2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Madison County Nursing Home offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, and memory care in Canton, MS. Nursing home and skilled nursing provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while assisted living supports daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. The range of care may suit a resident whose needs could grow over time or who needs dementia support.
The home has 95 beds, with total nurse staffing of 5 hours and 5 minutes per resident each day. That figure represents the daily hands on nursing time assigned per resident. Rehabilitation therapies and short term rehab are available for residents who need therapy during a temporary recovery stay, rather than an ongoing residence.
A pool and fitness center give residents places on site for physical activity, and the Healthplex adds another fitness focused program. Activities include gardening, religious activities, arts and crafts, musical entertainment, and outings. Residents have scheduled ways to take part in these pursuits.
Madison County Nursing Home accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay. Medicaid can help cover care for eligible residents whose resources may not support a long stay, while Medicare covers short term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long term residence; private pay means paying directly for care. Daniel Logan serves as the administrator.
A Walk Score of 67 places the area in the somewhat walkable band, meaning some errands can be done on foot. A resident who no longer drives may be able to reach some nearby destinations independently.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 115 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 5mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +25% above Mississippi average
2 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 10 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
10 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 51 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 21 agency contractors.
51 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 80 total: 59 of the facility's own employees and 21 agency contractors.
80 staff · 8-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
164
104 employees · 60 contractors · 55 on an average day
164 total staff / 93 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.76 : 1
↑ 10% · MS 1.60This facility: 1.76 staff per resident, 10% above the Mississippi average of 1.60 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
164 staff ÷ 93 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
≈ 0% · MS 8 hThis facility: 8 h, level with the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
40,555 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →89.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (21), Licensed Practical Nurse (21), Qualified Social Worker (4), Registered Nurse (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Other Physician (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
95
Rank #52 / 126Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 126 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #9 / 123Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 123 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #12 / 117Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 117. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 93 residents and 95 beds. Source: state inspection report (Apr 2026)
Higher than the Mississippi average: 86.7%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Madison County Nursing Home is legally operated by Daniel Logan, and administered by Daniel Logan.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Mississippi, the State Department of Health, Bureau of Health Facilities Licensure conducts unannounced surveys to monitor facility compliance with health, safety, and resident rights laws.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Mississippi state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 32 | 50.0 | This facility has 36% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Mississippi nursing home (32 vs. MS avg 50).↓ 36% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.1 | 1.6 | This facility has 31% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Mississippi nursing home (1.1 vs. MS avg 1.6).↓ 31% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MS Average | vs. MS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 28 | 30.0 | This facility has had 7% fewer total inspections than the Mississippi average (28 vs. MS avg 30). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 7% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
100% corrected
14 of 14 citations corrected Latest inspection: Apr 30, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 3 of 14 citations · 6 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 14 citations resulted from standard inspections; 2 of 14 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 14 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
76% lower than Mississippi averageMississippi average: $34K
51% fewer fines than Mississippi averageMississippi average: 2.0
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Mississippi averageMississippi average: 0.2
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
May 12, 2025 · $8K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
May 12, 2025Last updated: Aug 2026
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 18% · MS 11.1This facility: 13.1, 18% above the MS average of 11.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 11% · MS 20.2This facility: 18.0, 11% below the MS average of 20.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 4 worse, 3 near MS average
1 short-stay measure: 1 worse
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.3%
↑ 23% · MS 20.5This facility: 25.3, 23% above the MS average of 20.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.4%
↑ 4% · MS 19.6This facility: 20.4, 4% above the MS average of 19.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.3%
↓ 60% · MS 20.7This facility: 8.3, 60% below the MS average of 20.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%
↑ 54% · MS 2.5This facility: 3.9, 54% above the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
↓ 74% · MS 3.1This facility: 0.8, 74% below the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
↓ 41% · MS 6.3This facility: 3.8, 41% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.1%
↑ 142% · MS 6.2This facility: 15.1, 142% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · MS 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.5%
↑ 27% · MS 21.7This facility: 27.5, 27% above the MS average of 21.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.9%
≈ 0% · MS 95.4This facility: 95.9, level with the MS average of 95.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 2% · MS 97.0This facility: 99.0, 2% above the MS average of 97.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.3%
↓ 8% · MS 88.5This facility: 81.3, 8% below the MS average of 88.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
29% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
31% of new residents, often for short stays.
40% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
93Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Madison County Nursing Home from 2012–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 09/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 09/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #8 / 110Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 110 nursing homes we track in Mississippi. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #6 / 110Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 110 nursing homes we track in Mississippi. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
New residents most often arrive under Medicaid (40% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 5 - 6 years.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Canton's city center to Madison County Nursing Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 48.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grenada Living Center | NH HOS MC PC SNF | Grenada | 90
Facility
90
MS AVG
88
Rank
#53 / 126 |
96.7%
Facility
96.7%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#13 / 117 | +11% | 4.44
Facility
4.44
MS AVG
4.86
Rank
#59 / 115 | -12% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#1 / 117 | 11
Facility
11
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#24 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#63 / 116 | - | 87 | - |
63
Facility
63
MS AVG
40
Rank
#12 / 123 | Kelly Mann | $5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#63 / 110 | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.1M
Rank
#46 / 110 | 81.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
81.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
48%
Rank
#7 / 110 | 255104 | ||||
| Care Center of Aberdeen | NH HOS MC SNF | Aberdeen | 105
Facility
105
MS AVG
88
Rank
#36 / 126 |
85.7%
Facility
85.7%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#72 / 117 | -1% | 4.37
Facility
4.37
MS AVG
4.86
Rank
#59 / 115 | +97% | -10% | $10.4k
Facility
$10.4k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#74 / 117 | 20
Facility
20
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#70 / 116 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#41 / 116 | 1 | 90 | A+ |
53
Facility
53
MS AVG
40
Rank
#33 / 123 | Allison Knight | $6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#42 / 110 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.1M
Rank
#30 / 110 | 83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
83.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
48%
Rank
#18 / 110 | 255097 | ||||
| Plaza Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Pascagoula | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#44 / 126 |
83.0%
Facility
83.0%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#84 / 117 | -4% | 4.43
Facility
4.43
MS AVG
4.86
Rank
#59 / 115 | +97% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#1 / 117 | 26
Facility
26
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#91 / 116 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#110 / 116 | 4 | 83 | A+ |
61
Facility
61
MS AVG
40
Rank
#15 / 123 | Clc Of Pascagoula LLC | $8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#45 / 110 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.1M
Rank
#40 / 110 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
48%
Rank
#39 / 110 | 255207 | ||||
| Courtyards Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Fulton | 66
Facility
66
MS AVG
88
Rank
#66 / 126 |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#18 / 117 | +10% | 4.36
Facility
4.36
MS AVG
4.86
Rank
#59 / 115 | -6% | -10% | $132.5k
Facility
$132.5k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#114 / 117 | 42
Facility
42
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#110 / 116 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#111 / 116 | 11 | 63 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
MS AVG
40
Rank
#40 / 123 | Clc Of Fulton, LLC | $6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#79 / 110 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.1M
Rank
#90 / 110 | 53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
48%
Rank
#72 / 110 | 255212 | ||||
| Madison County Nursing Home | NH AL MC SNF | Trustees Canton | 95
Facility
95
MS AVG
88
Rank
#52 / 126 |
97.9%
Facility
97.9%
MS AVG
86.7%
Rank
#12 / 117 | +13% | 5.09
Facility
5.09
MS AVG
4.86
Rank
#27 / 115 | -35% | +5% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
MS AVG
$32.8k
Rank
#62 / 117 | 14
Facility
14
MS AVG
18.1
Rank
#41 / 116 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
MS AVG
3.8
Rank
#51 / 116 | 2 | 93 | - |
67
Facility
67
MS AVG
40
Rank
#9 / 123 | Daniel Logan | $11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$8.6M
Rank
#27 / 110 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
$4.1M
Rank
#8 / 110 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MS AVG
48%
Rank
#6 / 110 | 255329 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Madison County Nursing Home is legally operated by Daniel Logan, and administered by Daniel Logan.
Madison County Nursing Home has a walk score of 67. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Madison County Nursing Home's occupancy is 97.9%.
No, Madison County Nursing Home has a no-pet policy.
Madison County Nursing Home is a government-operated nursing facility in MS.
Daniel Logan is the administrator of Madison County Nursing Home.
Madison County Nursing Home received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
