Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
97
95 employees · 2 contractors · 42 on an average day Plaza Community Living Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pascagoula, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — in line with the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — in line with the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Plaza Community Living Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Pascagoula, MS
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — in line with the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — in line with the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Plaza Community Living Center accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Hospice care, respite care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing are what Plaza Community Living Center offers in Pascagoula, MS. The residential and Clinical tracks take residents whose care does not stop. Hospice serves a person receiving end-of-life support. Short respite stays are booked by caregivers who need help for a while.
Short-term rehabilitation and therapy services are on offer for a resident working back toward recovery. There are 100 beds inside. Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay all cover care, and which one applies depends on eligibility and how a family has arranged its money.
Daily nursing arrives at 4 hours and 18 minutes for one resident. An outdoor patio, a beauty shop, and transportation are available. CLC of Pascagoula operates the center, with Brandie Morace as administrator. That mix of a brief stay, recovery therapy, and steady nursing suits a person in any of the three situations.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 18m
This nursing home is ranked 67th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 18mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +94% above Mississippi average
3 of 6 metrics below Mississippi average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
57m
↑ 50% · MS 38mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 50% above the Mississippi average of 38m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
59m
↓ 10% · MS 1h 6mThis facility: 59m per resident per day, 10% below the Mississippi average of 1h 6m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 49 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
49 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
2h 21m
↓ 5% · MS 2h 29mThis facility: 2h 21m per resident per day, 5% below the Mississippi average of 2h 29m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 49 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
49 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 89% · MS 2mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 89% below the Mississippi average of 2m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 49m
↑ 9% · MS 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 49m per resident per day, 9% above the Mississippi average of 3h 31m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
43m
↑ 94% · MS 22mThis facility: 43m per resident per day, 94% above the Mississippi average of 22m (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
97
95 employees · 2 contractors · 42 on an average day
97 total staff / 83 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.17 : 1
↓ 30% · MS 1.66This facility: 1.17 staff per resident, 30% below the Mississippi average of 1.66 (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
97 staff ÷ 83 residents
See full Mississippi ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↑ 2% · MS 8 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 2% above the Mississippi average of 8 h (among Mississippi facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
31,193 staff hours this quarter
See full Mississippi ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Mississippi average: 89.4% · Contractors this quarter: Feeding Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
100
Rank #43 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
100
Rank #43 / 124Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 124 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Mississippi facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 11Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 11 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Mississippi facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 11Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 11 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Mississippi facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
49
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #14 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #14 / 122Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 122 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Mississippi facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
61
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #85 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #85 / 116Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 85th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Mississippi average, with its Statewide rank out of 116. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83%
This home usually has availability
Based on 83 residents and 100 beds. Source: state inspection report (Jun 2026)
Similar to the Mississippi average: 86.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
431
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyJackson
CMS Certification Number255207
Plaza Community Living Center is legally operated by CLC of Pascagoula LLC, and administered by Brandie Morace.
Owner NameCLC of Pascagoula LLC
Ownership TypeProprietary
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Outpatient Therapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech TherapyListed as: Speech-language therapy
TransportationListed as: Transportation van
Pets not allowed
Wi-Fi
Patio
Resident Smoking Area
Juice Bar
Activities
Exercise Classes
Arts and Crafts
Music Therapy
Holiday and Birthday Celebrations
- Volunteer-hosted activities by churches and local organizations
Meal ScheduleBreakfast: 7:25 AM; Lunch: 11:25 AM; Dinner: 5:25 PM
Room Types
Semi-Private / Shared Room
Suite
In-Room Features
In-Room Televisions
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
83 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
In line with the Mississippi average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
66 severity-weighted points (26 deficiencies) · 34% higher than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 49)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
34 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MS facility (median: 33)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 15% · MS 4.7This facility: 4, 15% below the MS average of 4.7 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
26
Rank #90 / 114Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 90th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Mississippi State average, with a ranking across all 114 MS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 41% · MS 18.4This facility: 26, 41% above the MS average of 18.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.5
Rank #108 / 114Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Mississippi mean across 114 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 65% · MS 3.95This facility: 6.5, 65% above the MS average of 3.95 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
26 of 26 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the MS average of 0.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
4
↑ 233% · MS 1.2This facility: 4, 233% above the MS average of 1.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
20
↑ 23% · MS 16.2This facility: 20, 23% above the MS average of 16.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 567% · MS 0.3This facility: 2, 567% above the MS average of 0.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 04, 2026 · 7 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 7 of 26 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 04, 2026
7 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 26, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 09, 2025
7 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 25, 2023
11 citations
Nursing Services serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 26 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (27%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (19%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (19%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (8%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (4%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 26 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MS avg $30KMississippi average: $29,592. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MS avg 2.11Mississippi average: 2.11. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MS avg 0.18Mississippi average: 0.18. Average among the 109 Mississippi facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Mississippi average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 50% · MS 2.0This facility: 1.0, 50% below the MS average of 2.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 46% · MS 10.8This facility: 15.8, 46% above the MS average of 10.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
28.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 49% · MS 19.4This facility: 28.9, 49% above the MS average of 19.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 6 worse, 3 near MS average
7 short-stay measures: 1 better, 4 worse, 1 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
30.4%
↑ 50% · MS 20.3This facility: 30.4, 50% above the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
30.4%
↑ 50% · MS 20.3This facility: 30.4, 50% above the MS average of 20.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
33.9%
↑ 86% · MS 18.3This facility: 33.9, 86% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
33.9%
↑ 86% · MS 18.3This facility: 33.9, 86% above the MS average of 18.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.5%
↑ 13% · MS 19.9This facility: 22.5, 13% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.5%
↑ 13% · MS 19.9This facility: 22.5, 13% above the MS average of 19.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↓ 3% · MS 2.5This facility: 2.4, 3% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↓ 3% · MS 2.5This facility: 2.4, 3% below the MS average of 2.5 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 51% · MS 3.1This facility: 1.5, 51% below the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 51% · MS 3.1This facility: 1.5, 51% below the MS average of 3.1 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↑ 14% · MS 6.2This facility: 7.0, 14% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
↑ 14% · MS 6.2This facility: 7.0, 14% above the MS average of 6.2 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9%
↓ 7% · MS 6.3This facility: 5.9, 7% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9%
↓ 7% · MS 6.3This facility: 5.9, 7% below the MS average of 6.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
↑ 4% · MS 1.6This facility: 1.6, 4% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
↑ 4% · MS 1.6This facility: 1.6, 4% above the MS average of 1.6 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.2%
↓ 35% · MS 21.8This facility: 14.2, 35% below the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.2%
↓ 35% · MS 21.8This facility: 14.2, 35% below the MS average of 21.8 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
↓ 1% · MS 95.3This facility: 94.5, 1% below the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
↓ 1% · MS 95.3This facility: 94.5, 1% below the MS average of 95.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.8%
↓ 6% · MS 97.3This facility: 91.8, 6% below the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.8%
↓ 6% · MS 97.3This facility: 91.8, 6% below the MS average of 97.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.75
↓ 28% · MS 2.44This facility: 1.75, 28% below the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.75
↓ 28% · MS 2.44This facility: 1.75, 28% below the MS average of 2.44 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.72
↑ 29% · MS 2.88This facility: 3.72, 29% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.72
↑ 29% · MS 2.88This facility: 3.72, 29% above the MS average of 2.88 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
43.6%
↓ 14% · US 50.6This facility: 43.6, 14% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
43.6%
↓ 14% · US 50.6This facility: 43.6, 14% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
8.3%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
8.3%
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
↓ 10% · MS 2.4This facility: 2.2, 10% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
↓ 10% · MS 2.4This facility: 2.2, 10% below the MS average of 2.4 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.6%
↓ 15% · MS 89.0This facility: 75.6, 15% below the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.6%
↓ 15% · MS 89.0This facility: 75.6, 15% below the MS average of 89.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.6%
↓ 30% · MS 85.0This facility: 59.6, 30% below the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.6%
↓ 30% · MS 85.0This facility: 59.6, 30% below the MS average of 85.0 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
41.9%
↑ 50% · MS 27.9This facility: 41.9, 50% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
41.9%
↑ 50% · MS 27.9This facility: 41.9, 50% above the MS average of 27.9 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.3%
↑ 13% · MS 15.3This facility: 17.3, 13% above the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
17.3%
↑ 13% · MS 15.3This facility: 17.3, 13% above the MS average of 15.3 (among MS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Plaza Community Living Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending August 2025, compared with 108 Mississippi nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Aug 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−1.7% operating margin
+2.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.3M) turns it into a net profit to $0.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Mississippi homes
55.6% payroll share of revenue
MS average 49.5%Rank #19 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.5M while revenue rose $0.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Mississippi homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.8M | +$0.1M | Trend 20182025 | MS median $8.2M | Rank in MS Rank #46 / 108Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Above MS median Higher net patient revenue than 58% of MS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $9.0M | −$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | MS median $8.4M | Rank in MS Rank #43 / 108Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | MS median $0.4M | Rank in MS Rank #84 / 108Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −1.7% | +2.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | MS median 5.2% | Rank in MS Rank #83 / 108Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.3M | — | Trend — | MS median $0.1M | Rank in MS Rank #8 / 108Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.0M | +$0.5M | Trend — | MS median $0.5M | Rank in MS Rank #84 / 108Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Mississippi homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Mississippi homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | MS median | Compared with MS homesRank in MS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.9M | +$0.5M | Trend 20182025 | MS median $4.1M | Rank in MS Rank #34 / 108Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Above MS median Higher payroll than 69% of MS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 55.6% | +4.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | MS median 47.0% | Rank in MS Rank #19 / 108Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 108 nursing homes we track in Mississippi for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Mississippi average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Mississippi that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | 6.1 pts over MS average The MS average is 49.5% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · MS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Mississippi payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.3M | $8.8M | $8.0M | $7.8M | $6.3M | $8.0M | $8.7M | $8.8M |
| Operating expenses | $7.6M | $8.3M | $7.8M | $7.8M | $7.2M | $8.6M | $9.1M | $9.0M |
| Net patient income | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.2M | −$0.0M | −$0.9M | −$0.6M | −$0.4M | −$0.2M |
| Operating margin | 8.5% | 6.0% | 3.1% | −0.1% | −14.5% | −7.4% | −4.6% | −1.7% |
| Net income | $1.4M | $0.5M | $0.2M | $0.3M | −$0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.5M | $0.0M |
| Payroll costs | $2.8M | $3.0M | $3.0M | $3.5M | $3.4M | $4.4M | $4.4M | $4.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 33.6% | 34.4% | 36.8% | 44.8% | 54.8% | 55.3% | 50.7% | 55.6% |
| Beds | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Gross revenue | $9.8M | $10.2M | $9.7M | $9.1M | $7.5M | $9.4M | $9.4M | $9.8M |
| Salaries | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $4.0M | $3.9M | $4.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.6M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.1M | — | $0.2M | $0.3M | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.8M | $5.3M | $4.8M | $4.3M | $3.8M | $4.2M | $4.7M | $4.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $278 | $265 | $242 | $233 | $206 | $238 | $259 | $262 |
| Cost per day | $254 | $249 | $235 | $233 | $236 | $256 | $271 | $267 |
| Average length of stay | 214.0 days | 250.5 days | 223.7 days | 311.5 days | 401.4 days | 425.1 days | 455.1 days | 431.3 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
90 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
25 · 28%
Medicaid
13 · 14%
Private pay & other
52 · 58%
Resident snapshot
83 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
3 · 4%
Medicaid
80 · 96%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
78 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
19 · 24%
Medicaid
16 · 21%
Private pay & other
43 · 55%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Plaza Community Living Center
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pascagoula's city center to Plaza Community Living Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Plaza Community Living Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MS State Dept. of Health (MSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Mississippi average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeSoto Healthcare Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Southaven (Brook Hollow) | 120
Facility
120
MS AVG
88
Rank
#16 / 124 | B+ |
77.7%
Facility
77.7%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#101 / 116 | -10% | 4.60
Facility
4.60
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#49 / 113 | -50% | -7% | $9.3k
Facility
$9.3k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#69 / 115 | 15
Facility
15
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#54 / 114 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#21 / 114 | 2 | 93 | A+ |
25
Facility
25
MS AVG
39
Rank
#90 / 122 | Desoto Healthcare, Inc. Adrian | $12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#15 / 108 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#26 / 108 | 42.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
42.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#81 / 108 | 255296 | ||||
| Plaza Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Pascagoula | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#43 / 124 | B |
83.0%
Facility
83.0%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#85 / 116 | -4% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#67 / 113 | +58% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#1 / 115 | 26
Facility
26
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#90 / 114 | 6.5
Facility
6.5
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#108 / 114 | 4 | 83 | A+ |
61
Facility
61
MS AVG
39
Rank
#14 / 122 | Clc Of Pascagoula LLC | $8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#46 / 108 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#34 / 108 | 55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
55.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#19 / 108 | 255207 | ||||
| Courtyards Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Fulton | 66
Facility
66
MS AVG
88
Rank
#65 / 124 | C- |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#18 / 116 | +10% | 4.22
Facility
4.22
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#81 / 113 | +10% | -15% | $117.7k
Facility
$117.7k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#112 / 115 | 42
Facility
42
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#108 / 114 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#109 / 114 | 11 | 63 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
MS AVG
39
Rank
#39 / 122 | Clc Of Fulton, LLC | $6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$6.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#92 / 108 | $3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$3.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#79 / 108 | 53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
53.4%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#26 / 108 | 255212 | ||||
| Pleasant Hills Community Living Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Jackson (Bradie) | 100
Facility
100
MS AVG
88
Rank
#43 / 124 | C |
81.0%
Facility
81.0%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#91 / 116 | -7% | 4.05
Facility
4.05
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#95 / 113 | +31% | -18% | $119.1k
Facility
$119.1k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#114 / 115 | 22
Facility
22
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#80 / 114 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#16 / 114 | 4 | 81 | A+ |
30
Facility
30
MS AVG
39
Rank
#82 / 122 | Clc Of Jackson, LLC | $9.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$9.1MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#45 / 108 | $5.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$5.3MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#23 / 108 | 58%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
58%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#12 / 108 | 255112 | ||||
| The Pillars of Biloxi | NH HOS RC SNF | Biloxi | 180
Facility
180
MS AVG
88
Rank
#3 / 124 | D |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
MS AVG
86.8%
Rank
#82 / 116 | -4% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
MS AVG
4.95
Rank
#67 / 113 | +9% | -13% | $47.7k
Facility
$47.7k
MS AVG
$29.3k
Rank
#101 / 115 | 42
Facility
42
MS AVG
18.4
Rank
#108 / 114 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
MS AVG
3.9
Rank
#103 / 114 | 5 | 150 | - |
27
Facility
27
MS AVG
39
Rank
#86 / 122 | Clc Of Biloxi LLC | $14.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$14.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$9.0M
Rank
#7 / 108 | $8.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
$4.3M
Rank
#4 / 108 | 57.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
Facility
57.6%Fiscal year ending 08/2025
MS AVG
49.5%
Rank
#13 / 108 | 255093 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Plaza Community Living Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Plaza Community Living Center?
Plaza Community Living Center is legally operated by CLC of Pascagoula LLC, and administered by Brandie Morace.
02 Is Plaza Community Living Center in a walkable area?
Plaza Community Living Center has a walk score of 61. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Plaza Community Living Center?
Plaza Community Living Center's occupancy is 83%.
04 How long has Plaza Community Living Center been in business?
Plaza Community Living Center has been operating for approximately 49 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Plaza Community Living Center?
No, Plaza Community Living Center has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Plaza Community Living Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Plaza Community Living Center is registered as a for-profit in MS.
07 Who is the administrator of Plaza Community Living Center?
Brandie Morace is the administrator of Plaza Community Living Center.
Updated on
