(888) 927-9409
Pricing Call
(888) 927-9409
Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · West Valley City, UT
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Exterior view of Rocky Mountain Care facility entrance Lobby area with a piano and decorative plants Interior view of a common area with seating Comfortable resident room with a bed and seating area A bright common area with comfortable seating

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · West Valley City, UT
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4090 Pioneer Pkwy, West Valley City, UT 84120 View map Calculator: See prices in your area
Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Contact Us Explore Open Rooms
Calculator: See prices in your area
Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.

Overview of Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Rocky Mountain Care in Hunter Hollow is the premier skilled nursing facility in West Valley City, Utah, offering its residents a sense of belonging. The staff excels in practicing a personal approach to the meaningful service they are guaranteed to deliver to the seniors; they strive to make a difference in the lives of older adults. Rocky Mountain Care has built its trusted reputation on excellent customer service that has earned the respect of being a reliable senior living community in the city.

The short and long-term care nursing home strives to improve the lifestyle of its elderly through community, connection, and care. They offer a personalized care program to meet each individual’s unique needs. Amenities and services include an exceptional dining experience, innovative programs, and educational activities that all aim to ensure a wonderful experience during your golden years and provide additional support.

Facility Direct Line (801) 397-4400
Facility Direct Line (801) 397-4400

Quality ratings

Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Overall rating Info The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
▼ 40.3% Below UT avg. ▼ 40.3% Below UT avg.UT average: 3.4Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Health Inspection Info Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
▼ 64.1% Below UT avg. ▼ 64.1% Below UT avg.UT average: 2.8Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Staffing Info Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
▼ 35.1% Below UT avg. ▼ 35.1% Below UT avg.UT average: 3.1Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Quality Measures Info Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
▲ 14.9% Above UT avg. ▲ 14.9% Above UT avg.UT average: 4.4Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Staffing hours Info Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.

Hours per resident per day vs Utah averages

Rank #60 / 69Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 60th out of 69 homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Utah average, with a ranking across 69 Utah facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Total nursing care Info This home is ranked 60th out of 69 homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.

3h 2m

19% below state avg
Staff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN) Info RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
52m
−27% State avg: 1h 11m per day · National avg: 41m per day
LPN / LVN Info Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
20m
−36% State avg: 31m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide Info Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
1h 50m
−23% State avg: 2h 22m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day
Weekend Total Nursing Info Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
2h 42m
−23% State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day
Physical Therapist Info Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
10m
+45% State avg: 7m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN Info Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
49m
−3% State avg: 50m per day · National avg: 28m per day

5 of 6 metrics below state avg

Standout metric: Physical Therapist is +45% above Utah average

By The Numbers

Community insights.

Bed count Info A larger shared setting that may offer more common spaces and organized community services. 124 Rank #27 / 189Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 27th out of 189 homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.

Years of operating Info A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. Rank #24 / 194Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 24th out of 194 homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
37 years
Walk Score Info Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities. Rank #70 / 266Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 70th out of 266 homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
67 / 100
Occupancy rate Info Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand. Rank #15 / 66Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 15th out of 66 homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 66. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
89% This home usually has limited availability
Higher than the Utah average: 70.1%
Occupied beds
110 / 124
Avg. Length of Stay Info Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
78 days

About this community

License Details

Facility TypeNursing Care Facility
StatusActive
IssuanceApril 1, 1989
ExpirationNovember 30, 2026
CountySalt Lake
CMS Certification Number465075

Contact Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Inspection History

In Utah, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Facility Licensing conducts regular onsite inspections to ensure compliance with state and federal healthcare standards.

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Utah state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Overall vs. UT average 0 Worse No metrics in this bucket. 1 At Avg Metrics at Utah average:
• Deficiencies High (at UT avg) 6 Better Metrics better than Utah average:
• Deficiencies (67% below)
• Deficiencies Moderate (100% below)
• Deficiencies Low (100% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (96% below)
• Inspections with deficiencies (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (60% below)

Deficiencies Info Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityUT Averagevs. UT Avg
Deficiencies Info Total deficiencies cited across all inspections on record. Utah reports these by severity; the levels below add up to this figure. 13 This facility has 67% fewer deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 3).↓ 67% better
Deficiencies High Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at high severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 11 This facility has deficiencies high in line with the Utah average (1 vs. UT avg 1).— At avg
Deficiencies Moderate Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at moderate severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 01 This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies moderate than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better
Deficiencies Low Info Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at low severity. The severity levels add up to the total. 01 This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies low than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better
Deficiencies per inspection Info Average deficiencies per inspection. 0.25.16 This facility has 96% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Utah nursing home (0.2 vs. UT avg 5.16).↓ 96% better

Inspections Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityUT Averagevs. UT Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility. 54 This facility has had 25% more total inspections than the Utah average (5 vs. UT avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 25% more
Inspections with deficiencies Info Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory deficiency. 12 This facility has 50% fewer inspections with deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 2).↓ 50% better
Inspection deficiency rate Info Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency. 20%50% This facility has 30 percentage points lower inspection deficiency rate than a typical Utah nursing home (20% vs. UT avg 50%).↓ 30% better
Show Inspection Reports

CMS Health Inspection History

Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.

Inspections Since 2020 · 6 years of data
Total health inspections 7

State average 3.5

Last Health inspection on Jun 2025

Total health citations
33 Rank #55 / 70Health citations — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 55th out of 70 homes we track in Utah for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Utah State average, with a ranking across all 70 UT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

State average 27.7

Citations per inspection
4.71 Rank #16 / 70Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 16th out of 70 homes we track in Utah for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Utah mean across 70 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

State average 7.62

Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.

24 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 9 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations.

Breakdown of citation severity (last 6 years)
Critical health citations
3
329% worse than State average

State average: 0.7

Serious health citations
4
60% worse than State average

State average: 2.5

3 critical citations State average: 0.7
4 serious citations State average: 2.5
26 moderate citations State average: 24.5
0 minor citations State average: 0.1
Citations history (last 6 years)
Infection Control moderate citation Jun 30, 2025
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation Jan 11, 2024
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation Jan 11, 2024
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation Jan 11, 2024
Corrected

Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.

Staffing Data

Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.

Total staff 303
Employees 134
Contractors 169
Staff to resident ratio 2.86 : 1
33% more staff per resident than Utah average
Utah average ratio: 2.14 : 1 Utah average ratio: 2.14 : 1See full Utah ranking
Avg staff/day 59
Average shift 7.7 hours
0% compared with Utah average
Utah average: 7.9 hours Utah average shift: 7.9 hoursSee full Utah ranking
Total staff hours (quarter) 41,918

Nursing staff breakdown

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse

Manages medical care and health needs.

RN Staff Info 64 total: 17 full-time employees and 47 contractors. 64
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9.9 hours
Licensed Practical Nurse

Assists with medical care and medications.

LPN Staff Info 27 total: 5 full-time employees and 22 contractors. 27
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 10 hours
Certified Nursing Assistant

Helps with daily care and mobility.

CNA Staff Info 162 total: 62 full-time employees and 100 contractors. 162
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 7.2 hours

Contractor staffing

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.

Total hours from contractors

12.2%

5,124 contractor hours this quarter

Certified Nursing Assistant: 100 Registered Nurse: 47 Licensed Practical Nurse: 22

Staff by category

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Certified Nursing Assistant6210016219,65692100%7.2
Registered Nurse1747647,78092100%9.9
Qualified Activities Professional7072,28892100%9.5
Licensed Practical Nurse522272,2439098%10
RN Director of Nursing4041,5778289%7.7
Respiratory Therapy Technician6061,4118390%7.2
Clinical Nurse Specialist8081,2006975%7.2
Physical Therapy Assistant6069767582%6.2
Nurse Aide in Training5058917278%8.1
Other Dietary Services Staff2028068289%7.4
Mental Health Service Worker1015115964%8.7
Administrator2024886470%7.5
Physical Therapy Aide2024526166%7.4
Nurse Practitioner1014285762%7.5
Speech Language Pathologist1013776874%5.5
Dietitian1013706065%6.2
Therapeutic Recreation Specialist1013136065%5.2
Qualified Social Worker2021272932%4.2
Dental Services Staff1012467%3.9
162 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days 100%
64 Registered Nurse
% of Days 100%
7 Qualified Activities Professional
% of Days 100%
27 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days 98%
View All Staffing Data

Penalties and fines

Includes penalties issued in 2023

Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.

Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total fines amount $41K Rank #49 / 75Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 49th out of 75 homes we track in Utah for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Utah average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 75 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
22% lower than Utah average

Utah average: $53K

Number of fines 2
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 1.9

Payment Denials Info Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed. 0
100% fewer payment denials than Utah average

Utah average: 0.3

Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility $41K
Utah average $53K
Penalty History

Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.

1 penalty in the past 3 years

Oct 26, 2023 · $20K

Civil Money Penalty Info Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation. Oct 26, 2023
$20K

Last updated: Jan 2026

Quality of care over time

These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.

High-risk clinical events score Info A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline. 11.6
24% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 9.3

Functional decline score Info A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence. 22.9
14% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 20.1

Long-stay resident measures
Significantly above average Utah avg: 4.0 Info CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased Info Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 16.9%
8% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 15.7%

Walking Ability Worsened Info Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened 30.8%
45% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 21.3%

Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence Info Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 21.0%
9% better than Utah average

Utah average: 23.1%

Falls with Major Injury Info Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.8%
6% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 2.6%

High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers Info Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers 3.6%
14% better than Utah average

Utah average: 4.2%

Urinary Tract Infection Info Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 2.2%
5% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 2.1%

Lost Too Much Weight Info Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 3.7%
10% better than Utah average

Utah average: 4.1%

Depressive Symptoms Info Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 6.6%
60% better than Utah average

Utah average: 16.5%

Antipsychotic Use Info Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 10.6%
21% better than Utah average

Utah average: 13.5%

Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 99.7%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 97.1%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 98.8%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 98.0%

Short-stay resident measures
Above average Utah avg: 3.3 Info CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 97.1%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 92.9%

Antipsychotic medication increase Info Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 0.5%
50% better than Utah average

Utah average: 1.1%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 94.3%
In line with Utah average

Utah average: 91.0%

Re-hospitalized after SNF stay Info Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission. 20.1%
16% worse than Utah average

Utah average: 17.4%

Emergency department visits Info Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit. 6.9%
42% better than Utah average

Utah average: 11.8%

Falls with major injury Info Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay. 0.0%
100% better than Utah average

Utah average: 0.8%

Ability to care for self at discharge Info Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge. 82.5%
54% better than Utah average

Utah average: 53.7%

Successful return to home or community Info Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility. 60.3%
19% better than Utah average

Utah average: 50.6%

Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.

Breakdown by payment type

Medicare

15% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.

Typical stay 27 days

Private pay

83% of new residents, often for short stays.

Typical stay 26 days

Medicaid

2% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.

Typical stay 7 years

Facility Characteristics

Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total residents 106
Medicare
29
27.4% of residents
Medicaid
64
60.4% of residents
Private pay or other
13
12.3% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group

Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities

Nurse Aide Training

State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site

Active Resident Council

Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.

Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.

Finances and operations

Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 06/2024.

For-profit
Operated by a single business entity.
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$15.7M
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$2.0M
For-profit Operated by a single business entity.
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$15.7M Rank #6 / 71Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 6th out of 71 homes we track in Utah. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$2.0M
Other income Info Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$3.5M
Payroll costs Info Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs. Rank #5 / 71Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 5th out of 71 homes we track in Utah. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$8.0M 50.7% of net patient revenue Info Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Rank #34 / 69Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 34th out of 69 homes we track in Utah. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costs Info Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$9.8M
Total costs Info The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$17.8M
How we calculate these figures

This home is owned by Bcvv, Inc

Certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services authority — CMS Certification Number: 465075

Show certification details

What does this home offer?

Pets allowed icon
Pets allowed icon

No pets allowed

Housing options icon
Housing options icon

Housing Options: Private Rooms / Semi-Private Rooms

Building type icon
Building type icon

Building Type: Single-story

Transportation services icon
Transportation services icon

Transportation Services

Fitness and recreation icon
Fitness and recreation icon

Fitness and Recreation

Who this home usually serves

TYPE OF STAY

Primarily short stays

Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.

Most new residents arrive under private pay (83% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 26 days.

Admissions
501 total

Coverage residents most often arrive under.

Medicare 15%
Private pay 83%
Medicaid 2%
Discharges
483 total

Coverage residents most often leave under.

Medicare 15%
Private pay 73%
Medicaid 11%

Admissions and discharges reflect care patterns over time — they are not used to rate this facility.

How we assess these insights

Places of interest near Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Address 1.1 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from West Valley City's city center to Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow's address, calculated via Google Maps. — 0.12 miles to nearest hospital (CommonSpirit Holy Cross Hospital - West Valley)

Calculate Travel Distance to Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around the area

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. RC (Respite Care): Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break. HC (Home Care): Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing. HOS (Hospice Care): Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment. PC (Palliative Care): Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
NH
HOS
RC
SNF
Spanish Fork
45
Facility 45
UT AVG 81
Rank #145 / 189
94.9%
Facility 94.9%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #8 / 66
+32%
2.83
Facility 2.83
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #65 / 69
 ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ -3%-24%
$69.1k
Facility $69.1k
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #67 / 75
12
Facility 12
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #9 / 70
4.0
Facility 4.0
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #10 / 70
143-
65
Facility 65
UT AVG 49
Rank #79 / 266
-
$5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $5.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #53 / 71
$2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #64 / 71
39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 39.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #51 / 69
465183
Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
NH
HC
HOS
SNF
West Valley City
124
Facility 124
UT AVG 81
Rank #27 / 189
88.6%
Facility 88.6%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #15 / 66
+24%
3.03
Facility 3.03
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #60 / 69
 ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ +25%-19%
$20.3k
Facility $20.3k
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #49 / 75
33
Facility 33
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #55 / 70
4.7
Facility 4.7
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #16 / 70
7110-
67
Facility 67
UT AVG 49
Rank #70 / 266
Bcvv, Inc
$15.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $15.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #6 / 71
$8.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $8.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #5 / 71
50.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 50.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #34 / 69
465075
Rocky Mountain Care – Clearfield ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
NH
AL
HC
HOS
PC
SNF
South Clearfield
168
Facility 168
UT AVG 81
Rank #8 / 189
72.3%
Facility 72.3%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #36 / 66
+1%
2.93
Facility 2.93
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #63 / 69
 ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ +29%-21%
$58.6k
Facility $58.6k
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #62 / 75
48
Facility 48
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #56 / 70
9.6
Facility 9.6
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #55 / 70
3121-
57
Facility 57
UT AVG 49
Rank #113 / 266
Beaver City Corporation
$15.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $15.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #7 / 71
$7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility $7.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #7 / 71
45.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility 45.3%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #45 / 69
465067
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
NH
HOS
RC
SNF
North Ogden
86
Facility 86
UT AVG 81
Rank #79 / 189
98.8%
Facility 98.8%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #4 / 66
+38%
2.38
Facility 2.38
UT AVG 3.72
Rank #67 / 69
 ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ --36%
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
---85-
86
Facility 86
UT AVG 49
Rank #9 / 266
----46A071
Sunshine Terrace Skilled Nursing ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆
NH
AL
HC
HOS
MC
RC
SNF
North Logan
172
Facility 172
UT AVG 81
Rank #7 / 189
38.6%
Facility 38.6%
UT AVG 71.7%
Rank #59 / 66
-46%- ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ -22%-
$0
Facility $0
UT AVG $52.4k
Rank #1 / 75
23
Facility 23
UT AVG 27.7
Rank #35 / 70
7.7
Facility 7.7
UT AVG 7.6
Rank #44 / 70
-66-
85
Facility 85
UT AVG 49
Rank #11 / 266
Milford Memorial Hospital
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $9.3M
Rank #66 / 71
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG $4.5M
Rank #46 / 71
70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 70.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG 49.5%
Rank #2 / 69
465079
Nursing Home Explorer

Frequently Asked Questions about Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow

Is Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow in a walkable area?

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow has a walk score of 67. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.

When does Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow's license expire?

According to UT state health department records, Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow's license expires on November 30, 2026.

What is the occupancy rate at Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow?

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow's occupancy is 89%.

How long has Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow been in business?

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow has been operating for approximately 37 years, based on available licensing and registration records.

Are pets allowed at Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow?

No, Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow has a no-pet policy.

Does Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow operate as a for-profit or non-profit?

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow is registered as a for-profit in UT.

How many beds does Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow have?

Rocky Mountain Care – Hunter Hollow has 124 beds.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance

Updated on
Pricing
More
More Actions
Contact Contact Map Book a Tour Let's Chat