5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Enjoy your best years at Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community, an outstanding community in Manhattan, KS, offering independent living. Featuring beautifully designed and spacious one- to three-bedroom floor plans, the community ensures residents are comfortable and safe. A hassle-free living is also guaranteed, especially with maintenance services and convenient apartment features.
Thriving local shops and recreational spaces surround the area, providing residents with unending leisure and wellness opportunities. Residents also enjoy various dining options with delightful restaurants in the area. The community is ideal for those looking to live independently in retirement, especially with its warm and welcoming environment.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 14th out of 141 homes in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 3m per day | ▲ 48% State avg: 42m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 39m per day | ▼ 3% State avg: 40m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 3h 5m per day | ▲ 15% State avg: 2h 41m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 16m per day | ▲ 17% State avg: 3h 38m per day · National avg: 3h 27m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 3m per day | ▲ 24% State avg: 2m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 46m per day | ▲ 58% State avg: 29m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 29 | 100 | This facility has 71% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (29 vs. KS avg 100).↓ 71% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 5.8 | 4 | This facility has 45% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (5.8 vs. KS avg 4).↑ 45% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 5 | 25 | This facility has had 80% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (5 vs. KS avg 25). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 80% fewer |
State average 4.5
Last Health inspection on Apr 2025
State average 26.9
State average 6.07
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
28 of 30 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 30 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than State averageState average: 0.9
11% worse than State averageState average: 0.9
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
16% more staff per resident than Kansas average
12% worse than Kansas average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 32 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
32
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.4 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 20 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
20
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 173 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
173
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
6.4 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
2,556 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 173 | 0 | 173 | 25,008 | 92 | 100% | 6.4 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 39 | 0 | 39 | 9,322 | 92 | 100% | 7 |
| Registered Nurse | 32 | 0 | 32 | 8,022 | 92 | 100% | 8.4 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 20 | 0 | 20 | 7,157 | 92 | 100% | 7.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 7 | 0 | 7 | 3,138 | 66 | 72% | 7.9 |
| Dental Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 744 | 41 | 45% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 6 | 6 | 708 | 72 | 78% | 4.2 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 4 | 4 | 570 | 64 | 70% | 4.3 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 536 | 66 | 72% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 531 | 66 | 72% | 4.6 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 520 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 520 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 3 | 3 | 491 | 74 | 80% | 4.7 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 476 | 63 | 68% | 7.5 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 414 | 61 | 66% | 6.8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 257 | 70 | 76% | 3.4 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 5 | 0 | 5 | 109 | 14 | 15% | 6.8 |
Includes penalties issued in 2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
81% lower than Kansas averageKansas average: $44K
59% fewer fines than Kansas averageKansas average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Kansas averageKansas average: 0.3
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Feb 3, 2025 · $8K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 3, 2025Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
10.1
In line with Kansas averageKansas average: 10.5
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
18.7
10% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 20.7
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.3%
In line with Kansas averageKansas average: 19.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.4%
15% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 19.4%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.5%
10% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 23.8%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
8% worse than Kansas averageKansas average: 4.4%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
16% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 4.6%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
In line with Kansas averageKansas average: 3.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.0%
38% worse than Kansas averageKansas average: 5.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
85% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 5.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
In line with Kansas averageKansas average: 16.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.8%
9% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 91.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.1%
In line with Kansas averageKansas average: 95.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
32% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 75.6%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 2.2%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
29% better than Kansas averageKansas average: 73.5%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
37% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
45% of new residents, often for short stays.
18% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
117Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community from 2012–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 06/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 06/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #4 / 143Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 4th out of 143 homes in Kansas for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Kansas average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Kansas that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #108 / 143Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 108th out of 143 homes in Kansas for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Kansas average. Well-run Kansas facilities typically land around 57–67% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Kansas that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
No pets allowed
Housing Options: 1 Bed / 2 Bed / 3 Bed
Building Type: 3-story
Beauty Services
Transportation Services
Exercise Programs
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
New residents most often arrive under private pay (45% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 8 - 9 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Manhattan's city center to Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Ascension Living Via Christi Village McLean | NH AL IL MC SNF | Wichita (Indian Hills) | 95
Facility
95
KS AVG
69
Rank
#43 / 223 |
33.7%
Facility
33.7%
KS AVG
76.8
Rank
#199 / 206 | -56% | 4.47
Facility
4.47
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#72 / 141 | +4% | -4% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#1 / 144 | 14
Facility
14
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#17 / 144 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#104 / 144 | 1 | 32 | - |
47
Facility
47
KS AVG
46
Rank
#186 / 363 | Abigail Poff | $7.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$7.3M
Rank
#67 / 143 | $3.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$3.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$3.3M
Rank
#78 / 143 | 44.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
44.1%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
47.9%
Rank
#130 / 143 | 175543 | ||||
| Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community | NH HC IL SNF | Manhattan (Meadowlark Road) | 134
Facility
134
KS AVG
69
Rank
#12 / 223 |
87.3%
Facility
87.3%
KS AVG
76.8
Rank
#65 / 206 | +14% | 5.72
Facility
5.72
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#14 / 141 | +3% | +24% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#65 / 144 | 30
Facility
30
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#92 / 144 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#71 / 144 | 1 | 117 | - |
28
Facility
28
KS AVG
46
Rank
#269 / 363 | Lonnie Baker | $19.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$19.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$7.3M
Rank
#4 / 143 | $17.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$17.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
$3.3M
Rank
#4 / 143 | 88.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
88.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
KS AVG
47.9%
Rank
#108 / 143 | 175174 | ||||
| Bethel Home Inc | NH IL RC SNF | Montezuma | 56
Facility
56
KS AVG
69
Rank
#116 / 223 |
89.3%
Facility
89.3%
KS AVG
76.8
Rank
#45 / 206 | +16% | 5.55
Facility
5.55
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#19 / 141 | -34% | +20% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#1 / 144 | 15
Facility
15
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#21 / 144 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#19 / 144 | 1 | 50 | - |
30
Facility
30
KS AVG
46
Rank
#260 / 363 | Bryson Nichols | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$7.3M
Rank
#76 / 143 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$3.3M
Rank
#58 / 143 | 68.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
68.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
47.9%
Rank
#13 / 143 | 175528 | ||||
| Claridge Court | NH IL SNF | Prairie Village (Prairie Hills) | 45
Facility
45
KS AVG
69
Rank
#151 / 223 |
84.4%
Facility
84.4%
KS AVG
76.8
Rank
#84 / 206 | +10% | 4.31
Facility
4.31
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#87 / 141 | +15% | -7% | $18.0k
Facility
$18.0k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#94 / 144 | 19
Facility
19
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#48 / 144 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#87 / 144 | 1 | 38 | A+ |
64
Facility
64
KS AVG
46
Rank
#77 / 363 | Emily Filla | $13.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$7.3M
Rank
#45 / 143 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$3.3M
Rank
#25 / 143 | 51.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
51.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
47.9%
Rank
#18 / 143 | 175343 | ||||
| Mennonite Friendship Communities Inc | NH AL IL SNF | South Hutchinson | 100
Facility
100
KS AVG
69
Rank
#36 / 223 |
68.0%
Facility
68.0%
KS AVG
76.8
Rank
#158 / 206 | -12% | 4.67
Facility
4.67
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#58 / 141 | -68% | +1% | $14.5k
Facility
$14.5k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#86 / 144 | 24
Facility
24
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#71 / 144 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#71 / 144 | - | 68 | - |
35
Facility
35
KS AVG
46
Rank
#240 / 363 | Mennonite Friendship Communities, Inc | $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$7.3M
Rank
#29 / 143 | $6.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$3.3M
Rank
#23 / 143 | 63.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
63.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
47.9%
Rank
#50 / 143 | 175379 |
Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community is in the Meadowlark Road neighborhood of Manhattan.
Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community has a walk score of 28. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community's occupancy is 126.3%.
Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community has been operating for approximately 51 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community has a no-pet policy.
Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community is registered as a non-profit in KS.
Yes — there are 7 photos of Meadowlark Hills Retirement Community in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
