG
80.7%
Rank
#24 / 143 | +14% | 4.63
Facility
4.63
KS AVG
4.87
Rank
#35 / 136 | -5% | -5% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
KS AVG
$42.8k
Rank
#67 / 139 | 42
Facility
42
KS AVG
27.5
Rank
#109 / 138 | 8.4
Facility
8.4
KS AVG
6.4
Rank
#109 / 138 | 3 | 70 | B- |
75
Facility
75
KS AVG
49
Rank
#23 / 162 | Rchr Development LLC | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#64 / 139 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$5.1M
Rank
#55 / 139 | 58.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.3%
Rank
#49 / 139 | 175532 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Kansas
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC is located in EAST WICHITA, Kansas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Kansas.
Frequently Asked Questions about Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Who is the owner of Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC?
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC is legally operated by Rchr Development LLC, and administered by Stacie Degoey.
Is Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC in a walkable area?
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC has a walk score of 75. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the license number of Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC?
According to KS state health department records, Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC's license number is 175532.
What is the occupancy rate at Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC?
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC's occupancy is 92.1%.
How long has Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC been in business?
Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC has been operating for approximately 15 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC?
No, Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC?
The team at Reed’s Cove Health and Rehabilitation LLC can be reached at info@reedscoverehab.com.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
