We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Nottingham is a retirement community in Jamesville, NY, that offers comprehensive care options, including independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Here, older adults are well-cared for, accompanied by a supportive and welcoming environment. Excellent services, including housekeeping, nutritious meals, and 24-hour assistance, are also provided to improve residents’ living experiences. Dedicated to understanding residents’ unique needs and habits, the community provides customized care plans.
Indoor games, light exercises, and a variety of recreational opportunities ensure residents can stay active. An indoor pool, a coffee lounge, and the Clubhouse are among the state-of-the-art amenities available, so residents can rest and create meaningful moments with friends. Surrounded by trees and green spaces in Jamesville, the community guarantees a laid-back lifestyle. As one of the trusted options for senior living in New York, this retirement community ensures older adults can live to their potential in retirement.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 157th out of 388 homes in New York. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 20m per day | ▲ 4% State avg: 3h 12m per day · National avg: 3h 25m per day |
Similar to the New York average: 88.3%The Nottingham is legally operated by Loretto Adult Community, Inc..
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the New York state average. See the assisted living residences benchmark below for the typical New York score; higher is better.
Near the New York average for assisted living residences.
New York assisted living residences benchmark: C+ 77/100
Inspection score: 79 out of 100. Letter grade C+. Near the New York average for assisted living residences.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the New York state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Violations
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total violations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 7 | 13 | This facility has 46% fewer total violations than a typical New York assisted living residence (7 vs. NY avg 13).↓ 46% better |
|
Violations per year
Average violations per year since 2021.
| 1.4 | 2.6 | This facility has 46% fewer violations per year than a typical New York assisted living residence (1.4 vs. NY avg 2.6).↓ 46% better |
|
Violations per inspection
Average violations per inspection.
| 0.5 | 1.4 | This facility has 64% fewer violations per inspection than a typical New York assisted living residence (0.5 vs. NY avg 1.4).↓ 64% better |
Per-category split of the 7 violations recorded across all inspections. Counts are compared against the New York state average for each category. A green dot means this facility is below the state average for that category; an amber dot means it is above.
Inspections
| This Facility | NY Average | vs. NY Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 13 | 9 | This facility has 44% more total inspections than a typical New York assisted living residence (13 vs. NY avg 9).↑ 44% worse |
|
Inspections with violations
Inspections that uncovered at least one regulatory violation.
| 6 | 5 | This facility has 20% more inspections with violations than a typical New York assisted living residence (6 vs. NY avg 5).↑ 20% worse |
|
Inspection violation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one violation.
| 46% | 51% | This facility has 5 percentage points lower inspection violation rate than a typical New York assisted living residence (46% vs. NY avg 51%).↓ 5% better |
|
Violations per inspection
Average violations recorded per inspection.
| 0.5 | 1 | This facility has 50% fewer violations per inspection than a typical New York assisted living residence (0.5 vs. NY avg 1).↓ 50% better |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 8 | 6 | This facility has 33% more complaint visits than a typical New York assisted living residence (8 vs. NY avg 6).↑ 33% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
The most recent inspection on June 16, 2025, found no deficiencies. Earlier inspections showed a pattern of occasional deficiencies primarily related to resident services and medication management, with some issues in records and reports. Complaint investigations were mostly unsubstantiated, and no enforcement actions, fines, or license suspensions were listed in the available reports. Prior reports noted isolated citations without recurring severe findings. The trend suggests improvement over time, with recent inspections consistently free of deficiencies.
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsNew York average 3.6
Last Health inspection on Sep 2025
New York average 18.5
New York average 5.05
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 8 citations resulted from standard inspections.
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 0.2
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
150
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
13
12 active · 1 restored
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
137
137 Disposed
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Next scheduled court appearance on record across active cases.
Apr 23, 2026Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
887% better than New York average
5% worse than New York average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.4 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
472 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 28 | 0 | 28 | 8,145 | 92 | 100% | 7.4 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 11 | 0 | 11 | 2,307 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,240 | 90 | 98% | 7.7 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1,000 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 4 | 4 | 447 | 66 | 72% | 6.8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 400 | 50 | 54% | 8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 282 | 44 | 48% | 6.4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 228 | 44 | 48% | 5.2 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 172 | 22 | 24% | 7.8 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 1 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 15 | 16% | 4.3 |
| Medical Director | 1 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 13% | 2 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 12 | 13% | 1.7 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 21 | 23% | 0.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3% | 1.9 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
8.6
13% better than New York averageNew York average: 9.8
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
23.6
30% worse than New York averageNew York average: 18.1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.1%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.9%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.8%
72% worse than New York averageNew York average: 21.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
54% better than New York averageNew York average: 7.2%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.7%
47% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6%
9% better than New York averageNew York average: 6.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
20.0%
11% worse than New York averageNew York average: 18.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.4%
54% worse than New York averageNew York average: 12.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.5%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 91.4%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
In line with New York averageNew York average: 95.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.5%
16% worse than New York averageNew York average: 76.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than New York averageNew York average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
11% better than New York averageNew York average: 78.8%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
55% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
44% of new residents, often for short stays.
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
37Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for The Nottingham based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #376 / 383Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 376th out of 383 homes in New York. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the New York average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Housing Options: Private / Semi-Private Rooms
Building Type: Two-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
5.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Jamesville's city center to The Nottingham's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The Nottingham is located in Jamesville, New York.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York.
The Nottingham is in the Nottingham Road neighborhood of Jamesville.
The legal owner and operator of The Nottingham is Loretto Adult Community, Inc..
The Nottingham's occupancy is 89%.
The Nottingham has 64 beds.
The Nottingham is located at 1301 Nottingham Rd, Jamesville, NY 13078, United States.
(315) 445-9242 will put you in contact with the team at The Nottingham.
The Nottingham is in Onondaga County.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
