Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
150
126 employees · 24 contractors · 56 on an average day Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Allentown, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 84 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 84 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Allentown, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 84 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 84 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living offers nursing home, assisted living, continuing care retirement community, independent living, memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Pa, PA. Independent living means having a private apartment with community services and no daily care, while assisted living adds help with bathing, dressing, medication, and similar daily tasks. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering, and skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Respite care supports a short stay when a usual caregiver needs to travel or recover.
Several care levels in one community can accommodate a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move elsewhere. Riverton Enhanced Senior Living may be a good fit for someone or a couple who needs different levels of support while remaining in the same community. The community has 90 beds and offers one bedroom and two bedroom apartments, with a two bedroom layout that can suit a couple moving together or someone who wants a companion.
The starting price is $3,200 per month, with an $1,800 entrance fee and a $3,200 move in deposit. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours 3 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time assigned per resident. A beauty salon, landscaped courtyard, restaurant style dining, chef prepared meals, and an on site bistro give residents places for personal care, outdoor time, and meals.
Rehabilitation services and short term rehabilitation allow a resident to receive therapy as part of the community’s services, while the Journeys Memory Care program supports the memory care offering. The area has a Walk Score of 56 and is somewhat walkable, so some errands can be completed on foot by a resident who is able to go out independently. Transportation is also available for trips that are not within walking distance. Riverton Operator operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 155th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 155th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m6 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 20 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
20 staff · 7.9-hour shifts
33m
↓ 31% · PA 47mThis facility: 33m per resident per day, 31% below the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 20 total: 13 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
20 staff · 7.9-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 8.5-hour shifts
45m
↓ 18% · PA 55mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 18% below the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 28 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
28 staff · 8.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 68 total: 67 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
68 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
1h 46m
↓ 22% · PA 2h 15mThis facility: 1h 46m per resident per day, 22% below the Pennsylvania average of 2h 15m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 68 total: 67 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
68 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 40% · PA 6mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 40% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 46m
↓ 23% · PA 3h 34mThis facility: 2h 46m per resident per day, 23% below the Pennsylvania average of 3h 34m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↓ 25% · PA 33mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 25% below the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
150
126 employees · 24 contractors · 56 on an average day
150 total staff / 100 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.50 : 1
↓ 17% · PA 1.81This facility: 1.50 staff per resident, 17% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.81 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
150 staff ÷ 100 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
↑ 1% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 1% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
40,399 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →88.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.6% · Contractors this quarter: Registered Nurse (7), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Certified Nursing Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
201
Rank #46 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
201
Rank #46 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
111 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 90 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #91 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #91 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
56
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #100 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #100 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 100th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
73.3%
This home usually has availability
Similar to the Pennsylvania average: 75.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
99
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$3,200/Month
Entrance FeeA one-time fee paid when moving in, common at continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). Depending on the contract, part of it may be refundable.
$1,800
Move-in Deposit
$3,200
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceJanuary 24, 2026
ExpirationJanuary 24, 2027
CountyLehigh
License LevelFULL
License Number230440
Journeys Memory Care programA branded memory-care program developed by this community's operator - a structured approach to dementia care, rather than an independent external certification.
LifeLoopA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living is legally operated by Riverton Operator LLC.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Family Council
Short-Term Rehab
Regularly Scheduled Physician Visits
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Emergency Call System
TransportationListed as: Transportation to doctor's appointments
85
Total Daily Staff
64
Waking Staff
0
Resident Support Staff
69
Residents Served
2
Hospice Residents
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Beauty Salon
Courtyard
Wi-Fi
Cable Tv
Bistro
Laundry
Activities
Concerts
Workshops
Lectures
Samba Fitness Classes
Religious AffiliationYes
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Riverton Enhanced Senior Living.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Riverton Enhanced Senior Living.- Bistro / café on site.
Building TypeMid-rise
Studio Floor plans as listed by the community: Companion Suite (Personal Care)
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: One Bedroom · One Bedroom Deluxe- with den · One Bedroom (Independent Living) · One Bedroom (Personal Care) · One Bedroom Deluxe (Personal Care)
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Two Bedroom – One Bath · Two Bedroom – Two Bath · Deluxe Two Bedroom – Two Bath · Two Bedroom – One Bath (Personal Care)
Floor plans: Deluxe
In-Room Features
In-Unit Kitchenette
Two inspection records, one community. Pennsylvania inspects its 90 state-licensed beds; CMS inspects its 111 nursing-home beds.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each covers only its own beds, visits and dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
ALM Inspection Grade
84 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Pennsylvania inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 55% of the grade
B+ · 89/100
8 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100).
111 certified beds, 55% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
36 severity-weighted points (11 citations) · 3% lower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 37)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
30 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Pennsylvania state-licensed beds · 45% of the grade
C+ · 77/100
6 points below the Pennsylvania average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
90 licensed beds, 45% of the grade. Graded with Pennsylvania state-licensed facilities on the Pennsylvania scale.
Citations
Typical
3.9 citations per inspection (55 in 14 inspections) · 20% more than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 3.3)
Finding Frequency
Typical
64% of inspections found a citation · 8% more than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 59%)
Complaints
Concern
11 complaints · 2× more than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 5)
How the final grade is calculated
B · 84/100
89 × 55% + 77 × 45% = 84 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 111 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (55%) and 90 Pennsylvania state-licensed beds (45%). The result, 84 out of 100, is a B on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
0vs 1.3 avg↓ 100% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Pennsylvania average:
• Inspection citation rate (8% above)
• Total complaints (120% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (38% below)
• Citations per inspection (9% below)
• Inspections with citations (25% below)
• Inspection citation rate (8% above)
• Total complaints (120% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (38% below)
• Citations per inspection (9% below)
• Inspections with citations (25% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 55 | 89.0 | This facility has 38% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (55 vs. PA avg 89).↓ 38% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 3.9 | 4.3 | This facility has 9% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (3.9 vs. PA avg 4.3).↓ 9% better Rank #38 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 14 | 21.0 | This facility has had 33% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (14 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 33% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 9 | 12.0 | This facility has 25% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (9 vs. PA avg 12).↓ 25% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 64% | 59% | This facility has 5 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (64% vs. PA avg 59%).↑ 5% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 11 | 5.0 | This facility has 120% more total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (11 vs. PA avg 5).↑ 120% worse |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↓ 18% · PA 7.3This facility: 6, 18% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.3 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
12
Rank #66 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 62% · PA 31.8This facility: 12, 62% below the Pennsylvania average of 31.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #38 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 51% · PA 4.11This facility: 2, 51% below the Pennsylvania average of 4.11 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
12 of 12 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 63% · PA 29.7This facility: 11, 63% below the Pennsylvania average of 29.7 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 11% · PA 0.9This facility: 1, 11% above the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 07, 2026 · 1 citation (Nutrition, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 6 of 12 citations · 3 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 07, 2026
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 18, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2025
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 06, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 30, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 11, 2024
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 12 citations
Quality of Life & Care
6 deficiencies (50%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (33%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
8 of 12 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 12 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
PA avg $58KPennsylvania average: $58,340. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
PA avg 1.82Pennsylvania average: 1.82. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.15Pennsylvania average: 0.15. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · PA 9.1This facility: 8.9, 2% below the PA average of 9.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 6% · PA 19.0This facility: 20.1, 6% above the PA average of 19.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 2 worse, 3 near PA average
3 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 1 near PA average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.5%
↓ 6% · PA 16.4This facility: 15.5, 6% below the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.5%
↓ 6% · PA 16.4This facility: 15.5, 6% below the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.0%
↑ 24% · PA 15.4This facility: 19.0, 24% above the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.0%
↑ 24% · PA 15.4This facility: 19.0, 24% above the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9%
↑ 4% · PA 25.0This facility: 25.9, 4% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.9%
↑ 4% · PA 25.0This facility: 25.9, 4% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 40% · PA 3.1This facility: 1.9, 40% below the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 40% · PA 3.1This facility: 1.9, 40% below the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
↓ 16% · PA 4.7This facility: 3.9, 16% below the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
↓ 16% · PA 4.7This facility: 3.9, 16% below the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↓ 34% · PA 6.0This facility: 4.0, 34% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↓ 34% · PA 6.0This facility: 4.0, 34% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
59.5%
↑ 331% · PA 13.8This facility: 59.5, 331% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
59.5%
↑ 331% · PA 13.8This facility: 59.5, 331% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.0%
↓ 38% · PA 17.6This facility: 11.0, 38% below the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.0%
↓ 38% · PA 17.6This facility: 11.0, 38% below the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
↑ 4% · PA 87.8This facility: 91.2, 4% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
↑ 4% · PA 87.8This facility: 91.2, 4% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9%
↓ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 91.9, 2% below the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9%
↓ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 91.9, 2% below the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
↓ 7% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.3, 7% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
↓ 7% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.3, 7% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.1%
↑ 2% · PA 70.8This facility: 72.1, 2% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.1%
↑ 2% · PA 70.8This facility: 72.1, 2% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.0%
↓ 18% · PA 70.9This facility: 58.0, 18% below the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.0%
↓ 18% · PA 70.9This facility: 58.0, 18% below the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
7.8% operating margin
+5.0 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.4M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
47.2% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #134 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.0M while revenue rose $1.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $17.4M | +$1.4M | Trend 20162024 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #88 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 51% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.0M | +$0.5M | Trend 20162024 | PA median $20.7M | Rank in PA Rank #121 / 177Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 32% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.4M | +$0.9M | Trend 20162024 | PA median −$1.3M | Rank in PA Rank #18 / 177Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 7.8% | +5.0 pts | Trend 20162024 | PA median −7.4% | Rank in PA Rank #14 / 177Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | PA median $1.1M | Rank in PA Rank #156 / 172Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 156th out of 172 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 9% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.4M | +$0.8M | Trend — | PA median $0.4M | Rank in PA Rank #59 / 177Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 59th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.2M | +$1.0M | Trend 20162024 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #117 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below PA median Higher payroll than 34% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 47.2% | +2.1 pts | Trend 20162024 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #134 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | 22.9 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021no report | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $14.0M | $14.3M | $14.0M | $14.2M | $12.6M | $16.0M | $16.0M | $17.4M | |
| Operating expenses | $14.3M | $14.0M | $13.8M | $14.6M | $16.3M | $15.6M | $15.5M | $16.0M | |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | −$0.4M | −$3.7M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $1.4M | |
| Operating margin | −2.0% | 2.2% | 2.0% | −2.7% | −29.3% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 7.8% | |
| Net income | $0.6M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $0.7M | −$1.5M | $0.3M | $0.5M | $1.4M | |
| Payroll costs | $7.0M | $7.0M | $6.9M | $7.8M | $8.7M | $6.6M | $7.2M | $8.2M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 50.2% | 48.6% | 49.4% | 54.6% | 69.0% | 41.1% | 45.1% | 47.2% | |
| Beds | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | |
| Gross revenue | $21.0M | $22.0M | $22.6M | $22.6M | $19.8M | $17.4M | $17.3M | $18.8M | |
| Salaries | $5.6M | $5.9M | $6.0M | $6.5M | $7.3M | $5.6M | $6.4M | $7.6M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.4M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.0M | $0.8M | $0.6M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | $2.8M | $1.8M | $0.8M | |
| Other operating costs | $7.3M | $7.0M | $6.8M | $6.8M | $7.6M | $9.0M | $8.3M | $7.8M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $371 | $371 | $366 | $380 | $395 | $439 | $444 | $453 | |
| Cost per day | $378 | $363 | $359 | $390 | $511 | $427 | $431 | $418 | |
| Average length of stay | 178.1 days | 129.1 days | 119.1 days | 118.2 days | 116.9 days | 67.7 days | 146.2 days | 99.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
401 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
152 · 38%
Medicaid
43 · 11%
Private pay & other
206 · 51%
Resident snapshot
100 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
13 · 13%
Medicaid
71 · 71%
Private pay & other
16 · 16%
Leaving
388 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
139 · 36%
Medicaid
93 · 24%
Private pay & other
156 · 40%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
3.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Allentown's city center to Riverton Enhanced Senior Living's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.73 miles to nearest hospital (St. Luke's University Hospital - Bethlehem Campus)
Calculate Travel Distance to Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Allentown
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedarbrook Senior Care and Rehab | NH HOS IL MC PC RC SNF | Allentown | 670
Facility
670
PA AVG
159
Rank
#1 / 200 | B+ |
76.3%
Facility
76.3%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#85 / 164 | +1% | 4.58
Facility
4.58
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#57 / 180 | +3% | +16% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 16
Facility
16
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#85 / 179 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#153 / 179 | - | 511 | - |
22
Facility
22
PA AVG
50
Rank
#162 / 207 | County Of Lehigh Pennsylvania | $21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#56 / 177 | $38.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$38.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#3 / 177 | 179.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
179.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#9 / 177 | 395465 | ||||
| Cedar Crest Post Acute | NH SNF | Allentown | 166
Facility
166
PA AVG
159
Rank
#74 / 200 | B+ |
92.8%
Facility
92.8%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#36 / 164 | +22% | 2.90
Facility
2.90
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#170 / 180 | +4% | -27% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 13
Facility
13
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#74 / 179 | 2.2
Facility
2.2
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#38 / 179 | - | 154 | - |
31
Facility
31
PA AVG
50
Rank
#145 / 207 | Cedar Crest Operator Holdings LLC | $20.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#63 / 177 | $9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#102 / 177 | 43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#156 / 177 | 395760 | ||||
| Riverton Enhanced Senior Living | NH AL CCRC IL MC RC SNF | Pa (Rittersville) | 201
Facility
201
PA AVG
159
Rank
#46 / 200 | B |
73.3%
Facility
73.3%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#100 / 164 | -3% | 3.06
Facility
3.06
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#155 / 180 | +11% | -23% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 12
Facility
12
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#66 / 179 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#38 / 179 | - | 66 | - |
56
Facility
56
PA AVG
50
Rank
#91 / 207 | Riverton Operator LLC | $17.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#88 / 177 | $8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#117 / 177 | 47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#134 / 177 | 395171 | ||||
| EverTrue Luther Crest | NH AL IL MC | Allentown (Trexler Estates) | 131
Facility
131
PA AVG
159
Rank
#108 / 200 | A |
35.2%
Facility
35.2%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#162 / 164 | -54% | 4.65
Facility
4.65
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#57 / 180 | +40% | +17% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 7
Facility
7
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#41 / 179 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#97 / 179 | - | 25 | - |
28
Facility
28
PA AVG
50
Rank
#151 / 207 | Lutheran Senior Services East | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#150 / 177 | $6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#144 / 177 | 63.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
63.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#53 / 177 | 395591 | ||||
| Good Shepherd Home Raker Center | NH SNF | Allentown (Fairview) | 99
Facility
99
PA AVG
159
Rank
#150 / 200 | ? |
98.8%
Facility
98.8%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#1 / 164 | +30% | 3.55
Facility
3.55
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#125 / 180 | +50% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 10
Facility
10
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#66 / 179 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#102 / 179 | 1 | 98 | - |
60
Facility
60
PA AVG
50
Rank
#83 / 207 | - | - | - | - | 395018 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Pennsylvania
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living is located in PA, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Riverton Enhanced Senior Living
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Riverton Enhanced Senior Living in?
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living is in the Rittersville neighborhood of PA.
02 Who is the owner of Riverton Enhanced Senior Living?
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living is legally operated by Riverton Operator LLC.
03 Is Riverton Enhanced Senior Living in a walkable area?
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living has a walk score of 56. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
04 What is the license number of Riverton Enhanced Senior Living?
According to PA state health department records, Riverton Enhanced Senior Living's license number is 230440.
05 When does Riverton Enhanced Senior Living's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Riverton Enhanced Senior Living's license expires on January 24, 2027.
06 What is the occupancy rate at Riverton Enhanced Senior Living?
Riverton Enhanced Senior Living's occupancy is 73.3%.
07 Does Riverton Enhanced Senior Living have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Riverton Enhanced Senior Living on this page.
Updated on
