Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
73
46 employees · 27 contractors · 22 on an average day TidePointe, a Vi Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Hilton Head Island, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
TidePointe, a Vi Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Hilton Head Island, SC
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 11 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
TidePointe, a Vi Community accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of TidePointe, a VI Community
Owned by Sandra Gilliam, TidePointe, a VI Community, is a skilled nursing community on TidePointe Way in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, with a 25-bed capacity. It provides skilled nursing, post-acute rehabilitation, and respite care, with cottages and one-bedroom and two-bedroom villas. It has an occupancy rate of 85.3%, with an average length of stay of 55 days, supporting both short-term recovery and longer-term care needs.
Residents receive an average of 5 hours and 20 minutes of nursing care each day from registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, nurse aides, and physical therapists. Furthermore, strong weekend registered nurse coverage and a staff-to-resident ratio of 3.04:1 help ensure consistent, individualized clinical support.
Rehabilitation services, wellness programs, daily activities, and meals tailored to individual dietary needs are offered to promote recovery and overall well-being. Medicare, private pay, and respite care options also provide flexibility for families. Meanwhile, the surrounding neighborhood has a Walk Score of 6, making transportation necessary for most errands. State inspections have confirmed compliance with health and safety standards.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 20m
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 20mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +250% above South Carolina average
1 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
15 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
2h 11m
↑ 231% · SC 40mThis facility: 2h 11m per resident per day, 231% above the South Carolina average of 40m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 12 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
15 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 8 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
8 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
26m
↓ 60% · SC 1h 5mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 60% below the South Carolina average of 1h 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 8 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
8 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 25 total: 21 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
25 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
2h 43m
↑ 14% · SC 2h 23mThis facility: 2h 43m per resident per day, 14% above the South Carolina average of 2h 23m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 25 total: 21 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
25 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 7% · SC 5mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 7% above the South Carolina average of 5m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 36m
↑ 29% · SC 3h 34mThis facility: 4h 36m per resident per day, 29% above the South Carolina average of 3h 34m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 24m
↑ 250% · SC 24mThis facility: 1h 24m per resident per day, 250% above the South Carolina average of 24m (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
73
46 employees · 27 contractors · 22 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 3% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 3% below the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
15,550 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →78.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89.1% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (5), Certified Nursing Assistant (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Registered Nurse (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (3), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Medical Director (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
25
Rank #130 / 132Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 130th out of 132 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
25
Rank #130 / 132Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 130th out of 132 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #44 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 46 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #44 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 46 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across South Carolina facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
6
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
92.8%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 25 beds.
Similar to the South Carolina average: 88.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
23
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
63
days
About This Community
License NumberNCF 0753
CMS Certification Number425351
RCFE NumberCRC 1036
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Landscaping
In-House Sommelier
MaintenanceListed as: Building maintenance
Concierge
Housekeeping
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation
Pets not allowed
Walking Paths
Wellness Center
Bar
Aquatic Center with Lap Pool
Sea Pines Resort Access
Covered & Garage Parking
Private Dining Room
Activities
Guest Lectures
Continued Learning Programs
Outings
Arts and Theater
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at TidePointe, a Vi Community.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at TidePointe, a Vi Community.- Private dining room for family events.
- Multiple dining venues.
Building TypeMid-rise
1 Bedroom
Floor plans: Cape Charles
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Cape Hatteras · Cape Lookout · Cape San Blas · Cape St. George
Floor plans: Cape Hatteras, Cape Lookout, Cape San Blas, Cape St. George
Cottage / Villa Floor plans as listed by the community: Assateague Island · Oak Island · Sand Island
Floor plans: Assateague Island, Oak Island, Sand Island
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points below the South Carolina average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
47 severity-weighted points (7 deficiencies) · 11% higher than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 42)
Enforcement
Typical
$15,945 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Concern
32 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified SC facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 21% · SC 3.8This facility: 3, 21% below the South Carolina average of 3.8 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
7
Rank #28 / 116Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 28th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the South Carolina State average, with a ranking across all 116 SC facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 46% · SC 12.9This facility: 7, 46% below the South Carolina average of 12.9 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.33
Rank #31 / 116Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the South Carolina mean across 116 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 31% · SC 3.4This facility: 2.33, 31% below the South Carolina average of 3.4 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
85% corrected
6 of 7 citations corrected · 1 still open
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 11% · SC 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the South Carolina average of 0.9 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
0% corrected · 1 open
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the South Carolina average of 0.3 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 49% · SC 11.7This facility: 6, 49% below the South Carolina average of 11.7 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100% corrected
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · SC 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the South Carolina average of 0.1 (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 18, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, critical), not yet corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 2 of 7 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 18, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Oct 27, 2023
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2023
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 7 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (29%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (29%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (14%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (14%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (14%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
3 of 7 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 7 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Mar 18, 2026 · $15,945 civil money penalty
Mar 18, 2026 · $15,945 civil money penalty
Total fines
$15,945
↓ 41% · SC $27KThis facility: $15,945, 41% below the South Carolina average of $27,117. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #87 / 119Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 119 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the South Carolina average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 119 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 52% · SC 2.1This facility: 1, 52% below the South Carolina average of 2.1. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
SC avg 0.12South Carolina average: 0.12. Average among the 98 South Carolina facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Mar 18, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,945
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,945Fine amount comparison
This facility
$15,945
South Carolina average
$27,117
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. South Carolina and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 2% · SC 3.9This facility: 4.0, 2% above the SC average of 3.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 9% · SC 2.8This facility: 3.0, 9% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 23% · SC 7.8This facility: 6.0, 23% below the SC average of 7.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 37% · SC 14.1This facility: 19.4, 37% above the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 7 better, 2 worse, 1 near SC average
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near SC average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↑ 23% · SC 11.9This facility: 14.7, 23% above the SC average of 11.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↑ 23% · SC 11.9This facility: 14.7, 23% above the SC average of 11.9 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.1%
↑ 44% · SC 16.7This facility: 24.1, 44% above the SC average of 16.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.1%
↑ 44% · SC 16.7This facility: 24.1, 44% above the SC average of 16.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 1.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 1.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · SC 3.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the SC average of 3.2 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
↓ 26% · SC 5.1This facility: 3.8, 26% below the SC average of 5.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
↓ 26% · SC 5.1This facility: 3.8, 26% below the SC average of 5.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
↓ 14% · SC 6.3This facility: 5.4, 14% below the SC average of 6.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
↓ 14% · SC 6.3This facility: 5.4, 14% below the SC average of 6.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
↓ 28% · SC 3.1This facility: 2.2, 28% below the SC average of 3.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
↓ 28% · SC 3.1This facility: 2.2, 28% below the SC average of 3.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
↓ 35% · SC 15.3This facility: 10.0, 35% below the SC average of 15.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
↓ 35% · SC 15.3This facility: 10.0, 35% below the SC average of 15.3 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.1%
↑ 2% · SC 91.7This facility: 93.1, 2% above the SC average of 91.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.1%
↑ 2% · SC 91.7This facility: 93.1, 2% above the SC average of 91.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 10% · SC 90.6This facility: 100.0, 10% above the SC average of 90.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 10% · SC 90.6This facility: 100.0, 10% above the SC average of 90.6 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 19% · SC 1.5This facility: 1.2, 19% below the SC average of 1.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 19% · SC 1.5This facility: 1.2, 19% below the SC average of 1.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.0%
↑ 3% · SC 81.5This facility: 84.0, 3% above the SC average of 81.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.0%
↑ 3% · SC 81.5This facility: 84.0, 3% above the SC average of 81.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 28% · SC 78.0This facility: 100.0, 28% above the SC average of 78.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 28% · SC 78.0This facility: 100.0, 28% above the SC average of 78.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
TidePointe, a Vi Community’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−36.5% operating margin
+5.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($2.1M) trims the net loss to −$1.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most South Carolina homes
77.8% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #12 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.0M while revenue rose $0.6M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.1M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #87 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Below SC median Higher net patient revenue than 17% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.1M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.0M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −36.5% | +5.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.1M | — | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.7M | +$0.4M | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.3M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #64 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 64th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 39% of homes | Below SC median Higher payroll than 39% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 77.8% | +7.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #12 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 89% of homes | 17.0 pts over SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · SC benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.0M | $7.2M | $7.1M | $7.0M | $6.7M | $7.4M | $7.6M | $8.1M |
| Operating expenses | $8.1M | $7.9M | $8.2M | $9.4M | $9.4M | $9.9M | $10.7M | $11.1M |
| Net patient income | −$1.1M | −$0.7M | −$1.0M | −$2.3M | −$2.7M | −$2.5M | −$3.2M | −$3.0M |
| Operating margin | −15.7% | −10.1% | −14.2% | −33.2% | −40.1% | −33.5% | −41.9% | −36.5% |
| Net income | −$6.6M | −$0.1M | −$0.3M | −$1.4M | −$1.3M | −$1.5M | −$2.1M | −$1.7M |
| Payroll costs | $3.9M | $4.0M | $4.3M | $5.1M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $5.3M | $6.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.6% | 55.8% | 60.3% | 72.0% | 67.8% | 63.7% | 70.5% | 77.8% |
| Beds | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Gross revenue | $8.6M | $8.9M | $8.7M | $7.9M | $7.5M | $8.0M | $8.2M | $9.0M |
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.7M | $4.3M | $3.8M | $3.9M | $4.4M | $5.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $0.9M | $0.8M | $1.5M | $0.9M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $0.7M |
| Other operating costs | $4.2M | $3.9M | $3.8M | $4.3M | $4.8M | $5.2M | $5.4M | $4.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $834 | $866 | $872 | $950 | $876 | $898 | $971 | $994 |
| Cost per day | $965 | $954 | $996 | $1,266 | $1,228 | $1,199 | $1,378 | $1,356 |
| Average length of stay | 34.8 days | 32.3 days | 39.2 days | 52.5 days | 70.7 days | 59.3 days | 55.2 days | 63.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
135 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
96 · 71%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
39 · 29%
Leaving
130 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
87 · 67%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
43 · 33%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near TidePointe, a Vi Community
3.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Hilton Head Island's city center to TidePointe, a Vi Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to TidePointe, a Vi Community
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Hilton Head Island
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TidePointe, a Vi Community | NH AL CCRC IL RC SNF | Hilton Head Island | 25
Facility
25
SC AVG
108
Rank
#130 / 132 | C- | 92.8% | +5% | 5.33
Facility
5.33
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#7 / 116 | +120% | +29% | $15.9k
Facility
$15.9k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#87 / 119 | 7
Facility
7
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#28 / 116 | 2.3
Facility
2.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#31 / 116 | 1 | 23 | - |
6
Facility
6
SC AVG
33
Rank
#44 / 46 | Sandra Gilliam | $8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#87 / 104 | $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#64 / 104 | 77.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
77.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#12 / 104 | 425351 | ||||
| Preston Health Center | NH MC SNF | Hilton Head Island | 77
Facility
77
SC AVG
108
Rank
#100 / 132 | A- | - | - | 6.38
Facility
6.38
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#3 / 116 | +33% | +55% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#63 / 119 | 5
Facility
5
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#14 / 116 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#38 / 116 | 1 | 39 | - | - | The Cypress Club Inc | $7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#90 / 104 | $14.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#5 / 104 | 190.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
190.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#1 / 104 | 425325 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Hilton Head | NH SNF | Hilton Head Island | 88
Facility
88
SC AVG
108
Rank
#84 / 132 | C- |
64.0%
Facility
64.0%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#82 / 84 | -28% | 4.25
Facility
4.25
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#49 / 116 | +74% | +3% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#65 / 119 | 15
Facility
15
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#78 / 116 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#94 / 116 | 1 | 56 | - |
23
Facility
23
SC AVG
33
Rank
#31 / 46 | Life Care Centers Of America Inc | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#98 / 104 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#89 / 104 | 87.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
87.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#5 / 104 | 425147 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in South Carolina
TidePointe, a Vi Community is located in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in South Carolina.
Frequently Asked Questions about TidePointe, a Vi Community
Is TidePointe, a Vi Community in a walkable area?
TidePointe, a Vi Community has a walk score of 6. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of TidePointe, a Vi Community?
TidePointe, a Vi Community's license number is NCF 0753.
What is the occupancy rate at TidePointe, a Vi Community?
TidePointe, a Vi Community's occupancy is 92.8%.
Are pets allowed at TidePointe, a Vi Community?
No, TidePointe, a Vi Community has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for TidePointe, a Vi Community?
The team at TidePointe, a Vi Community can be reached at tidepointe@viliving.com.
Does TidePointe, a Vi Community operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
TidePointe, a Vi Community is registered as a for-profit in SC.
What is the overall rating for TidePointe, a Vi Community?
TidePointe, a Vi Community received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
