Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
83
83 employees · 0 contractors · 36 on an average day Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cedar Hill, MO
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cedar Hill, MO
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation keeps three care types in Cedar Hill, MO. Skilled nursing, memory care, and nursing home care are the set. Memory care is the secured, supervised setting, and it works beside the nursing oversight in one building.
Staffing is a 24-hour arrangement, so the hours nobody schedules get covered along with the ones they do. That combination suits a person needing memory support and clinical attention at once.
There are 150 beds, and Short and Long term Care is a named program next to rehabilitation services. The short version covers a temporary recovery stay; the long version covers an actual move. Nursing time per resident is 2 hours and 5 minutes a day.
Medicare’s part is the skilled stretch that comes once a hospital is done. Medicaid steps in for an eligible resident whose savings will not reach across a long stay. Private pay puts the cost on the household, and every one of the three is accepted. Forrest Opco owns the operation, with Sharon Wooten as administrator on-site.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 256th out of 266 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 5m
This nursing home is ranked 256th out of 266 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 5mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +67% above Missouri average
4 of 6 metrics below Missouri average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 11.1-hour shifts
17m
↓ 41% · MO 28mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 41% below the Missouri average of 28m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 11.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
32m
↓ 22% · MO 41mThis facility: 32m per resident per day, 22% below the Missouri average of 41m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
1h 17m
↓ 45% · MO 2h 19mThis facility: 1h 17m per resident per day, 45% below the Missouri average of 2h 19m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↑ 67% · MO 2mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 67% above the Missouri average of 2m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
1h 46m
↓ 42% · MO 3h 3mThis facility: 1h 46m per resident per day, 42% below the Missouri average of 3h 3m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
22m
↑ 8% · MO 20mThis facility: 22m per resident per day, 8% above the Missouri average of 20m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
83
83 employees · 0 contractors · 36 on an average day
83 total staff / 86 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
0.97 : 1
↓ 42% · MO 1.66This facility: 0.97 staff per resident, 42% below the Missouri average of 1.66 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
83 staff ÷ 86 residents
See full Missouri ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↑ 1% · MO 8.1 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 1% above the Missouri average of 8.1 h (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
27,038 staff hours this quarter
See full Missouri ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Missouri average: 92.5% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #45 / 288Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #45 / 288Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #77 / 167Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Missouri for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Missouri facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #77 / 167Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 77th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Missouri for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Missouri facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
1
year
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #260 / 297Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 260th out of 297 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #260 / 297Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 260th out of 297 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
22
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #212 / 271Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 212th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 271. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #212 / 271Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 212th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Missouri for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Missouri average, with its Statewide rank out of 271. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
55.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 83 residents and 150 beds. Source: state inspection report (Nov 2025)
Lower than the Missouri average: 67.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
969
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Nursing Facility
IssuanceFebruary 1, 2025
CountyJefferson
License Number051862
CMS Certification Number265430
Certification TypeMedicare / Medicaid
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Forrest Opco LLC, and administered by Sharon Wooten.
Corporate EntityFORREST OPCO LLC
Owner NameForrest Opco LLC
Skilled Nursing Facility
150 units
Total beds
150 units
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
74 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
9 points below the Missouri average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
132 severity-weighted points (55 deficiencies) · 49% higher than the typical CMS-certified MO facility (median: 89)
Enforcement
Concern
5 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified MO facility (median: 0) · $29,491 in fines
Persistence
Typical
43 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MO facility (median: 42)
Total health inspections
10
↑ 52% · MO 6.6This facility: 10, 52% above the MO average of 6.6 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
55
Rank #231 / 273Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 231st out of 273 nursing homes we track in Missouri for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Missouri State average, with a ranking across all 273 MO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 52% · MO 36.1This facility: 55, 52% above the MO average of 36.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.5
Rank #159 / 273Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 159th out of 273 nursing homes we track in Missouri for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Missouri mean across 273 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · MO 5.6This facility: 5.5, 2% below the MO average of 5.6 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
55 of 55 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 67% · MO 0.6This facility: 1, 67% above the MO average of 0.6 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MO 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the MO average of 1.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
51
↑ 53% · MO 33.3This facility: 51, 53% above the MO average of 33.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
3
↑ 173% · MO 1.1This facility: 3, 173% above the MO average of 1.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Nov 18, 2025 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 15 of 55 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Nov 18, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 02, 2025
18 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 06, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 13, 2024
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 30, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 23, 2024
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2024
6 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 13, 2023
1 citation
Infection Control critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 15, 2023
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 06, 2022
17 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 55 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 55 citations
Resident Rights
15 deficiencies (27%)
Quality of Life & Care
13 deficiencies (24%)
Nutrition & Dietary
8 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (9%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (7%)
Nursing & Physician Services
4 deficiencies (7%)
Environmental
4 deficiencies (7%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
46 of 55 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 9 of 55 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsPenalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
Total fines on record
$29K Rank #203 / 274Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Missouri average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 274 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
64% lower than Missouri averageMissouri average: $81K
Number of fines on record
4
107% more fines than Missouri averageMissouri average: 1.9
Payment denials on record
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
43% more payment denials than Missouri averageMissouri average: 0.7
Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility
$29K
Missouri average
$81K
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Penalties issued more than 3 years ago are included in the totals above, not in this list.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Missouri average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 10% · MO 2.7This facility: 3.0, 10% above the MO average of 2.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 53% · MO 2.1This facility: 1.0, 53% below the MO average of 2.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 45% · MO 9.8This facility: 5.4, 45% below the MO average of 9.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 49% · MO 17.8This facility: 9.1, 49% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 4 worse, 1 near MO average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 3 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.3%
↓ 65% · MO 18.1This facility: 6.3, 65% below the MO average of 18.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.3%
↓ 65% · MO 18.1This facility: 6.3, 65% below the MO average of 18.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.2%
↓ 76% · MO 17.4This facility: 4.2, 76% below the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.2%
↓ 76% · MO 17.4This facility: 4.2, 76% below the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.9%
↓ 5% · MO 17.8This facility: 16.9, 5% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.9%
↓ 5% · MO 17.8This facility: 16.9, 5% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
↓ 15% · MO 2.3This facility: 2.0, 15% below the MO average of 2.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
↓ 15% · MO 2.3This facility: 2.0, 15% below the MO average of 2.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1%
↑ 74% · MO 4.1This facility: 7.1, 74% above the MO average of 4.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1%
↑ 74% · MO 4.1This facility: 7.1, 74% above the MO average of 4.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
↓ 20% · MO 4.5This facility: 3.6, 20% below the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
↓ 20% · MO 4.5This facility: 3.6, 20% below the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6%
↑ 5% · MO 5.3This facility: 5.6, 5% above the MO average of 5.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.6%
↑ 5% · MO 5.3This facility: 5.6, 5% above the MO average of 5.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
73.0%
↑ 295% · MO 18.5This facility: 73.0, 295% above the MO average of 18.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
73.0%
↑ 295% · MO 18.5This facility: 73.0, 295% above the MO average of 18.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8%
↓ 7% · MO 23.5This facility: 21.8, 7% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8%
↓ 7% · MO 23.5This facility: 21.8, 7% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.9%
↑ 6% · MO 84.1This facility: 88.9, 6% above the MO average of 84.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.9%
↑ 6% · MO 84.1This facility: 88.9, 6% above the MO average of 84.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
↑ 4% · MO 90.9This facility: 94.7, 4% above the MO average of 90.9 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
↑ 4% · MO 90.9This facility: 94.7, 4% above the MO average of 90.9 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↑ 9% · MO 2.08This facility: 2.26, 9% above the MO average of 2.08 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↑ 9% · MO 2.08This facility: 2.26, 9% above the MO average of 2.08 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 35% · MO 2.35This facility: 1.53, 35% below the MO average of 2.35 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.53
↓ 35% · MO 2.35This facility: 1.53, 35% below the MO average of 2.35 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.0%
↑ 12% · US 53.7This facility: 60.0, 12% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
60.0%
↑ 12% · US 53.7This facility: 60.0, 12% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
40.1%
↓ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 40.1, 21% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
40.1%
↓ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 40.1, 21% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.0%
↑ 81% · MO 2.2This facility: 4.0, 81% above the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.0%
↑ 81% · MO 2.2This facility: 4.0, 81% above the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.5%
↓ 47% · MO 65.7This facility: 34.5, 47% below the MO average of 65.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.5%
↓ 47% · MO 65.7This facility: 34.5, 47% below the MO average of 65.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.2%
↓ 26% · MO 63.5This facility: 47.2, 26% below the MO average of 63.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.2%
↓ 26% · MO 63.5This facility: 47.2, 26% below the MO average of 63.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.8%
↓ 30% · MO 25.3This facility: 17.8, 30% below the MO average of 25.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.8%
↓ 30% · MO 25.3This facility: 17.8, 30% below the MO average of 25.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.6%
↓ 66% · MO 13.4This facility: 4.6, 66% below the MO average of 13.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.6%
↓ 66% · MO 13.4This facility: 4.6, 66% below the MO average of 13.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
86
Medicare
4
4.7% of residents
Medicaid
55
64% of residents
Private pay or other
27
31.4% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net Patient Income
$6.1K
↑ ~$1.0M vs 2022
Payroll Costs
$5.0M
↑ ~$136.0K vs 2022
Operating Margin
0.1%
↑ 13.7pp vs 2022
Finances and operations
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
For-profit
Operated by a limited liability company.
Net patient revenue
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$6.1KFiscal year ending 12/2024
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
For-profit
Operated by a limited liability company.
Net patient revenue
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$6.1KFiscal year ending 12/2024
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Other income
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$784Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Payroll costs
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
55.9% of net patient revenue
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Other operating costs
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$3.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
Total costs
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Reviews (1)
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation Reviews
Penny Pinson
Very awesome care my husband is there for rehabilitation from stroke very nice people.
Places of interest near Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Cedar Hill's city center to Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MO Dept. of Health & Senior Services (DHSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Missouri average is: 54.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center of St Louis | NH SNF | Saint Louis | 100
Facility
100
MO AVG
111
Rank
#151 / 288 | B+ |
90.0%
Facility
90.0%
MO AVG
67.7%
Rank
#20 / 271 | +33% | 3.91
Facility
3.91
MO AVG
3.67
Rank
#98 / 266 | -8% | +7% | $15.6k
Facility
$15.6k
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#188 / 274 | 37
Facility
37
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#173 / 273 | 7.4
Facility
7.4
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#231 / 273 | 1 | 90 | A+ |
92
Facility
92
MO AVG
50
Rank
#16 / 297 | Cmc Extended Care Center, Inc | $11.2MFiscal year ending 02/2025
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 02/2025
MO AVG
$7.4M
Rank
#61 / 249 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 02/2025
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 02/2025
MO AVG
$3.9M
Rank
#36 / 249 | 55.2%Fiscal year ending 02/2025
Facility
55.2%Fiscal year ending 02/2025
MO AVG
54.9%
Rank
#40 / 249 | 265610 | ||||
| The Manor | NH MC SNF | Poplar Bluff | 90
Facility
90
MO AVG
111
Rank
#187 / 288 | A- |
77.8%
Facility
77.8%
MO AVG
67.7%
Rank
#89 / 271 | +15% | 3.69
Facility
3.69
MO AVG
3.67
Rank
#127 / 266 | +61% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#1 / 274 | 26
Facility
26
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#112 / 273 | 8.7
Facility
8.7
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#252 / 273 | - | 70 | A+ |
67
Facility
67
MO AVG
50
Rank
#66 / 297 | Poplar Bluff No 1, Inc | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$7.4M
Rank
#172 / 249 | $2.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$3.9M
Rank
#188 / 249 | 44.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
54.9%
Rank
#185 / 249 | 265442 | ||||
| Delhaven Manor | NH SNF | Saint Louis | 156
Facility
156
MO AVG
111
Rank
#41 / 288 | B- |
38.5%
Facility
38.5%
MO AVG
67.7%
Rank
#253 / 271 | -43% | 7.54
Facility
7.54
MO AVG
3.67
Rank
#1 / 266 | +26% | +106% | $73.0k
Facility
$73.0k
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#234 / 274 | 48
Facility
48
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#212 / 273 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#115 / 273 | 1 | 60 | A+ |
92
Facility
92
MO AVG
50
Rank
#16 / 297 | Delhaven Manor No. 2, Inc | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$7.4M
Rank
#207 / 249 | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$3.9M
Rank
#178 / 249 | 59.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
54.9%
Rank
#56 / 249 | 265392 | ||||
| Lakeview Post Acute | NH HOS SNF | Florissant (Old Town Florissant) | 120
Facility
120
MO AVG
111
Rank
#73 / 288 | D- |
79.2%
Facility
79.2%
MO AVG
67.7%
Rank
#81 / 271 | +17% | 3.58
Facility
3.58
MO AVG
3.67
Rank
#138 / 266 | -48% | -2% | $242.5k
Facility
$242.5k
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#267 / 274 | 90
Facility
90
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#269 / 273 | 5.6
Facility
5.6
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#164 / 273 | 6 | 95 | A+ |
63
Facility
63
MO AVG
50
Rank
#91 / 297 | Florissant Skilled Nursing LLC | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 45.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 265838 | ||||
| Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | Cedar Hill (Meramec Township) | 150
Facility
150
MO AVG
111
Rank
#45 / 288 | C |
55.3%
Facility
55.3%
MO AVG
67.7%
Rank
#212 / 271 | -18% | 2.09
Facility
2.09
MO AVG
3.67
Rank
#256 / 266 | -38% | -43% | $29.5k
Facility
$29.5k
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#203 / 274 | 55
Facility
55
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#231 / 273 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#159 / 273 | 1 | 83 | - |
22
Facility
22
MO AVG
50
Rank
#260 / 297 | Forrest Opco LLC | $8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024 | 55.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024 | 265430 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation
What neighborhood is Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation in?
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation is in the Meramec Township neighborhood of CEDAR HILL.
Who is the owner of Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation?
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Forrest Opco LLC, and administered by Sharon Wooten.
Is Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 22. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
What is the license number of Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation?
According to MO state health department records, Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation's license number is 051862.
What is the occupancy rate at Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation?
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 55.3%.
How long has Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation been in business?
Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation?
No, Arbor View Nursing and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
