Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park runs 125 beds across a three-story building on Baptist Road in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. The care lineup is broad: nursing home care, assisted living, hospice, independent living, memory care, and respite care all live under one roof. That means a resident could, in theory, move through several stages of need without changing addresses.
Walkability sits on the lower end, Walk Score 34, so most errands here mean getting in a car rather than walking down the block. Occupancy runs at 78%, with 98 of the 125 beds currently filled, numbers that put this comfortably in the range of an established, actively operating community rather than a newer or struggling one.
Clinically, the ratio here is one nurse to every 24 residents, backed by staff around the clock. The wellness program goes deeper than a typical rehab offering: full physical therapy services, licensed therapists, and dedicated post-stroke and post-surgical tracks sit alongside restorative care. Add in specific programs for Alzheimer’s and dementia, skilled nursing, and outpatient rehab, and the medical infrastructure here looks built for residents with real, ongoing care needs, not just daily living support.
Life outside the clinical side includes a fitness center, barber and spa access, garden and patio space, and a private dining option alongside the main dining room, plus a steady calendar of social, educational, and spiritual programming with group transportation built in. State inspections here have tended to center on medication management and dietary and food service rather than broader care concerns.
Mr. James Cox owns the community, operating as Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park LLC. Between the six-way care continuum, the nurse staffing ratio, and the depth of the rehab program, this reads as a facility built for residents whose medical needs run higher than a standard assisted living setting can typically support.
Community insights.
About this community
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park is legally operated by Paramount Senior Living At Bethel Park LLC.
Inspection History
In West Virginia, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
7vs 0.9 avg↑ 678% higher than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the West Virginia state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Inspections with citations (13% above)
• Total complaints (75% above)
• Complaints per year (71% above) 3 Better Metrics better than West Virginia average:
• Total citations (40% below)
• Citations per inspection (52% below)
• Inspection citation rate (16% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 38 | 63 | This facility has 40% fewer total citations than a typical West Virginia nursing home (38 vs. PA avg 63).↓ 40% better Rank #226 / 478 Total citations — State benchmarked This home is ranked 226th out of 478 homes we track in West Virginia for total citations. Shows this facility's total citations compared to the West Virginia average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in West Virginia that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Citations per inspection
| 2.4 | 5.05 | This facility has 52% fewer citations per inspection than a typical West Virginia nursing home (2.4 vs. PA avg 5.05).↓ 52% better Rank #108 / 478 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 108th out of 478 homes we track in West Virginia for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the West Virginia average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in West Virginia that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 16 | 11 | This facility has had 45% more total inspections than the West Virginia average (16 vs. PA avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 45% more |
|
Inspections with citations
| 9 | 8 | This facility has 13% more inspections with citations than a typical West Virginia nursing home (9 vs. PA avg 8).↑ 13% worse |
|
Inspection citation rate
| 56% | 67% | This facility has 11 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical West Virginia nursing home (56% vs. PA avg 67%).↓ 11% better Rank #115 / 478 Inspection citation rate — State benchmarked This home is ranked 115th out of 478 homes we track in West Virginia for % of inspections with citations. Shows this facility's % of inspections with citations compared to the West Virginia average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in West Virginia that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 7 | 4 | This facility has 75% more total complaints than a typical West Virginia nursing home (7 vs. PA avg 4).↑ 75% worse Rank #403 / 478 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 403rd out of 478 homes we track in West Virginia for complaint inspections. Shows this facility's complaint inspections compared to the West Virginia average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in West Virginia that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Complaints per year
| 1.2 | 0.7 | This facility has 71% more complaints per year than a typical West Virginia nursing home (1.2 vs. PA avg 0.7).↑ 71% worse |
What does this home offer?
No pets allowed
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed
Building Type: 3-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Places of interest near Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bethel Park's city center to Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 3.41 miles to nearest hospital (St. Clair Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Morgantown
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WV Dept. of Health & Human Resources, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Illinois average is: 60.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tabor Hills | NH AL IL RC SNF | Naperville (Naperville Park District) | 96 | 74.8% | -1% | 4.95 | -1% | +59% | $0 | 14 | 4.7 | - | 72 | A+ | 21 | John Bozett | $13.1MFiscal year ending 09/2023 | $9.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023 | 74.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2023 | 145840 | ||||
| Sundale Nursing Home | NH MC PC SNF | Morgantown | 100
Facility
100
WV AVG
80
Rank
#23 / 75 |
85.0%
Facility
85.0%
WV AVG
80.7%
Rank
#34 / 62 | +5% | 3.65
Facility
3.65
WV AVG
3.62
Rank
#14 / 42 | -9% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
WV AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#1 / 43 | 31
Facility
31
WV AVG
43.1
Rank
#13 / 43 | 7.8
Facility
7.8
WV AVG
9.3
Rank
#13 / 43 | - | 85 | - |
47
Facility
47
WV AVG
37
Rank
#27 / 85 | Crossgates Medical Inc | $14.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#16 / 34 | $8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#5 / 34 | 62.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
62.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
47.8%
Rank
#3 / 34 | 515083 | ||||
| Friendship Village of South Hills | NH AL IL MC SNF | Upper St Clair | 102 | 78.4% | +12% | 4.12 | +3% | -1% | $0 | 15 | 5.0 | - | 80 | - | 8 | Dina Stover | $30.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023 | $14.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023 | 48.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023 | 395688 | ||||
| Morgantown Healthcare Center | NH HOS MC RC | Morgantown | 120
Facility
120
WV AVG
80
Rank
#10 / 75 |
98.3%
Facility
98.3%
WV AVG
80.7%
Rank
#3 / 62 | +22% | 3.69
Facility
3.69
WV AVG
3.62
Rank
#12 / 42 | +6% | +2% | $24.8k
Facility
$24.8k
WV AVG
$52.9k
Rank
#28 / 43 | 48
Facility
48
WV AVG
43.1
Rank
#26 / 43 | 9.6
Facility
9.6
WV AVG
9.3
Rank
#25 / 43 | 1 | 118 | - |
49
Facility
49
WV AVG
37
Rank
#25 / 85 | Jeffrey Grewell | $19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$19.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#4 / 34 | $8.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#6 / 34 | 43.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
43.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WV AVG
47.8%
Rank
#14 / 34 | 515058 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in West Virginia
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park is located in Bethel Park, West Virginia.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in West Virginia.
Frequently Asked Questions about Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park
Is Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park in a walkable area?
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park has a walk score of 34. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park?
According to PA state health department records, Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park's license number is 440880.
What is the occupancy rate at Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park?
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park's occupancy is 78%.
How long has Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park been in business?
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park has been operating for approximately 1 year, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park?
No, Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park has a no-pet policy.
Does Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park is registered as a for-profit in PA.
How many beds does Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park have?
Paramount Senior Living at Bethel Park has 125 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





