Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
71 employees · 13 contractors · 28 on an average day Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Germantown, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Germantown, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 14 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is a nursing home in Germantown, WI, providing skilled nursing and hospice care. Skilled nursing means licensed nurses are on site around the clock, while hospice supports residents receiving end of life care. Nursing home services also include rehabilitation and long term care, and respite care provides a short stay when a family’s usual caregiver needs to travel or recover.
The community has 121 beds, with 3 hours and 27 minutes of total nurse staffing per resident each day. That figure represents the combined daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Semi private suites offer shared accommodations rather than a fully private room. Physical, occupational and speech therapies support rehabilitation on site, so residents do not need to arrange therapy elsewhere, while orthopedic rehabilitation focuses on recovery related to orthopedic conditions.
Cardiac care, dementia care, respiratory care, diagnostic testing, X ray services and audiology care are also available within the nursing center, giving residents access to several medical and therapy services in one setting. An on site beauty salon and barbershop let residents arrange grooming services within the community. Medicare, Medicaid and private pay are accepted, including eligible Medicare coverage for short term skilled care, Medicaid assistance for qualifying residents and direct payment for care. Michael Spitzer serves as the administrator, and Virginia Highlands Care And Rehab Center operates the community. Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center may be a good fit for someone who needs skilled nursing alongside rehabilitation, hospice or specialized medical services, as well as for a family seeking short term respite care.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 125th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 27m
This nursing home is ranked 125th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 27m5 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
49m
↓ 15% · WI 58mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 15% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
35m
↓ 9% · WI 38mThis facility: 35m per resident per day, 9% below the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 3m
↓ 20% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 2h 3m per resident per day, 20% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 37 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
37 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
2m
↓ 46% · WI 4mThis facility: 2m per resident per day, 46% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 1m
↓ 19% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 3h 1m per resident per day, 19% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
40m
↑ 2% · WI 39mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 2% above the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
84
71 employees · 13 contractors · 28 on an average day
84 total staff / 49 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.71 : 1
↓ 29% · WI 2.42This facility: 1.71 staff per resident, 29% below the Wisconsin average of 2.42 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
84 staff ÷ 49 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↑ 4% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 4% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
19,651 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →92.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.1% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
121
Rank #21 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
121
Rank #21 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #151 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #151 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
25
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #154 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 154th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #154 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 154th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
42%
This home usually has availability
Based on 50.8 residents and 121 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Lower than the Wisconsin average: 71.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
70
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyWashington
CMS Certification Number525653
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Virginia Highlands Care And Rehab Center LLC, and administered by Michael Spitzer.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Orthopedic Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Cardiac Care
Audiology Care
Colostomy CareHelp caring for a colostomy, an opening in the abdomen that allows stool to leave the body into an attached pouch. Support can include pouch changes and skin care.
X-Ray Services
Respiratory Care
Dental Services
Podiatry Services
Total Parenteral Nutrition
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Psychiatric Services
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Fax(262) 251-7359
Beauty Salon
Room Types
Semi-Private / Shared Room
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
95 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
21 severity-weighted points (18 deficiencies) · 4× lower than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
26 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
7
↑ 15% · WI 6.1This facility: 7, 15% above the Wisconsin average of 6.1 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18
Rank #67 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 36% · WI 28This facility: 18, 36% below the Wisconsin average of 28 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.57
Rank #30 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 39% · WI 4.24This facility: 2.57, 39% below the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · WI 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 1.1 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
18
↓ 29% · WI 25.5This facility: 18, 29% below the Wisconsin average of 25.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 05, 2025 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 6 of 18 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 05, 2025
4 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 30, 2025
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 17, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 08, 2024
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 24, 2024
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 07, 2023
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 25, 2023
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (33%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (28%)
Quality of Life & Care
3 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (11%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (6%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
6 of 18 citations resulted from standard inspections; 11 of 18 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 18 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
WI avg $95KWisconsin average: $94,855. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
WI avg 2.02Wisconsin average: 2.02. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.7Wisconsin average: 0.7. Average among the 148 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 32% · WI 3.0This facility: 4.0, 32% above the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 4% · WI 2.9This facility: 3.0, 4% above the WI average of 2.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 38% · WI 9.4This facility: 5.8, 38% below the WI average of 9.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 41% · WI 19.8This facility: 11.6, 41% below the WI average of 19.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse, 1 near WI average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse, 2 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.3%
↓ 48% · WI 16.1This facility: 8.3, 48% below the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.3%
↓ 48% · WI 16.1This facility: 8.3, 48% below the WI average of 16.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.7%
↓ 80% · WI 18.4This facility: 3.7, 80% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.7%
↓ 80% · WI 18.4This facility: 3.7, 80% below the WI average of 18.4 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9%
↓ 7% · WI 24.6This facility: 22.9, 7% below the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9%
↓ 7% · WI 24.6This facility: 22.9, 7% below the WI average of 24.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 55% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.2, 55% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 55% · WI 2.7This facility: 1.2, 55% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 45% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.8, 45% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 45% · WI 3.3This facility: 1.8, 45% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
↑ 5% · WI 5.0This facility: 5.3, 5% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
↑ 5% · WI 5.0This facility: 5.3, 5% above the WI average of 5.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7%
↑ 92% · WI 5.1This facility: 9.7, 92% above the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7%
↑ 92% · WI 5.1This facility: 9.7, 92% above the WI average of 5.1 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.0%
↑ 305% · WI 5.7This facility: 23.0, 305% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.0%
↑ 305% · WI 5.7This facility: 23.0, 305% above the WI average of 5.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.4%
↓ 22% · WI 15.8This facility: 12.4, 22% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.4%
↓ 22% · WI 15.8This facility: 12.4, 22% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 3% · WI 95.7This facility: 98.8, 3% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 3% · WI 95.7This facility: 98.8, 3% above the WI average of 95.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · WI 95.0This facility: 100.0, 5% above the WI average of 95.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
76.7%
↑ 43% · US 53.7This facility: 76.7, 43% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
76.7%
↑ 43% · US 53.7This facility: 76.7, 43% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.6%
↑ 6% · US 50.6This facility: 53.6, 6% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.6%
↑ 6% · US 50.6This facility: 53.6, 6% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.3%
↑ 2% · WI 86.5This facility: 88.3, 2% above the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.3%
↑ 2% · WI 86.5This facility: 88.3, 2% above the WI average of 86.5 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1%
↑ 14% · WI 82.2This facility: 94.1, 14% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1%
↑ 14% · WI 82.2This facility: 94.1, 14% above the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.7%
↑ 48% · WI 22.7This facility: 33.7, 48% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.7%
↑ 48% · WI 22.7This facility: 33.7, 48% above the WI average of 22.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.4%
↓ 4% · WI 15.0This facility: 14.4, 4% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.4%
↓ 4% · WI 15.0This facility: 14.4, 4% below the WI average of 15.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−2.2% operating margin
−12.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
46.0% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #132 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue fell $0.7M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $7.6M | −$0.7M | Trend 20162024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #93 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 93rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 44% of homes | Below WI median Higher net patient revenue than 44% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.7M | +$0.3M | Trend 20162024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | −$1.0M | Trend 20162024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −2.2% | −12.0 pts | Trend 20162024 | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.1M | −$1.0M | Trend — | WI median — | Rank in WI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20162024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #117 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 29% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 29% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 46.0% | +4.6 pts | Trend 20162024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #132 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | 12.7 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022no report | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.6M | $8.6M | $7.8M | $7.6M | $8.4M | $7.8M | $8.2M | $7.6M | |
| Operating expenses | $7.3M | $8.6M | $8.3M | $8.2M | $8.3M | $8.0M | $7.4M | $7.7M | |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | −$0.0M | −$0.5M | −$0.5M | $0.1M | −$0.2M | $0.8M | −$0.2M | |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | −0.5% | −6.2% | −7.1% | 1.0% | −2.1% | 9.8% | −2.2% | |
| Net income | $0.3M | −$0.0M | −$0.5M | −$0.5M | $1.1M | $0.2M | $0.8M | −$0.1M | |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M | $4.6M | $4.5M | $4.4M | $4.7M | $4.3M | $3.4M | $3.5M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 52.2% | 53.3% | 58.2% | 57.6% | 56.1% | 54.3% | 41.4% | 46.0% | |
| Beds | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | |
| Gross revenue | $20.8M | $24.3M | $21.6M | $19.8M | $21.1M | $17.7M | $8.4M | $8.0M | |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $4.0M | $4.0M | $3.8M | $4.2M | $3.5M | $3.1M | $3.1M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.8M | $0.3M | $0.4M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.5M | $0.5M | |
| Other operating costs | $3.3M | $4.1M | $3.7M | $3.8M | $3.6M | $3.7M | $4.0M | $4.2M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $244 | $250 | $253 | $261 | $291 | $329 | $357 | $392 | |
| Cost per day | $234 | $251 | $268 | $279 | $288 | $336 | $322 | $401 | |
| Average length of stay | 87.9 days | 74.2 days | 67.5 days | 80.2 days | 64.9 days | 54.1 days | 80.0 days | 70.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
272 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
55 · 20%
Medicaid
19 · 7%
Private pay & other
198 · 73%
Resident snapshot
49 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 8%
Medicaid
18 · 37%
Private pay & other
27 · 55%
Leaving
274 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
48 · 18%
Medicaid
30 · 11%
Private pay & other
196 · 72%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Germantown's city center to Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.63 miles to nearest hospital (Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Germantown
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WI Dept. of Health Services (DHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Official facility name used in federal/state reporting (may differ slightly from the marketing name).
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Estimated monthly cost range for the facility.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Housing or bed configuration options (e.g. studio, shared), often from facility-reported amenities and licensing details.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH HOS SNF | Germantown (Village Of Germantown) | - | 121
Facility
121
WI AVG
78
Rank
#21 / 197 | - |
25
Facility
25
WI AVG
48
Rank
#151 / 191 | - |
| Menomonee Falls Health Services | NH SNF | Menomonee Falls | - | 50
Facility
50
WI AVG
78
Rank
#114 / 197 | - |
33
Facility
33
WI AVG
48
Rank
#134 / 191 | - |
| LindenGrove Menomonee Falls | NH SNF | Menomonee Falls | - | 73
Facility
73
WI AVG
78
Rank
#103 / 197 | - |
10
Facility
10
WI AVG
48
Rank
#176 / 191 | - |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WI nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is located in Germantown, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center in?
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is in the Village of Germantown neighborhood of Germantown.
02 Who is the owner of Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Virginia Highlands Care And Rehab Center LLC, and administered by Michael Spitzer.
03 Is Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 25. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 42%.
05 Are pets allowed at Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center?
No, Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center is registered as a for-profit in WI.
07 Who is the administrator of Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Michael Spitzer is the administrator of Virginia Highlands Health and Rehabilitation Center.
Updated on
