Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
134
130 employees · 4 contractors · 50 on an average day Sheboygan Senior Community Inc
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Sheboygan, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Sheboygan, WI
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Sheboygan Senior Community offers nursing home care, assisted living, respite care, and skilled nursing in Sheboygan, WI. Assisted living provides help with daily tasks while a resident maintains an apartment, while skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care around the clock. Nursing home care supports residents who need ongoing nursing supervision, and respite care provides a short stay when a usual caregiver needs time away. The range of care can suit someone whose needs may change over time without requiring a move to another community.
With 31 beds, the community has a smaller setting where residents and staff can get to know one another. It may be a good fit for someone who prefers a smaller community. Private rooms provide individual living space, and private bathrooms let residents manage personal routines in their own room. Rehabilitation services include short term rehabilitation, giving a resident a time limited period of care focused on recovery.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours 26 minutes per resident per day, representing the amount of daily hands on nurse staffing allocated per resident. Sheboygan Senior Community accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Medicare applies to short term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long term residence, while Medicaid can matter when savings may not cover a long stay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 26m
This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 26mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +66% above Wisconsin average
3 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 10.4-hour shifts
19m
↓ 68% · WI 58mThis facility: 19m per resident per day, 68% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 10.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
1h 3m
↑ 66% · WI 38mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 66% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 53 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
53 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
3h 4m
↑ 19% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 3h 4m per resident per day, 19% above the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 53 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
53 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 99% · WI 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 99% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 16m
↑ 15% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 4h 16m per resident per day, 15% above the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
11m
↓ 72% · WI 40mThis facility: 11m per resident per day, 72% below the Wisconsin average of 40m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
134
130 employees · 4 contractors · 50 on an average day
134 total staff / 54 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.48 : 1
↑ 3% · WI 2.40This facility: 2.48 staff per resident, 3% above the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
134 staff ÷ 54 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↑ 1% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 1% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
33,559 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →99.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
31
Rank #179 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 179th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
31
Rank #179 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 179th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #32 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #32 / 55Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
11
years
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #54 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #54 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
80.6%
This home usually has availability
Based on 25 residents and 31 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jan 2026)
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
119
days
About This Community
Facility TypeClass CNA (Nonambulatory)
IssuanceSeptember 30, 2015
CountySheboygan
CMS Certification Number525598
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc is legally operated by Sheboygan Senior Community Inc.
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Pets not allowed
Room Types
Private Room
In-Room Features
Private Bathrooms
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Wisconsin, the Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance performs unannounced onsite surveys to ensure that long-term care facilities meet health and safety laws.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 3 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 3 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Wisconsin state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Wisconsin state average
Overall vs. WI average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Wisconsin average:
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WI Average | vs. WI Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 7.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Wisconsin nursing home (0 vs. WI avg 7).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | WI Average | vs. WI Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 3 | 4.0 | This facility has had 25% fewer total inspections than the Wisconsin average (3 vs. WI avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
5
↓ 19% · WI 6.2This facility: 5, 19% below the WI average of 6.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
29
Rank #96 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 2% · WI 28.3This facility: 29, 2% above the WI average of 28.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.8
Rank #153 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 153rd out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 37% · WI 4.24This facility: 5.8, 37% above the WI average of 4.24 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
29 of 29 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the WI average of 0.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 17% · WI 1.2This facility: 1, 17% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
28
↑ 9% · WI 25.8This facility: 28, 9% above the WI average of 25.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the WI average of 0.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 03, 2026 · 1 citation (Resident Rights, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 8 of 29 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 03, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 20, 2026
9 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 27, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 25, 2024
15 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 19, 2023
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 29 citations
Resident Rights
8 deficiencies (28%)
Quality of Life & Care
6 deficiencies (21%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (10%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (10%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (7%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (7%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (7%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 29 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 29 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 29 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
WI avg $107KWisconsin average: $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
WI avg 2.03Wisconsin average: 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.71Wisconsin average: 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 67% · WI 3.0This facility: 1.0, 67% below the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 74% · WI 2.9This facility: 5.0, 74% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 67% · WI 9.0This facility: 15.1, 67% above the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
29.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 54% · WI 18.9This facility: 29.1, 54% above the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 5 better, 6 worse, 2 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.1%
↑ 84% · WI 15.8This facility: 29.1, 84% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
29.1%
↑ 84% · WI 15.8This facility: 29.1, 84% above the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
33.4%
↑ 96% · WI 17.0This facility: 33.4, 96% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
33.4%
↑ 96% · WI 17.0This facility: 33.4, 96% above the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.8%
↑ 5% · WI 23.6This facility: 24.8, 5% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.8%
↑ 5% · WI 23.6This facility: 24.8, 5% above the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.1%
↑ 200% · WI 2.7This facility: 8.1, 200% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.1%
↑ 200% · WI 2.7This facility: 8.1, 200% above the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
↓ 40% · WI 3.3This facility: 2.0, 40% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
↓ 40% · WI 3.3This facility: 2.0, 40% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2%
↑ 26% · WI 4.9This facility: 6.2, 26% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2%
↑ 26% · WI 4.9This facility: 6.2, 26% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7%
↓ 5% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.7, 5% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7%
↓ 5% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.7, 5% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9%
↓ 35% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.9, 35% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9%
↓ 35% · WI 6.0This facility: 3.9, 35% below the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5%
↓ 15% · WI 15.9This facility: 13.5, 15% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5%
↓ 15% · WI 15.9This facility: 13.5, 15% below the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.5, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.5%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.5, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.4%
↓ 1% · WI 95.6This facility: 94.4, 1% below the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.4%
↓ 1% · WI 95.6This facility: 94.4, 1% below the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.70
↑ 68% · WI 1.61This facility: 2.70, 68% above the WI average of 1.61 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.70
↑ 68% · WI 1.61This facility: 2.70, 68% above the WI average of 1.61 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.94
↓ 57% · WI 2.19This facility: 0.94, 57% below the WI average of 2.19 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.94
↓ 57% · WI 2.19This facility: 0.94, 57% below the WI average of 2.19 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
57.8%
↑ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 57.8, 8% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
57.8%
↑ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 57.8, 8% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.6%
↑ 14% · US 50.6This facility: 57.6, 14% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.6%
↑ 14% · US 50.6This facility: 57.6, 14% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 31% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.8, 31% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
↓ 31% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.8, 31% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.1%
↑ 7% · WI 86.9This facility: 93.1, 7% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.1%
↑ 7% · WI 86.9This facility: 93.1, 7% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.6%
↓ 32% · WI 82.2This facility: 55.6, 32% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.6%
↓ 32% · WI 82.2This facility: 55.6, 32% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.0%
↓ 3% · WI 22.7This facility: 22.0, 3% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
22.0%
↓ 3% · WI 22.7This facility: 22.0, 3% below the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.3%
↓ 78% · WI 15.0This facility: 3.3, 78% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.3%
↓ 78% · WI 15.0This facility: 3.3, 78% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−22.9% operating margin
−4.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($2.2M) turns it into a net profit to $0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
84.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #10 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.3M | +$0.1M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #83 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 50% of homes | Above WI median Higher net patient revenue than 50% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.2M | +$0.4M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #56 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 66% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.9M | −$0.3M | Trend 20182025 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #140 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 140th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 15% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −22.9% | −4.0 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #136 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 136th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.2M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #18 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 89% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | +$0.3M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #64 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.0M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #38 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 77% of homes | Above WI median Higher payroll than 77% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 84.0% | +2.1 pts | Trend 20182025 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #10 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | 25.3 pts over WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.4M | $5.8M | $5.9M | $5.8M | $6.8M | $7.4M | $8.2M | $8.3M |
| Operating expenses | $7.7M | $7.9M | $8.0M | $8.5M | $9.0M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $10.2M |
| Net patient income | −$2.3M | −$2.1M | −$2.1M | −$2.7M | −$2.2M | −$1.8M | −$1.6M | −$1.9M |
| Operating margin | −42.5% | −36.8% | −36.2% | −46.4% | −32.5% | −24.7% | −18.9% | −22.9% |
| Net income | −$0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | $0.3M | −$0.3M | $0.5M | $0.0M | $0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $4.3M | $4.7M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $5.4M | $6.0M | $6.7M | $7.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 79.8% | 81.0% | 81.3% | 87.8% | 80.2% | 81.0% | 81.9% | 84.0% |
| Beds | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Gross revenue | $6.4M | $6.6M | $6.7M | $6.7M | $7.7M | $8.2M | $9.1M | $9.1M |
| Salaries | $3.7M | $4.0M | $4.0M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $5.1M | $5.7M | $6.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.1M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.3M | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.4M | $3.2M | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.2M | $3.0M | $3.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $279 | $282 | $292 | $311 | $338 | $363 | $397 | $401 |
| Cost per day | $397 | $386 | $398 | $455 | $447 | $453 | $472 | $493 |
| Average length of stay | 84.9 days | 135.4 days | 126.4 days | 124.7 days | 133.5 days | 158.2 days | 166.1 days | 119.1 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
122 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
39 · 32%
Medicaid
3 · 2%
Private pay & other
80 · 66%
Resident snapshot
54 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 11%
Medicaid
28 · 52%
Private pay & other
20 · 37%
Leaving
174 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
39 · 22%
Medicaid
15 · 9%
Private pay & other
120 · 69%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Sheboygan Senior Community Inc
5.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Sheboygan's city center to Sheboygan Senior Community Inc's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Sheboygan Senior Community Inc
Add your location
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Sheboygan Senior Community Inc
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What is the occupancy rate at Sheboygan Senior Community Inc?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc's occupancy is 80.6%.
02 How long has Sheboygan Senior Community Inc been in business?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc has been operating for approximately 11 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
03 Are pets allowed at Sheboygan Senior Community Inc?
No, Sheboygan Senior Community Inc has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Sheboygan Senior Community Inc operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc is registered as a non-profit in WI.
05 What is the overall rating for Sheboygan Senior Community Inc?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Sheboygan Senior Community Inc have?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc has 31 beds.
07 Has Sheboygan Senior Community Inc had any deficiencies?
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc has no reported deficiencies according to records from Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS).
Updated on
