Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
110 employees · 3 contractors · 37 on an average day The Springs of Mine Creek
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Nashville, AR
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Arkansas average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Arkansas average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Springs of Mine Creek
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Nashville, AR
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Arkansas average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 12 points above the Arkansas average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The Springs of Mine Creek accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
The Springs of Mine Creek provides skilled nursing and nursing home care in Nashville, AR. Skilled nursing means licensed nursing care is available on site around the clock, while nursing home care supports residents who need ongoing assistance in a residential setting. The community may be a good fit for someone who needs licensed nursing care and rehabilitation services in one setting.
The community has 78 beds. Rehabilitation services are available for residents who need therapy as part of their care, allowing those services to be provided within the same setting. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 34 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families those payment routes. Melissa Wright is the administrator, and Nashville Wellness operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 183 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 34m
This nursing home is ranked 97th out of 183 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 34mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +15% above Arkansas average
1 of 6 metrics below Arkansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
25m
↑ 4% · AR 24mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 4% above the Arkansas average of 24m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 2m
↑ 9% · AR 57mThis facility: 1h 2m per resident per day, 9% above the Arkansas average of 57m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
3h 7m
↑ 15% · AR 2h 43mThis facility: 3h 7m per resident per day, 15% above the Arkansas average of 2h 43m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 46 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
46 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 80% · AR 2mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 80% below the Arkansas average of 2m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 45m
↑ 8% · AR 3h 29mThis facility: 3h 45m per resident per day, 8% above the Arkansas average of 3h 29m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
17m
↑ 3% · AR 16mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 3% above the Arkansas average of 16m (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
113
110 employees · 3 contractors · 37 on an average day
113 total staff / 69 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.64 : 1
↑ 1% · AR 1.62This facility: 1.64 staff per resident, 1% above the Arkansas average of 1.62 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
113 staff ÷ 69 residents
See full Arkansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.8 h
↑ 10% · AR 8 hThis facility: 8.8 h, 10% above the Arkansas average of 8 h (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
29,530 staff hours this quarter
See full Arkansas ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arkansas average: 94.5% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
78
Rank #171 / 204Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 171st out of 204 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arkansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
78
Rank #171 / 204Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 171st out of 204 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arkansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #64 / 202Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 202 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arkansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #64 / 202Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 202 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arkansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
48
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #17 / 150Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 150 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arkansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 150. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #17 / 150Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 150 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arkansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 150. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
90.8%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 70.8 residents and 78 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Arkansas average: 71.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
178
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Nursing Facility With Dual Certified Beds (Medicaid/Medicare)
CountyHoward
CMS Certification Number045180
Certification TypeMedicaid / Medicare
CMS CertificationMedicaid / Medicare
The Springs of Mine Creek is legally operated by Nashville Wellness LLC, and administered by Melissa Wright.
Owner NameNashville Wellness LLC
Profit StatusFor-profit
Medicaid and Medicare
78 units
Total beds
78 units
Resident Council
Fax870-845-5280
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
95 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
12 points above the Arkansas average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
21 severity-weighted points (8 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified AR facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
26 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified AR facility (median: 28)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 19% · AR 3.7This facility: 3, 19% below the Arkansas average of 3.7 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #11 / 183Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 183 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arkansas State average, with a ranking across all 183 AR facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 55% · AR 17.9This facility: 8, 55% below the Arkansas average of 17.9 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.67
Rank #12 / 183Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 183 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arkansas mean across 183 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 47% · AR 5.01This facility: 2.67, 47% below the Arkansas average of 5.01 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AR 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Arkansas average of 0.4 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AR 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arkansas average of 0.1 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
8
↓ 53% · AR 17.1This facility: 8, 53% below the Arkansas average of 17.1 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AR 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Arkansas average of 0.3 (among Arkansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 20, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 8 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 20, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 08, 2024
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 27, 2023
4 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (25%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (13%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (13%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 8 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
AR avg $26KArkansas average: $26,098. Average among the 73 Arkansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AR avg 1.38Arkansas average: 1.38. Average among the 73 Arkansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AR avg 0.15Arkansas average: 0.15. Average among the 73 Arkansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arkansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 19% · AR 4.2This facility: 5.0, 19% above the AR average of 4.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 10% · AR 2.7This facility: 3.0, 10% above the AR average of 2.7 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 45% · AR 6.1This facility: 3.4, 45% below the AR average of 6.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
2.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 74% · AR 10.4This facility: 2.7, 74% below the AR average of 10.4 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 12 better, 1 worse
7 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near AR average, 2 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
↓ 63% · AR 9.1This facility: 3.4, 63% below the AR average of 9.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
↓ 63% · AR 9.1This facility: 3.4, 63% below the AR average of 9.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.5%
↓ 73% · AR 9.2This facility: 2.5, 73% below the AR average of 9.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.5%
↓ 73% · AR 9.2This facility: 2.5, 73% below the AR average of 9.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.3%
↓ 82% · AR 12.9This facility: 2.3, 82% below the AR average of 12.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.3%
↓ 82% · AR 12.9This facility: 2.3, 82% below the AR average of 12.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 27% · AR 1.1This facility: 0.8, 27% below the AR average of 1.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
↓ 27% · AR 1.1This facility: 0.8, 27% below the AR average of 1.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 26% · AR 3.9This facility: 2.9, 26% below the AR average of 3.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 26% · AR 3.9This facility: 2.9, 26% below the AR average of 3.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4%
↓ 43% · AR 4.2This facility: 2.4, 43% below the AR average of 4.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4%
↓ 43% · AR 4.2This facility: 2.4, 43% below the AR average of 4.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
↑ 41% · AR 4.1This facility: 5.7, 41% above the AR average of 4.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
↑ 41% · AR 4.1This facility: 5.7, 41% above the AR average of 4.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AR 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AR average of 1.4 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AR 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AR average of 1.4 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.6%
↓ 67% · AR 10.9This facility: 3.6, 67% below the AR average of 10.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.6%
↓ 67% · AR 10.9This facility: 3.6, 67% below the AR average of 10.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 5% · AR 95.1This facility: 99.6, 5% above the AR average of 95.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 5% · AR 95.1This facility: 99.6, 5% above the AR average of 95.1 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · AR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the AR average of 95.3 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · AR 95.3This facility: 100.0, 5% above the AR average of 95.3 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.32
↓ 33% · AR 1.97This facility: 1.32, 33% below the AR average of 1.97 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.32
↓ 33% · AR 1.97This facility: 1.32, 33% below the AR average of 1.97 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.59
↓ 27% · AR 2.18This facility: 1.59, 27% below the AR average of 2.18 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.59
↓ 27% · AR 2.18This facility: 1.59, 27% below the AR average of 2.18 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
76.0%
↑ 42% · US 53.7This facility: 76.0, 42% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
76.0%
↑ 42% · US 53.7This facility: 76.0, 42% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AR 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AR average of 1.4 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · AR 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AR average of 1.4 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.0%
↑ 18% · AR 81.9This facility: 97.0, 18% above the AR average of 81.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.0%
↑ 18% · AR 81.9This facility: 97.0, 18% above the AR average of 81.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9%
↑ 1% · AR 75.9This facility: 76.9, 1% above the AR average of 75.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9%
↑ 1% · AR 75.9This facility: 76.9, 1% above the AR average of 75.9 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.1%
↓ 24% · AR 25.2This facility: 19.1, 24% below the AR average of 25.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.1%
↓ 24% · AR 25.2This facility: 19.1, 24% below the AR average of 25.2 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.0%
↓ 28% · AR 13.8This facility: 10.0, 28% below the AR average of 13.8 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
10.0%
↓ 28% · AR 13.8This facility: 10.0, 28% below the AR average of 13.8 (among AR facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
The Springs of Mine Creek’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 173 Arkansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.6% operating margin
+9.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Arkansas homes
42.4% payroll share of revenue
AR average 47.7%Rank #128 / 173Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arkansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.0M while revenue rose $0.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arkansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | AR median | Compared with AR homesRank in AR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.9M | +$0.1M | Trend 20162025 | AR median $9.1M | Rank in AR Rank #134 / 173Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arkansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Below AR median Higher net patient revenue than 23% of AR homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.4M | −$0.5M | Trend 20162025 | AR median $8.7M | Rank in AR Rank #144 / 173Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 144th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Arkansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.5M | +$0.6M | Trend 20162025 | AR median $0.2M | Rank in AR Rank #72 / 173Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Arkansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.6% | +9.4 pts | Trend 20162025 | AR median 3.0% | Rank in AR Rank #52 / 173Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Arkansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 70% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | AR median $0.0M | Rank in AR Rank #64 / 169Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Arkansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.5M | +$0.6M | Trend — | AR median $0.4M | Rank in AR Rank #79 / 173Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 79th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Arkansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Arkansas homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | AR median | Compared with AR homesRank in AR | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.9M | +$0.0M | Trend 20162025 | AR median $4.1M | Rank in AR Rank #149 / 173Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 149th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arkansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | Below AR median Higher payroll than 14% of AR homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 42.4% | −0.6 pts | Trend 20162025 | AR median 46.0% | Rank in AR Rank #128 / 173Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 128th out of 173 nursing homes we track in Arkansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arkansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arkansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | 5.3 pts under AR average The AR average is 47.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2025 2 charts · AR benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arkansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AR payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018no report | 2019 | 2020no report | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.6M | $5.0M | $3.8M | $5.7M | $6.6M | $7.4M | $6.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Operating expenses | $4.5M | $4.7M | $4.5M | $6.2M | $7.3M | $7.3M | $7.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.0M | $0.3M | −$0.7M | −$0.5M | −$0.7M | $0.1M | −$0.2M | $0.5M | ||
| Operating margin | 0.6% | 6.7% | −18.9% | −8.4% | −11.0% | 1.2% | −2.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Net income | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.4M | $0.1M | $0.1M | −$0.1M | $0.5M | ||
| Payroll costs | $0.7M | $0.8M | $2.0M | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.7M | $2.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 16.5% | 15.4% | 52.9% | 40.2% | 37.5% | 36.7% | 43.0% | 42.4% | ||
| Beds | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||
| Gross revenue | $3.9M | $4.6M | $4.1M | $5.6M | $6.6M | $7.4M | $6.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Salaries | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.8M | $2.1M | $2.2M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | ||
| Contract labor | $1.7M | $1.9M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.2M | — | ||
| Other operating costs | $3.8M | $3.9M | $2.5M | $3.9M | $4.9M | $4.6M | $4.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $228 | $232 | $191 | $241 | $249 | $276 | $254 | $274 | ||
| Cost per day | $227 | $216 | $227 | $262 | $276 | $272 | $261 | $256 | ||
| Average length of stay | 226.9 days | 297.4 days | 155.2 days | 181.5 days | 179.7 days | 154.5 days | 216.2 days | 177.9 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
130 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
35 · 27%
Medicaid
21 · 16%
Private pay & other
74 · 57%
Resident snapshot
69 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
3 · 4%
Medicaid
55 · 80%
Private pay & other
11 · 16%
Leaving
141 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
28 · 20%
Medicaid
40 · 28%
Private pay & other
73 · 52%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near The Springs of Mine Creek
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Nashville's city center to The Springs of Mine Creek's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to The Springs of Mine Creek
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Arkansas
The Springs of Mine Creek is located in Nashville, Arkansas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arkansas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about The Springs of Mine Creek
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of The Springs of Mine Creek?
The Springs of Mine Creek is legally operated by Nashville Wellness LLC, and administered by Melissa Wright.
02 Is The Springs of Mine Creek in a walkable area?
The Springs of Mine Creek has a walk score of 48. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the occupancy rate at The Springs of Mine Creek?
The Springs of Mine Creek's occupancy is 90.8%.
04 Are pets allowed at The Springs of Mine Creek?
No, The Springs of Mine Creek has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for The Springs of Mine Creek?
The team at The Springs of Mine Creek can be reached at info@thespringsminecreek.com.
06 Does The Springs of Mine Creek operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
The Springs of Mine Creek is registered as a for-profit in AR.
07 Who is the administrator of The Springs of Mine Creek?
Melissa Wright is the administrator of The Springs of Mine Creek.
Updated on
