We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
2
Ranked on Data, Not Dollars
We rank communities on objective measures like inspection records, quality scores, and care data, so you can find trusted options without the guesswork.
3
Personalized Guidance
From lifestyle matching to help with insurance and financial assistance, we make sure the community is the right fit
ALM Inspection GradeCALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
ALM Inspection GradeCALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Treemont Health Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Treemont Health Care Center
Treemont Health Care Center provides nursing home and skilled nursing care, assisted living, independent living, and respite care in Houston, TX. Nursing home and skilled nursing care include licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while assisted living helps with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care, and respite care provides short stays when a family caregiver needs to travel or recover.
The community has 70 beds, with private and semi-private rooms. A private room gives one resident a private living space, while a semi-private room is shared with another resident. The starting price is $145 per day, which gives families a daily figure for initial budgeting. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted.
Music and memory therapy gives residents an activity focused on music and memory work. Treemont Care operates the community. With a Walk Score of 58, the area is somewhat walkable, so a resident who no longer drives may be able to complete some errands on foot. The combination of several care levels and respite care may suit a resident whose needs may grow over time or a family caregiver who needs a short-term arrangement.
Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Overall ratingThe Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Health InspectionBased on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
StaffingMeasures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Quality MeasuresBased on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
StaffingData period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
This facility
TX avg 3h 30m
↑ 15% · TX 3h 30mThis facility: 4h 2m per resident per day, 15% above the Texas average of 3h 30m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rank#46 / 233Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 46th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Texas average, with a ranking across 233 Texas facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 46th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Texas average, with a ranking across 233 Texas facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
4h 2m
Standout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +23% above Texas average
2 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
TX average · US = national average
Registered nurse (RN) RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.4 staff · 8-hour shifts
24m↓ 11% · TX 27mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 11% below the Texas average of 27m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 43m
LPN / LVN Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.15 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 4m↑ 11% · TX 57mThis facility: 1h 4m per resident per day, 11% above the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 52m
Certified nursing assistant Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 38 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.38 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
2h 34m↑ 23% · TX 2h 5mThis facility: 2h 34m per resident per day, 23% above the Texas average of 2h 5m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 2h 26m
Physical therapist Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m↓ 35% · TX 4mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 35% below the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 4m
Total nursing, weekends Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 38m↑ 19% · TX 3h 4mThis facility: 3h 38m per resident per day, 19% above the Texas average of 3h 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 3h 32m
RN, weekends Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.Sat–Sun
22m↑ 2% · TX 21mThis facility: 22m per resident per day, 2% above the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 29m
Headcount
Total staffEvery person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.78
78 employees · 0 contractors · 31 on an average day Staff per resident78 total staff / 43 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.1.81 : 1↑ 26% · TX 1.44This facility: 1.81 staff per resident, 26% above the Texas average of 1.44 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
78 staff ÷ 43 residents See full Texas ranking →Average shiftAverage hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.7.6 h↓ 6% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 6% below the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
21,657 staff hours this quarter See full Texas ranking →
100%
of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.4% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.70Rank#198 / 257Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 198th out of 257 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 198th out of 257 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Smaller home
· May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.Rank#68 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 68th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 68th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
58/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
70.1%This home usually has availability
Based on 49.1 residents and 70 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Similar to the Texas average: 71.5%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
U.S. News & World Report Best Senior Living (2020)U.S. News rates communities from independent surveys of residents and their families (the 2025 edition analyzed ~450,000 responses across 3,800+ communities) covering safety, caregiving, activities, dining, management and value. Only communities meeting its data thresholds earn a Best designation for that year.
Certifications & Programs
Music and Memory therapy — Music & MemoryCertification from the nonprofit Music & Memory: staff are trained to build personalized playlists for residents with dementia, an evidence-supported way to reduce agitation and reconnect residents with memories.
Ownership & Operating Entity
Treemont Health Care Center is legally operated by Treemont Care, LLC.
Therapy & Rehabilitation
4 services
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Occupational Therapy
Physical Therapy
Speech Therapy
Staffing & Medical
5 services
Subacute Care
IV Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Orthopedic CareMedical care for bone, joint, muscle, and connective-tissue problems, including injuries, arthritis, and mobility concerns. It may involve orthopedic specialists or treatment plans.
Doctor On Staff
Additional Services
4 services
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Daily Living Assistance
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Additional Policies & Features
Pets not allowed
Amenities & Lifestyle
Wi-Fi
Cable Tv
Activities
Music and Memory Therapy
Room Accommodations
Room Types
Private RoomSemi-Private / Shared Room
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the
figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file —
covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this
home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification
surveys.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
ALM Inspection Grade
C
75 / 100
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.
Based on state-published inspection data
Category breakdown
Health citationsConcern›
9 health citations · 9× more than the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 1)
Life safety citationsStrong›
2 life safety citations · 2× fewer than the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 4)
The Inspection Grade is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade — a
0–100 score (shown as a letter) of a facility's regulatory inspection record,
compared with other state-licensed facilities in Texas. It is built from several categories, each carrying a
weighted share — ranking better than that group raises the grade, worse lowers it. Serious
problems weigh more than clean marks, so one severe issue costs more than a good record earns.
It is not a government rating. CMS and state health agencies publish the underlying
inspection records; the grade is our own calculation from them, and no regulator endorses or reviews it.
How the score is actually built — the categories, what share of the grade each one
carries, the exact measure behind it, and how the pieces combine — is set out in the
Methodology panel. This page covers what the grade is, what it is not, and when we
decline to publish one.
It covers inspections, and nothing else. This grade reads a facility's regulatory
inspection record. It does not measure staffing levels, clinical quality, food, activities, or what
residents and families think of the place. A facility with a strong inspection record can still be
a poor fit, and a weaker record is a reason to ask questions rather than a verdict.
Not every facility is graded on the same categories. Which categories exist at all
depends on what a facility's regulator publishes — fines and problem-resolution data, for instance, are
collected only at the federal level, so they are never part of a state-licensed facility's grade. A
grade can even rest on a single category when that is the only inspection data on
record. It reflects what we can actually verify, and a facility is never marked down for data that
does not exist for it. The Methodology panel lists the categories this facility is
graded on.
The period we look at. Where a state publishes its own inspection record, the grade
follows that record and the period the state reports on. Where we grade from inspection reports we have read
ourselves, the grade covers the last five years. CMS-certified
nursing homes are graded on the current records CMS publishes. Either way, old findings age out: a
facility isn't judged forever on a problem it has long since fixed.
Data quality. We weigh every category by how much verified data we actually have —
federal CMS inspection records count fully, a state's own published record counts nearly as much, and reports read by our AI count for less. When a
record is thin, we grade more cautiously and won't publish a damaging grade we can't stand behind.
The scale. It's set so a typical facility lands around a B+. Most homes are fine;
C, D, or F is a genuine warning flag worth a closer look.
Methodology
How the grade is built for state-licensed facilities in Texas
Every measure below is compared against other state-licensed facilities in Texas — a facility's
position among its peers, not a fixed target. Each category starts at
78, the neutral point, and a measure
moves it up or down according to where the facility ranks.
Citations56% of grade
Health citationsCitations about resident care and the running of the home, counted as a total. Texas publishes no inspection tally, so there is no per-inspection rate to compute; the count is compared with other state-licensed Texas facilities as it stands.100% of this category · can add or subtract
Life safety24% of grade
Life safety citationsCitations about the building rather than the care — fire safety, exits, alarms, sprinklers. Kept as its own category and weighted lighter than health findings, because a building fault and a care fault are not the same thing and Texas records about four times as many of the former.100% of this category · can add or subtract
Enforcement actions20% of grade
Enforcement actionsActions the state took against the facility — in Texas, administrative penalties. Counted, not valued: the register records how many were issued, never how much they cost. A clean record here earns nothing, because most facilities have none; a facility with actions on record is marked down against those that do not.100% of this category · can only subtract — a clean record here earns nothing
The categories are averaged, each weighted by the share shown above, giving a score out of 100.
Those shares assume every category has data behind it: where one is missing — because the
regulator publishes nothing for it — that category is left out and the remaining ones take its
share, rather than the facility being marked down for the gap.
A result above 78 is then pulled back toward it in
proportion to how complete the facility's record is, so a high grade cannot rest on thin evidence.
A recent serious finding can cap the result regardless of the categories. The number is finally
published on a 0–100 scale where a typical facility sits in the 70s and 80s.
The letter comes from cut-offs set within
Texas — so every
facility is compared only with state-licensed facilities in Texas.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. TX average
4 Worse
Metrics worse than Texas average:
• Total citations (38% above)
• Health citations (125% above)
• Enforcement actions (400% above)
• Inspections with citations (100% above)
1 Better
Metrics better than Texas average:
• Life safety citations (67% below)
Citations Citations are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.
This Facility
TX Average
vs. TX Avg
Total citations Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
11
8.0
This facility has 38% more total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (11 vs. TX avg 8).↑ 38% worse
Health citations Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
9
4.0
This facility has 125% more health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (9 vs. TX avg 4).↑ 125% worse
Life safety citations Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
2
6.0
This facility has 67% fewer life safety citations than a typical Texas nursing home (2 vs. TX avg 6).↓ 67% better
Enforcement actions Formal penalties the state issued against this facility. In Texas these are administrative penalties, recorded by the Health and Human Services Commission. Recorded July 10, 2024.
1
0.2
This facility has 400% more enforcement actions than a typical Texas nursing home (1 vs. TX avg 0.2).↑ 400% worse
Inspections State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.
This Facility
TX Average
vs. TX Avg
Inspections with citations Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
2
1.0
This facility has 100% more inspections with citations than a typical Texas nursing home (2 vs. TX avg 1).↑ 100% worse
Since 2023 · 3 years of data · Last health inspection May 2026
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or
Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4↓ 49% · TX 7.9This facility: 4, 49% below the Texas average of 7.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18Rank#66 / 234Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 66th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 66th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 35% · TX 27.7This facility: 18, 35% below the Texas average of 27.7 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4.5Rank#206 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 206th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 206th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 23% · TX 3.65This facility: 4.5, 23% above the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Bar = mix of this home's 18 citations, not a state comparison
Moderate (D–F, no harm, more than minimal risk): 18 citations, corrected
Lighter shade = corrected
CriticalJ–L
0↓ 100% · TX 1.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 1.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
SeriousG–I
0↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
ModerateD–F
18↓ 28% · TX 24.9This facility: 18, 28% below the Texas average of 24.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
MinorA–C
0↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 6 of 18 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 06, 20261 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Dec 04, 202510 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Sep 19, 20245 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Jul 27, 20232 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Pharmacy Services6 deficiencies (33%)
Quality of Life & Care4 deficiencies (22%)
Nutrition & Dietary3 deficiencies (17%)
Infection Control1 deficiency (6%)
Resident Rights1 deficiency (6%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation1 deficiency (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious).
Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Clean record
Aug 2023202420252026Aug 2026
Total fines
$0TX avg $66KTexas average: $65,686. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0TX avg 2.16Texas average: 2.16. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
Data as of Aug 2026 · CMS Care Compare
High-risk clinical eventsAverage of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.13.8Score · lower is better↑ 74% · TX 7.9This facility: 13.8, 74% above the TX average of 7.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Functional declineAverage of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.22.0Score · lower is better↑ 52% · TX 14.5This facility: 22.0, 52% above the TX average of 14.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
11 long-stay measures:5 better, 4 worse, 2 near TX average
3 short-stay measures:3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
TX average
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activitiesPercent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased23.8%↑ 50% · TX 15.8This facility: 23.8, 50% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsenedPercent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened32.1%↑ 130% · TX 14.0This facility: 32.1, 130% above the TX average of 14.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder10.1%↓ 25% · TX 13.4This facility: 10.1, 25% below the TX average of 13.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infectionPercent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%↓ 100% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injuryPercent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury4.2%↑ 27% · TX 3.3This facility: 4.2, 27% above the TX average of 3.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers3.4%↓ 11% · TX 3.8This facility: 3.4, 11% below the TX average of 3.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Physical & mental health
Lost too much weightPercent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%↑ 81% · TX 3.0This facility: 5.5, 81% above the TX average of 3.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptomsPercent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms0.8%↓ 66% · TX 2.4This facility: 0.8, 66% below the TX average of 2.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic usePercent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication6.9%↓ 28% · TX 9.6This facility: 6.9, 28% below the TX average of 9.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine100.0%↑ 4% · TX 96.5This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine100.0%↑ 2% · TX 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the TX average of 98.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
TX average
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medicationPercent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication0.0%↓ 100% · TX 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 1.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine100.0%↑ 13% · TX 88.9This facility: 100.0, 13% above the TX average of 88.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine97.8%↑ 11% · TX 88.0This facility: 97.8, 11% above the TX average of 88.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Breakdown by payment type
Medicare
36% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Typical stay3 - 4 months
Private pay
59% of new residents, often for short stays.
Typical stay10 months
Medicaid
5% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Typical stay9 - 10 months
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics
(Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents43
Medicare
10
23.3% of residents
Medicaid
3
7% of residents
Private pay or other
30
69.8% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for Treemont Health Care Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 09/2023 — the home's most recent complete cost report, an older period than most facilities report.
Net Patient Income-$533.1K↑ ~$350.7K vs 2022
Payroll Costs$3.1M↓ ~$135.6K vs 2022
Operating Margin-10.5%↑ 6.3pp vs 2022
Financial Performance
Net patient revenueOperating expensesNet patient income
Payroll & Labor Costs
SalariesStaff salaries from the home's own payroll records.Wage CostsWage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement. Together with salaries, these make up payroll.Contract LaborPay for temporary or agency staff. Counted under other operating costs, not payroll.
Payer Mix (percentage)
MedicareMedicaidPrivate Pay/Other
Metric
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Occupancy %
57.4%
56.0%
59.3%
58.5%
60.8%
61.3%
55.6%
58.3%
56.6%
61.0%
50.7%
55.6%
51.4%
Beds
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
Net Income
-$167,427
$248,565
$50,983
$165,874
$148,120
$10,687
$1,558
-$255,960
-$16,794
$261,099
-$586,538
-$785,498
-$464,339
Gross Revenue
$5,126,959
$6,089,725
$5,632,114
$5,965,593
$5,973,074
$6,076,705
$6,184,833
$6,064,354
$5,915,972
$6,581,253
$5,594,035
$5,276,588
$5,087,589
Operating Expenses
$5,294,385
$5,841,160
$5,581,131
$5,799,719
$5,824,954
$6,066,018
$6,183,275
$6,320,314
$5,932,766
$6,320,154
$6,180,573
$6,160,404
$5,620,705
Net Patient Income
-$167,427
$248,565
$50,983
$165,874
$148,120
$10,687
$1,558
-$255,960
-$16,794
$261,099
-$586,538
-$883,816
-$533,116
Net Patient Revenue
$5,126,958
$6,089,725
$5,632,114
$5,965,593
$5,973,074
$6,076,705
$6,184,833
$6,064,354
$5,915,972
$6,581,253
$5,594,035
$5,276,588
$5,087,589
Payroll Costs
$2,425,931
$2,466,263
$2,493,853
$2,544,476
$2,639,782
$2,892,243
$3,018,136
$3,230,830
$3,088,626
$3,456,123
$3,132,679
$3,252,789
$3,117,166
Operating Margin %
-3.3%
4.1%
0.9%
2.8%
2.5%
0.2%
0.0%
-4.2%
-0.3%
4.0%
-10.5%
-16.8%
-10.5%
Medicare %
11.6%
18.7%
17.2%
18.2%
17.2%
16.8%
16.1%
13.9%
12.6%
10.7%
10.2%
5.9%
4.8%
Medicaid %
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.7%
16.7%
19.2%
15.2%
7.9%
11.0%
18.0%
Private %
88.4%
81.3%
82.8%
81.8%
82.8%
83.2%
72.2%
69.5%
68.2%
74.0%
81.9%
83.2%
77.2%
Net Patient Revenue/Day
$197
$240
$210
$225
$217
$218
$246
$230
$231
$238
$244
$210
$219
Cost/Day
$204
$230
$208
$219
$212
$218
$246
$239
$232
$228
$269
$245
$242
Avg Length of Stay
125.5 days
100.4 days
103.9 days
108.6 days
110.0 days
98.7 days
87.0 days
107.8 days
135.7 days
117.2 days
73.4 days
134.1 days
161.3 days
Finances and operations
Based on the home's most recent complete CMS SNF Cost Report — fiscal year ending in 09/2023. This is an older period than most facilities report, so compare with that in mind.
For-profit
Operated by a limited liability company.
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$5.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$533.1K*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
For-profit Operated by a limited liability company.
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$5.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$533.1K*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Payroll costsStaff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
$3.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
61.3% of net patient revenue
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Other operating costsEverything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$2.5M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Total costsThe home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$5.6M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
Certification details
CMS Certification Number:676009
Owner Name:Treemont Care, LLC
Rural vs. Urban:Urban
County:Harris
Type of Control:For-profit — Operated by a limited liability company.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and State data
How we calculate these figures
We use the home's most recent CMS SNF Cost Report — the annual financial statement every Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home is required to file — to show how it earns and spends on resident care.
This includes
Net patient revenue — what the home collects for resident care after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts.
Payroll — staff salaries plus wage-related benefits. Contract and agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Net patient income — what's left after the home's total operating expenses.
How we calculate net patient income and payroll %
Net patient income is net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. Payroll % is payroll divided by net patient revenue — the share of each revenue dollar that goes to staff pay.
Net patient revenue vs. other income
Net patient revenue is money earned from resident care only. Anything the home earns outside of care — investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources — is reported separately as other income. Other income is not part of net patient revenue, and it is not included in net patient income.
Who this home usually serves
TYPE OF STAY
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (59% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 10 months.
Admissions
22 total
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Medicare36%
Private pay59%
Medicaid5%
Discharges
30 total
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Medicare36%
Private pay59%
Medicaid5%
How we assess these insights
We analyze official CMS data on admissions and discharges to understand the types of residents a nursing home most often serves.
This includes
Medicare, Medicaid, and private-pay admissions and discharges
Number of nights covered by each payment type
Typical length of stay
How length of stay is calculated
Average length of stay comes from the facility's Medicare cost report: total resident days in the year divided by total discharges, across all residents and payment types. Homes that mostly provide long-term care show long averages, because few residents leave in a given year.
Places of interest near Treemont Health Care Center
9.8 miles from city center Estimated distance in miles from Houston's city center to Treemont Health Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.35 miles to nearest hospital (Medical Profiles Inc)
Quick search
Calculate Travel Distance to Treemont Health Care Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Houston
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This TableAL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 68.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
$5.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
$3.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
61.3%*Fiscal year ending 09/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.
676009
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Covers Part B premiums ($174.70/month)Deductibles ($240/year)Copays (~20%)
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
Texas Family Caregiver Support Program
Age—
GeneralCaregivers of 60+ needing care or 55+ caregivers of others; TX resident; 2+ ADLs.
Income Limits (2025)No strict cap; prioritizes low-income~$24,980/year
Asset LimitsNot assessed.
TX
High rural demand; includes grandparent caregivers.
Benefits
Respite (4-6 hours/week or 5 days/year)Adult day care ($60/day)TrainingSupplies (~$500/year)
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
Texas VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound
Age65+ or disabled veteran/spouse
GeneralTX resident, wartime service, ADL help (A&A) or homebound.
Income Limits (2025)Net income < ~$1,984/month (veteran with dependent, A&A); pension offsets income.
Asset Limits~$155,356net worth
TX
High veteran population; supports rural/urban needs.
Benefits
Cash (~$1,433-$2,642/month veteran, ~$951-$1,318 spouse) for care costs
Property Tax Exemption for Seniors
Texas Senior Property Tax Exemption
Age65+
GeneralTX resident, homeowner (homestead).
Income Limits (2025)None; tax-based eligibility.
Asset LimitsNot assessed.
TX
$25,000+ exemption; optional freeze in some counties; saves ~$500-$1,000/year.
Benefits
Tax exemption or freeze (~$500-$1,000/year savings)
Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP)
Texas SFMNP
Age60+
GeneralTX resident, low-income.
Income Limits (2025)~$2,322/month185% FPL
Asset LimitsNot assessed.
TX
Vouchers (~$50/season); serves ~20,000 via 28 AAAs.
Benefits
Vouchers (~$50/season) for produce at farmers’ markets
Frequently Asked Questions about Treemont Health Care Center
What neighborhood is Treemont Health Care Center in?
Treemont Health Care Center is in the Mid West neighborhood of Houston.
Who is the owner of Treemont Health Care Center?
Treemont Health Care Center is legally operated by Treemont Care, LLC.
Is Treemont Health Care Center in a walkable area?
Treemont Health Care Center has a walk score of 58. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Treemont Health Care Center?
Treemont Health Care Center's occupancy is 70.1%.
Are pets allowed at Treemont Health Care Center?
No, Treemont Health Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Does Treemont Health Care Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Treemont Health Care Center is registered as a for-profit in TX.
What is the overall rating for Treemont Health Care Center?
Treemont Health Care Center received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
78
78 employees · 0 contractors · 31 on an average day 
100% corrected 
