Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
185
153 employees · 32 contractors · 81 on an average day Asbury Heights
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Pittsburgh, PA
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Asbury Heights
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Pittsburgh, PA
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Asbury Heights accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Asbury Heights offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, and memory care in Pittsburgh, PA. Nursing home and skilled nursing services provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while assisted living includes help with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication management. Independent living comes with a private apartment and community services but no daily care. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering.
The combination of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time, since moving to another level can happen within the same community. Asbury Heights has 120 beds and is operated by Asbury Healthcare. Starting rates are $2,983 per month for independent living, $212 per day for assisted living, $246 per day for memory care, and $423 per day for skilled nursing. The billing schedules differ: Independent living is budgeted monthly, while the other listed care levels are budgeted by day. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted.
Housing includes studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartment layouts. A studio provides a single private space, while a two bedroom apartment can suit a couple or a resident who wants a companion. Pets are allowed, so residents can bring a pet. Gardens, a pergola or gazebo, an indoor cafe, a beauty salon, and a barbershop are available on site. Activities include shopping outings, balance class, live music and entertainment, and cooking classes. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours 29 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nurse staffing time allocated per resident.
A Walk Score of 47 places Asbury Heights in a car dependent setting, where most errands require a car or a ride. For a resident who no longer drives, arranging transportation is generally necessary for errands outside the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 115th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 29m
This nursing home is ranked 115th out of 182 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 29mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +42% above Pennsylvania average
4 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
1h 4m
↑ 36% · PA 47mThis facility: 1h 4m per resident per day, 36% above the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
29m
↓ 47% · PA 55mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 47% below the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 73 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
73 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
1h 55m
↓ 15% · PA 2h 15mThis facility: 1h 55m per resident per day, 15% below the Pennsylvania average of 2h 15m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 73 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
73 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↓ 7% · PA 6mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 7% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 8m
↓ 12% · PA 3h 33mThis facility: 3h 8m per resident per day, 12% below the Pennsylvania average of 3h 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
47m
↑ 42% · PA 33mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 42% above the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
185
153 employees · 32 contractors · 81 on an average day
185 total staff / 134 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.38 : 1
↓ 23% · PA 1.80This facility: 1.38 staff per resident, 23% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.80 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
185 staff ÷ 134 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↑ 4% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 4% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
60,379 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →90.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.4% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (8), Qualified Social Worker (8), Physical Therapy Aide (6), Respiratory Therapy Technician (5), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #62 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #62 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #116 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #116 / 208Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 208 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
47
/ 100
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
112
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$2,983/Month
Assisted Living
$212/Day
Memory Care
$246/Day
Skilled Nursing
$423/Day
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceApril 1, 2026
ExpirationApril 1, 2027
CountyAllegheny
License LevelFULL
License Number455500
Asbury Heights is legally operated by Asbury Healthcare, LLC.
Profit StatusNonprofit
Alzheimer's Units
24 units
Total beds
120 units
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
TransportationListed as: Transportation to local attractions, grocery stores, and medical appointments
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Garden
Gazebo
Café
Beauty Salon
Post Office
Indoor Skylight Mall
Activities
Bingo
Exercise Classes
Trivia
Wii Bowling
Shopping Trips
Card Games
Badminton Activities
Live Music and Entertainment
League Bowling
Cooking Classes
Book Club
Crafts and Crochet
Happy Hour
Lectures
Movie Night
Baking
Book Reviews
Live Music
Neurobics (Puzzles and Brain Teasers)
Virtual Reality Experiences
Outings
- Creative classes (painting, writing, crafting, journaling)
Chapel
Studio
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
Apartment Floor plans as listed by the community: Asbury Apartments · Embassy Apartments
Floor plans: Asbury, Embassy
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
8vs 1.3 avg↑ 515% higher than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Pennsylvania average:
• Citations per inspection (16% above)
• Inspection citation rate (69% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (72% below)
• Inspections with citations (58% below)
• Total complaints (80% below)
• Citations per inspection (16% above)
• Inspection citation rate (69% above) 3 Better Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (72% below)
• Inspections with citations (58% below)
• Total complaints (80% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 25 | 89.0 | This facility has 72% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (25 vs. PA avg 89).↓ 72% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 5.0 | 4.3 | This facility has 16% more citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (5 vs. PA avg 4.3).↑ 16% worse Rank #107 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 5 | 21.0 | This facility has had 76% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (5 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 76% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 5 | 12.0 | This facility has 58% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (5 vs. PA avg 12).↓ 58% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 100% | 59% | This facility has 41 percentage points higher inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (100% vs. PA avg 59%).↑ 41% worse |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 1 | 5.0 | This facility has 80% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (1 vs. PA avg 5).↓ 80% better |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↓ 17% · PA 7.2This facility: 6, 17% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.2 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
23
Rank #109 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 28% · PA 32This facility: 23, 28% below the Pennsylvania average of 32 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.83
Rank #107 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 8% · PA 4.16This facility: 3.83, 8% below the Pennsylvania average of 4.16 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
23 of 23 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
23
↓ 23% · PA 29.9This facility: 23, 23% below the Pennsylvania average of 29.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 21, 2026 · 1 citation (Pharmacy, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 23 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 21, 2026
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 26, 2025
10 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 03, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 17, 2024
7 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 13, 2023
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 15, 2023
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 23 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (30%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (22%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
3 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (4%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
18 of 23 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 23 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 23 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
PA avg $58KPennsylvania average: $58,140. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
PA avg 1.78Pennsylvania average: 1.78. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.17Pennsylvania average: 0.17. Average among the 287 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · PA 9.5This facility: 9.7, 2% above the PA average of 9.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · PA 19.8This facility: 20.7, 4% above the PA average of 19.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 6 worse
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 worse
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.9%
↓ 17% · PA 16.8This facility: 13.9, 17% below the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.9%
↓ 17% · PA 16.8This facility: 13.9, 17% below the PA average of 16.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.3%
↑ 19% · PA 17.0This facility: 20.3, 19% above the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.3%
↑ 19% · PA 17.0This facility: 20.3, 19% above the PA average of 17.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
↑ 9% · PA 25.5This facility: 27.7, 9% above the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
↑ 9% · PA 25.5This facility: 27.7, 9% above the PA average of 25.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 28% · PA 3.1This facility: 4.0, 28% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
↑ 28% · PA 3.1This facility: 4.0, 28% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
↓ 37% · PA 4.8This facility: 3.1, 37% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
↓ 37% · PA 4.8This facility: 3.1, 37% below the PA average of 4.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3%
↑ 18% · PA 6.2This facility: 7.3, 18% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3%
↑ 18% · PA 6.2This facility: 7.3, 18% above the PA average of 6.2 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.7%
↓ 10% · PA 10.8This facility: 9.7, 10% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.7%
↓ 10% · PA 10.8This facility: 9.7, 10% below the PA average of 10.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8%
↑ 6% · PA 17.7This facility: 18.8, 6% above the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8%
↑ 6% · PA 17.7This facility: 18.8, 6% above the PA average of 17.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.5%
↑ 5% · PA 87.5This facility: 91.5, 5% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.5%
↑ 5% · PA 87.5This facility: 91.5, 5% above the PA average of 87.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.9%
↓ 17% · PA 93.5This facility: 77.9, 17% below the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.9%
↓ 17% · PA 93.5This facility: 77.9, 17% below the PA average of 93.5 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 51% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.7, 51% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 51% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.7, 51% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.9%
↑ 6% · PA 70.0This facility: 73.9, 6% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.9%
↑ 6% · PA 70.0This facility: 73.9, 6% above the PA average of 70.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.9%
↓ 35% · PA 68.7This facility: 44.9, 35% below the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.9%
↓ 35% · PA 68.7This facility: 44.9, 35% below the PA average of 68.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Asbury Heights’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−20.9% operating margin
+24.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.7M) trims the net loss to −$4.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
53.6% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #92 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $6.7M while revenue rose $7.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $27.8M | +$7.3M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #31 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 83% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $33.6M | +$3.7M | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$5.8M | +$3.6M | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −20.9% | +24.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.7M | — | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$4.9M | +$3.6M | Trend — | PA median — | Rank in PA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $14.9M | +$6.7M | Trend 20172024 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #43 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 76% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 53.6% | +13.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #92 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 48% of homes | 16.5 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $19.1M | $19.6M | $20.3M | $19.1M | $16.7M | $17.5M | $20.5M | $27.8M |
| Operating expenses | $22.7M | $23.2M | $24.7M | $26.5M | $26.9M | $29.0M | $29.9M | $33.6M |
| Net patient income | −$3.6M | −$3.5M | −$4.4M | −$7.4M | −$10.2M | −$11.5M | −$9.4M | −$5.8M |
| Operating margin | −18.7% | −18.0% | −21.5% | −38.6% | −60.9% | −66.1% | −45.6% | −20.9% |
| Net income | −$0.6M | −$1.1M | −$2.3M | −$4.6M | −$8.3M | −$10.8M | −$8.5M | −$4.9M |
| Payroll costs | $8.8M | $9.2M | $10.2M | $8.9M | $8.2M | $7.5M | $8.2M | $14.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 46.2% | 46.7% | 50.3% | 46.5% | 48.8% | 43.2% | 40.0% | 53.6% |
| Beds | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 139 | 330 |
| Gross revenue | $22.4M | $23.1M | $25.5M | $25.2M | $21.7M | $22.1M | $25.8M | $36.7M |
| Salaries | $7.6M | $7.7M | $9.0M | $7.0M | $6.2M | $6.3M | $6.9M | $12.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $2.3M |
| Contract labor | $1.9M | $1.9M | $2.7M | $2.8M | $4.4M | $7.2M | $7.8M | $3.8M |
| Other operating costs | $13.8M | $14.0M | $14.5M | $17.6M | $18.7M | $21.5M | $21.7M | $18.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $404 | $416 | $438 | $416 | $425 | $427 | $458 | $386 |
| Cost per day | $479 | $490 | $533 | $577 | $684 | $708 | $668 | $467 |
| Average length of stay | 67.0 days | 64.2 days | 141.0 days | 133.9 days | 133.0 days | 147.9 days | 67.5 days | 106.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
264 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
34 · 13%
Medicaid
13 · 5%
Private pay & other
217 · 82%
Resident snapshot
134 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
37 · 28%
Medicaid
50 · 37%
Private pay & other
47 · 35%
Leaving
278 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
29 · 10%
Medicaid
34 · 12%
Private pay & other
215 · 77%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Asbury Heights
4.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pittsburgh's city center to Asbury Heights's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.71 miles to nearest hospital (St. Clair Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Asbury Heights
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Pittsburgh
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asbury Heights | NH AL IL MC SNF | Pittsburgh | 120
Facility
120
PA AVG
109
Rank
#62 / 200 | - | - | 3.48
Facility
3.48
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#115 / 182 | +58% | -12% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 23
Facility
23
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#109 / 179 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#107 / 179 | - | 136 | - |
47
Facility
47
PA AVG
50
Rank
#116 / 208 | Asbury Healthcare, LLC | $27.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$27.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#31 / 177 | $14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#43 / 177 | 53.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#92 / 177 | 395391 | ||||
| Reformed Presbyterian Home | NH IL SNF | Pittsburgh (Perry South) | 56
Facility
56
PA AVG
109
Rank
#157 / 200 |
39.3%
Facility
39.3%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#159 / 163 | -48% | 4.32
Facility
4.32
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#73 / 182 | +151% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 40
Facility
40
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#140 / 179 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#113 / 179 | 2 | 22 | A+ |
50
Facility
50
PA AVG
50
Rank
#105 / 208 | Reformed Presbyterian Women's Association | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#166 / 177 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#166 / 177 | 66.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
66.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#46 / 177 | 395561 | ||||
| Little Sisters of the Poor | NH IL | Pittsburgh (Brighton Heights) | 48
Facility
48
PA AVG
109
Rank
#169 / 200 |
92.9%
Facility
92.9%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#25 / 163 | +23% | 6.54
Facility
6.54
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#10 / 182 | +60% | +66% | $59.1k
Facility
$59.1k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#170 / 183 | 46
Facility
46
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#156 / 179 | 7.7
Facility
7.7
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#170 / 179 | 4 | 45 | - |
46
Facility
46
PA AVG
50
Rank
#118 / 208 | Claire Mccanless | $3.1M*Fiscal year ending 2015These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $4.8M*Fiscal year ending 2015These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 155%*Fiscal year ending 2015These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 396116 | ||||
| South Western Veterans Center | NH MC | Pittsburgh (Lincoln-Lemington-Belmar) | 236
Facility
236
PA AVG
109
Rank
#12 / 200 |
77.5%
Facility
77.5%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#95 / 163 | +3% | 5.11
Facility
5.11
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#31 / 182 | - | +30% | $245.6k
Facility
$245.6k
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#183 / 183 | 36
Facility
36
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#131 / 179 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#161 / 179 | 3 | 183 | - |
5
Facility
5
PA AVG
50
Rank
#199 / 208 | - | - | - | - | 39A438 | ||||
| Vincentian Home | NH AL IL MC SNF | Pittsburgh | 110
Facility
110
PA AVG
109
Rank
#75 / 200 |
71.8%
Facility
71.8%
PA AVG
75.3%
Rank
#104 / 163 | -5% | 4.43
Facility
4.43
PA AVG
3.94
Rank
#99 / 182 | +83% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.4k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 34
Facility
34
PA AVG
32.0
Rank
#129 / 179 | 4.9
Facility
4.9
PA AVG
4.2
Rank
#142 / 179 | - | 79 | A |
20
Facility
20
PA AVG
50
Rank
#170 / 208 | Vincentian Home Inc | $20.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$20.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#64 / 177 | $12.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$12.4MFiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#62 / 177 | 61%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
61%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#63 / 177 | 395034 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Pennsylvania
Asbury Heights is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Frequently Asked Questions about Asbury Heights
Who is the owner of Asbury Heights?
Asbury Heights is legally operated by Asbury Healthcare, LLC.
Is Asbury Heights in a walkable area?
Asbury Heights has a walk score of 47. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of Asbury Heights?
According to PA state health department records, Asbury Heights's license number is 455500.
When does Asbury Heights's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Asbury Heights's license expires on April 1, 2027.
What is the occupancy rate at Asbury Heights?
Asbury Heights's occupancy is 67.7%.
Are pets allowed at Asbury Heights?
Yes, Asbury Heights allows residents to bring their pets.
Does Asbury Heights operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Asbury Heights is registered as a non-profit in PA.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
