5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Buckner Parkway Place in Houston, TX, provides independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home services, and respite stays. Independent living delivers private residences paired with community conveniences, while assisted living supports residents with routine tasks like bathing, dressing, and managing medication. Secured memory care housing features dedicated oversight for individuals prone to wandering, and 24-hour licensed medical coverage is available in the nursing care division. Respite stays give family caregivers a short-term break.
Operated by Buckner Retirement Services under administrator Andrea Carr, the campus accommodates 42 beds. Living units come in one-bedroom and two-bedroom arrangements, making them suitable for individuals or couples. Medicare and private pay are accepted, and total nurse staffing averages 4 hours and 17 minutes per resident per day.
Community life features organized group outings, fitness programs, Bible studies, social gatherings, movie nights, and wellness initiatives, alongside pet-friendly policies. A walk score of 81 makes the area convenient for walking to nearby shops, pharmacies, and local cafes.
Interested individuals can reach out to the administrative team at Buckner Parkway Place to request additional details or organize an on-site visit.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 17mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +131% above Texas average
0 of 6 metrics below Texas average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 11.5-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 11 total: 9 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
11 staff · 10.9-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 28 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
29 staff · 10-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
77
56 employees · 21 contractors · 24 on an average day
77 total staff / 38 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.03 : 1
↑ 40% · TX 1.44This facility: 2.03 staff per resident, 40% above the Texas average of 1.44 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
77 staff ÷ 38 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.9 h
↑ 10% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 8.9 h, 10% above the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
19,551 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →87.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Certified Nursing Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Qualified Social Worker (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
42
Rank #234 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 234th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #9 / 278Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 278 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #13 / 174Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 174 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 174. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 39.1 residents and 42 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Higher than the Texas average: 71.6%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
The below pricing was updated on
Buckner Parkway Place is legally operated by Buckner Retirement Services, Inc., and administered by Andrea Carr.
Sourced directly from the team at Buckner Parkway Place.This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 1 | 8.0 | This facility has 88% fewer total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (1 vs. TX avg 8).↓ 88% better |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 1 | 4.0 | This facility has 75% fewer health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (1 vs. TX avg 4).↓ 75% better |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties the state issued against this facility. In Texas these are administrative penalties, recorded by the Health and Human Services Commission.
| 0 | 0.2 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Texas nursing home (0 vs. TX avg 0.2).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has inspections with citations in line with the Texas average (1 vs. TX avg 1).— At avg |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Texas avg 27.7 (35% better than Texas average)Texas avg 3.65 (18% better than Texas average)
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected 
Texas avg 1.9 (58% worse than Texas average)Texas avg 0.4 (100% better than Texas average)Texas avg 24.9 (40% better than Texas average)Texas avg 0.4 (100% better than Texas average)
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
13 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 5 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
30% lower than Texas averageTexas average: $66K
54% fewer fines than Texas averageTexas average: 2.2
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Texas averageTexas average: 0.2
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Sep 24, 2024 · $46K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Sep 24, 2024Last updated: Aug 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
3.8
52% better than Texas averageTexas average: 7.9
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
2.8
81% better than Texas averageTexas average: 14.5
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.6%
65% better than Texas averageTexas average: 15.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 13.4%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
42% worse than Texas averageTexas average: 3.3%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
36% worse than Texas averageTexas average: 3.8%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 0.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 3.0%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 2.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 9.6%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with Texas averageTexas average: 96.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with Texas averageTexas average: 98.0%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.0%
10% better than Texas averageTexas average: 88.9%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Texas averageTexas average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
12% better than Texas averageTexas average: 88.0%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
100% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
38Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Buckner Parkway Place from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #38 / 218Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 218 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #9 / 199Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 199 nursing homes we track in Texas. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (100% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 23 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1321 Park Bayou Dr, Houston, TX 77077
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 71.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Manor of CyFair | NH SNF | Houston (White Oak Bend) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
107
Rank
#96 / 258 |
90.4%
Facility
90.4%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#20 / 174 | +26% | 3.07
Facility
3.07
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#161 / 234 | +82% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 8
Facility
8
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#13 / 235 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#22 / 235 | - | 109 | - |
55
Facility
55
TX AVG
44
Rank
#80 / 278 | Winnie-Stowell Hospital District | $11.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$11.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#77 / 218 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#127 / 218 | 43%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
43%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#169 / 199 | 675818 | ||||
| Capstone Healthcare Estates on Orem | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Houston (Central Southwest) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
107
Rank
#96 / 258 |
78.5%
Facility
78.5%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#64 / 174 | +10% | 2.79
Facility
2.79
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#208 / 234 | -25% | -20% | $34.4k
Facility
$34.4k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#150 / 237 | 19
Facility
19
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#80 / 235 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#42 / 235 | 1 | 94 | - |
55
Facility
55
TX AVG
44
Rank
#80 / 278 | - | $9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#89 / 218 | $4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#136 / 218 | 44.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#167 / 199 | 676314 | ||||
| Buckner Parkway Place | NH AL IL MC RC | Houston (Energy Corridor) | 42
Facility
42
TX AVG
107
Rank
#234 / 258 |
93.1%
Facility
93.1%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#13 / 174 | +30% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#39 / 234 | +2% | +23% | $45.7k
Facility
$45.7k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#171 / 237 | 18
Facility
18
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#68 / 235 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#88 / 235 | 3 | 39 | - |
81
Facility
81
TX AVG
44
Rank
#9 / 278 | Buckner Retirement Services, Inc | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#184 / 218 | $8.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#38 / 218 | 136.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
136.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#9 / 199 | 675777 | ||||
| Courtyard Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH RC SNF | Houston (Southeast Houston) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
107
Rank
#96 / 258 |
57.5%
Facility
57.5%
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#142 / 174 | -20% | 3.28
Facility
3.28
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#121 / 234 | -58% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 18
Facility
18
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#68 / 235 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#228 / 235 | 1 | 69 | - |
73
Facility
73
TX AVG
44
Rank
#24 / 278 | Stanwick Senior Care LLC | $6.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 59.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 455613 | ||||
| Clarewood House Assisted Living | NH AL IL MC SNF | Houston (Sharpstown) | 90
Facility
90
TX AVG
107
Rank
#173 / 258 | - | - | 0.44
Facility
0.44
TX AVG
3.49
Rank
#234 / 234 | -29% | -87% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 237 | 5
Facility
5
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#4 / 235 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#9 / 235 | - | 35 | - |
50
Facility
50
TX AVG
44
Rank
#111 / 278 | Clarewood House, Inc | $7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$9.4M
Rank
#153 / 218 | $6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#54 / 218 | 84.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
84.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
71.6%
Rank
#21 / 199 | 676021 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Buckner Parkway Place is located in Houston, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
Buckner Parkway Place is in the Energy Corridor neighborhood of Houston.
Buckner Parkway Place is legally operated by Buckner Retirement Services, Inc., and administered by Andrea Carr.
Buckner Parkway Place has a walk score of 81. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
According to TX state health department records, Buckner Parkway Place's license number is 149591.
Buckner Parkway Place's occupancy is 93.1%.
Yes, Buckner Parkway Place allows residents to bring their pets.
The team at Buckner Parkway Place can be reached at brslicense@buckner.org.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
