Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
66
58 employees · 8 contractors · 23 on an average day Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
Nursing Home & Independent Living · Winfield, KS
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
Nursing Home & Independent Living · Winfield, KS
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 15 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc provides independent living in Winfield, KS. The community opened in 1963 and has 41 beds, creating a smaller setting that may suit a resident who prefers fewer people around them.
Independent living apartments offer private living with community services rather than daily care. Therapy and rehabilitation services are available through the community’s program offerings, so residents can access those forms of support within the facility. A Walk Score of 78 places the area in the very walkable band, meaning most errands can be done on foot and a resident who no longer drives can still get out independently. Amy Lemer serves as administrator, and 98% occupancy means nearly all beds are in use.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 22m
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 22mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +5% above Kansas average
5 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 4 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
4 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
28m
↓ 44% · KS 51mThis facility: 28m per resident per day, 44% below the Kansas average of 51m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 4 total: 2 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
4 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9-hour shifts
31m
↓ 28% · KS 43mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 28% below the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 7-hour shifts
3h 22m
↑ 5% · KS 3h 13mThis facility: 3h 22m per resident per day, 5% above the Kansas average of 3h 13m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 71% · KS 3mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 71% below the Kansas average of 3m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 47m
↓ 11% · KS 4h 15mThis facility: 3h 47m per resident per day, 11% below the Kansas average of 4h 15m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
22m
↓ 30% · KS 31mThis facility: 22m per resident per day, 30% below the Kansas average of 31m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
66
58 employees · 8 contractors · 23 on an average day
66 total staff / 40 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.65 : 1
↓ 26% · KS 2.22This facility: 1.65 staff per resident, 26% below the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
66 staff ÷ 40 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 6% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 6% below the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
15,132 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →92.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · Contractors this quarter: Nurse Practitioner (2), Registered Nurse (2), Medical Director (1), Administrator (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
41
Rank #62 / 71Bed count — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 62nd out of 71 independent living communities we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
41
Rank #62 / 71Bed count — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 62nd out of 71 independent living communities we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #13 / 142Walk Score — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 13th out of 142 independent living communities we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #13 / 142Walk Score — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 13th out of 142 independent living communities we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
78
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #3 / 62Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 3rd out of 62 independent living communities we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 62. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #3 / 62Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This independent living community is ranked 3rd out of 62 independent living communities we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 62. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every independent living community we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Independent living communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
90%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 36.9 residents and 41 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Higher than the Kansas average: 74.9%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
661
days
About This Community
StatusActive
CountyCowley
License Number175488
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc is administered by Amy Lemer.
Owner NameWinfield Rest Haven Ii LC
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Licensed Nurses/CNAs
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
15 points above the Kansas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
34 severity-weighted points (11 deficiencies) · 2× lower than the typical CMS-certified KS facility (median: 79)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
22 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified KS facility (median: 31)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 30% · KS 4.3This facility: 3, 30% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
11
↓ 60% · KS 27.5This facility: 11, 60% below the KS average of 27.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.67
↓ 42% · KS 6.37This facility: 3.67, 42% below the KS average of 6.37 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
11 of 11 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 25% · KS 0.8This facility: 1, 25% above the KS average of 0.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
10
↓ 60% · KS 25.2This facility: 10, 60% below the KS average of 25.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the KS average of 0.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 04, 2024 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 11 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 04, 2024
5 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 15, 2023
5 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 25, 2021
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 11 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (36%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (18%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (9%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (9%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 11 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
KS avg $40KKansas average: $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
KS avg 2.16Kansas average: 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 33% · KS 9.5This facility: 12.6, 33% above the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
29.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 55% · KS 18.9This facility: 29.3, 55% above the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 8 worse
2 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.0%
↑ 23% · KS 17.9This facility: 22.0, 23% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.0%
↑ 23% · KS 17.9This facility: 22.0, 23% above the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.8%
↑ 102% · KS 16.2This facility: 32.8, 102% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.8%
↑ 102% · KS 16.2This facility: 32.8, 102% above the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 47% · KS 22.6This facility: 33.1, 47% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 47% · KS 22.6This facility: 33.1, 47% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
↑ 43% · KS 2.9This facility: 4.2, 43% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
↑ 43% · KS 2.9This facility: 4.2, 43% above the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
↓ 84% · KS 4.3This facility: 0.7, 84% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
↓ 84% · KS 4.3This facility: 0.7, 84% below the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3%
↓ 70% · KS 4.4This facility: 1.3, 70% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3%
↓ 70% · KS 4.4This facility: 1.3, 70% below the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5%
↑ 32% · KS 4.9This facility: 6.5, 32% above the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5%
↑ 32% · KS 4.9This facility: 6.5, 32% above the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
↓ 78% · KS 6.5This facility: 1.4, 78% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
↓ 78% · KS 6.5This facility: 1.4, 78% below the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9%
↑ 32% · KS 18.1This facility: 23.9, 32% above the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9%
↑ 32% · KS 18.1This facility: 23.9, 32% above the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.4%
↓ 11% · KS 92.1This facility: 82.4, 11% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.4%
↓ 11% · KS 92.1This facility: 82.4, 11% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7%
↓ 10% · KS 95.5This facility: 85.7, 10% below the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7%
↓ 10% · KS 95.5This facility: 85.7, 10% below the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 2 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
11.3%
↓ 85% · KS 76.1This facility: 11.3, 85% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
11.3%
↓ 85% · KS 76.1This facility: 11.3, 85% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.5% operating margin
+2.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 1 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.2M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Kansas homes
53.9% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.3%
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.6M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.7M | Rank in KS Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $4.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.1M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.5% | +2.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.0M | — | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.2M | +$1.1M | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.5M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.6M | Rank in KS Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 53.9% | +2.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Not ranked | 3.4 pts under KS average The KS average is 57.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.7M | $3.2M | $3.2M | $2.5M | $2.3M | $3.3M | $4.3M | $4.6M |
| Operating expenses | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.3M | $3.9M | $3.1M | $3.8M | $4.3M | $4.5M |
| Net patient income | −$0.5M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$1.3M | −$0.8M | −$0.5M | −$0.0M | $0.1M |
| Operating margin | −18.9% | −6.5% | −4.4% | −52.8% | −35.7% | −14.7% | −0.1% | 2.5% |
| Net income | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | −$0.0M | −$0.9M | $0.0M | −$0.1M | $0.0M | $1.2M |
| Payroll costs | $1.8M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $2.1M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $2.2M | $2.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 66.6% | 58.9% | 59.1% | 84.7% | 77.3% | 51.1% | 51.3% | 53.9% |
| Beds | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 |
| Gross revenue | $2.7M | $3.2M | $3.2M | $2.6M | $2.3M | $3.4M | $4.4M | $4.7M |
| Salaries | $1.5M | $1.6M | $1.6M | $1.9M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.9M | $2.1M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.1M | $0.1M |
| Other operating costs | $1.4M | $1.5M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.3M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $216 | $250 | $248 | $238 | $285 | $308 | $321 | $329 |
| Cost per day | $257 | $266 | $259 | $363 | $387 | $353 | $321 | $321 |
| Average length of stay | 200.5 days | 160.6 days | 375.0 days | 590.8 days | 424.4 days | 316.0 days | 314.7 days | 661.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
26 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
7 · 27%
Medicaid
10 · 38%
Private pay & other
9 · 35%
Resident snapshot
40 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
2 · 5%
Medicaid
31 · 78%
Private pay & other
7 · 18%
Leaving
21 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
4 · 19%
Medicaid
6 · 29%
Private pay & other
11 · 52%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Winfield's city center to Winfield Rest Haven II Lc's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
Add your location
Compare Independent Living around the area
Info below is compiled from the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
City and state of the facility. Used for mapping and state-average comparisons.
|
Licensed bed capacity (maximum allowed). Not the same as how many beds are currently filled.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Indicates whether residents are allowed to have pets in the facility.
|
Third-party neighborhood walkability score (0–100). Convenience/context metric, not a healthcare quality measure.
|
Description of bed or unit types offered (e.g. assisted living, memory care), as reported in state or facility disclosures.
|
Reported or derived occupancy for the facility—typically how fully licensed capacity is utilized. Compare across peers in the same market.
|
Better Business Bureau grade for the operating company. Reflects complaint handling and business practices, not clinical care quality.
|
A named contact for the facility. Hover the name to see their role — Administrator (state administrator of record or facility-provided administrator), Nursing Director, Medical Director, or Staff. The most authoritative available is shown.
|
Name of the licensed owner, operator, or managing entity as filed with the state. Useful for grouping facilities under the same organization.
|
Count of regulatory inspections in the reporting window. Higher volume can reflect more oversight visits, complaint-driven surveys, or routine licensure cycles.
|
Total count of deficiencies (cited regulatory issues) recorded in the selected reporting period. Read alongside inspection counts for context.
|
The average number of deficiencies this facility receives each time it's inspected, calculated as total deficiencies ÷ total inspections. A lower number suggests more consistent compliance with safety and care standards.
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mission Chateau Senior Living Community | IL AL MC NH SNF | Prairie Village | 88
Facility
88
KS AVG
80
Rank
#24 / 71 | - | Yes |
64
Facility
64
KS AVG
48
Rank
#31 / 142 | Assisted Living (48), Residential (40) |
81.8%
Facility
81.8%
KS AVG
74.9%
Rank
#25 / 62 | - | A Miles Nease | Mission Chateau Property, LLC | 5 | 6
Facility
6
KS AVG
101
Rank
#2 / 57 | 1.2
Facility
1.2
KS AVG
4.2
Rank
#3 / 57 |
| Garden Villas of Lenexa | IL AL MC NH SNF | Lenexa | 78
Facility
78
KS AVG
80
Rank
#33 / 71 | - | Yes |
75
Facility
75
KS AVG
48
Rank
#18 / 142 | Suite |
79.5%
Facility
79.5%
KS AVG
74.9%
Rank
#32 / 62 | A+ | Mark Sutton | Delmar Gardens Of Lenexa Inc | 12 | 41
Facility
41
KS AVG
101
Rank
#26 / 57 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
KS AVG
4.2
Rank
#20 / 57 |
| Lexington Park Independent Living | IL AL NH RC SNF | Topeka | 60
Facility
60
KS AVG
80
Rank
#41 / 71 | - | No |
60
Facility
60
KS AVG
48
Rank
#43 / 142 | Assisted Living (60) |
90.0%
Facility
90.0%
KS AVG
74.9%
Rank
#9 / 62 | - | Ben Rigdon | Lexington Park LLC | 15 | 15
Facility
15
KS AVG
101
Rank
#14 / 57 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
KS AVG
4.2
Rank
#5 / 57 |
| Avenue 81 | IL AL MC | Overland Park (Colonial Village) | 55
Facility
55
KS AVG
80
Rank
#47 / 71 | - | No |
88
Facility
88
KS AVG
48
Rank
#3 / 142 | Private Rooms |
81.8%
Facility
81.8%
KS AVG
74.9%
Rank
#25 / 62 | A+ | Nicholas Wysong | Avenue 81 Investors LLC | 8 | 10
Facility
10
KS AVG
101
Rank
#3 / 57 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
KS AVG
4.2
Rank
#2 / 57 |
| Winfield Rest Haven II Lc | IL NH | Winfield | 41
Facility
41
KS AVG
80
Rank
#62 / 71 | A+ | No |
78
Facility
78
KS AVG
48
Rank
#13 / 142 | - |
90.0%
Facility
90.0%
KS AVG
74.9%
Rank
#3 / 62 | - | Amy Lemer | Winfield Rest Haven II LC | 31 | 179
Facility
179
KS AVG
101
Rank
#51 / 57 | 5.8
Facility
5.8
KS AVG
4.2
Rank
#41 / 57 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each independent living community is ranked against every other KS independent living community we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Winfield Rest Haven II Lc
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Winfield Rest Haven II Lc in a walkable area?
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc has a walk score of 78. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
02 What is the license number of Winfield Rest Haven II Lc?
According to KS state health department records, Winfield Rest Haven II Lc's license number is 175488.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Winfield Rest Haven II Lc?
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc's occupancy is 90%.
04 Are pets allowed at Winfield Rest Haven II Lc?
No, Winfield Rest Haven II Lc has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Winfield Rest Haven II Lc operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc is registered as a non-profit in KS.
06 Who is the administrator of Winfield Rest Haven II Lc?
Amy Lemer is the administrator of Winfield Rest Haven II Lc.
07 What is the overall rating for Winfield Rest Haven II Lc?
Winfield Rest Haven II Lc received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
