We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
2
Ranked on Data, Not Dollars
We rank communities on objective measures like inspection records, quality scores, and care data, so you can find trusted options without the guesswork.
3
Personalized Guidance
From lifestyle matching to help with insurance and financial assistance, we make sure the community is the right fit
The Pines at Rolling Meadows
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Wichita Falls, TX
The Pines at Rolling Meadows accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of The Pines at Rolling Meadows
The Pines, located in Wichita Falls, TX, is a senior living community within the Rolling Meadows senior living campus, offering assisted living with specialization in memory care services. They offer residents a secure home-like environment where they are provided 24/7 supervision, security, and assistance with daily living activities.
Some of the amenities they offer include meal preparation services, access to an on-site physician, housekeeping, and laundry services. They also curate special activities that promote the residents overall wellness, and enhance their independence.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.86Rank#178 / 255Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 178th out of 255 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Smaller home
· May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.Rank#106 / 275Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 106th out of 275 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
50/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
26days
About this community
License Details
Facility TypeNF Medicaid Only
CountyWichita
Ownership & Operating Entity
The Pines at Rolling Meadows is legally operated by Wichita Falls Retirement Foundation.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. TX average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Texas average:
• Health citations (50% above)
1 At Avg
Metrics at Texas average:
• Inspections with citations (at TX avg)
1 Better
Metrics better than Texas average:
• Total citations (63% below)
Citations Citations are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.
This Facility
TX Average
vs. TX Avg
Total citations Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
3
8
This facility has 63% fewer total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (3 vs. TX avg 8).↓ 63% better
Health citations Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
3
2
This facility has 50% more health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (3 vs. TX avg 2).↑ 50% worse
Inspections State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.
This Facility
TX Average
vs. TX Avg
Inspections with citations Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
1
1
This facility has inspections with citations in line with the Texas average (1 vs. TX avg 1).— At avg
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines)
and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Breakdown by payment type
Medicare
41% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Typical stay16 days
Private pay
58% of new residents, often for short stays.
Typical stay8 - 9 months
Medicaid
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Typical stay2 years
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for The Pines at Rolling Meadows from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net Patient Income-$1.3M↑ ~$161.6K vs 2022
Payroll Costs$4.6M↑ ~$209.1K vs 2022
Operating Margin-15.7%↑ 2.1pp vs 2022
Financial Performance
Net patient revenueOperating expensesNet patient income
Payroll & Labor Costs
SalariesStaff salaries from the home's own payroll records.Wage CostsWage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement. Together with salaries, these make up payroll.Contract LaborPay for temporary or agency staff. Counted under other operating costs, not payroll.
Payer Mix (percentage)
MedicareMedicaidPrivate Pay/Other
Metric
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Occupancy %
53.3%
52.3%
54.8%
59.3%
60.6%
57.1%
55.7%
54.7%
55.3%
50.9%
44.2%
50.5%
52.7%
Beds
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
Net Income
$219,326
$788,334
$1,767,405
$1,315,538
$762,535
$1,663,279
$1,436,275
-$304,270
$2,055,380
$2,418,380
$1,119,297
-$1,339,261
$1,442,596
Gross Revenue
$8,496,144
$8,696,322
$9,011,607
$9,299,653
$9,101,068
$8,757,143
$8,334,544
$8,426,276
$8,204,418
$3,298,025
$7,583,610
$8,246,881
$8,371,810
Operating Expenses
$8,375,630
$8,495,710
$8,135,616
$8,221,226
$8,333,776
$8,326,607
$8,499,057
$8,871,635
$8,990,312
$8,930,746
$9,242,878
$9,813,033
$9,736,777
Net Patient Income
-$58,656
-$90,445
$491,832
$766,123
$583,844
$330,347
-$164,513
-$432,606
-$806,947
-$5,590,512
-$1,575,512
-$1,482,573
-$1,320,932
Net Patient Revenue
$8,316,974
$8,405,265
$8,627,448
$8,987,349
$8,917,620
$8,656,954
$8,334,544
$8,439,029
$8,183,365
$3,340,234
$7,667,366
$8,330,460
$8,415,845
Payroll Costs
$3,367,095
$3,433,795
$3,721,929
$3,831,567
$3,845,872
$3,836,513
$3,882,107
$3,953,675
$4,213,520
$4,308,108
$4,391,477
$4,415,102
$4,624,162
Operating Margin %
-0.7%
-1.1%
5.7%
8.5%
6.6%
3.8%
-2.0%
-5.1%
-9.9%
-167.4%
-20.6%
-17.8%
-15.7%
Medicare %
11.3%
10.9%
9.0%
12.7%
9.6%
8.9%
9.6%
13.9%
10.1%
6.0%
5.3%
4.1%
4.0%
Medicaid %
0.3%
3.8%
4.2%
3.0%
2.4%
3.4%
4.1%
3.9%
4.0%
4.6%
5.1%
4.6%
4.4%
Private %
88.4%
85.3%
86.8%
84.2%
88.0%
87.7%
86.3%
82.1%
85.9%
89.4%
89.6%
91.3%
91.6%
Net Patient Revenue/Day
$497
$511
$502
$483
$468
$482
$477
$491
$471
$209
$553
$526
$508
Cost/Day
$501
$516
$473
$441
$438
$463
$486
$516
$518
$558
$667
$620
$588
Avg Length of Stay
30.6 days
34.0 days
23.3 days
18.5 days
34.9 days
34.3 days
41.9 days
36.1 days
30.9 days
29.0 days
26.7 days
24.9 days
26.5 days
Finances and operations
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.4M
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$1.3M
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.4M Rank#115 / 218Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 115th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$1.3M
Other incomeMoney the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$2.8M
Payroll costsStaff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.Rank#119 / 218Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 119th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$4.6M
54.9% of net patient revenue
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.Rank#118 / 199Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 118th out of 199 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costsEverything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$5.1M
Total costsThe home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$9.7M
Certification details
License Number:676203
Owner Name:Wichita Falls Retirement Foundation
Rural vs. Urban:Urban
County:Wichita
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and State data
How we calculate these figures
We use the home's most recent CMS SNF Cost Report — the annual financial statement every Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home is required to file — to show how it earns and spends on resident care.
This includes
Net patient revenue — what the home collects for resident care after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts.
Payroll — staff salaries plus wage-related benefits. Contract and agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Net patient income — what's left after the home's total operating expenses.
How we calculate net patient income and payroll %
Net patient income is net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. Payroll % is payroll divided by net patient revenue — the share of each revenue dollar that goes to staff pay.
Net patient revenue vs. other income
Net patient revenue is money earned from resident care only. Anything the home earns outside of care — investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources — is reported separately as other income. Other income is not part of net patient revenue, and it is not included in net patient income.
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Who this home usually serves
TYPE OF STAY
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (58% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 8 - 9 months.
Admissions
104 total
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Medicare41%
Private pay58%
Medicaid1%
Discharges
106 total
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Medicare16%
Private pay46%
Medicaid37%
How we assess these insights
We analyze official CMS data on admissions and discharges to understand the types of residents a nursing home most often serves.
This includes
Medicare, Medicaid, and private-pay admissions and discharges
Number of nights covered by each payment type
Typical length of stay
How we calculate length of stay
We calculate length of stay separately for each payment type (Medicare, Medicaid and private) by dividing total number of nights by total number of admissions.
Places of interest near The Pines at Rolling Meadows
4.9 miles from city center Estimated distance in miles from Wichita Falls's city center to The Pines at Rolling Meadows's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Quick search
Calculate Travel Distance to The Pines at Rolling Meadows
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Wichita Falls
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This TableAL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 71.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
$5.4M*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
$2.8M*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
52.2%*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities