Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
93
87 employees · 6 contractors · 23 on an average day Stonehenge of South Jordan
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · South Jordan, UT
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Stonehenge of South Jordan
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · South Jordan, UT
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 94 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Stonehenge of South Jordan accepts Medicare and private pay.
What Stonehenge of South Jordan does in South Jordan, UT, is provide two care types, nursing home care and skilled nursing.
Each designation here names nursing the license has to authorize. Rehabilitation Services provide the therapy, delivered in the building.
Thirty-two beds keep this small, so the building never holds a crowd. Four hours and 33 minutes of nursing goes to each resident daily.
Somebody recovering while still needing nursing oversight and therapy is who it fits. The payment side has two entries. Medicare picks up the short skilled work an admission can lead into, and the family’s own outlay is private pay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 74 nursing homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 15m
This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 74 nursing homes we track in Utah for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 15mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +146% above Utah average
2 of 6 metrics below Utah average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 16 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
16 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
1h 47m
↑ 51% · UT 1h 11mThis facility: 1h 47m per resident per day, 51% above the Utah average of 1h 11m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 16 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
16 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 6.3-hour shifts
18m
↓ 40% · UT 30mThis facility: 18m per resident per day, 40% below the Utah average of 30m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 6.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 25 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
29 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 10m
↓ 9% · UT 2h 22mThis facility: 2h 10m per resident per day, 9% below the Utah average of 2h 22m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 25 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
29 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
17m
↑ 146% · UT 7mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 146% above the Utah average of 7m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 32m
≈ 0% · UT 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 32m per resident per day, level with the Utah average of 3h 31m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 30m
↑ 79% · UT 50mThis facility: 1h 30m per resident per day, 79% above the Utah average of 50m (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
93
87 employees · 6 contractors · 23 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 9% · UT 7.9 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 9% below the Utah average of 7.9 h (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
14,984 staff hours this quarter
See full Utah ranking →99.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Utah average: 94.6% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (4), Registered Nurse (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
32
Rank #72 / 73Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
32
Rank #72 / 73Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #54 / 63Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #54 / 63Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
15
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #47 / 81Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #47 / 81Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 81 nursing homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
51
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #28 / 63Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 63. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #28 / 63Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Utah for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Utah average, with its Statewide rank out of 63. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
76.6%
This home usually has availability
Based on 24.5 residents and 32 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Utah average: 71.5%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
17
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Care Facility
StatusActive
IssuanceMay 11, 2011
ExpirationOctober 31, 2027
CountySalt Lake
CMS Certification Number465176
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
94 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
12 points above the Utah average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
23 severity-weighted points (8 deficiencies) · 3× lower than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 75)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
35 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified UT facility (median: 41)
Total health inspections
2
↓ 41% · UT 3.4This facility: 2, 41% below the Utah average of 3.4 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #3 / 73Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Utah State average, with a ranking across all 73 UT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 70% · UT 26.5This facility: 8, 70% below the Utah average of 26.5 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4
Rank #10 / 73Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 73 nursing homes we track in Utah for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Utah mean across 73 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 47% · UT 7.54This facility: 4, 47% below the Utah average of 7.54 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · UT 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Utah average of 0.6 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 58% · UT 2.4This facility: 1, 58% below the Utah average of 2.4 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
7
↓ 70% · UT 23.4This facility: 7, 70% below the Utah average of 23.4 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · UT 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Utah average of 0.1 (among Utah facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 18, 2024 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 8 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 18, 2024
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 17, 2021
6 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (25%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (13%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 8 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
UT avg $48KUtah average: $48,183. Average among the 48 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
UT avg 1.67Utah average: 1.67. Average among the 48 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
UT avg 0.27Utah average: 0.27. Average among the 48 Utah facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Utah average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 54% · UT 3.3This facility: 5.0, 54% above the UT average of 3.3 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near UT average, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.9%
↓ 16% · US 53.7This facility: 44.9, 16% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
44.9%
↓ 16% · US 53.7This facility: 44.9, 16% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
73.8%
↑ 46% · US 50.6This facility: 73.8, 46% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
73.8%
↑ 46% · US 50.6This facility: 73.8, 46% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 9% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 9% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 7% · UT 1.1This facility: 1.0, 7% below the UT average of 1.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 7% · UT 1.1This facility: 1.0, 7% below the UT average of 1.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.2%
↑ 5% · UT 94.1This facility: 99.2, 5% above the UT average of 94.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.2%
↑ 5% · UT 94.1This facility: 99.2, 5% above the UT average of 94.1 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.7%
↓ 3% · UT 92.2This facility: 89.7, 3% below the UT average of 92.2 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.7%
↓ 3% · UT 92.2This facility: 89.7, 3% below the UT average of 92.2 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.5%
↑ 6% · UT 17.4This facility: 18.5, 6% above the UT average of 17.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.5%
↑ 6% · UT 17.4This facility: 18.5, 6% above the UT average of 17.4 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.1%
↑ 19% · UT 11.8This facility: 14.1, 19% above the UT average of 11.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.1%
↑ 19% · UT 11.8This facility: 14.1, 19% above the UT average of 11.8 (among UT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Stonehenge of South Jordan’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 70 Utah nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
3.2% operating margin
+4.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.2M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Utah homes
56.3% payroll share of revenue
UT average 51.2%Rank #20 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.5M while revenue rose $0.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Utah homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | UT median | Compared with UT homesRank in UT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.3M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $8.1M | Rank in UT Rank #59 / 70Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 16% of homes | Below UT median Higher net patient revenue than 16% of UT homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.2M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $8.1M | Rank in UT Rank #61 / 70Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Utah homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $0.2M | Rank in UT Rank #36 / 70Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Utah homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 49% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 3.2% | +4.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | UT median 2.8% | Rank in UT Rank #34 / 70Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Utah homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 52% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.2M | +$0.2M | Trend — | UT median $0.4M | Rank in UT Rank #41 / 70Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Utah homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 42% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Utah homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | UT median | Compared with UT homesRank in UT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.0M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | UT median $4.2M | Rank in UT Rank #51 / 70Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 51st out of 70 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Below UT median Higher payroll than 28% of UT homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 56.3% | −0.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | UT median 49.6% | Rank in UT Rank #20 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Utah for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Utah average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 72% of homes | 5.1 pts over UT average The UT average is 51.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · UT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Utah payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin UT payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.6M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $4.3M | $4.1M | $3.8M | $4.5M | $5.3M |
| Operating expenses | $4.9M | $4.9M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $4.7M | $4.2M | $4.6M | $5.2M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | $0.0M | −$0.7M | −$0.6M | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | $0.2M |
| Operating margin | −6.5% | −2.0% | 0.9% | −17.6% | −14.3% | −8.5% | −1.4% | 3.2% |
| Net income | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | $0.0M | $0.2M | $0.8M | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | $0.2M |
| Payroll costs | $2.9M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $2.5M | $2.4M | $2.4M | $2.5M | $3.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 62.4% | 59.6% | 55.9% | 57.9% | 59.3% | 61.3% | 56.4% | 56.3% |
| Beds | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 |
| Gross revenue | $8.2M | $8.8M | $9.3M | $7.2M | $6.6M | $5.6M | $6.3M | $7.3M |
| Salaries | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.2M | $2.2M | $2.1M | $2.2M | $2.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $2.0M | $2.0M | $2.2M | $2.5M | $2.3M | $1.8M | $2.0M | $2.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $490 | $423 | $515 | $525 | $567 | $575 | $596 | $622 |
| Cost per day | $522 | $431 | $510 | $617 | $648 | $623 | $604 | $603 |
| Average length of stay | 18.3 days | 20.1 days | 19.3 days | 18.7 days | 25.5 days | 19.7 days | 19.5 days | 17.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
488 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
252 · 52%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
236 · 48%
Leaving
496 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
256 · 52%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
240 · 48%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Stonehenge of South Jordan
0.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from South Jordan's city center to Stonehenge of South Jordan's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Stonehenge of South Jordan
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Utah
Stonehenge of South Jordan is located in South Jordan, Utah.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Utah.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Stonehenge of South Jordan
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Stonehenge of South Jordan in?
Stonehenge of South Jordan is in the Y Worry Estates neighborhood of South Jordan.
02 Is Stonehenge of South Jordan in a walkable area?
Stonehenge of South Jordan has a walk score of 51. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
03 When does Stonehenge of South Jordan's license expire?
According to UT state health department records, Stonehenge of South Jordan's license expires on October 31, 2027.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Stonehenge of South Jordan?
Stonehenge of South Jordan's occupancy is 76.6%.
05 How long has Stonehenge of South Jordan been in business?
Stonehenge of South Jordan has been operating for approximately 15 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Stonehenge of South Jordan?
No, Stonehenge of South Jordan has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the overall rating for Stonehenge of South Jordan?
Stonehenge of South Jordan received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
